March 15, 2010
Every little bit counts
This is hardly a huge victory against the Global Warmerists, but I think it's a sign that Climategate has had an impact:
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled that the adverts – which were based on the children's poems Jack and Jill and Rub-A-Dub-Dub – made exaggerated claims about the threat to Britain from global warming.
In definitely asserting that climate change would cause flooding and
drought the adverts went beyond mainstream scientific consensus, the
watchdog said.
It noted that predictions about the potential
global impact of global warming made by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) "involved uncertainties" that the adverts failed
to reflect.
The article states that the rebuke came in part from public complaints.
I'm
far from certain, but it sounds to me like the Climategate scandal has
opened the door to stuff like this. I mean, can you imagine something
like this happening, say, a couple of years ago?
Posted by: Sean M. at
11:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 1 kb.
March 11, 2010
AGW Freaks Are Scared? Well Tough Shit!
This comment from McGoo over at Soylent Green ultimately led me to this priceless quote from one of the big AGW enablers. as fewer and fewer people buy into their bullshit.
Ecologist Paul Ehrlich at Stanford University in California says that his climate colleagues are at a loss about how to counter the attacks. “Everyone is scared shitless, but they don't know what to do,” he says.
Yeah, well, guess what (UPDATE INCLUDED BELOW)?
more...
Posted by: eddiebear at
04:43 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 432 words, total size 3 kb.
1
eddiebear:
Green text FTW.
Love,
the botnet
Posted by: the botnet at March 11, 2010 05:24 PM (DDqDb)
2
I don't think they have anything to worry about. Look at Ehrlich. He's one of the most discredited 'scientists' in history, and he still has a job, and gets used as a media 'expert'.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at March 11, 2010 05:34 PM (WhFvm)
3
What Hermit said.
Meanwhile - check this out courtesy of
JunkScience:
http://sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/56954/title/Fowl_surprise!_Methylmercury_improves_hatching_rate
They tested mercury in ducks and found it was good for them in small doses! Oddly, this directly contradicts identical tests done 30 years ago (Gee - in the eco-eighty's!).
Now I wonder if some data fudging was done - and by whom, - and when? Let me guess.....
Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at March 11, 2010 07:09 PM (/cH23)
4
Oh! Excellent rant, ediebear!
Especially the careful use of imagery and literary references. The assertion, "...
that people are no longer going to just swallow your bilge like a sorrority girl at Mardi Gras. ....You puny toad fucking puttocks", just brought tears to my eyes!
Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at March 11, 2010 07:13 PM (/cH23)
5
whenever eddibear posts, you click "more...." just knowing.. KNOWING that it's going to be a fucktastick fuxperience of fucktudiness. And that's fucking awesome.
Posted by: tangonine at March 11, 2010 09:19 PM (C8Pcc)
6
mmmmm...that was some motherfucking good rant. I'ma gonna go cockpunch a hippie.
Posted by: Gromulin at March 11, 2010 10:18 PM (7Zrx4)
7
Perfect. Made my day. Is there any chance of this going onto YouTube the way that "My Healthcare Message to the Left" did? That one was magnificent. More. Please.
Posted by: Froto at March 11, 2010 10:41 PM (GzeNN)
8
Froto: Check the update.
Posted by: eddiebear at March 11, 2010 11:58 PM (AM9Az)
9
"treefuckingly skyfucked"
Poetry!
Posted by: HeatherRadish at March 12, 2010 09:24 AM (mR7mk)
10
The vid is hilarious .
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at March 12, 2010 11:26 AM (a9UO0)
Posted by: Froto at March 12, 2010 08:04 PM (GzeNN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 10, 2010
March 09, 2010
Obama To Hammer Fishermen And The Fishing Industry?
Oh, for fuck's sake.
"Now we see NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and the administration planning the future of recreational fishing access in America based on a similar agenda of these same groups and other Big Green anti-use organizations, through an Executive Order by the President. The current U.S. direction with fishing is a direct parallel to what happened in Canada with hunting: The negative economic impacts on hard working American families and small businesses are being ignored.
"In spite of what we hear daily in the press about the President's concern for jobs and the economy and contrary to what he stated in the June order creating this process, we have seen no evidence from NOAA or the task force that recreational fishing and related jobs are receiving any priority."
Consequently, unless anglers speak up and convince their Congressional representatives to stop this bureaucratic freight train, it appears that the task force will issue a final report for "marine spatial planning" by late March, with President Barack Obama then issuing an Executive Order to implement its recommendations — whatever they may be.
Led by NOAA's Jane Lubchenco, the task force has shown no overt dislike of recreational angling, but its indifference to the economic, social and biological value of the sport has been deafening.
Additionally, Lubchenco and others in the administration have close ties to environmental groups who would like nothing better than to ban recreational angling. And evidence suggests that these organizations have been the engine behind the task force since before Obama issued a memo creating it last June.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:37 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 271 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Look, I'm no fan of the Administration in general. And I'm against stupid overregulation in the specific. But when you seriously use the phrase "but its indifference to the economic, social
and biological value of the sport" in reference to FISHING, I think you're overstating your case.
Social value. To fishing. Look, father/son bonding stuff is granted. But other than that? Fuck all. Drop the hysteria and stick to the tangible. They're over-regulating with a goal of absolute ban. Fuck them on that.
Posted by: MikeD at March 09, 2010 01:03 PM (FkL60)
2
I don't like fishing, mostly because I don't like to eat fish.
But..... I will defend the "social value" of fishing.
Where else can you sit around drinking beer all day and still actually get something done?
That's about as socially redeeming as you can get. IMO.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 09, 2010 01:23 PM (aFnZ8)
3
I think Minnesota gets a bunch of money from tourism, related to fishing, just as one state in an example. Fisheries are used to replenish a lot of sport fish. Both items definitely have an economic impact.
Exactly what probably happened in Canada, after people couldn't go on hunting trips, because of the regulation. I have no problem whatsoever with the wording of the original item.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at March 09, 2010 01:29 PM (UEEex)
4
Well, I wasn't clear. Economic and biological impact? Sure. SOCIAL value?
Fishing? Seriously?
Posted by: MikeD at March 09, 2010 03:31 PM (FkL60)
5
It doesn't matter. Every single thing that give any one person any type of enjoyment will be legislated out of existence, or taxed until no one can afford to enjoy it. As Hillary Clinton said: "If it moves, tax it"
What a bunch of fucking asswipes. 1984. Don't worry about reading it. It is fast becoming our reality.
We are not pussies, Congress.
Don't count on everyone going along with all your fucking stupid taxation until we puke. WE HATE YOU.
Posted by: Charlotte at March 09, 2010 04:22 PM (iXIlj)
Posted by: eddiebear at March 09, 2010 04:35 PM (wnU1W)
7
I'll give them my flyrod when they take it from my cold, dead hands!!!
Posted by: Andy at March 09, 2010 05:12 PM (5Rurq)
8
The more I think about this the crazier it sounds.
It would affect a huge percentage of Americans.
Go to any sporting goods store, look at the fishing section. It's usually freaking huge.
Not to mention bass boats and what-not.
Talk to little towns on mountain streams and lakes all over the country and ask them about reducing their fishing tourists.
That's a lot of jobs in every area of the country.
Couple angry, out of work fishing industry people with angry, sober, out of fishing fishermen and you'll see some things.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 09, 2010 11:40 PM (fKXsu)
9
Too late, way way too late. The money used for government to restrict fishing comes from the excise tax on fishing equipment, and has since the 1930's, with complete support of the piscatorial community. No fishing group has ever objected to state management of fisheries; in many states, sport fishermen have led the charge to revoke commercial licences. Outdoorsmen stood in line with WaterKennedyKeepers to endorse the Great Lakes and Riverine initiatives. Fish have been wards of the state for 150 years. You just never noticed before.
The New England commercial fisheries have already--again, in case you haven't been watching--been shut down, and we freemen did not lift a finger to stop it. And the usual useful idiots have been primed for over 20 years that fish aren't safe to eat; most of us posting here believe this to be true. The battle is lost; the victors are just dividing the spoils. Spoiled fish, you see. It's a little joke.
On the seaboard, and four of the Lakes, the Canadians will "take up the slack." In the rest of the country, stop all fishing and they'll be crawling up the banks in two seasons. Don't go near the water!
Posted by: comatus at March 11, 2010 02:59 PM (/VEEI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 08, 2010
Dog Bites Man: Soros-funded Green Business Astroturfing
A name like "
American Businesses for Clean Energy" trips my BS detector somethin' fierce. "Clean energy" in reference to current-generation technology is pretty much antithetical to economic growth.
I found out about this organization from a co-blogger from another site who was approached about spreading the word about this wonderful group. Obviously the green evangelist didn't realize my co-blogger dude does a lot of business with oil companies and makes frequent trips to Alaska.
First stop is a WhoIs search -- turns out
the domain is registered to a group called the
Natural Resources Defense Council, which is
funded by all the usual lefty suspects such as Soros' Open Society Institute, Ted Turner's foundation, the New York Times Company Foundation, the Heinz Family Foundation, etc. Robert Redford and Leonardo DiCaprio happen to be on the
NRDC board of trustees.
I guess this is where I'd go "gotcha", but as I indicated in the title, this is pretty much a "dog bites man" story.
Posted by: JoeCollins at
09:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
Maybe Writing Emails Is A Bad Thing For Green Goofs.
Wow. It looks as though a Soros group is tied to a bunch of wind initiatives.
The 900 pages of emails, obtained by the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Christopher C. Horner, show staff members from the DoE’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and the EPA developing a response to the report. They also show them coordinating the response with the Center for American Progress, plus the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) and the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) — two wind industry lobbyist groups.
What the emails show runs contrary to statements made to Congress by the Assistant Secretary of Energy Cathy Zoi — the Obama administration response to the Spanish report was in fact instigated at the request of the AWEA. It was then written with the close cooperation of the AWEA, the Center for American Progress, and the Union of Concerned Scientists.
The emails concentrate on the political implications of the Spanish study — and how to discredit it.
There also appears to have been significant pressure to publish an internal report from the NREL as a DoE report — bypassing the internal review and publication procedures — and to do so quickly.
The emails suggest that wind industry lobbyists and political organizations have significant behind-the-scenes influence on scientific reports from the Obama administration. This contradicts Obama’s insistence that his administration would get the politics out of science. It also calls into question the objectivity and quality of the information they provided to Congress.
Posted by: eddiebear at
05:49 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
1
What the fuck? You, of all fucking people, leave me out of a fucking post that deserves a fucking rant?
Posted by: The F bomb at March 08, 2010 08:11 PM (QBQcg)
2
But! But! But? Obie Wan said that there would be no lobiest influence on his regeme. This has got to be a bald face lie, since I believe everything that Obie Wan has told us.
Posted by: TimothyJ at March 08, 2010 09:26 PM (IKKIf)
3
So what you're saying is that even as global warmmongers were screeching about how deniers were being paid to deny, they were raking in $billions in gov't grants and other incentives.
Wow.
It's almost as if it's a strategery.
Someone should come up with a phrase for that in case it catches on.
Something like, I don't know, he who smelt it is probably the one who farted.
I'll work on the scansion.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 08, 2010 09:39 PM (4DUAv)
4
1: sorry, man. I wanted to get this one up before I left the office.
Posted by: eddiebear at March 08, 2010 11:36 PM (tOw6X)
5
Just fucking with you eddiebear.
Posted by: The F bomb at March 09, 2010 12:15 AM (QBQcg)
6
heh. Don't worry. I'll be back on my game soon enough
Posted by: eddiebear at March 09, 2010 12:36 AM (tOw6X)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 06, 2010
Did Phil Jones Perjure Himself?
Look, I have no idea what the UK's perjury laws are,
especially in front of Parliament. But whatever they are, Phil Jones may have indeed perjured himself.Dr. Jones asserted that the weather services of several countries,
including Sweden, Canada and Poland, had refused to allow their data to
be released, to explain his reluctance to comply with Freedom of Information requests.
This statement is false and misleading in regards to the Swedish data. 
All Swedish climate data are available in the public domain. As is
demonstrated in the attached correspondence between SMHI (Swedish
Meteorological and Hydrological Institute), the UK Met Office and Dr.
Jones (the last correspondence dated yesterday March 4), this has been
clearly explained to Dr. Jones. What is also clear is that SMHI is
reluctant to be connected to data that has undergone “processing” {heh. What's Scandi for "fucking shredding as we fucking speak"?-ed}by
the East Anglia research unit.
Oopsie!
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:44 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 159 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"But it's just one mistake..."
Posted by: Al Gore at March 06, 2010 01:11 PM (AipKT)
2
Rats. Sinking Ship.
Some disassembly required.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 06, 2010 05:05 PM (nENtL)
Posted by: Alice H at March 06, 2010 11:14 PM (qJHYy)
4
Oh, I like that! Hahahahaaaa
Posted by: doubleplusundead at March 06, 2010 11:19 PM (hIjdQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 02, 2010
Dear Phil Jones
Fuck you. Fuck you with Algore's used sweatrags. Fuck your "process". Fuck the scams you have pushed with your fucked up "process". Fuck your arrogance. Fuck the polar bears, carbon credits, Cap & Trade, glaciers, and anything else you or your whoresons of fucking fuckity fuck and luxuriously icegilded mountain goatse have going for you.
And just fuck you and your hoy hoy sweep of vanity in general. You want a "process"? You fucking want to do it right?
Why not follow this memo, oh sucker of syrup from the skyfucked treecock of fuck? Or, is the fear of being proven wrong too much for you and your cockringed cabal of climate coddled kleptocracy, who have helped force punitive and burdensome restrictions and penalties on people and businesses because of the shit you pushed?
Fuck you, Phil Jones. Fuck you for what you have done to the world, science, and everything because of your work. Now go away, and fuck off while you are at it.
Posted by: eddiebear at
01:05 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: winewife at March 02, 2010 01:24 AM (OnM4p)
2
Seriously? Seriously?
I mean it... REALLY??!!? Standard practice was to NOT submit your scientific results and data to peer review?
REALLY? Because, and please pay attention here... the moment you do that (fail to share data and results) you are
no longer engaging in science. Science is dependent on performing repeatable, independently testable results. If I claim I've found a
magnetic monopole through experimentation, but refuse to tell anyone how, then no scientist will EVER take me seriously.
And yet, jackass here (my apologies to donkeys everywhere) claims that it's standard practice? Sorry, my bullshit meter pegged on that one.
Posted by: MikeD at March 02, 2010 10:40 AM (FkL60)
3
The sad part is, how many rubes are buying into this explanation, and will use it to protect anthropogenic climate change.
The sadder part, how many of said sad individuals are members of Congress.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at March 02, 2010 12:29 PM (UEEex)
4
Most beautimous, eddie....my eyes glittered with the joy of a thousand suns when they alighted on the first two words.... You had me right there
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at March 02, 2010 12:29 PM (+bSoE)
5
That was awesome.
I'm printing this out in tiny font and laminating it and putting it in my wallet in case I ever find myself in need of some verbal wizardry. I'm coming for you, LauraW!
Posted by: IreneFingIrene at March 02, 2010 04:28 PM (MFQJZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 01, 2010
Violent, Right Wing Teabaggers Go On An Ideologically Fueled Killing Spree
Did I say that? I meant enviro wackos who took Manbearpig's works to heart and were inspired to kill themselves and their children. Thankfully, the baby daughter survived.
But their unnamed daughter cheated death after the bullet from her dad's handgun missed her vital organs.
Paramedics rushed her to hospital covered in blood when police alerted by worried neighbours discovered the massacre three days later.
The youngster is recovering in hospital in the town of Goya in the northern Argentine province of Corrientes, where doctors say she is out of danger.
Her parents said they feared the effects of global warming in a suicide note discovered by police.
Shockingly, this story has not been covered in the American press.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:56 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Shockingly" not in American news? The mediocre media won't go near a story that would put algore in a bad light. They've not even been covering the unraveling of the hoax! Sorry, but this just means 2 more useful idiots have expired, and nutjobs like that, it's better they won't reproduce again. Maybe now the baby girl will be adopted by sane people & have a chance at a normal life.
Posted by: SeaUrchin at March 01, 2010 03:00 PM (7DDfK)
2
Say "Hi" to Tookie for me.
Posted by: jukin at March 01, 2010 03:15 PM (vkkNZ)
3
Will Keefums Olbermann hold Al Gore responsible for this? Let's all hold our breath while we wait.
Posted by: GarandFan at March 01, 2010 04:53 PM (6mwMs)
4
naw, he'll try to blame it on Bush. Don't worry about the why/how, Keefums will fill in the blanks, Mad Libs style.
Posted by: eddiebear at March 01, 2010 05:04 PM (wnU1W)
5
Well Bush took us out of Kyoto* and that increased the global worming* which drove these people around the bend.
*Yes, I know. Don't Write Letters (to steal a phrase).
Posted by: Veeshir at March 01, 2010 06:07 PM (GLfio)
6
Of course, if the Obama media did print this story, the angle would be how we need more gun control.
Posted by: steve at March 01, 2010 06:37 PM (JC+x3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 26, 2010
Well, that's a new way to look at it
Apparently, if you have doubts about the validity of the AGW theory, you might as well believe that O.J. Simpson didn't murder anyone.
No, really.
That's what
this guy says, anyway. Note that the word "scientist" doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere in his bio. Funny, that.
Posted by: Sean M. at
03:24 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wonder if he noticed that OJ was aquitted?
Posted by: XBradTC at February 26, 2010 03:39 AM (cB95w)
2
Can I be the Johnny Cochran of the AGW trial?
If the data is fake, AGW's a mistake!
If the ice cap's still there, AGW's a scare!
Posted by: Hermit Dave at February 26, 2010 04:31 AM (WhFvm)
3
Disclaimer: I didn't click, it's not worth giving the LA Times another hit (their 5th today!). As I think about that Brad, it makes me laugh even more.
It's the LA Times, right? That's
where he was acquitted, where they were ready to riot if he was found guilty.
I bet he just called huge swathes (relatively) of their few remaining readers "idiots" and it wasn't conservatives.
Okay, that's funny.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 26, 2010 02:43 PM (SbhZU)
Posted by: eddiebear at February 26, 2010 04:39 PM (wnU1W)
5
Isn't that the dimbulb who went into a church in Copenhagen and wailed like a banshee on helium when COP15 locked 3,000 "concerned environmentalists" out of the second general meeting?
Posted by: BillT at March 01, 2010 04:51 AM (7xRyj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 22, 2010
Oh, too bad, so sad
You know, I don't begrudge anybody who makes a shitload of money...as long as they do it
in a way that's legit:
The latest blow to those urging action against global warming came last week, when Yvo de Boer said he would step down as United Nations climate chief, two months after 193 countries meeting in Copenhagen failed to reach a binding agreement on curbing greenhouse gases. [...]
The resignation may reduce the possibility that a worldwide market aimed at reducing carbon emissions is within reach, said Trevor Sikorski, an emissions analyst for Barclays Capital in London. “It’s a sad day for the carbon market, and we’ll be lucky to get somebody with Yvo’s dedication and hard work as a successor,” Sikorski said.
UN carbon credits have fallen 13 percent on the European Climate Exchange in London since the start of the Copenhagen meeting, which was aiming to set limits for emissions after 2012. The NEX index tracking shares of 86 companies involved in clean energy has tumbled 12 percent since the talks.
You know what? I hope you all lose your fucking shirts, you fucking dishonest pirate bastards. And I'll laugh and laugh if you lose your private jets, limousines, and mansions, too.
You bet your money and credibility on a fucking scam, and you lost. It's not a sad day. It's a
fucking great day when something like this happens, you fucking wealth-destroying shitheels. And it'll be an even better day if a bunch of you (including that fattest of fat fucking hypocrites, Algore) end up in jail, though I'm not holding my breath.
You. Fucking. Lose. Go to hell, where it's plenty warm.
Posted by: Sean M. at
01:26 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
February 20, 2010
Tilting at windmills
If you're in PA, I'm sure you're well aware of Fast Eddie Rendell's push for "green" energy in PA and "green jobs", in particular, a big push for windmills. Of course you're all aware that green power facilities usually require massive subsidies just to get built.
cbullitt notes that Fast Eddie's going around to different cities and pimping Porkulus and green jobs, and the crock it is. And I'm not totally shitting on windmills as energy sources, there's no doubt that there are places where there's good steady wind, and putting up a windmill is actually a clever way to produce some energy. But that's not what this is, most of this is feelgood stuff, stealing from Peter to pay Paul, and an excuse to grow government and suppress enterprise, and it'll take a looooong time to even break even on the investment, if you even do break even. It really is neat technology, but it just has limited application in the broader energy grid.
But I thought I'd note too, right now we're producing a traditional source of energy in PA, and no, it's not coal, though certainly we still have coal mining in the state. It's been discovered that are major deposits of natural gas in PA, in particular in Northcentral PA. We've seen a lot of people locally working natural gas extraction, or supporting, supplying or advising, this is energy producers themselves, contractors, subcontractors, and probably consultants too. The Texas accent is usually a dead giveaway. In fact, saw a Halliburton (ZOMGTEHEVUL!!!1!1eleventy!1) truck a few days ago. And let me tell you, if you let these guys set up shop on your property, they compensate you very well, and from what I'm hearing, most, if not all agree to take on costs of environmental damage on your property in their contracts. There's no doubt that the gas producers probably see something for setting up shop here, but I doubt there seeing what Fast Eddie's windmill producers are seeing.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
11:10 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 334 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You know, I didn't want to link to myself, but this is pretty close to a topic that I wrote about today, so
I'll link to it. Basically I'm saying that all of the people who push the green agenda are a bunch of disingenuous fucktards.
Another thing I was planning on writing about is just how much of a liar Obama is. I was unfortunate enough to be eating lunch in a place that was playing his stupid townhall thing the other day, so I got a chance to see what he had to say for 20 minutes. Basically every word that came out of the fucker's mouth was a blatant lie.
I am in the middle of reading Rules for Radicals, and it is amazing how many of the tactics that the Shithead in Chief uses come straight out of the Alinsky playbook. The basic thesis I have gotten so far is that it is perfectly fine to lie, cheat, steal, murder, and generally be a dick about things so long as your cause is righteous.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 20, 2010 11:46 PM (8P3+x)
2
It's all about intent, which is what liberalism is all about. It doesn't matter if the results are horrifying, if your intentions were good enough and liberal enough.
And Jeff, if you've got something to plug, absolutely do so.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at February 20, 2010 11:56 PM (GcfAO)
3
Oh, you've told me that in the past, so I had no regrets.
Although I should change the name of my fourth-tier (fifth? what's the lowest tier?) crapblog. It's making fun of something Hugh Hewitt said like 2 years ago, not exactly the apex of humor, that.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 21, 2010 12:02 AM (8P3+x)
4
It's still kinda funny. I'll still somtimes slip in a B+ or Trusted Analyst reference if I link/reference Hewitt.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at February 21, 2010 12:13 AM (GcfAO)
5
DPUD, if you read that American Thinker post I linked, you'll see that wonderful photo of the
abandoned windmills at Tehachapi, where the wind is steady enough and strong enough to make the trees grow bent--and they still couldn't turn (heh) a profit..
Posted by: cbullitt at February 21, 2010 01:12 AM (gwh5D)
6
Interesting, I had always heard they were impractical outside of a very few ideally windy locations...guess that wasn't even true. Good to know.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at February 21, 2010 01:37 AM (GcfAO)
7
Windmills are still kinda neat technology, can't help but like the old grainmills.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at February 21, 2010 01:43 AM (GcfAO)
8
Unlike solar panels, which require very little maintenance, windmills require a lot. This is why they're generally impractical: the up-front costs would amortize reasonably well if they required no maintenance and had a long useful lifespan, but when it's all taken into account, it's a huge money sink.
Solar, of course, is much less efficient than wind, and doesn't amortize its up-front costs well at all, unless you make some really drastic assumptions about fossil fuel prices going forward.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at February 21, 2010 02:41 AM (WhFvm)
9
Wind turbines, while being a pretty cool technology, requires a lot of maintenance. Maintenance that costs a lot of money and requires the turbines to be shut down. Some wind developers will run the machines into the ground before they stop them and spend money on repairs. That's probably why you see so many idle ones even in areas with ideal winds. They got their money out of them.
Posted by: Rich at February 22, 2010 01:26 AM (m1Tnu)
10
A prize porker in sterling silver! This links of london charm will make
a quirky addition to your collection.This Links Of London Pig Charm will make a
truly unforgettable gift that will last forever!Links of London-It is a great
accessory for any outfit.
Posted by: links of london at February 23, 2010 10:02 PM (6BJGJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 18, 2010
More than Teddy Kennedy?
So far Global Warmmongering
has killed at least 4 people in Australia.
The Aussie PM decided to save Gaia by subsidizing foil insulation in people's houses.
So little known fact, foil insulation can electrocute people.
Well, little known to Aussie PMs.
Electricians formally warned Environment Minister Peter Garrett that
metal roof insulation could cost lives months before he banned it.
Oh, so maybe it wasn't little known. Well, now that people are dying and there's an uproar,
Mandatory training starts on Friday - almost a year after the program
began, despite a string of warnings that untrained installers were
dangerous and reports of homes catching fire because of poorly
installed pink batts.Yay! I mean, it's not his fault. Just because he was warned and stuff.
After all, he's a lefty. His biggest problem is that he cares too much.
What's a few dead installers between friends? Bah. Working class drudges. There's plenty more where they came from. Too many if you ask your average global warmmonger.
Via
Tim Blair, who's been covering this for a couple weeks. I've been expecting it to be covered here but nobody's touching it.
I guess all the revelations about global worming "science" has been good for at least one person.
Posted by: Veeshir at
05:01 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 2 kb.
February 16, 2010
Stop giving up wine for Lent. You're Killing The Planet™!
Are you wondering what to give up for Lent? Actually, I rather hope you're not wondering what to give up for Lent. You should know that by now. But, in case you're way behind in deciding what to cut back on this year, the Catholic Church in the UK has a great suggestion for you:
Carbon fasting! (Typing that phrase was literally, actually painful. Part of my brain may have actually ceased to function.)
Seriously.
The Bishop of London, Richard Chartres, and the Bishop of Liverpool, James Jones, are among those calling for a carbon fast for Lent -- a period ahead of Easter which Christians traditionally consider a time of penance and reflection -- which begins on Wednesday.
As well as spending a day without using technology such as mobile phones or iPods, the 46 daily suggestions also include eating by candlelight, cutting meat and vegetables thinner so they cook faster and flushing the toilet less often.
"Instead of giving up chocolate for Lent, why not fast for justice ... to help those suffering from the effects of climate change," said Jones.
So, uh, don't flush the toilet for Jesus! Or something.
Posted by: Ember at
09:01 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ok, fine, I will go on a 'carbon fast'. Let's see, that means that I can eat... water. That will be a fun 40 days.
Additionally, why is eating by candlelight supposedly so great. Don't these people know that a candle is nothing but *bum
bum bum* burning hydrocarbons? Seriously, enough candles to light a table to the point where you don't cut your hand off would produce a hell of a lot more CO
2 than would a 60 Watt lightbulb.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 16, 2010 09:17 PM (8P3+x)
2
Keeping up the English tradition of sending the family twit into the church, I see. That's only slightly more dick-headed than what I just posted, and not nearly as funny.
Posted by: cbullitt at February 16, 2010 10:16 PM (gwh5D)
3
I'm gonna chop down and burn a tree in their honor.
Since it'll be green, I will probably have to douse it in kerosene to get it burning.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 16, 2010 10:47 PM (+bb4P)
4
I've given up giving something up for Lent. I think it is more important to do something positive, than not do something negative.
Posted by: Rich at February 17, 2010 09:49 AM (Qrjpn)
5
Good one Rich.
I tried that on the nuns back in the 70s.
They thought that was less funny than my "Jesus jokes".
Posted by: Veeshir at February 17, 2010 10:00 AM (FDi8G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Why "going green" is great for China
There's a lot more to going green than just separating your glass, plastic, and paper waste from the rest of it. You've got to buy fancy lightbulbs, and insulate your house, and maybe install some solar panels, and you definitely need to get some sort of green car. (Unless you're Al Gore or Prince Charles. Then, you should fly private jets all over the world and waste tons of electricity. It's good for the planet. Shut up.)
And, as we all know, Teh Won is pretty damn sure that the way to fix the economy is green jobs. After all, it's the way of the future, those evil oil companies are run by fat-cat capitalist assholes, and you need to have some sort of a political agenda to push when your "stimulus bill" has stimulated us straight to double-digit unemployment.
How could going green possibly go wrong?
Well ... a couple of ways, actually. (All emphasis, naturally is mine.)
Now rare earth elements with exotic names such as europium and tantalum hold the key to hybrid cars, wind turbines and crystal-clear TV displays - that is, if a looming supply shortage doesn't stop innovation in its tracks.
Rare earth elements, called "rare earths" by those who use and study them, often prove irreplaceable in green technologies and high-tech consumer products. Yet the world's production of rare minerals relies mainly upon China, and the Chinese government warned last year that its own rising demand will soon force it to stop exporting the precious elements.
"Countries and companies that have or plan to develop industries that need rare earth minerals to make products are concerned about China's growing consumption, which they fear will eliminate China's exports of rare earths," said W. David Menzie, chief of the international minerals section at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
China has also encouraged companies that use rare earths to locate their manufacturing facilities in China, Menzie told TechNewsDaily. But some companies fear moving because of concerns about intellectual property protection, he added.
Deposits of rare earth elements exist in the United States, Canada and other countries. But only China's government supports the mining and refining industries capable of processing the resources from start to finish.
Brilliant. Fucking brilliant. So, not only does China own our goddamn debt, they also have, essentially, a world-wide monopoly on mining and refining the very elements that are essential to our essential green jobs push? Are you fucking kidding me?
I have a few choice words on this subject.
more...
Posted by: Ember at
08:06 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 656 words, total size 5 kb.
1
These moronic
green shitheads are the epitome of the NIMBY attitude. They like to pretend that this technology is perfectly environmentally friendly, and just ignore the fact that we are buying these compounds form China, who has one of the dirtiest industries on the planet. It is apparently to environmentally harmful for
us to mine for rare earth materials, but it is perfectly fine for
China to do it.
They need to either stop using this green technology, as it is apparently hurting the environment, or they need to STFU and allow us to extract minerals and oil ourselves. We would be able to do it in a much cleaner and safer way than practically any country on Earth.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 16, 2010 08:41 PM (8P3+x)
2
Environmentalism isn't about actually saving the planet, it's about feeling better about yourself.
And really, isn't that all that matters?
The answer, of course, is "No".
Posted by: Veeshir at February 16, 2010 11:22 PM (+bb4P)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 15, 2010
Oh Great! Now The Hurricane Data Is Wrong?
You know, something tells me that the whole IPCC
dataset is a bit mistaken. But that's just me.
Posted by: eddiebear at
11:14 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Oh, it's not a mistake.
It's entirely on purpose.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 15, 2010 11:20 PM (L+EmQ)
2
So there isn't any science in the science. Good to know.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 15, 2010 11:35 PM (lvYSc)
3
I'd have to say that's been settled.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 15, 2010 11:39 PM (L+EmQ)
4
He's published all the raw data and invites criticism, but warns he is neither "a warmist nor a denialist", but a scientist.
Some 'scientist' ... he still has his raw data and invites criticism. If I've learned anything from the AGW scientists, it's that neither of these are acceptable.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at February 16, 2010 12:38 AM (WhFvm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 12, 2010
They invite abuse, it would be impolite not to give it to them.
Now some people think I'm being harsh on global warmmongers who, finally, sort of admit that maybe they've been wrong.
I'm of the opinion that they deserve far more abuse than I'll give them.
Case in point.
Bolt and Blair were right all along. The whole AGW enterprise was a political movement, and was rotten to the core.
The "Blair" in there is Tim Blair. Ausse maker fun of Global Warmmongers extraordinaire. He's like an Aussie Ace.
So the response?
Perhaps, but if so they were so thru prejudice and not observation.
How can you be polite to people like that?
Why be polite to people like that?
H/T
Veeshir
Posted by: Veeshir at
11:51 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We're moving into the "acceptance" phase. Not quite there yet, but close.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/02/12/crus-jones-climate-data-not-well-organised-and-mwp-debate-not-settled/
Posted by: Andy at February 13, 2010 12:38 AM (f1o8E)
Posted by: Andy at February 13, 2010 12:40 AM (f1o8E)
3
I saw that story earlier today, Andy. Unbelievable. But Bill Nye the Science Guy still thinks we're unpatriotic, so, there's that.
Posted by: Ember at February 13, 2010 12:43 AM (LdRAG)
4
He should change his name to Bill Nye the "Science" Guy.
Posted by: Andy at February 13, 2010 12:51 AM (f1o8E)
Posted by: the botnet at February 13, 2010 09:16 AM (kZzmb)
6
And, again, WTF is wrong with Wisconsin?
Posted by: Ember at February 13, 2010 01:11 PM (LdRAG)
7
as a former Wisconsonite, I say, shit like this (and the snow) is the reason I left! (ok, that, and at the time I left, the gf at the time kept complaining about some biological clock that was ticking... and I wanted nothing to do with being a parent, or husband. then, 2 yrs later I met my wife, and now I have been married 10 yrs and have a 9yr old boy. go figure)
Posted by: mrfixit at February 13, 2010 04:45 PM (Bsm1s)
8
Aside from the occasional goof flipping out, the land of cheese and beer is delightful. There is about 2' of ice on Winnebagie, and the beer stays plenty cold. Good times.
It's kind of weird how well the random goofs in Sconnie do crazy, though. When we go crazy, we go fucking batshit!
Posted by: the botnet at February 13, 2010 07:55 PM (kZzmb)
9
"Dahmer, party of one... Dahmer, party of one??"
Posted by: mrfixit at February 13, 2010 08:03 PM (Bsm1s)
10
links of london
store offers kinds of elegant jewelries for wholesale and retail, which is
considered as a brand for modern design and classic elegance. Wearing links london jewelry makes you out of ordinary in a crowd.links london is one of the chief jewelry brands in the UK.
Posted by: links of london at February 23, 2010 04:49 AM (AEJ3L)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Aha! I Knew I Was Saving The Earth By Eating So Much Meat!
Fuck you, vegetarians. Fuck you and your smug self righteousness with a soy block soaked in bacon drippings. Fuck you for lecturing me that eating meat was bad for me. Fuck you for trying to push that "healthy lifestyle" fuckhelmet of fucking fuckitudinally fucked up fuckheadedness upon us. And fuck you for killing jobs and raping your beloved Gaia more than us knuckle dragging meat eaters ever will do.
The Cranfield University study found that switching from British-bred beef and lamb to meat substitutes imported from abroad such as tofu and Quorn would increase the amount of land cultivated, raising the risk of forests being destroyed for fields.
Production methods can be energy intensive and the final products tend to be highly processed, the report, which was commissioned by the environmental group WWF, found.
The researchers concluded: 'A switch from beef and milk to highly refined livestock product analogues such as tofu could actually increase the quantity of arable land needed to supply the UK.'
They also warned that a significant increase in the number of vegetarians in Britain from the current total of 3.7million could cause the collapse of the country's livestock industry and result in meat production moving to countries with few regulations to protect uncultivated land {since when did weenies care about jobs?-ed}.
Donal Murphy-Bokern, one of the report's authors and a former farming and food science coordinator at the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, told The Times: 'For some people, tofu and other meat substitutes symbolise environmental friendliness but they are not necessarily the badge of merit {and absolution from affluence guilt so many weenies have today-ed}that people claim.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH!1!1!11!!!
*GOUGH*
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAA!11!!!
Stupid fucking hippies.
Now, I do not wish to include in my mockery those who are required by health issues to eat a certain diet. But the rest of you vegetarians can go choke on a syphillis soaked sack of senile sausage for all I care
Posted by: eddiebear at
11:46 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 337 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I have no problem with people being vegetarian, but don't try and force it on the rest of us.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at February 12, 2010 11:58 AM (GcfAO)
2
I have no problem with vegetarians either. Vegans, though, can DIAF.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at February 12, 2010 12:06 PM (PH0UW)
3
I have a friend who went vegan. It made me laugh my ass off.
She lived in upstate NY and spent the first winter really, really sick all the time.
Her doctor told her it was the no meat thing, her unbalanced diet was hurting her.
Now? She eats eggs and cheese with her veggies.
She puts a lot of cheese on most stuff she eats.
So naturally, she went from pretty darn cute to about 60 lbs overweight.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 12, 2010 12:57 PM (9u9oT)
4
I am going to eat some bacon wrapped bacon in celebration of this story.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 12, 2010 01:09 PM (8WZWv)
5
Well the ecoweenie answer to this is that we have too many people and thus need to cull the herd. Naturally, they and their fellow travellers are excluded from the culling.
Posted by: Nicole at February 12, 2010 01:32 PM (Lgaa+)
6
I knew this Hindu vegetarian guy in college. Everybody who knew him knew why he wasn't eating meat, and nobody really gave a crap. Then he started experimenting with a little chicken, and all of a sudden people were taking notice. The experiment lasted a few weeks as I recall, and he eventually stopped again. Not sure whether if he stopped because of the social attention or just that he didn't feel right doing it.
Of course, a Hindu diet still contains dairy, and the guy seemed pretty healthy, unlike most of the vegans I've met.
Posted by: JoeCollins at February 12, 2010 01:32 PM (jtJig)
7
this is why I'm a meatatarian
Posted by: mrfixit at February 12, 2010 01:32 PM (Bsm1s)
8
meatatarianOnly meat, or high meat? I used to joke about it, but I've more-or-less been eating only meat since mid-january, and there's a tiny subculture of zero-carbers doing the same.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at February 12, 2010 01:40 PM (PH0UW)
9
You of course realize that this will not phase them at all. It will simply shift them from "don't eat meat" into the "zero population" camp. The logical conclusion for these wackos is that there is no ecofriendly way for us to be on the planet, thus we need to all die (or at least, those of us who aren't as enlightened as they are).
Posted by: MikeD at February 12, 2010 02:16 PM (FkL60)
Posted by: cbullitt at February 12, 2010 06:35 PM (gwh5D)
11
ok, I don't ONLY eat meat, I am an omnivore, as man was meant to be. However, given a choice between a 1lb porterhouse and the saladbar, I'll take the steak (medium rare please). I'll hit the saladbar if there is room left after the steak and loaded baked potato. When we go out to breakfast (my fave is Cracker Barrel), it's the heart attack special for me. Fried eggs, country fried steak with sausage gravy, potatos fried in bacon grease with onion, bacon, and rye toast smothered in butter. (of course, I'm usually not hungry after that for the rest of the day). Oh, and a BIG glass of orange or grapefruit juice, and coffee. (the juice is so I don't get the scurvy...lol)
Posted by: mrfixit at February 13, 2010 01:08 PM (Bsm1s)
Posted by: Ember at February 13, 2010 01:14 PM (LdRAG)
13
To quote that eminent philosopher, Red Forman,
"That's not food, that's what food eats."
Posted by: Veeshir at February 13, 2010 02:25 PM (foWRP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 09, 2010
IPCSunk
The hits keep on coming for
the IPCC and their reliance on flimsy evidence for catastrophic claims.
Quote
TREES will not uproot themselves and embark on blood-soaked killing sprees by 2035, global warming experts have admitted....snip..."It appears the claim was not based on new data or field research but on that bit with the angry, talking trees in Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers.
...snip...
There is a supplementary source, and yes it is that bit with the angry, talking trees in The Wizard of Oz.Surprisingly enough, they're standing by their prediction that
trees will mate with little people bringing forth a new, super-race of Gaians. (note: Link not safe for work.... or sanity, or stomach. Contains graphic depictions of hobbits fucking a tree).
First link via
Tim Blair, second link via
some blog nobody reads (thank goodness).
Posted by: Veeshir at
08:03 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 141 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Too good not to copy. That is five-by-fucking-five snark. Great find Veeshir.
Posted by: cbullitt at February 09, 2010 09:38 PM (gwh5D)
2
Funny stuff. Other likely IPCC sources: Hitchcock's 'The Birds', Roald Dahl's 'James and the Giant Peach', and 'Creature from the Black Lagoon'.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at February 09, 2010 10:02 PM (WhFvm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Damn you Gorequemada! (shakes fist)
Okay, so DC had a freaking blizzard (pics below the fold of the view out of my window 3 days later) and the Federal Gov't has been closed for two days.
Yes, they closed yesterday and today. Yesterday I agreed with, too many people didn't have power and the roads were really, really bad.
Today? It would just be a pain in the neck. Although, the buses still aren't running regularly and most streets are still just packed snow. But that's another shitload of money down the chute.
But that's not the point.
Another
blizzard is on the way. Possibly another 10-20 inches.
And why? Why are we the target of every snow cloud out there?
MoFo
global warmmongering bastids!
The blizzard (s) is delaying their pronouncement
“More and more, Americans are witnessing the impacts of climate change
in their own backyards, including sea-level rise, longer growing
seasons, changes in river flows, increases in heavy downpours, earlier
snowmelt and extended ice-free seasons in our waters. People are
searching for relevant and timely information about these changes to
inform decision-making about virtually all aspects of their lives,” the
release says.Fuck you. You know? Fuck you.
Global worming pics below the fold.
more...
Posted by: Veeshir at
10:11 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 422 words, total size 3 kb.
1
don't longer growing seasons mean more crops (and more food), much of which could be used to fucking help feed the poor of the world?
And I no longer give a flyingfistfuck of fucking fuckitude about any ice other than the ise in my martini shaker
Posted by: eddiebear at February 09, 2010 10:28 AM (wnU1W)
2
Whiners, all. DC is getting a typical Michigan winter.
General Washington won the nation's freedom in weather just as bad.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at February 09, 2010 11:42 AM (PH0UW)
3
Longer growing seasons
Oh God, no! Anything but that! I can see why we need to destroy the economy, we need to get rid of all of the extra food that we will get from global warming.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 09, 2010 12:16 PM (HllLs)
4
Stupid iPod. Can't format anything right.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 09, 2010 12:17 PM (HllLs)
5
it would be a blast going sideways at about 15 MPH with the speedometer reading 80 (ahhhh, my teenage years
No ice - I'm a in Cali - but I recall one day getting out of classes, and we all headed out the parking lot east on E18th, left on Rameriz and right on Rideout ...to discover they had oiled the pavement.
Hilarity ensued.
Well, until we almost wide-eyed crashed the pristine 1950 Ford sedan into a parked car (after 3-4 brodies).
...and of course drugs were semi-involved (we would have taken advantage of that stone-cold sober though): it was 1969 after all, and we were sophisticated juniors.
It's a wonder any of us stupid-fucks survived at all ....
Posted by: davis,br at February 09, 2010 12:33 PM (uCShA)
6
I got a car at the beginning of my junior year, the first year and a half I spent more time with the car going sideways than going forward.
In winter especially.
I figured that people get in trouble when they start sliding unexpectedly so I spent all my time sliding. That way it wasn't unexpected.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 09, 2010 12:48 PM (Yxu/y)
7
2nd car I had was a 69 Impala 4 door. It was a lead sled, 327, automatic, 4 wheel drum manual brakes, limited slip posi rear end.Was living in S.E. WI (end of and just after high school) and the place I was working at part time, the only way to get there was driving down a 1/4 mile hill, up the other side, then a sharp right and up a 1/4 mile gravel hill driveway. In the middle of winter, everyone else parked at the bottom of the driveway and walked up. Not me, that chevy made it all the way up to the top, sideways, creeping about 5mph. It would also go through drifts as high as the top of the wheel-well without slowing down much. They sure don't make cars like they used too.
Posted by: mrfixit at February 09, 2010 01:04 PM (Bsm1s)
8
There was a road near my house, Jeffrey Lane, it went up a hill in a looping pattern.
You went right, wide turn, back to the left, wide turn, back to the right, wide turn, back left.
Like an S with a another loop or two, up a steep hill.
Nobody but snowmobilers went up it in the winter, except me. In my 72 Cutlass Supreme 2dr, 350 4bbl, 3-speed automatic trans, 4-wheel drum, no pansy ass posi.
I just pointed the car straight up the hill, punched it and used the steering wheel. I would go up at about 10-15 MPH, sliding sideways back and forth with the car always facing up the hill and the speedometer reading 80-100.
That was all about teh adrenaline.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 09, 2010 01:12 PM (Yxu/y)
9
I currently live almost exactly where the thermocline changes. Seriously, I'll have four or five inches of snow and go 2/10ths of a mile down to the stop sign and maybe an inch. Good times, good times. My driveway is moderately steep, gravel covered and there's a natural spring that sends water down in even in the middle of a drought. This makes a nice natural bobsled run. Directly across the street is a guardrail, then a steep pitch down into a stream. Oh it's fun times heading out for work, let me tell you.
It's even better when the idiots are flying past at 50 mph then lose it when they hit the ice patch on the road and slam into the abandoned house next to me. There's always at least one idiot who manages to get into the stream.
Fun fun fun.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 09, 2010 01:50 PM (8WZWv)
10
72 Cutlass Supreme 2dr, 350 4bbl, 3-speed automatic trans, 4-wheel drum, no pansy ass posi
...ah: sophmore HS driving class (required to get your CA driver's license at 16) we "learned" in a new 68 Cutlass Supreme ...Saturday and the Algebra teacher - Mr Charles ...the teachers could make a few extra bucks by teaching "driving class" evenings and weekends - would meet with the three of us at 08:00A and we'd get back around 02:00P. We drove hundreds of miles through the Sierra's (spring time: little snow left ...but occasional patches, and we'd stop and throw snow-balls).
Geez, that brought back memories: that was the first new car I was ever in (let alone drove) ...though I actually learned to drive in a '59 Ford stepside in a field, and spent most of my teen years driving around in this (my parent's '59 was ice-white tho') ...the definitive pimp car ...6,000 pounds plus of chrome and fins.
And oh yes: I could get it sideways! Although that almost resulted in me rear-ending my best friend's parent's Chrysler New Yorker (PUSH-BUTTON shifters!!!11leventy!) one cold wet icy winter day ...only his reflexes saved our asses from getting killed (I'm sure) by both our parents'.
...if you can imagine - usually 6-8 - neurotic, mildly stoned teenagers tooling around Aggy-town on a Saturday evening, the smell of pot wafting out the open windows: I can never hear Hotel California without seeing that car from the driver's seat.
Posted by: davis,br at February 09, 2010 01:52 PM (uCShA)
11
There's nothing like 2 tons of <1972, Detroit steel barreling down the road.
CAFE screwed us all.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 09, 2010 03:48 PM (VWiW7)
12
3
Longer growing seasons
Oh God, no! Anything but that! I can see why we need to destroy the
economy, we need to get rid of all of the extra food that we will get
from global warming.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 09, 2010 12:16 PM (HllLs)
Think of it as the first salvo in our ongoing battle against the demon, Obesity.
Posted by: TheUnrepentantGeek at February 09, 2010 04:50 PM (g1cNf)
13
Heh, I though Jeff M. had not read his earlier comment and reposted it.
Cabin Fever. It's like drugs only the snow is legal and a lot cheaper.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 09, 2010 05:03 PM (VWiW7)
14
How dare you, I would never double-post.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 09, 2010 06:07 PM (8P3+x)
15
How dare you, I would
never double-post.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 09, 2010 06:07 PM (8P3+x)
16
Global Warming causes blizzards.
Read Time watch NBC like the 2 dozen other people in werethefuckwazzit?
Posted by: Nord at February 10, 2010 08:36 PM (OBDWE)
17
Forgot
Federal debt is good (ala Kieth)
Posted by: Nord at February 10, 2010 08:38 PM (OBDWE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
114kb generated in 0.2152 seconds; 76 queries returned 280 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.2-pink.