July 30, 2010
On top of being a slow news week, seems we've all been kinda busy in Real LifeTM as well, sorry, at some point someone will do something fucking stupid or awesome, and it'll make for lots of fun, funny shit, in the meantime, if you've got a post to plug, by all means,
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
11:19 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at
09:05 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 3 words, total size 1 kb.
The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Wisconsin shows Johnson with 48% support. Feingold, a member of the Senate since 1993, again picks up 46% of the vote. Two percent (2%) favor another candidate in the race, and five percent (5%) are undecided.
While it would be great to talk about something that was right with Wisconsin, I'm not going to get too optimistic about this one. Feingold has been winning by double digits for quite a while and for the first time, I'm seeing him actually put on television commercials.
Sure, that means he's nervous but he's also good at this. If Reid can come back and take a lead, bet that Russy will do the same.
Also, go Johnson!
Posted by: Moron Pundit at
08:44 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
OOOOPS!!!
Finally, he wrapped it up: “And then you should ask Mr. Limbaugh — I don’t know what kind of car he drives, but I bet it’s not an F-150.â€The F-150 truck, we should note, is made by Ford, which didn’t get federal rescue funds.
Better luck in the Showcase Showdown, Robby, but at least you won that Blackberry.
Posted by: Sean M. at
04:32 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
Thursdays this summer at the Atlas Performing Arts Center [in Washington, D.C.] will be Gay 101 – a series of films one must see to be a card-carrying gay man.
Sucks for you guys, I think I'd rather set myself on fire than watch some of that list...
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
01:42 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.
*tumbleweed blows by*
Anyone? Bueller?
Posted by: Sean M. at
12:02 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
July 29, 2010
The university previously argued that the timing of Rove's appearance for the upcoming school year could imperil its 501(c)(3) tax status.The article notes that they're letting some no-name Obama appointee from "the White House interfaith council" (yawn) speak on campus, but that's really nothing major compared to this:"The timing of this event is problematic given the campaign cycle," Kimberly A. Moore, director of student affairs and Greek affairs, told students in an e-mail. "Loyola has to maintain impartiality in order to protect our tax-exempt status."
Conservative students point out that the school has hosted partisan speakers on election years before. In September 2004, the school hosted Howard Dean, who ran for president that year. A couple of weeks after his speech, political activist Ralph Nader, who also ran for president that year, spoke on campus -- a speech that was advertised as a campaign event in which donations were solicited.But neither of those events were a threat to the school's tax status, whereas Rove (who the article notes isn't even working on any campaigns this year) appearing on campus would be a big problem. Yeah.
I honestly would have a lot more respect for these douchebags if they would come right out and just say that they didn't want someone like Rove delivering a speech on their campus because they disagreed with his political views. At least that would be honest, but I guess that's a little too much to ask for. Surprise, surprise.
Update: Now that I think of it, though they probably don't like Karl Rove, maybe they are worried about their tax status. This is Barry and Rahm's home turf, after all.
"Wouldn't want anything to happen to this nice university you've got here that would raise your taxes, would you?"
Posted by: Sean M. at
12:05 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 321 words, total size 2 kb.
July 28, 2010
So here's the question for all the lawyerly types; have you read the ruling and what do you think of the reasoning? I have to admit I only read the first 18 pages, but here is what I gleaned from it; the injunction stems from the fact that congress didn't make it a crime to be in the US illegally. I'm not quite sure how she came to that conclusion but that's her basis. All the rest of it - The burden on federal authorities, the possibility of detaining lawful aliens, all that is just window dressing. What I really don't understand is how she can injoin (?) the part of the law requiring aliens to carry their paperwork when federal law already requires the same thing. She asserts that the AZ penalties somehow adversely impact the uniform alien registration requirement that Congress enacted. I just don't see how one necessarily follows the other.
Hopefully at some point Law and Order LA will do an episode based on this so I can broaden my legal education.
Posted by: chad98036 at
09:50 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 207 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
09:46 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
Basil Marceaux does not explain himself. He kills hippies, dispenses justice, and ballroom dancesNow that's my kind of politician.
Posted by: chad98036 at
06:18 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Alice H at
04:40 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at
03:48 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
Oh, and once again, for catharsis and motivation in November, anybody who supported this fucking pile of fuckwaste can get fucked so hard with this chart, they will be twisted around and forced to fucking walk backwards so that they can see ahead of themselves. Fuck them for ruining the most innovative and life saving medical system around. And fuck them for making such fucking gawdawful charts.
Posted by: eddiebear at
02:59 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
One of the memes of those who advocate a rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan is that historically the Afghans have never been conquered; that Afghanistan is “the graveyard of empiresâ€. I have argued against this view in the comments sections of other blogs as well as here, most recently last year when Ralph Peters once again called for us to withdraw. Once again I must be a trend setter because now almost a year later Foreign Policy magazine has published an article entitled, “Bury the Graveyard†which advances the idea that the graveyard of empires meme is hurting our progress in Afghanistan:
The Victorian British and the Soviet Union, the story goes, were part of a long historical continuum of arrogant conquerors that met their match in the country's xenophobic, fanatical, trigger-happy tribesmen. Given a record like that, it's obvious that the effort by the United States and its NATO allies to stabilize the shaky government in Kabul is doomed to fail.
Look, failure is always a possible outcome, especially judging by the way things have been going lately. But if the United States and its allies end up messing up their part of the equation, blame it on their bad policy decisions. Don't blame it on a super simplified version of Afghanistan's history -- especially if you prefer to overlook the details.
…
One of those myths, for example, is that Afghanistan is inherently unconquerable thanks to the fierceness of its inhabitants and the formidable nature of its terrain. But this isn't at all borne out by the history. "Until 1840 Afghanistan was better known as a 'highway of conquest' rather than the 'graveyard of empires,'" Barfield points out. "For 2,500 years it was always part of somebody's empire, beginning with the Persian Empire in the fifth century B.C."
…
Unfortunately, popular views of the place today are shaped by the past 30 years of seemingly unceasing warfare rather than substantive knowledge of the country's history.
So, what does this mean as far as the current war in Afghanistan go? Well in practical terms probably not much. The COIN strategy that GEN Petraeus is likely to pursue is inherently based on the idea that a stable government (or more accurately a stable enough government) can be established. All that an acceptance of this view of history can really accomplish in the current fight is to foster an acceptance, among the political class, that it actually can be won, and I stick by that assertion. From the article:
I made my first visit to Afghanistan that same year (ed. 2001). The Afghans I met were neither xenophobic nor bellicose. What they wanted most of all was peace, and they didn't trust their own leaders to bring it. "We're sick of fighting. We hate war. We want to have a free election," one grizzled -- and illiterate -- warrior told me. "And let's have the United Nations come in and make sure it's fair, so the warlords don't interfere." I heard similar views from many Afghans.
Really the fight is ours to lose, but given the attitudes currently in existence in D.C. I think that we are well on our way to that outcome.
Posted by: chad98036 at
05:07 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 540 words, total size 4 kb.
July 27, 2010
I'm not going to inflict a picture on you, but WTF is wrong with his left (your right, morons!) ear?
Posted by: Alice H at
11:30 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
...even the Mad Men star could not hide her blushes when she got chatted up on live television by a female host.The curvaceous beauty, who plays Joan Holloway on the hit TV show, was appearing on U.S. TV's The View when guest host Alexandra Wentworth told her she was her 'girl crush'.
...
At one point she placed her hand seductively on Christina's leg.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1296929/Mad-Mens-Christina-Hendricks-gets-chatted-WOMAN-TV-presenter.html#ixzz0utp1qkUQ
I probably don't need to say much more. more...
Posted by: chad98036 at
11:15 AM
| Comments (34)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
I was going to photoshop a birthday cake onto her lap to make this a birthday picture, but why hide fantastic legs?

Posted by: Alice H at
10:19 AM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.
We forget, we all forget, how huge and amazing and miraculous the world is. I am grateful for my life, I truly am.
Posted by: alexthechick at
08:45 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
Oh, and just for the hell of it, Fuck Chris Matthews. Fuck him Titanfucking style with a jackhammer powered spiked dildo soaked in hot sauce.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:41 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
July 26, 2010
(S)cientists are predicting another consequence of climate change: mass migration to the United States.
Between 1.4 million and 6.7 million Mexicans could migrate to the U.S. by 2080 as climate change reduces crop yields and agricultural production in Mexico, according to a study published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The number could amount to 10% of the current population of Mexicans ages 15 to 65.
Oh Dear God, what can we do? Wait I know we can adopted the green house gas emissions targets set at Copenhagen. It’s the only way to preserve the American way of life.
Or we can look at this as what it is, scare tactics to try and drum up support for the Cap and Trade bill and comprehensive immigration reform, and probably any other languishing social program you care to name.
This is why we need a man like Basil Marceaux
Posted by: chad98036 at
10:07 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 2 kb.
61 queries taking 0.263 seconds, 181 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








