With all the talk of how the Democrats are going to rape us up the ass with no lube, a rusted chainsaw dipped in the clap, and nary an after-rape cuddle or thank you card to show for it, I'm happy seeing anybody saying anything about it. Regardless of what the House and the Senate think, no does mean no, and yelling "surprise" does not make it surprise sex - it makes you an asshole who yelled "surprise" at a bitch before you raped her.
There are quite a few states (and the majority of the American population) saying fuck this loudly and clearly by sponsoring or passing legislation that would require the state to sue the feds for forcing insurance on citizens. Today, we can congratulate Idaho for being the first to sign it into law. Now, I know that this is totally frivolous, doubtlessly a waste of time, and impossible to win - since federal law supercedes state law.
But, damnit, someone's got to make it loud and fucking clear that we don't want this reform. We don't want you to deem it so (who the fuck deems shit to be so in a democracy? isn't that what kings and queens say before the angry mob at their castle gates drop the guillotine?); we don't want you to force it through with the nuclear option, we want you to think about what's really, honestly, genuinely going to help America. And Americans.
But, no. You've hung your fucking hat on this one, and you are standing by the Titanic while it sinks. You called it unsinkable - and if you have to tie the fucking thing to a million blimps to airlift it out of the motherfucking ocean, you're going to do it.
Fuck you. Fuck you, your fucking agenda, your fucking arrogance, and fuck your fucking delusions of grandeur. Fuck you for being cowards who can't accept that you have failed, and, instead of being man enough to say, "Well, we failed; let's focus on what Americans want!" deciding to force something that no one wants on us.
In November, when I vote against every fucker who dared to support health care in any way, shape, or form, I will be saying fuck you under my breath. And loving every damn minute of it.
I'm still hoping it doesn't pass, but I will donate a crap-load of money to everybody in a competitive district who's running against one of those tools.
I gave to Tarkanian in Nevada when there was that Ten for Tark or whatever it was. I'm waiting to see who Nevada chooses, and then I'm giving to that candidate. I'll look around carefully and see who else can use $100 or so, spread it out over months, and forward the receipt to the other candidate, just like I did with Reid.
Money talks to these tools. We tried, very publicly, with Reid and they didn't listen. We need November to be a bloodbath and it has to be undone. If they pass a law saying you can't undo it, the next congress passes a law saying you can, then undoes it. It's not like it's rocket surgery.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 17, 2010 06:04 PM (8vBqg)
<i>Now, I know that this is totally frivolous, doubtlessly a waste of time, and impossible to win - since federal law supercedes state law.</i>
I wouldn't rush that analysis. We're talking about the Feds coming and proposing to takeover something that has been the purview of the individual states for sometime.
Vote for the Homo!
Updated I live in Northern VA, my Representative is Jim Moran (Hates-Veeshir, VA). I used to live in Maurice Hinchey's district, the 4th craziest congress-critter, Moran is probably 3rd craziest. (no plans on moving to either Ohio or Texas so 1 and 2 are unlikely).
But this year, in keeping with this homo-friendly site, I get to vote for a homo! Quote Matthew lives in Arlington with his partner Josh and two dogs.
And the best part? He's not just "better than Moran"(a very, very, very, low bar), his "issues" pages give me a chubby. Except for "transportation", it is generally thought that better roads will help NoVa's traffic. My solution involves shooting rockets at every third vehicle. That's the only way. But everything else involves limited gov't and more freedom for me.
Gooooooo Homo! h/t Volokh via the Puppy Blender. As the PB says, check out the homo love from the nice, tolerant lefties in the comments.
Update I meant to say, I'm mostly happy someone is contesting this race. His conservatism and lefty-head-popping-homoness are just the icing on the sundae. I usually just write in Meryl Yourish because there's nobody running against Moran and Meryl campaigned to be written in for some other position right around when I moved here so it was her or Fred Flintstone and I had visions of nobody voting for Moran in protest and Meryl winning 1-0.
1no plans on moving to either Ohio or Texas so 1 and 2 are unlikely
Ahem ... you failed to account for the 4th district of Massachusettes. Bawney Fwank sets the standard for crazy. And homo.
Posted by: Andy at March 06, 2010 09:21 AM (82Zkd)
2
I'd love to see Moran lose, he's such a shitbag, and I love that Berry makes sure to basically put I SUPPORT ISRAEL as the top item on his foreign policy page.
3
Andy, I couldn't care any less about homoness. Well, in guys. I'm very interested in it in women.
I do think it helps, this is a very lefty area. It's the default position. People you meet casually just assume you are a lefty. Being gay will help them accept voting for (R). "I didn't vote for the Republican, I voted for the gay guy."
I would quibble with Barney being crazy, he's slimy. Moran and Hinchey are fucking insane. They were only 4 and 5 at one time because Cynthia McKinney was in Congress.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 06, 2010 10:34 AM (ZPlgl)
4
Andy, that came out harsher than I intended. I know you probably couldn't care less about his homoness either.
I like to be a jerk on purpose to those who deserve it, I don't like doing it on accident.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 06, 2010 11:12 AM (ZPlgl)
5I know you probably
couldn't care less about his homoness either.
Yeah, I was just keeping with the theme. If he's not the engineer on the crazy train, though, he at least works for the railroad and is probably embezzling from it.
I'll have to try to find the rambling, 30,000-word email he sent in reply to his constituents (one of which I am) explaining why the financial crisis was everyone's fault but his. Cray-Z!
But Cynthia McKinney ... whoa! Now that's batshit certifiable fucking insane crazy.
Posted by: Andy at March 06, 2010 01:00 PM (82Zkd)
6
To finish your analogy, I think Bawney is the guy shoveling coal into the boiler. And he's just going to keep on shoveling.
Posted by: Jeff M at March 06, 2010 01:24 PM (8P3+x)
7
I should say, you're right about Barney, he is pretty darn crazy, it's just that his sliminess is his defining characteristic.
Notice that Moran, Hinchey and Kucinich don't have prestigious committee posts like Barney, they're too far past crazy.
Barney helps the right people, the three above would help other crazy people who don't contribute enough campaign donations.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 06, 2010 05:23 PM (nENtL)
Eco-wackos in control, poor, me hardest hit. This is what pisses me off the most about "greenhouse reduction" legislation, it has nothing to do with making stuff cleaner, Quote To reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the transportation sector 14
percent from 2005 levels by 2020, the cost of driving must simply
increase,
It usually has to do with making energy use more expensive so I'll use less so my standard of living will decrease and the gov't gets another tax to take my money. Of course, the rich and political won't have to worry about it because the first can afford it while the second just take my money to pay for it.
This particular one probably won't happen, but look at every "greenhouse gas reduction" plan, they always involve making energy more expensive. Which facet screws the little man and gives gov't more of my money while giving eco-wackos a chance for smug self-satisfaction. That's lose, lose, lose to me.
Blame Tom at Just One Minute for pissing you off, I know I do. I always shoot the messenger, that'll learn him to keep his mouth shut next time.
1
Always shoot the messenger. That's one less motherfucker you need to kill when the shooting starts.
Posted by: tangonine at March 03, 2010 09:08 PM (C8Pcc)
2
As a college student, I understand being poor and being subject to increasing costs. However, this is trading the cost of spewing NOx and ozone-creating chemicals out of the tailpipe to the cost of purchasing that energy in the first place. I'm not as convinced about CO2 as I am about the other pollutants, but the science is still emerging.
Cost is a different term for an ecologist than it is for an economist. Which has value: the dollar bill or the twig? One represents the human construct, while the other represents the natural construct, on which the human one is based.
For me, I drive a 30mpg wagon and strive for efficiency, cheap, innovative efficiency.
Posted by: That one guy at March 04, 2010 03:16 PM (JtCPE)
3
You see, I don't think CO2 is a pollutant, I think it's plant food. Hence this bit Which facet screws the little man and gives gov't more of my money while giving eco-wackos a chance for smug self-satisfaction. The gov't doesn't take that money to make stuff less polluting, they take that tax money and use it to buy votes.
But since you're a college student, take science classes, figure out a way to make things less polluting, become rich. Don't lower poor people's standard of living for anti-science reasons.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 04, 2010 04:22 PM (ZqZma)
Mormen
Goooooo Utah! Quote Long frustrated by Washington's control over much of their state, Utah
legislators are proposing a novel way to deal with federal land --
seize it and develop it.
Can I get a few "ha"s for my Bwa? For the first time, I might get to see Kelo cited and laugh, laugh, laugh without the concomitant feeling of despair that usually goes with The Funniest End of Civilization Ever.
Via Say Uncle who you should be reading so I wouldn't have to steal his stuff so much.
After reading this, I think I may be starting a blog war ...
I think it's an interesting thing that so many people see tattoos and piercings on a young person and immediately assume liberal. I think to some of my friends from my especially punk rock days, and I smile to myself a little, since probably seven in ten of those friends "grew up" to be conservatives. After all, the punk movement is about anarchy - about damn the man and fuck the government and all that shit, so it's only a natural evolution for those people to gravitate to the small government conservative movement.
Where people like that (and in that, I include myself) get ostracized from the conservative movement are the socially conservative issues, if you will. Gay marraige, religion, maybe abortion.
I consider myself a conservative because I believe in small government, fewer entitlements, market-based initiatives, free enterprise and markets, legal immigration, and gun rights. I may have missed a few, but when it really comes down to it, that's what separates me from your average liberal.
But conservatism doesn't always welcome a social liberal into their ranks. I haven't always been accepted by a lot of the conservatives I know, because I don't care who you fuck, or what you believe in, or whether you smoke pot. And, because of those kinds of issues, my support on gun rights, my support of the free market, my support of small government has often been swept to the side.
I found this piece on one of the "founders" of the Tea Party movement, and I thought it was interesting that the immediate spin of the article is that she isn't "your average conservative". Why? Well, she has a piercing. In her nose. She's an actress! So, when her voice wasn't being heard, she did what she thought was right, and held a protest against the stimulus bill.
Keli Carender has a pierced nose, performs improv on weekends and lives here in a neighborhood with more Mexican grocers than coffeehouses. You might mistake her for the kind of young person whose vote powered President Obama to the White House. You probably would not think of her as a Tea Party type.
But leaders of the Tea Party movement credit her with being the first.
A year ago, frustrated that every time she called her senators to urge them to vote against the $787 billion stimulus bill their mailboxes were full, and tired of wearing out the ear of her Obama-voting fiancé, Ms. Carender decided to hold a protest against what she called the “porkulus.”
There's been a lot of talk on how the Tea Party could cost us Republican seats by throwing up candidates against a RINO. And it's an absolute truth. But maybe, just maybe, that's not the Tea Party's fault. Maybe it's the fault of the Republicans for failing to see, as Ronald Reagan said, that someone who agrees with you 80% of the time should be considered a good friend. If we can't work out these differences within our own party, then that's what's giving the Tea Party this strength and momentum.
I'll vote for a RINO over a democrat, because I know what happens when you vote 3rd party. But can you blame other people for choosing to use their vote to make a statement? Can you blame another party for capitalizing on the weaknesses within our own party?
1
Other than that I believe that if your party is throwing you duds, you need to get in there and make them stop - BEFORE it gets to the point of resorting to a third party - you've hit the nail on the head.
Posted by: Alice H at March 02, 2010 01:01 AM (qJHYy)
Posted by: mesablue at March 02, 2010 01:47 AM (CbF4r)
5
And another thing...I'm not fond of nose piercings. I'd rather not have that strumpet on our side.
Whore.
Posted by: Sean M. at March 02, 2010 01:49 AM (rLWHv)
6
And, I think the Tea Party folks will be good for the repubs in the long term. All those extra precinct delegates are gonna be fun at the conventions. Wake up the old turds.
Pat Robertson's folks did the dame thing a long time ago for different reasons. Not all stuck around, but quite a few did who had previously been lifelong dems.
Posted by: mesablue at March 02, 2010 01:50 AM (CbF4r)
And, no, I won't wrassle you to determine which flavor Ember and I use, mesa.
Posted by: Sean M. at March 02, 2010 02:17 AM (rLWHv)
11
Actually we had almost the same conversation over at Daphne's place about the same thing and had a bit of intelligent conversation about it until a commenter lost his shit when we said that the only reason that homosexuality trended towards a supposed non-conservative slant was because it had been politicized as such, but in truth did not limit one's beliefs in the political arena. Apparently who you shag (to this guy) immediately makes you desire a massive government and the loss of large percentages of your income.
Posted by: Old Iron at March 02, 2010 05:13 AM (tD0Cq)
12
Part of the problem is that there aren't many "punk" ethic candidates or elected officials. (Jesse Ventura, maybe? Look how that turned out.) All the "fiscal conservative, social liberal-tarian-ish" Republicans turn out to be fiscal squishes as well. (Not to say that the social cons have been especially good on fiscal issues either.)
Ok, so Ron Paul doesn't care if you smoke pot. Whoop-dee-do.
Posted by: JoeCollins at March 02, 2010 07:56 AM (jtJig)
13
You're a victim of a stereotype, but it's a stereotype of your compatriots making. One of the things that defines a conservative is acceptance of responsibility, but of all the multipley tattooed and pierced types I know, and I know a ton through school and a previous job working at a plasma donation center, responsibility was in short supply in that crowd. Of course like every stereotype there are numerous exceptions but you all get tarred with a broad brush.
As far as the social issues go. If you are expecting acceptance by the social cons you might as well just give it up. Never gonna happen unless you agree 100%
Posted by: chad98036 at March 02, 2010 09:29 AM (WNcvq)
14
Ember, I agree. I learned long ago never to assume anything about
anybody based solely on their appearance. I write a blog called Red State Witch,
which is a pretty good clue that not all witches and pagans are loopy,
San-Fran-style liberals. Quite a few of us are pro-gun, pro-military,
low-tax, low-spend, anti-government-butting-into-your-life,
anti-statist, self-employed small business owner types. Not that the
strict social-cons would ever willingly be caught in the same room as
us.
And as for tats, I'm with you on that. I gots 'em, including a big one. But when I put on the Brooks Brothers suit, I blend in with all the other professionals. Witches call that casting a glamour.
I performed a real act of magic once. I put a Bush/Cheney bumper
sticker on my car and it became invisible to my liberal witch friends.
17
Why is it that there's a stereotype of tattoos = liberal, when there's also almost not a single United States Marine that I've met without some manner of tattoo? Generally the Eagle, Globe, and Anchor, but I've also seen a lot of flags, bulldogs and other non-Marine related tattoos on em. Why?
Are we to assume that Marine = liberal now?
Posted by: MikeD at March 02, 2010 10:45 AM (FkL60)
18
"May I suggest stompy boots/heels as the only mandatory part of their chosen gladiator uniform?"
TIFIFY
Posted by: MikeD at March 02, 2010 10:47 AM (FkL60)
As far as the social issues go. If you are expecting acceptance by the social cons you might as well just give it up. Never gonna happen unless you agree 100%
That's the point. That's the problem! While the social cons are becoming a smaller and smaller group, they are often still part of a new conservative's introduction to the Republican party. And they will go out of their way to make some people feel unwelcome in the party.
What? No picture to accompany this?
There will be pics soon. New corset pics, even.
I performed a real act of magic once. I put a Bush/Cheney bumper sticker on my car and it became invisible to my liberal witch friends.
There is so much win in that sentence that I don't even know how to handle it.
Posted by: Ember at March 02, 2010 12:17 PM (LdRAG)
22I performed a real act of magic once. I put a Bush/Cheney bumper
sticker on my car and it became invisible to my liberal witch friends.
Actually, that one was on the wife's car. Mine has the NRA Member sticker on it. They are able to see the car, but it makes their heads nearly explode.
I would have figured that would make you invisible to them.
Yes, Veeshir. "These are not the conservative witches you are looking for..."
Uhhh, Ember - I've got a newsflash for you, hot-stuff...
You is more Libertarian than you is conservative. I've been reading your stuff for long enough to see this. I know it is going to take some getting used to, but welcome to the ranks.
Posted by: Goober at March 03, 2010 08:01 PM (QNRoi)
24
I'm actually registered Libertarian (now) after a few really terrible experiences with the GOP. So, yeah. I've finally hung my head and admitted to being one of teh crazies.
Posted by: Ember at March 03, 2010 10:27 PM (LdRAG)
25
OK, I've gotta scold you for that, Ember. You can't vote in GOP primaries if you're registered Libertarian, unless Louisiana is one of those crazy states with open primaries.
Posted by: Alice H at March 03, 2010 11:56 PM (qJHYy)
26
I honestly don't know how Louisiana's primaries work. I haven't been here for a primary yet.
Posted by: Ember at March 03, 2010 11:57 PM (LdRAG)
27
Okay, looked it up. They do not allow crazy fringe third partiers to participate in the caucus. Damnit.
Posted by: Ember at March 04, 2010 12:50 AM (LdRAG)
28
It's probably too late for you to register for this year's caucus, too. Dammit is right.
Posted by: Alice H at March 04, 2010 10:02 AM (qJHYy)
29
But hey, you can go choose the Libertarian candidate that will be the next...um...Libertarians rarely actually win an office, so I'm not sure what you'll be accomplishing.
Posted by: Alice H at March 04, 2010 10:03 AM (qJHYy)
30
I tend more towards Livid-terrier than Republican myself, but in SC it's kind of "don't ask don't tell" during primaries.
Don't feel bad Ember, almost every Libertarian I know is personally a well spoken, sober, intelligent individual. It's the Party and its candidates that are batshit insane.
Posted by: MikeD at March 04, 2010 10:23 AM (FkL60)
ItshayBastids. I hate Virginia GFWs So lately the Virginia legislature, with their fine, new, GOP, gun-friendly, governor, has been trying to pass some gun-friendly laws. Like the one where you can't buy more than one handgun a month unless you have a concealed carry permit. So the Gun Fearing Wussies need to stop that. Only the fine gov't is allowed to have guns and they can't have gun laws relaxed, they must always be strengthened.
Courts of Justice Committee Chairman Henry Marsh on
Monday announced the creation of a subcommittee to handle bills
concerning guns and other issues. The subcommittee is stacked with
four anti-gun Democrats and one Republican.
So nothing gun related and likely to pass will not leave this fine oubliett... err... committee. On the one hand, that's really pissing me off. On the other hand, this might mean an extra impetus for an electoral bloodbath of gun grabbers. On the first hand (all balled up), this pisses me off. I really want this little ploy to fail. Why are they afraid of a vote? Because they'd lose it. I hate Virginia Nazis.
Forgot the h/t: H/T Some guy I know. You wouldn't know him.
2
On the bright side, at least the Restaurant Carry bill (and the mail renewal of CHPs) managed to escape. To me, that fixes the most onerous of the existing restrictions. I'd dearly love to see campus carry and church carry, along with lifetime CHP and repeal of One-Gun-a-Month, but we're making progress.
Posted by: Wolfwood at March 02, 2010 08:49 AM (NyqJb)
Yes, fuck you lefties. Fuck you for what you are trying to do to my family and my country. And may you never run into me if the shitty care you intend to impose upon us leads to ill events happening to the people I know and love.
Posted by: Mortis at February 28, 2010 07:54 AM (QjuDE)
5
See, what they think is that once it's been passed it's the Full Democratic Employment Act as all their campaigns are going to all be "Don't vote for the GOP because they'll take away your health care".
It's been a lefty wet dream for decades, they're so close they probably will figure they have to do it because it's now or never.
I don't know if that makes any sense in reality-land, but I do think it will screw them the next two elections if they pass it. If they pass it, they'll start their ads about the GOP taking away health care (before it's implemented), and the next two elections will be a blood bath, and the GOP had better rescind it.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 28, 2010 09:04 AM (f1Y40)
Everybody Knows.....
Ace links to Rubio's fundraising "bomb" or something. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying don't give him money, but....
Ace quotes something from the link While Marco enjoys a 14 point lead today, this race will certainly
tighten up as Gov. Crist has a commanding cash advantage ($9 million
raised to Rubio's to $3.4 million). That's why Marco's trip to
California is so important to helping him raise the funds necessary to
turn his lead into a victory.
It's the Holy Grail to politicos* that money=votes.
I don't know if that is a valid assumption anymore. It used to be the only time anybody heard about a politician was when he was in a commercial. Most people didn't watch debates or really pay attention to politics until the weekend before the election.
Now? Teh Peepul are angry so they're looking for information, it doesn't have to look for them. There is suddenly a bad form of publicity in politics not involving dead hookers or live boys.
*No, not the lying blog that's hilariously trying to claim the name, the original use of the word.
Posted by: Veeshir at
03:23 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 1 kb.
Ahhh, the sweet smell of success.
You know, sometimes you work and you work and you just don't know if you're doing any good.
Other times, you see results. You realize you're not just pissing into the wind. Those are the good times.
Just 8 percent of Americans want the
members of Congress re-elected, according to a CBS News-New York
Times poll
Yes, CBS and the NY Times, probably even with their usual demographic tricks, found out that people are totally pissed off at the Democrat led gov't.
How cool would 100% turnover be? Not because it would mean that Republicans would be the majority in the House and would at least gain seats in the Senate, but because of all the career pols sent home. Think of those members of the House who've been elected every two years for decades going home to K Street....errrr.... home.
1Giving your best friend a Links of London Mobile Charm may bewonderful. This classic,links of london comes from
professional charmmaker. If you have
any question for purchasing Links of London MobileCharm, please contact us.
Posted by: links of london at February 23, 2010 04:48 AM (AEJ3L)
Not just "No", but "Hell No!"
Yawn, another day another beltway-better saying, "What happened to the great, intelligent, Obama?" Quote How could such smart people do so many stupid things?
Because they weren't smart, you were willfully ignorant (which equates to functional stupidity). Obama was never tested. Remember the one semi-difficult question? Quoth Obama I don't want you to waste your question.
And the follow-up? Do you or Duncan have a better jump shot?
To which the ultra-smart Obama replied Duncan, much better. That one's an easy one.
Saying whatever your listener wants to hear as a compliant media shields you from your own mistakes (Joe fucking Biden?) while campaigning isn't being "smart". Not being able to deliver on a whole shitload (not metric, no science involved) of contradictory, nebulous promises isn't surprising.
That an inexperienced, far left, Chicago-machine-politician acting like an inexperienced, far-left, Chicago-machine-politician surprises our intellectual betters always makes me laugh. Too bad the stakes are so high and they'll never admit they were had.
Until about 10 years from now, when they'll write article after article about how Obama fooled Americans. (You know, those Americans, not the author).
Fuck you Captain America! (?)
Via the Jawas, we see this link to Right Wing News about Captain USO...errrr...Captain America. Some blog nobody reads commented about how he's embarassed about the American flag. Now? He's opining on how the Tea Parties are racist. A black superhero is thinking about infiltrating but... Quote "I don't exactly see a black man from Harlem fitting in with a bunch of angry white folks,
And no, Falcon is not talking about getting a job at CNN or MSNBC. Quote from RWN After this we find that the Captain's plan is to send the black man
into a redneck bar to pretend to be a black man working for the IRS and
to get everyone all mad
So, Captain America is NBC in disguise? Double fuck you.
I never really was all that into comic books, I just read my brother's, but this pisses me off. Next up, the Haunted Tank will listen to J.E.B. Stuart and start running down black folks outside tea party events.
Posted by: Veeshir at
10:44 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.
Mission Creeps
So DHS,(PDF warming) fresh off calling me a terrorist, is now defending the homeland against Dependence on fossil fuels and the threat of global climate change
Popcorn Stocks Through the Roof
Even with O'Keefe getting busted, Big Gov't managed to slap Minitru around again. That's just funny. They got too complacent and out of shape in the Bush years when he didn't fight back and they just can't learn. The warm cocoon of leftist thought makes learning difficult. They think everybody is stupid but them, in other words, they know far too much to learn anything. Forgot the h/t, same place you saw it, Ace's headlines.
1
the MSM and lefties didn't realize with whom they were fighting on this one. They thought Breitbart would roll over. They thought he would give in, throw everybody aside, issue an apology, and ask to be forgiven. They thought wrong. They bought the ticket to the crazytrain, and they can't get off now. They tangled with the cyber version of a streetbrawler spliced with Chuck Norris, and now that he is hitting back, and hitting back with the ferocity of a man who is defending his livelihood, they have no idea how to deal with him, and are either trying to starve the story of oxygen, or issue multiple posts defending themselves.
Let this be a lesson: when facing an ambush, wheel around and run into the fire, for it will surprise, disorient, and scare shitless those who wish you harm.
Posted by: eddiebear at February 06, 2010 12:11 AM (mQcrN)
Is our politicians learning?
Not just no but Hell No! You saw the link, Shelby is "holding" all of Obama's nominees. Not because they give "misleading" and more "misleading" testimony in their nomination hearings, or because they all seem to have a tax "forgetting" problem nor of course,because of the interesting choices like the union rep/labor board member, no, not because of all the ethical problems from what seems like each and every nominee, but because Shelby wants some of that sweet, sweet pork. He's gumming up the works in a totally unrelated area in a particularly lame, but obviously totally legit, move to suckle at the public teat (I'm not talking about the merits of the deal, I don't care. It doesn't make any difference.) It's funny how often I agree with idealistic lefties, you can do the right thing for the wrong reasons. I'm always in favor of gumming up the works of gov't but that's a lame reason and way to do it.
I wonder if he'll have a realistic, conservative challenger in his next primary.
Curiouser and Curiouser
The Saga of Treacher is getting curiouser and curiouser.
The State Dept's attitude is pretty much, "Shut up and go away." Now they're claiming a jogger collided with their SUV. According to the link, he doesn't jog.
I'm not going to excerpt it, RTWT, it's.... interesting reading. Edited for clarity.
Treacher should have known better than to be out during the State Dept.'s annual 'Death Race' event.
The jaywalking ticket was a nice touch.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at February 04, 2010 10:55 PM (WhFvm)
4
Feds are going to comment as little as possible, they don't want conflicting or incriminating statements out there. I'd recommend Treacher do the same, keep your yap shut till you're in court. This I find interesting,
In one of his strikingly short conversations with the Daily Caller,
agent Mike McGuinn acknowledged that Medlock was not jaywalking at all,
but walking “outside the crosswalk when the incident occurred.”
So he's got plenty of time to notice Treach is walking outside of the lines, but not enough time to brake so Treach can get the fuck out of his way or stop once he hit him...uh huh. Unless the agent has got video to back that one or a horde of good witnesses (and he won't, because he hit and ran), he's gonna have fun explaining that one in court.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at February 04, 2010 11:46 PM (N/KIT)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at February 04, 2010 11:47 PM (N/KIT)
6
Dc is well camerad, I wonder if there's video and if they'll "lose" it.
I feel for Treacher, but if this had to happen, it's good it happened to somebody with a platform. They can't just make this unhappen unless they make him happy.
Hermit Dave, the ticket was a nice touch. I liked the part about how he was in and out of consciousness at the time so they gave to it a visitor.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 05, 2010 01:37 AM (K0ZVE)
Rahm meets Alinsky's 4th rule
The left demands rigid political correctness, well, they got rigid political correctness. The Special Olympics is really making Rahm Emmanuel squirm. Fun to watch, really.
America's Economy is De-Evolving
A couple months ago I posted an op-ed I had submitted to the Washington Post both here and as part of an Open Blog over at Ace's . In it I speculated that one of the things that will be necessary to rebuild the American economy is a resurgence of on shore manufacturing. I was pretty thoroughly shouted down at Ace's both by those who believed I was advocating a command economy and by those who believe that manufacturing in the US is dead.
That lack of an industrial base has put the American economy and worker in jeopardy, says distressed investor Lynn Tilton, CEO of Patriarch Partners. "The reality is, in recent times, every great empire has been built on a manufacturing economy," notes Tilton. "The fall of every empire has been the failure to remember that one fundamental fact."
Tilton's point is simple: the country cannot thrive as simply a service-based economy. As Tilton explains to Aaron and Henry in the accompanying clip, there isn't enough demand for services and those related jobs to keep the U.S. competitive on a global scale. We should also not over look the fact some people are better at building and making things then working on spreadsheets in a cubicle
Now I have to admit I'm not sure what empires she is referring to but she agrees with me so she must be a genius.
Any economy needs producers of some sort. Whether that be manufacturing, software development, farming, or whatever -- an economy that produces too little to support its population will eventually decline. Neither government, wall street, nor Starbucks produce anything -- without industry related to needs and basic wants they'd eventually cease to exist.
The big issue with manufacturing in the US is global wage arbitrage. The standard of living is much higher in the United States than most of the rest of the world. Most of our 'poor' would be considered well-off in many countries. For the United States to re-industrialize, we need to become globally competitive on wages, either by reducing our standard of living or by other countries raising theirs. Protectionism is also possible, but that would have terrible long-term consequences.
The US has largely papered over the effects of globalization during the last 25 years by continually expanding our debt load, both government and private. Taking advantage of our reserve currency status, we've blown bubbles with overly accommodative interest rate policy, and pretended we could all get rich selling each other stocks and real estate. It's now time to pay the piper, which means a lower overall standard of living in the US, until our cost of production is competitive with the rest of the world.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at February 02, 2010 10:34 PM (WhFvm)
2
From what I have read (and experienced in my job) when productivity transport costs etc are factored in the wage difference, while a factor, could be overcome. The biggest problem at the moment is the chinese artificially keeping their currency low so that they are in effect subsidizing all their manufacturers. If their currency were to rise evene if wages remained the same the price of Chinese goods would not be nearly as attractive.
I don't know if I am explaining that exactly right but I think you understand what I mean.
Posted by: chad98036 at February 02, 2010 10:46 PM (WNcvq)
3
Here is the thing. Manufacturing has increased above inflation during all the 2000s. Did it shed jobs for sure. Automation came in to reduce the very, very expensive labor, regulation, and tax costs here. The state does nothing to help business here. I was in the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) industry in the mid 80s. California produces more PCB than any other country except Japan. What happened to kill this golden goose? Regulations that were directed on getting yucky industry out of the beautiful state meant for maids and waitresses. The PCB industry had to leave for offshore because of regulations that were completely out of bounds.
OK so that is bad the manufacturers of the PCB left. However, there was a multitude of companies supplying the whole world with machines that make PCBs. Those jobs left too because you cannot innovate in the USA when the item is made somewhere else. Now all those companies that made equipment to make PCBs are gone. The jobs, the very high R&D jobs are gone to China, Taiwan, and other points in SE Asia.
This exact death spiral of industry under eco-fascists, government bureaucrats, and taxation killed these othe world leading industries in california:
MACHINE TOOLS ENERGY PRODUCTION SEMI-CONDUCTORS TEXTILES CARS AEROSPACE and I'm sure many others. Sadly what california does is soon presented and forced on to the rest of the country.
Posted by: jukin at February 02, 2010 10:49 PM (vkkNZ)
Agreed with jukin: manufacturing is crushed between very high taxes and the beaucrazy that the taxes buy. Besides the ecofreaks I will add the lawyers guild and the unions: Europe has four of the same problems, but even without the litagation culture they are losing manufactureing to the middle east. I would like to think the accessabilaty of roads, electricity, potable water and a literate work force would make this a nice country in which to operate a factory, but the crush of this five-way vice is just too damn much.
Posted by: vermindust at February 02, 2010 11:14 PM (ccNpT)
Yes, of course, it's a total equation including shipping, spoilage, etc. This is why America still grows its own food.
The Chinese currency is an issue, but it's also a double-edged sword. If the Renminbi were allowed to float, it would certainly appreciate. While this would make our manufacturing more competitive, it would also lower our standard of living by making goods more generally expensive. Also, the debt owed by the US to China would depreciate in terms of the Renminbi, something China and the US Government both want to avoid.
Essentially, the US and China have each other in an economic death grip. China wants exports to grow its own economy, while the US wants cheap money to continue its debt-based spending binge. The dollars China gets on exports have to be invested in dollar assets, which is why they've financed so much of our debt over the past few decades. Should the Remnimbi float, unless the Fed cranks the printing presses up to ludicrous speed, the market for US debt would likely collapse.
Putting China aside, Japan and Korea are still net exporters to the US, even though they are relatively wealthy nations, for the simple reason that their populace is willing to accept a lower standard of living than the US populace. Even so, Japan is hurting badly due to competition from the rest of Asia.
The recent recession is just the start of a major change in the global status-quo. The main question is: Will the US tighten its belt, accept tough times for a while and work harder, or will we just continue to try to paper over these issues until we're a shadow of our former selves?
Posted by: Hermit Dave at February 02, 2010 11:21 PM (WhFvm)
6
She is correct. The de-industrialization of the US is killing the country. Go out and try to purchase any large bore stainless steel pipe. When you find it it will be made in Asia somewhere. All of this recent talk of reviving nuclear power and building plants. Where are you going to get the vessels, steam generators, turbines, and generators? They will not be US made.
Posted by: OldNuc at February 02, 2010 11:51 PM (RCSVq)
7
Anyone who ever lived in an industrial area knew the routine.
In '98, we were going through a boom, and a few friends of mine would RAIL against the stupidity of it.
you outsource SERVICE, not production, we outsourced both.
Posted by: Douglas at February 03, 2010 12:53 AM (uU+Ss)
Just when you thought it was safe to quit doing stuff for that free-wheeling happy happy life of servicing stuff, we need to get back to work. And by "work" that means work. Not servicing people or stuff.
the botnet fucking quits.
Posted by: the botnet at February 03, 2010 01:07 AM (kZzmb)
9
Douglas, you outsource that which you have a competitive disadvantage in. It makes sense to outsource - or import, if you want to use less politically charged terminology - both production and services. This makes the most sense when the service is something that requires little to no skill, and just feet (or pants, as it were) on the ground - call centers come to mind, although a lot of financial services could be done with very little training.
I am studying Macroeconomics right now, and it simply amazes me the amount of our economy that is services. It amounts to around 75% of the economy. I'm not sure exactly that encapsulates (for instance would clerical staff at a manufacturing plant?), but the fact of the matter is that the amount of manufacturing per capita being done has not increased substantially in 50 years. Of course the quality of the products has improved markedly, but the overall volume is more or less constant.
I don't really have a point, other than it is amazing how much of our economy is made up of people paying other people to just do stuff.
Posted by: Jeff M at February 03, 2010 01:09 AM (8P3+x)
10 I was making the same point in a comment thread over at IB. Michael responded with this post.
Posted by: geoff at February 03, 2010 03:05 AM (G/5Za)
Services, support 1 & 2, but they do not create wealth.
Individually, we are all service providers (labor). How labor is utilized is critical.
Wealth creation in excess of wealth consumption results in improved living standards.
Consumption in excess of production results in declining living standards.
We have been making up for a productivity shortfall over the last 40 years by borrowing the surplus productivity from other countries to the tune of 13 trillion and climbing.
Soon we will hit our credit limit. Then IT will hit the fan.
It does not matter how many people are creating wealth as long as production exceeds consumption.
Government is a service provider and creates zero wealth. It is a drain on productivity potential.
On our current path, hyper-inflation is certain. I can only assume this is Obama's intent.
Posted by: esblowfeld at February 03, 2010 09:48 AM (annik)
12
^I dunno. He strikes me as not smart enough to even know that
Posted by: eddiebear at February 03, 2010 09:50 AM (wnU1W)
I check out the post at IB and I agree with a lot of what was said, especially about China's demographic death knell and about India being an up and comer. (obviously). That is one reason I am taking an online Hindi course. I doubt that I will become fluent but at least I will be able to understand when our new South Asia overlords say jump.
Posted by: chad98036 at February 03, 2010 09:56 AM (WNcvq)
14 I check out the post at IB and I agree with a lot of what was said,
especially about China's demographic death knell and about India being
an up and comer.
I tend to discount the "demographic death knell" - I think it'll be an inconvenience, not a show-stopper. I think China's still got the lead in the "most likely to displace the US" contest.
Posted by: geoff at February 03, 2010 10:12 AM (G/5Za)
15 Why do I think China's got the lead? Because China, more than any other country, has been actively working to lock in supplies of natural resources from Asia, South America, Africa, and the Middle East. We've been letting our supply lines atrophy. Via the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, they've become a regional leader of Asia (displacing . . . us).
China has a rapidly growing high tech manufacturing industry, which India doesn't. China is modernizing its military, and has been increasing its military budget by >15% per year since 2001. China is now Russia's largest trading partner, so they no longer have to worry (so much) about protecting that border.
There are economic problems and demographic issues, but the totalitarian governors of China aren't going to let those stymie their ambition to become the world's sole superpower.
Posted by: geoff at February 03, 2010 10:22 AM (G/5Za)
16
Well when you have a birth rate that isn't anywhere near the maintaining much less growing your population and you have actively killed off girls thereby reducing the ability of your population to reproduce then I think that counts as a death knell.
Posted by: chad98036 at February 03, 2010 10:43 AM (WNcvq)
17
It stands to reason that a service economy in dominance is clearly not enough. We would be vulnerable to trade wars! IF we import the preponderance of our manufactured goods, those countries COULD withhold those goods from us....I am reminded of Britian during WWI and WWII where the Germans tried to starve the Brits to submission. Granted it is an extreme example. But it would be foolish to ignore history.
Posted by: Robert Woolwine at February 03, 2010 12:12 PM (V+ylD)
Importing from China is not an easy job. It is very complicated and involves numerous, highly detailed-oriented tasks. It requires strong communication and earnest co-operation from all participating parties.
19 Well when you have a birth rate that isn't anywhere near the
maintaining much less growing your population and you have actively
killed off girls
China's population continues to grow - all they've been able to do is slow the growth rate to about 10 million a year. And the American impression of the sex ratio is a little off. Yes, China has an excess of males, but %-wise, it's not that significant. As of 2007, males constituted 51.5% of the population.
Not an overwhelming majority.
Posted by: geoff at February 04, 2010 10:18 AM (G/5Za)
Could Another Conservative Conquest Happen In Obama's Home State?
Adam Andrzejewski (yeah, I copy and pasted his name) is running in the Republican Primary for Governor as a conservative against a guy who endorsed Obama. Andrzejeswki is not only unabashedly conservative, but he recently received an endorsement that rises to the "Holy Shit!" level by having Lech Walesa endorse him. And last time I checked, Chicago has a large Polish and Lithuanian population.
Internal Polling (FWIW) has Andrzejewski only down 2 points, so we will see what happens. But either way, this guy is making waves in a state that is otherwise tough sailing for non Democrats, and with what just transpired in Massachusetts, who knows what could happen?
1
Yeah, and that banker guy is in a load of trouble over his dealings at that bank. I can just see the banking scandle hitting right about the time that people are getting ready to pull the leaver or poke a chad. Can you say, POOR OBIE WON!!!!?
Posted by: TimothyJ at February 01, 2010 01:27 AM (IKKIf)
2
There would not be enough pudding in the world if he won.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 01, 2010 01:43 AM (TtXKB)
In a just world
As I read this link about Lech Walesa going to a Tea Party event I had a thought. In a just world this man would be a hero, feted wherever he went and talked about and revered at least as much as Nelson Mandela.
Alas, the thugocracy he ended was a brutal, commie one and for that he can never be forgiven by all the right people.
1
Along with Reagan and Thatcher, Lech Walesa is on the short list of the 20th centuries greatest people. Few have made more of a positive impact than they have.
Imagine the crowd if Lech Walesa spoke at the same Tea Party convention that Sarah Palin will be speaking at.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 29, 2010 03:35 PM (UEEex)