August 31, 2008
Talk about "gob-smackingly vile"
Over at Moron Central, Ace makes the argument that
Excitable Andy has gone too far
with his embrace of "Trig trutherism," and that conservative bloggers
should swear off linking to anything he writes from now on. I
don't know if any of the bloggers here have ever linked to any of Sullivan's
posts, but I agree with Ace.
Andrew Sullivan was one of the first bloggers I read on a regular
basis, and I used to have a great deal of respect for him, even when I
didn't agree with what he wrote all of the time, but he's descended
into the worst kind of hackery over the last few years, and I agree
witgh Ace when he says "He should be blogging at the Daily Kos."
He's not just attacking Sarah Palin here, he's attacking her
innocent teenage daughter and infant son as well, and that's beyond reprehensible.
So I say, yes, let's join in on this ban. As I wrote in the
comments over there, he's dead to me. If you disagree, let me
know in the comments.
Posted by: Sean M. at
10:19 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'll say this for Ace, he knew Sully was a fraud before anyone else. I remember seeing an old interview he and a bunch of other big bloggers did with Hawkins, most of them were at least somewhat positive about Sully. Ace saw right through his bullshit, and his read on him has been entirely confirmed. As for Sully, I don't think I've ever linked him.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 31, 2008 10:36 PM (XWeKU)
2
Yeah, screw that hysterical man-cow. No wait,
don't.
Posted by: Amos at September 01, 2008 03:21 AM (V51g8)
3
I, for one, have never linked Sullivan, and I certainly won't be starting now! Oh wait, I don't have a blog.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 01, 2008 06:24 AM (WhFvm)
4
I tooled on over to the Atlantic and dropped a letter to the editor. A completely useless gesture, I'm sure, but magazine editors are kind of touchy about literary standards. It's got to plink them when Sullivan posts things as ugly and low-rent as those DKOS rumors. He must be a big traffic draw -- or they must perceive him as one -- for them to have carried him this far.
Posted by: S. Weasel at September 01, 2008 08:32 AM (Dy8+A)
5
It's about time that Sully was finally read out of any kind of society, let alone polite society. I really really hate to think that we're only seeing the start of how low this election is going to go.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 01, 2008 10:46 AM (5Zhm5)
6
I wouldn't even let him toss my salad. Disgusting partisan and anti-Christian hack. I wonder if dementia is setting in
Posted by: Frank G at September 01, 2008 03:45 PM (P0rQD)
Posted by: Conservative Belle at September 01, 2008 04:11 PM (r0SN0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Ummm...has he been watching the same person I have?
Marc Ambinder took a break from splitting atoms...
with his mind to write an informal Q&A with...himself? I found
one of his answers to himself a bit nuanced (emphasis mine):
How big are the risks for McCain?
Enormous. The fighter pilot whose hero is TR is trying to
land with zero visibility. It is going to be hard to wrest away from Obama the
banner of change, and McCain risks being seen as unserious about national
security. Palin is smart and quick on
the draw, but she is completely untested and prone to bursts of the mouth. She seems to know very little about Iraq and the
world and even about the national economy.
She is an identity pick, first and foremost, and a process-pick,
second. Women could be offended or
inspired.
First of all, she has been to the Middle East (Kuwait, not Iraq) as many times during her tenure in office as Barack Obama has in his. Secondly, what mother with a son headed to Iraq isn't following what's going on there?
As far as the national economy goes, I've (of course) found her to speak eloquently on how America's reliance on foreign oil hurts both our national security and economy. But then again, I'm from a town that's smaller than Wasilla, Alaska, so what do I know?
Update: I've just been informed that Sarah Palin is not--I repeat not--a Jew like Eric Cantor and Jack Abramoff. I'm not sure if this applies to her bastard grandson Trig Palin. I'll keep you updated .
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at
08:32 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 263 words, total size 2 kb.
Weekend open thread
Since there isn't much going on this weekend, I'm putting up an open thread. Feel free to pimp your posts here.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
01:27 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I think everyone is recovering from their Palingasm. Plus it's some kinda holiday weeking or something.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 31, 2008 01:34 PM (WhFvm)
Posted by: lemurking at August 31, 2008 03:35 PM (Zst1n)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
McCain-Palin trivia for the night
I swear I won't single-handedly turn this blog into an "all Palin, all the time" format, but I can't really get it out of my head. So deal with it.
Anyway, I just realized that this is the first time since Reagan-Bush 1984 that both nominees on a major party ticket haven't been lawyers. John McCain went to the U.S. Naval Academy while Sarah Palin got a journalism degree from the University of Idaho.
No offense to Gabe, of course, but that's kind of refreshing.
Update: I once again prove my Moron credentials. This is the first time a national ticket has had two non-lawyers since...ummm...2004.
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at
01:24 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I may be wrong (it's happened once or twice before) but I don't think either W. or Cheney is a law-talkin' guy.
Posted by: Sean M. at August 31, 2008 01:42 AM (e6v7s)
2
Yeah, Cheney's one of those evil oilmen that has daily transfusions of the blood of innocents from those fallen during the epic 'War for Oil', or some I'm told--his misbegotten sidekick is one of those evil, capitalist, MBAs: monsters of baseless agresssion, again, for oil.
They don't do God's work like The One who organized communities in uprisings against "The Man" and, in his spare time, rescued kittens from trees. His sidekick, Lyin--err, Smilin' Joe Biden apparently has an IQ higher than yours...if you hadn't heard.
/moonbat
Posted by: ECM at August 31, 2008 01:53 AM (q3V+C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Guess what this is?
Well, what it
was, anyway. The answer is below the fold.
more...
Posted by: Sean M. at
12:34 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I used to drive by there all the time. That's right after a very dangerous interchange with the 405, just a bit north of UCLA and Hollywood.
I've seen all sorts of crap at that interchange, especially on the ramp from the 405N to 101W (the direction this guy was going). Example: two yo-yos doing donuts on the ramp after a fresh rain (when the roads are slick) because they tried to jam their breaks as usual going into a tight curve. It was like freaking car ballet.
This guy was probably going way too fast for conditions and lost it. Shame about the car though.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 31, 2008 01:49 AM (WhFvm)
2
I once saw a labrador retriever get run over at that interchange (101E to 405S) during rush hour. The poor dog was out in the middle of the 101 (I know: I have no idea how it got out there, either), and managed to dodge 2 or 3 cars before being run right over...it was awful.
I also once saw a car do a 90 degree right turn (at over 70 MPH), cross three lanes of traffic, barely missing three others cars as it careened, hit the median (the median that divides the 101 and the 170 heading north) and roll three times before coming to a halt. I called 911 and, initially, all I could manage was "I think I saw something bad but I'm not sure I actually just saw it"--it looked like something out of a Michael Bay movie. To this day, I don't quite grasp how the physics worked to allow a car to make that initial move (the virtually light cycle-esque, 90 degree, turn without rolling and causing untold carnage--I was about an eigth of a mile back when this happened). Still, at least those people were in some sort of old beater from the mid-80s, so they probably walked away if their belts were fastened.
Posted by: ECM at August 31, 2008 02:02 AM (q3V+C)
3
I knew it was a car because I look at wrecked cars for a living (lots of other wrecked stuff, too, but that's a different post) but I didn't know what kind of car it was. Sad about the driver and the car.
The good thing about my job is that my kid never drinks and drives because I've always shown him photos (and taken him on assignments) to look at cars that were damaged in DUI-related accidents. I have some doozies, but nothing completely unrecognizable.
I do have one of a Nissan p/u truck that was driven by a drunk/medicated driver. It was hit from underneath, while airborne, and the trans and engine were knocked out of the vehicle. The driver did not survive, but the guy who hit him did.
I had (pre-Katrina) photos of two small trucks, a Ford and a Nissan, that hit head-on at about 70mph. Both were driven by impaired drivers, one died, the other was in a coma for five months. They were both left looking like the after version of crushed cars.
I also had pics of an NSX that was doing 110 on the interstate, got clipped by another vehicle and sent into a 45-degree slide. It had the front end run over by a tractor-trailer entering the interstate from an on-ramp. I talked to the guy who was in the passenger seat, and he said it was the scariest thing he ever saw- looking out the passenger window, seeing that 18-wheeler bearing down on him and not being able to do a thing about it.
I'll be swamped with Gustav flooded cars... yay.
Posted by: LickyLicky at August 31, 2008 04:22 AM (RWIot)
4
They're saying that car only cost around $100,000. I know, "only", but in today's market, that gets you a decent Mercedes (not a really nice one) or a good Volvo. Heck, a nice Lincoln or Caddy costs around there.
A quick Google search places it at over $300K, assuming it was a 2008 Murcielago.
Freaking "journalists", they have no critical thinking skills. They just print whatever someone tells them without trying to find out if it makes sense.
Posted by: Veeshir at August 31, 2008 09:27 AM (ThMnZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 30, 2008
I've found the problem with Sarah Palin!
She isn't from the same state
as the PowerLine guys like Tim Pawlenty is, and she isn't Mitt Romney (as Mitt Romneyness is a quality highly valued
in some circles for his nuanced conservative authenticity).
Hopefully Gov. Palin can tell us how she's actually a boring mullet-weilding governor who campaigned for state office on a platform diametrically opposed to the stances she currently takes as a vice presidential candidate. Then we can get the "conservative leaders" fully behind her for the general election.
If we could find a way to make her more boring and inauthentic, that would help, too. As it stands now, she's hurting the Republican Party's brand.
Update: Charles "I'm from Washington, so I know better than you rubes" Krauthammer
shows up at Moron Central to register his displeasure.
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at
10:29 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 139 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Powerline guys really seem to be taking the Palin pick poorly. I think they'd already set their hearts on Pawlenty and are having to readjust. They've had nothing but complaining since Friday.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at August 30, 2008 10:35 PM (1Ug6U)
2
I agree (kinda) with Allah: Yeah, it may be an "affirmative action" pick, but can you really imagine conservatives getting
this worked up over Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Carly Fiorina, or Meg Whitman?
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at August 30, 2008 11:02 PM (Wr2SO)
3
^bingo. The buzz is what is proving it's a wise move.
Besides, the Powerline guys and K-LO just need to get over it. And Allah will always be Allah: a defeatist/glass half empty/pessimist. Nothing will change him.
Posted by: eddiebear at August 30, 2008 11:49 PM (tA9w+)
4
As some have said in the thread at Moron Central: conservatives need a better class of pundit. The Corner is a fucking disaster -- the elitist assholes over there are really showing their true stripes. How dare the VP pick be someone that hasn't had the priviledge of kissing the NRO staff's ass for years.
This pick has pissed off all the right people, on both sides. Hopefully it will shake things up enough to continue the real conservative groundswell and sweep aside the old RINO hack elites.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 31, 2008 12:05 AM (WhFvm)
5
The Powerline guys were all a-flutter for Pawlenty because he was the hometown boy and, likely, they had a pretty good inside track on the guy so it would have benefitte them.
K-Lo is just a smitten Mitten and will get over it quickly, I think (I hope...at least we won't have to hear about it for at least a few weeks).
And, yeah, what nobody seems to get is that firing up the base is a huge, huge win for McCain: I've now gone out of my way to actually talk the ticket up where before I would just grumble and say I'm taking one for the team.
Needless to say, my BDS-afflicted father isn't taking the news very well which is another upside for the Palin pick (he's already spouting the "inexperienced" talking points and somehow thinks that Obama's years in the Illinois state senate were the ultimate proving grounds for future POUTUS'--all this before he even knows a damn thing about Palin other than she's female and that McCain is just "playing off the Hillary thing to get elected"--good thing the apple does fall far from the tree in at least some cases).
Posted by: ECM at August 31, 2008 12:49 AM (q3V+C)
6
I also must add that the post directly above "Charles'" is certainly an interesting take on things...
Posted by: ECM at August 31, 2008 01:04 AM (q3V+C)
7
Hermit Dave, eggs-frigging-zactly.
I used to like Fred Barnes and Bill Kristol, no more. As for NRO, I only read Jay Nordlinger's Impromptues and occasionally Victor Davis Hanson.
The whole inside the beltway crew, on both sides, are a bunch of iceholes. They're so insulated and coccooned in their world, they have no more idea of how Iowans feel than does your average Guardian writer.
When they were all claiming that a Mitt, "I've been a conservative for about a week" Romney pick would have helped McCain, you knew they were idiots.
Posted by: Veeshir at August 31, 2008 09:07 AM (ThMnZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Downer for Dumpster Muffin, WIN for me
In honor of
my Alma Mater's opening football game against Michigan State, I bring you
the following update (from Wednesday, so it's a little old) on the stupid, smelly hippies who have been blocking Cal's attempt to build a new training facility:
A judge lifted the order blocking the University of California at Berkeley from beginning construction on a planned athletic facility next to Cal's football stadium yesterday, thus clearing the way for treeborne hippies protesting the removal of the trees to immediately begin their search for new housing. Dumpster Muffin, thy name is sadness. It would be easy to get all Eric Cartman on the dedicated freaks who, beginning on December 1, 2006, have sat, slept, lounged naked, and screamed at police from the trees. You must admire some things about their effort, though: it was consistent (constant occupancy), stylish (one of the sitters calls herself "Dumpster Muffin,") and quasi-successful in that it put off the construction of the facility for nearly two years. Consistent, stylish, and quasi-successful would not be the words I normally associate with the word "hippie," so at the least the whole exercise has been a loopy but effective exercise in rebranding for Team Hippie. (Those three original words, by the way, are "lice," "marijuana," and "naked.")
Let's hope the next few days involve a lot of tears (from tear gas as well as sadness over their FAIL) and cracked hippie skulls. Because the word I like most to associate with hippies is "whomping."
Posted by: Sean M. at
08:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 256 words, total size 2 kb.
FAIL Brittannia!
Could these people be
any more clueless about firearms and human nature? Via
The Drawn Cutlass, we get
this report about the rampant illegal gun trade in the UK.
Weapons are pouring in from Eastern Europe (Poland in particular), soldiers and others are smuggling them in from Afghanistan and Iraq, some are smuggled in from lesser or non-Nanny States, and there's a pretty solid homegrown illegal gun trade too.
Apparently a lot of deactivated guns in Britain are now being sold on the black market and are rebuilt to fire in clandestine workshops. Shotguns and sawed-off shotguns are the cheapest to acquire and are less popular because they are often awkward to carry and don't offer the street cred of a semi-auto pistol or even a full auto firearm.
I have to laugh at this,
"Everyone
wants to be a gangster now, mainly the kids. You have five or six in a
little crew and one of them will be carrying. They want handguns -
shotguns are too big and bulky. The sawn-off doesn't look so good but
use a machine gun and you get known as a heavy guy. They have them just
to be a chap on the street, to pose. Some of them walk around all day
with a .38. It's 16-year-olds at it and it's getting like America,
silly as it sounds."
Yeah, except if a 16 year old pulls a gun on one of us in Silly America, we at least have the right to have our own to defend ourselves and draw our own pistol, your life is completely in the hands of some stupid teen gangsta wannabe chav with a pistol. Pretty silly to live at the mercy of common street thugs like that if you ask me,
The Guardian's source said that guns were becoming a first rather than
a last recourse. "A gun used to be used as a mediator; now everything
is revolved with a gun. It's brought the heat on everyone. Before you
would get a two [years jail sentence], now it's a five. It's getting
like the US now, like The Wire. It's like a prediction of what will
happen here. I think they all think they're playing Grand Theft Auto.
It's madness out there."
Yeah, except we weren't dumb enough to give up our guns. Hope you Brits enjoy living at the mercy of street thugs and your increasingly fascistic government, because that's where things appear to be headed.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
08:00 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 413 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I never pass up an opportunity to quote Machiavelli:
The Prince Chapter XX, Paragraph 2...
"Now,
no new prince has at any time disarmed his subjects; rather, when he
has found them unarmed he has always given them arms. this is because
by arming your subjects you arm yourself; those who were suspect become
loyal, and those who were loyal not only remain so but are changed from
being merely your subjects to being your partisans...[some unsavory
stuff here - it is Machiavelli after all]... But as soon as you disarm
your subjects you start to offend them, showing whether through
cowardice or suspicion that you mistrust them; and on either score
hatred is aroused against you."
Posted by: Sockless Joe at August 30, 2008 08:26 PM (jZthg)
2
It's 16-year-olds at it and it's getting like America,
silly as it sounds.
Someone ought to remind this Limey that the parts of America that suffer most from gun crime are urban areas run by...
pro-gun control Democrats.
Posted by: Sean M. at August 30, 2008 11:07 PM (e6v7s)
3
Sean:
Right on. STL city is very restrictive, though things have gotten better post Heller. And we are usually #1 or #2 per capita in murders.
Posted by: eddiebear at August 30, 2008 11:57 PM (tA9w+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Are we going to do something smart for a change?
It looks like the GOP, known (rightly) for years as the "Stupid Party" actually has a clue about what to do if Gustav slams into the Gulf Coast during next week's convention:
The
contingency plan – a worst case scenario if the storm devastates
coastal areas – would turn Republicans into Red Cross-type volunteers
who would help collect donations, food and goods to help storm victims.
McCain - whose campaign motto is "Country First" – said
helping people during an emergency will take precedence over accepting
his GOP nomination for president.
"It wouldn't be appropriate
to have a festive occasion while a near tragedy or a terrible challenge
is presented in the form of a natural disaster," McCain told Fox News
in a pretaped interview airing today.
That might just do the trick in terms of killing the meme that
I worried about a couple of days ago.
The link to the Post story comes from Instaglenn, who wisely suggests "sending a group of volunteers down afterward, with Sarah Palin in charge." Yes, please.
Posted by: Sean M. at
05:43 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.
OMG! Look at all the Alaskans who HATE Palin
Thank you, Politico, for
providing today's DNC talking points. It turns out that Sarah Palin is a
horrible pick because Alaskans
hate her:
It will be fascinating to see the Alaska Republican delegation front
and center at this week’s Republican National Convention now that
Alaska governor Sarah Palin will be on the ticket.
This is a state party whose establishment faction, to put it mildly, isn’t too enamored with their reform-minded governor.
This is a state party whose chairman, Randy Ruedrich, has been feuding
with Palin for years. Palin exposed Ruedrich for ethical violations in
2004 when both served on the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
— and their relationship has been frosty ever since.
Ruedrich declined to comment at the historic nature of having an
Alaskan on the national ticket for the first time in the state’s
history.
Gee, I guess those 80-90% approval ratings were just a fluke! Who would have thought that running against both the Democratic and (to some extent) the Republican parties in her state would leaver her with a few enemies?
Exit question: Why hasn't the Politico gone to great lengths to highlight the
frosty relationships between Sen. Obama and his opponents in Chicago?
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at
12:21 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 209 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The Alaskan Mobys are coming out of the woodwork too. All of a sudden there are one hell of a lot of commenters on various blogs who live in or know someone in Alaska and, amazingly, they all hate Palin.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 30, 2008 12:33 PM (WhFvm)
2
Well, this is stupid.
Poltitco: "The Alaska Republicans hate Sarah Palin."
Why do they hate her: "Because she exposed them as being corrupt."
Clearly, she is unfit to lead.
Posted by: Jeff_McAwesome at August 30, 2008 01:22 PM (G07ST)
3
There's something that's been driving me crazy for a while now, Politico started out by mischaracterizing a Fred Thompson story (claiming that he had dissed some firemen while they obviously didn't feel dissed, even going so far as to dowdify a quote) and yet, people act as if they're a respectable outfit suitable for quoting.
No, I'm not talking about you IV,D, you did it correctly here, showing them to be partisan hacks. But I've seen plenty of people, like say Brit Hume or even Ace, act as if they're journalists and not "journalists" or, even more apropos, yellow journalists.
How did that happen? They are about as reliable as any random Kos diarist or Excitable Andy.
Posted by: Veeshir at August 30, 2008 01:28 PM (ThMnZ)
4
^part of the deal is that politico was founded by Beltway insiders for Beltway insiders. As a result, they are indeed as reliable as Kos or ST Andrew.
Posted by: eddiebear at August 30, 2008 05:03 PM (TaZBG)
5
I would think the Alaska GOP would be more than enthusiastic. If McCain wins, she goes to Washington, and out of their hair.
Posted by: kishnevi at August 30, 2008 07:37 PM (MP/aT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More Proof The Left Is Unhinged Over Palin
To piggyback on Sean's post about the Kossacks being worried over Palin, they are now accusing
her of faking her recent pregnancy in order to cover for her teenage daughter.Some of the gems from Newsbusters:
Next concernedamerican posted a slam on Palin's commitment to her baby. "She decided not to take maternity leave with this pregnancy!!!! What's up with that? With a special needs baby?" And then went on to accept the claims without proof saying, "Kind
of hypocritical to push abstinence programs in schools and then cover
up your own teenage daughter's pregnancy with a lie that you had the
baby yourself, dontcha think?"
Not4bushwa also assumed it was all true merely because it was posted on DailyKos, saying: "If
Palin had come clean about her daughter or if McCain had vetted her
more carefully and not chosen her, this would not be a story. But she
didn't and he didn't. Tough luck, poor judgment, another right-wing
hypocrite scandal." And later wrote, "This is a big lie. Why
the excessive secrecy? So much shame for a fairly common
predicament--teenage pregnancy? I wonder: Who's the father?"
Obviously, since a Kos diarist posted this garbage story, many
Kossacks will simply believe it is true despite that there is no proof
at all for even a single word of the accusations.
Poster sailmaker finds Motherhood so disgusting that he can't imagine a vice president doing it, posting that his "mind boggles at the idea of a lactating VP." That's classy, isn't it?
Poster Subversive really went for the gutter with, "The only thing missing from this story is that the baby wasn't Black."
Folks, they don't know how to handle her. And the fact that as a mother of five, she is still more manly (though -ILFish to 11) than any male Kossack would ever be. And the fact her husband could rip their eyeballs out just by farting on them scares the shit out of them as well.
Posted by: eddiebear at
09:26 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 336 words, total size 2 kb.
1
And the fact her husband could rip their eyeballs out just by farting on them scares the shit out of them as well.
Shit Eddie, Sarah's taken down Mooses. Meese...aw, what the hell is the plural of "Moose"?
Anyway, I'd be very afraid for any of these D. Kock idiots were they to be locked in a room with the Vice-Hottie for even 45 seconds...
Posted by: Nigel at August 30, 2008 10:55 AM (80B17)
2
Annnnd so it begins. I'm sure that there's no proof possible to make them believe that this is a lie But they'll accept the word of the Chinese government that those gymnasts are 16 no problem.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 30, 2008 10:59 AM (cR/DV)
Posted by: Jones at August 30, 2008 11:08 AM (VkNlv)
4
They base their story on one blurb in an AK paper about her being seven months pregnant and not showing. When I was pregnant, I weighed 136 lbs at eight months. I did not show until about six and a half, and even when I did start to show a lot after that, it was only 'a lot' by the standards of not having shown at all early. It was only from the side that you could really see; from the front, if I didn't wear anything fitted or tight, you could barely tell, and from the back, nothing.
But of course, I must be lying because I give credence to her having gone so long without showing. Oh, and because I vote R.
Posted by: LickyLicky at August 30, 2008 11:36 AM (YsTKm)
5
Heck, I had people who had seen me the month before I gave birth not know I was pregnant. The owner of the coffee shop I hit about once a week asked me when my daughter was about four months old why I always ordered decaf. When I told her it was because I was nursing, her eyes bugged out - she thought I meant my almost-four-year-old. Granted, I don't have Palin's slim figure, but still...
I'm trying to figure out how the "covering up for her teenage daughter's pregnancy" thing meshes with the "taking a risk of having a defective child by getting pregnant past forty" thing.
Posted by: Alice H at August 30, 2008 12:35 PM (jRtPb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hmmmmm...
....do you think the Kossaks
might be worried?
Posted by: Sean M. at
06:26 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The entirety of the left is in panic mode.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 30, 2008 08:23 AM (XWeKU)
2
Hilarious! The kids are over there comparing her to things that are supposed to be 'new and improved', which, on its own is an oxymoron, but are, in fact, crappy and obsolete and one compares her to Blu-Ray. Which is odd, because, as another kid points out a few posts later:
Blu-Ray WON THE FORMAT WAR. The poster points out that it's a bad analogy. Not even the crickets that chirp in the silence of their hatred responded to that one.
Hee hee... gotta love it. Reading comments on lefty blogs makes me realize just how hate-filled I am not. I would never wish evil, death, sickness, etc., on someone I don't like and really, don't even know.
Posted by: LickyLicky at August 30, 2008 11:29 AM (YsTKm)
3
Here's an appropriate analogy:
You go to the store to buy milk, but all that's left is one half-crushed carton which is well past its sell-by date. You really consider getting it as you need milk badly, but it's just too gross.
Just as you're about to leave, the stockboy comes by with extremely fresh milk, right off the truck fromt he farm. You're thrilled and now happy to get milk.
Then the manager comes by and tells you that if you want fresh milk, you also have to take the carton of bad milk off his hands. It won't cost any more, but you have to take it home too.
You think about it for a bit, but hell, you can always just throw the gross milk in the trash later so you end up buying milk after all.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 30, 2008 11:53 AM (WhFvm)
4
That's the kind of biting commentary one can only find at Daily Kos. Well done.
Posted by: Jeff_McAwesome at August 30, 2008 01:24 PM (G07ST)
5
I wanted to leave a comment, but it would just be deleted, so I'm gonna leave it here.
Sarah Palin is your new....
Worst Nightmare.
Posted by: Veeshir at August 30, 2008 01:36 PM (zXUuJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Presented without context
At press time, the nut was still firmly attached to the base of the man’s genitals.
Huh. Like most guys, I have two nuts firmly attached to the base of my genitals, but
this guy is different, I guess.
Posted by: Sean M. at
01:29 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 41 words, total size 1 kb.
Wow....just wow....
It's not often I get to file something under the "GOP Win!" category and truly,
truly mean it. Last night I went to bed and dreamt all night that John McCain had chosen Tim Pawlenty as his running mate. When I woke up at 11am, I didn't even head to the computer to see who the choice was, because I knew McCain's choice could do nothing but disappoint.
Boy was I wrong.
When I got out of the shower, the friend I'm staying with was awake, and said "CNN News just woke me up with a text saying that McCain chose some b**** from Alaska as his running mate." At this point, I told him that he was just going to have to deal with the fact that I would be on the computer all day.
I'm thrilled.
I'm shocked.
I just shelled out $50 to
John McCain. I just bought two bumper stickers and I only have one car.
The next 67 days just got a lot more exciting. We now have what we were lacking: a GOP ticket we can be excited about.
Hey,
$3,000,000 in 7 hours can't be wrong!
We now return me to my regularly scheduled vacation.
P.S. - Yes, my head did
asplode.
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at
01:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 1 kb.
August 29, 2008
My Meaningless Take On The Palin Selection
While some prominent conservative bloggers are
disappointed at the Palin pick, and worried that Gov. Palin may become Geraldine Ferraro Redux, one thing I noticed today that has been lacking on our side of the aisle for a long while is back:
Excitement and Energy.
Hell, just look at the comment and traffic activity here, at
Moron Central, and elsewhere. This move has excited many in the base of the Party to actually (gasp) kinda, just maybe, don't look twice, support McCain.
Also, I tip my hat to Maverick for being ballsy enough to eschew the Conventional Wisdom that picking another capable, though boring, white guy with ties to a "battleground state or area" was the wise move. He gambled on energy and buzz, and it is paying off in the short term. And all of this without pissing off a base that (myself included) already eyed Maverick with suspicion and caution.
Yeah, Pawlenty, Portman, Cantor, and Romney may very well have been wonkish Beltway approved picks, or ones that would have helped solidify states like Michigan or Ohio, but would they have generated this sort of buzz? Would they have been able to get more than a "meh. I guess I'll support him" from many in the base? Would my wife and that friend of mine I see at the playground with his daughters when I take my daughter to the park be talking about Romney tonight like he was Palin?
Why do I mention my wife? Here's why. She works in a secure office without TV, radio, or internet access.
She didn't know about the Palin pick until she heard it in the car on
the way home from her job. She immediately called me screaming, "Did
you hear?!?!?" That is how excited she was over the Sarah Palin pick. If a person who really doesn't follow politics too much can get this excited, how many times over has that happened across America this afternoon and evening?
Hey, this race is tight, and McCain could have played it safe and gone for a boring pick. He didn't need to do a desperation pick, ala Mondale/Ferraro in 1984. But the Palin choice has rocked the campaign season to its core. No more proof is needed than the fact Team Obama seems on its heels for the first time since Jeremiah Wright became a household name.
Of course, I am writing this after settling my daughter down for bed and enjoying a nightcap to help me forget about my job. So who knows?
But well played, Senator McCain. Well played.
Posted by: eddiebear at
11:21 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 437 words, total size 3 kb.
1
It also stole the thunder from Obama's coronation last night in a way that the other possible VP picks couldn't have. I think the Obama campaign was counting on people buzzing about it for several days, and here, virtually nobody was talking about it at all just a day later.
Posted by: Sean M. at August 29, 2008 11:45 PM (e6v7s)
2
I'm sorry, but if the Powerline guys are disappointed, that's just more proof that it was an excellent pick. Those guys are pure establishment hacks like Hewitt -- I stopped reading them ages ago (actually one of them seemed OK, but I don't remember who's who over there).
As I've said before (in relation to K-Lo), those types aren't going anywhere ... they won't sit out, much less vote dem. With this pick, McCain hit all the right notes with those coservatives who might have sat out (from strong pro-lifers to small-l libertarians like me).
To go along with eddie's anecdote, my SO spent half the day online looking for information on Palin, and she's completely apolitical and probably wouldn't have bothered to vote before. She's more liberal than I am and she's thrilled and will most likely go to the polls for McCain now.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 29, 2008 11:57 PM (WhFvm)
3
I still read Powerline, but their constant pessimism is annoying. Yeah, they did yeoman ork in 2004 against Dan Rather, but they seem to be wanting to wrest the "Eeyorepundit" title away from Allah at Hot Air.
And their churlishness because their hometown boy Pawlenty didn't get it goes against their supposed maturity and education.
Posted by: eddiebear at August 30, 2008 12:09 AM (dwHgn)
Posted by: eddiebear at August 30, 2008 12:10 AM (dwHgn)
5
I'm certainly willing to give them credit for their work on Rathergate. I remember them shilling for the Meirs SC pick, however, and then turning around and trying to give Bush credit for ending up with Alito and Roberts on the SC. If Bush hadn't been beaten back into line by actual conservatives, his picks would have sucked wind.
I like the Eyorepundit thing though ... describes Allah (another one I don't read anymore) to a T.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 30, 2008 12:17 AM (WhFvm)
6
^yeah. I mean, what's with always wanting to lose? What does that prove?
And as for shilling for Miers, that was one of the first reasons I quit reading DJ Drummond when he still was at polipundit.
Posted by: eddiebear at August 30, 2008 12:24 AM (dwHgn)
7
As much as I respect the Powerline guys, their attitude of "we are wealthy, successful lawyers, so we are smarter and better than you" has always grated at me.
Posted by: eddiebear at August 30, 2008 12:26 AM (dwHgn)
8
I heard the news while driving to a friends for my mini-vacation and I actually started clapping. Which is hard to do while driving. This may be enough to get me to vote for McCain, though I'm sure he'll piss me off soon. But it is an excellent choice.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 30, 2008 10:52 AM (cR/DV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Oh, just go away already
The rEVOLution may not be televised, but
it's apparently still going to be in Minnesota next week:
As Republicans gather to nominate John McCain for president in St. Paul next week, don't expect former rival Ron Paul to cheer him on.Unlike other former candidates like Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, the libertarian-leaning Texas congressman wasn't given a speaking slot at the convention -- in fact, he says the McCain campaign tried to bar him from the convention floor entirely.
"I didn't expect much and I didn't get much, because they don't want somebody there who will emphasize where they're coming short," he said in an interview.
Instead, Paul plans a rally of his own at a basketball arena across the river in Minneapolis, along with training sessions for his supporters who want to more effectively push the Republican party toward his antiwar, small-government ideals.
"They're lining up for the next fight, and they're going to have better numbers and they're going to know the rules better," he said.
Yeah, I'm sure your loyal horde of weirdos and retards will be well equipped (maybe with an even bigger blimp!) to convince us all to go back to the gold standard and stop giving foreign aid to Israel or whatever nutty thing you're currently advocating.
In between cross burnings and LARP tournaments, that is.
Posted by: Sean M. at
07:50 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You mean nutty things like small government, responsible fiscal policy and budgets, using the US military only when it was really really necessary...all those nutty things the Republican Party used to be seen as being for?
(Sorry, but you opened yourself up for that one like someone shouting "Hit me! Beat me!" at a BDSM party.)
Posted by: kishnevi at August 29, 2008 08:14 PM (FFHuv)
2
There's being a Libertarian, and there's being a Paulnut, there's a difference and you know it.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 29, 2008 08:36 PM (XWeKU)
Posted by: Sean M. at August 29, 2008 09:28 PM (e6v7s)
4
True enough. The LP is full of nutcases.
Posted by: kishnevi at August 29, 2008 10:58 PM (FFHuv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The bumper sticker
I actually told MP in google that I wanted a bumper sticker with the Palin in giant letters and a tiny McCain...
guess one of the Jawas did too. I think I'd like to see a shirt, poster or sticker with Palin '08! in giant letters, with "...and that bastard McCain too, I guess" under it in tiny letters.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
04:54 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If you can get them printed up, and on your site, they'd sell like hotcakes! I'd certainly buy one(or more), and you could give the proceeds to the McCain campaign.
Posted by: J David at August 29, 2008 05:34 PM (RRPCn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Another round of Denver pics
Alice has a bunch of new pictures from the Denver protests up, and you can go here for posts
I-XII, here for
XIII-XX, and here's XXI-XXX,
Part XXI
Part XXIIPart XXIIIPart XXIVPart XXV
Part XXVIPart XXVIIPart XXVIIIPart XXIXPart XXXI'm actually still looking through these myself, they're excellent shots, so check out Alice's work, she's done an excellent job, every bit as good as Zombie.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
12:36 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 2 kb.
1
yer making me blush, dpud!
my network card on my desktop computer is down, so I'm working on the last batch of pictures but won't be able to post them without jumping through hoops until my husband gets home. (Not because I can't put a network card in, because he's doing the shopping for me, heh!)
I've asked on twitter, I'll ask here - if anyone has experience using Premiere Pro, I could use a few pointers. I have a lot of video that should be seen. And if anyone is interested in doing a fisking on some of the vids, let me know. Especially the truther vids.
Posted by: Alice H at August 29, 2008 12:44 PM (jRtPb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A little midday Obama campaign EPIC FAIL
Taking a swipe at Palin for inexperience in foreign affairs. Really Barack, you're gonna go there? I guess I can see how you'd think that she's inexperienced in foreign matters, given she hasn't done a few trips to Africa and a two week tour of Europe and the Middle East. Hell, she hasn't even failed to keep a promise of aid to a poor African school yet! What does she know about foreign affairs, silly woman...
Here's a little Alaska-delivered foreign policy for you!
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
11:32 AM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Uh, better a heartbeat away than right at the forefront, full of himself and thinking he knows how to solve the world's problems by
farting unicorns out of his ass.
Posted by: Alice H at August 29, 2008 11:35 AM (jRtPb)
2
Now I'm all excited for the VP debates.
Joe Biden is that most obtuse of idiots who doesn't realize he's an idiot and so thinks everybody else is.
Watch as he tries to go the "inexperienced" route against her and gets laughed off the stage. Or even funnier, if he goes the "poor widdle woman" route and gets laughed off the stage.
I mean, I know he's gonna get laughed off the stage no matter what, but at least now I can know it's a conservative doing it to him.
Posted by: Veeshir at August 29, 2008 11:57 AM (ThMnZ)
3
"Today, John McCain Yesterday, the Democrat party put the a former mayor of a town of 9,000 "community organizer" with
zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from up for election to the presidency."
Fixed that for ya, Bill. Enjoy.
Posted by: Sean M. at August 29, 2008 12:13 PM (e6v7s)
4
Negative: Now I actually have to get off my ass and go vote, which I wouldn't have had to do if McCain had picked some schmuck like Ridge.
Positive: I don't think I'm gonna need a full hazmat suit to do it. Maybe just some scrubs and a breathing mask.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 29, 2008 12:25 PM (WhFvm)
5
Juan Amnesty McVain now has the ONLY "executive experience" in either Dem or GOP tickets, and it's ALL in his VP pick.
Posted by: J David at August 29, 2008 12:41 PM (RRPCn)
6
Check out this from the Kos site. They're really reaching for something to use against McCain. Enjoy
Trainwreck McCain by
Devilstower
Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 09:00:12 AM PDT
There
are many points of contrast between the Democratic ticket and the
Republican pairing of John McCain plus "I haven't made up my mind"
(points like intelligence, competence, and common sense), but few
differences as stark as the gulf between John McCain and Joe Biden when
it comes to public transportation.
It's becoming well known that Joe Biden
commutes 100 miles a day by Amtrak. He pays for the service like anyone
else, and appreciates it so much that he not only throws an annual
Christmas party for the crew on his train, he stopped in to say goodbye
to his "Amtrak family" before heading for Denver.
Biden's son serves on the Amtrak board, and Biden has been a consistent supporter of passenger rail service.
He is an original co-sponsor of the Amtrak Reauthorization Bill
(National Defense Rail Act), S.104, introduced on January 7, 2003.
Introducing an earlier version of the bill with Sen. Fritz Hollings
(D-SC) on March 6, 2002, Biden stated, "For 30 years, I have witnessed
Congress dangling a carrot in front of Amtrak's eyes, funding it just
enough for it to limp along. And I'll tell you, this has to stop. Now
is the time to commit politically and financially to a strong, safe,
and efficient passenger rail system."
If you want an expanded passenger rail network, having Joe Biden in a place to impact national policy is a good bet.
There's more, much more. Can you imagine that McCain had the nerve to try to dismantle Amtrak? Oh no!!!
Posted by: Quaking_Conservative at August 29, 2008 12:42 PM (Rn9KX)
7
Okay, J David, look, I don't know if you've noticed, but we've all been Palin boosters here for a while now, so could you please, on a day like today, just SHUT THE FUCK UP AND TAKE YOUR FUCKING PESSIMISM ELSEWHERE FOR FUCKITY-FUCKING-FUCK'S SAKE!??!
Thanks.
Posted by: Sean M. at August 29, 2008 12:56 PM (e6v7s)
8
Sean, J David is a troll. It's best to just ignore him.
Posted by: Alice H at August 29, 2008 01:04 PM (jRtPb)
9
I know, Alice. Believe me, I'm a big time advocate for troll starvation, but on a day like today, it just had to be said. Plus, I got to write "fuck" a bunch of times in capital letters, which feels good every once in a while.
Posted by: Sean M. at August 29, 2008 01:10 PM (e6v7s)
10
She might have foreign policy experience with Canada & Russia on the border of her state. That's more than Obambi can say.
Posted by: Quaking_Conservative at August 29, 2008 01:23 PM (Rn9KX)
11
I'm gonna defend J David here ...
I think he's someone who's just so disgusted by McCain he's having trouble finding any good in the situation. That doesn't necessarily make him a troll, although relentless negativity does get old. It's something a lot of us can relate to, but we're willing to give credit where its due, and are obviously very big fans of this VP pick.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at August 29, 2008 01:58 PM (WhFvm)
12
I'm not just basing it on this post, Hermit Dave.
Posted by: Alice H at August 29, 2008 02:22 PM (jRtPb)
13
Thank you, Hermit Dave, fortunately I don't give a rat's rosy red rear-end what other people think when they are wrong...And the "pragmatics" are most especially pissed-off at people still operating under the influence of CONSCIENCE when they choose their political hack candidates...No sweat!
Posted by: J David at August 29, 2008 04:06 PM (RRPCn)
14
Pragmatists (expediency over morality) really dislike the "un-nuanced"("nuance" being a good synonym for mealy-mouthing /self-justification/rationalization/moral equivalence) running around blurting out "pessimism" (usually a synonym for "the truth")...Thus enters the RINO Party "FAIL" of the last decade..."Please make us feel good or we will not vote for you: just tell us what each individual(of three hundred million)wants to hear"
Posted by: J David at August 29, 2008 04:45 PM (RRPCn)
15
So...
Two conservative new USC justices=FAIL
Massive tax cuts=FAIL
Millions of people formally under abject tyranny now free=FAIL
Tighter reins on abortion, embryonic stem cell research, etc=FAIL
No terrorist attacks since 9-11=FAIL
Historically low rates of unemployment=FAIL
And so on...
Yeah, you're right: what a huge pile of failure the GOP has racked up over the past decade--it's almost like there were nothing but a bunch of far leftoids running the government for the past decade or so and, gosh, look how far a democrat-controlled Congress has managed to move the country in a positive direction for the past two years...
Now all of this isn't to say that we'd have liked more (illegal immigration/lack of border security being an especially festering sore for many) but, at some point, you need to sit back and take a slightly less ass-holishly pessimistic view of everything since what you bring isn't "the truth" it's a vacuous, braindead, simple-minded belief that, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, the GOP, the country and everyone in it is going to hell in a handbasket--in other words, you're a fucking idiot.
Posted by: ECM at August 29, 2008 05:10 PM (q3V+C)
16
Wow! Love the "nuance" ECM! Beautiful, I wish I had such a "silver tongue"(or golden keyboard finger), I'm sure other pragmatic self-worshiping vizualizers will agree with you 100%!
Posted by: J David at August 29, 2008 05:37 PM (RRPCn)
17
A lot has been assumed of an occasional poster of a month or so...Must be the ESP skills of visualizing self-worshipers...
Posted by: J David at August 29, 2008 05:40 PM (RRPCn)
18
Oops! Hope I didn't the widdle feewings of the Extra Crass Midget that called me a *^%#ing thingy! Wouldn't want to annoy the really loud and profane "Republican" neo-con (oxymoronic) pragmatists. They might call me foul names...Yikes!
Posted by: J David at August 29, 2008 05:50 PM (RRPCn)
19
lol, yes, you've crushed my fragile feelings but, though I lie here cradling my shattered ego, that still doesn't change the fact that you are, indeed, a fucking idiot.
It's also plainly apparent that you had your clock rung pretty hard as it took you three posts to reply with, well, the same 'arguments', in microcosm, that you posted above. Have you got anything new or is your next reply going to consist of the same old song (with all due respect to the Four Tops, of course)?
Posted by: ECM at August 29, 2008 06:22 PM (q3V+C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
100kb generated in 0.1749 seconds; 78 queries returned 257 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.2-pink.