March 19, 2010
Sen. Coburn May Be On To Something
Look at what may be
developing in North Dakota.“This “Bismarck Bank Job” provision looks like exactly
the sort of backroom deal that makes the American people hate
Washington and the whole process that has led to this massive, awful
government takeover of our health care. Rep. Earl Pomeroy, the only
House Member from the State of North Dakota has some questions to
answer. Did he know about this provision? Was it inserted in an
attempt to secure his support for the health care bill?
Democratic
Leaders owe the American people an explanation: did they cut a backroom
deal on this issue? What other backroom deals have they cut in their
eleventh-hour push to jam through a bill that the American people have
soundly rejected? The American people want answers, and they deserve
the truth.”
Posted by: eddiebear at
07:23 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If you are a student in school, or you want to enter the IT industry, passing
350-050 exam and obtaining Microsoft certification at least shows that you are really making your efforts and have acquired the knowledge and skills in this field.Pass4sure
650-393 will help you lead your competitors,
646-656 help you win an opportunity.
Posted by: Cisco at March 19, 2010 07:35 AM (5HPzC)
2
I'm sure he knew nothing about it! You should be ashamed of yourself for even thinking that.
Posted by: Car in at March 19, 2010 07:38 AM (7DtTW)
3
The truth? The truth is that Barack Obama is the biggest whore this side of Paris Hilton.
Posted by: Wyatt Earp at March 19, 2010 03:06 PM (zgZzy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 16, 2010
Some Numbers To Chew On
How much you want to bet
that breast cancer survival rates will plunge if Obamacare passes while the lead time between discovery of a lump and an effective consultation with a specialist/surgeon team will go from two to three weeks to whenever a bureaucrat approves you will increase? How much you want to bet that
fewer doctors will want to get into, or stay in, practice if Government meddling takes place? And how much you want to bet that O-care will
actually make costs increase? Tell me I am wrong, and right about now, I will do to your person what William Tecumseh Sherman wanted to do to Georgia, but held back out of courtesy.
Yeah, fuck you O-care supporters. Fuck you with the used condom from that special chicken wrapped soaked in hate and around my boot. Fuck you for wanting to destroy everything and everybody I hold dear by replacing excellent service with the equivalent of "that guy" from a frat party who claims to know how to beat a drug test and/or avoid pregnancy with a can of Dr. Pepper. Fuck you for trying to demonize medical and insurance professionals who already suffer under the fucking yoke of legal harassment, and yet still are able to help people as best as they can. And fucking fuck you fuckrancid style with the fucking fuckbeagle of fuckingly fucked up fuckwitlessness for thinking that people would be better off with rationed or completely unobtainable care.
Fuck off, and stand in the back of the line you want all of us to endure.
Posted by: eddiebear at
11:13 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 267 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Fuckbeagle--it drips with awesome.
You should have multiple litters of them delivered to Congress on Saturday. Last good time they'll have before the fires an lynchings.
Posted by: cbullitt at March 16, 2010 11:29 PM (AipKT)
2
Fuck you with the used condom from that special chicken wrapped soaked
in hate and around my boot.I have to say, that is the most unusual and confusing ones you have invoked yet.
Posted by: Douglas at March 16, 2010 11:44 PM (uU+Ss)
3
So, will doctors be sued for the delay caused by bureaucrats?
Posted by: TimothyJ at March 17, 2010 01:42 AM (IKKIf)
4
Women’s ornaments box is to make steady that the trinkets are better for dresses. Jewelry is excellent presents for women who enjoy functional jewelry.Jewelry has been used over the years for a number of different purposes.
<a href="http://www.linksoflondonstore.com">links of london sale</a>Jewelry has been used as; an item of currency; an item for functional use such as pins, clasps and buckets; a method of showing status or membership of a group; an item that protects from spirits; and an item of artistic display. All of these different uses are still in use but nevertheless the most popular of these uses is as decoration. In particular earrings, not noly beautiful but also fashion, <a href="http://www.linksoflondonstore.com">links of london jewelry</a>so it has been created to dress every single part of the body. Links of London-Raindance Earrings, like water cascading from a waterfall these beautiful Sterling Silver earrings drop delicately from your ear. <a href="http://www.linksoflondonstore.com/bracelets">links of london bracelet</a>Catching the light with every move you make they add glamour and sparkle for any occasion. You can buy it for yourself as decoration; you can also buy it for your best friend, she or he must be very happy. Whatever you may decide that you want, whether it is a cheap earring or a more expensive one, <a href="http://www.linksoflondonstore.com/rings">links of london rings</a> you really need to take the time to find the one that is right for you and the look that you want to get across. This is something that you will need to think about and then you should do what is right for you. <a href="http://www.linksoflondonstore.com/necklaces">links of london necklace</a>Take some time and get the earring that you really want so that you will be happy in the end.
Posted by: zhangguoren at March 19, 2010 01:47 AM (Q1mQ8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sure, you wanna compare Glenn Beck to the Hitlerjugend?
So, apparently Glenn Beck at some point noted that some Catholic priests and bishops reject the "social justice" (read: cede the church's traditional role in society as provider of aid to those in need and agitate for socialism) agenda, and advocates leaving churches that advocate "social justice" for ones that oppose it. Some tool named
Anthony Stevens-Arroyo in the WaPo compared him to the Hitler Youth. Let's talk about Hitler Youth, Mr. Stevens-Arroyo,
Below the fold,
more...
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
11:46 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 213 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The projection is getting very thick.
Posted by: Mad Saint Jack at March 16, 2010 12:05 PM (zVgnK)
2
I better never, ever hear a
leftist throw out the fascist
epithet at the right in my presence ever again.Let me know how that works out for ya!
Posted by: Jay in Ames at March 16, 2010 12:27 PM (UEEex)
3
I think you can figure how I'd react to that charge.
Also, IIRC, didn't a lot of people get pissed at GatewayPundit for taking a picture of the Hitler Youth of the 1930s and put the Obama logo on their sleeves?
Posted by: eddiebear at March 16, 2010 01:37 PM (wgrBB)
4
Let me know how that works out for ya!Probably a lawsuit from some sniveling leftist about "permanent hearing loss from excess shouting and emotional trauma" or somesuch bullshit.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at March 16, 2010 02:14 PM (izI0d)
5
Probably a lawsuit from some sniveling leftist about "permanent hearing
loss from excess shouting and emotional trauma" or somesuch bullshit.
Hey. Look. I'd feel bad about filing that suit but a girl needs her shoes.
Posted by: alexthechick at March 16, 2010 02:20 PM (8WZWv)
6
I used to actually try to defend myself but now I go for ridicule, I started doing it about 5-6 years ago and it's worked so far.
In my snottiest, most derisive, sneering voice I'll respond, "
That's the best you got? I have a great sneer. I usually use it for comical effect with kids and for real on adults who do stuff like that.
I'll go on with how if they can't respond to my points instead of using a 10 year old's defense of attacking they're losing.
If they still ignore the point and attack me I
always say, "
Yeah, well eat shit sideways" point and laugh.
That works best with an audience. I've rarely not gotten a laugh and it makes the tools look and feel like the tools they are.
If they refuse to respond to my points and only attack me, they just look ridiculous as I point and laugh and they get frustratedly angry. I'm thinking of adding in a Scut Fargas-like "Cry for me". That would be funny.
I've lost a bunch of leftist 'friends' using it, but the rest learn to stay on point and I don't get personally attacked to my face much anymore.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 16, 2010 02:59 PM (8OYAl)
7
<i>Hey. Look. I'd feel bad about filing that suit but a girl needs her shoes. </i>
It's cool. I got his back if you have him served.
Posted by: Blackiswhite, Imperial Consigliere at March 17, 2010 10:49 AM (bFOFG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 15, 2010
Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Hopenchange
Creepy. The latest ensemble from the Obamajugend.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
10:57 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The Obama worshipers need to just start their own church already. Then they can have their own version of Christmas carols and everything.
Obama we have heard on high,
Swiftly taxing all our gains,
And the congress in reply,
Flushes our wealth down the drain.
Oooooo -ooooooo -oooooo - Obama,
In excelsis Barak.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at March 15, 2010 11:28 PM (WhFvm)
2
No Nietzsche, no Wagner. That's a fair-to-middling ripoff of Aaron Copland's "Lincoln Portrait," with quotes from Carl Sandburg. Lot of Illinoisiana there. Hard to beleive Mayor Daly never rated. Blago, maybe, someday.
A Certain Party has been known to ruminate on what he has to do in order to be revered like Lincoln and MLK. Someone should remind him that you have to do what Garfield and McKinley did. It hasn't dawned on him yet.
Posted by: comatus at March 17, 2010 07:14 PM (/VEEI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 14, 2010
Motherfucking rats
They're gonna go for it, not only that, but they're reconciling a Trojan Horse, and adding the real stuff later.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
11:12 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I desperately wish I could fucking say that I was surprised. Everyone, bend over!
Posted by: Ember at March 14, 2010 11:19 PM (LdRAG)
2
^Everyone, bend over lock and load!
FIFY Emb'.
Posted by: davis,br at March 15, 2010 12:56 AM (uCShA)
3
I wanted to thank you for this excellent read!! I definitely enjoyed every little bit of it. I have you bookmarked your site to check out the new stuff you post.
Posted by: supra shoes at March 15, 2010 02:49 AM (Jl/yg)
4
Great articles and it's so helpful. I want to add your blog into my rrs reader but i can't find the rrs address. Would you please send your address to my email? Thanks a lot!
Posted by: true religion jeans at March 15, 2010 02:49 AM (Jl/yg)
Posted by: Tangonine at March 15, 2010 09:16 AM (C8Pcc)
6
FUCK WADS!!! Every Congress idiot who signs this piece of shit legislation should be tarred, feathered, and run out of town.
Dims: ARE YOU FUCKING STUCK ON STUPID??? HELLO???
Here's a fucking fact, idiots: You CANNOT govern without OUR (yes, the pesky voters) consent.
I hate them all and will be working actively to make sure that NO ONE FORGETS the TRAITORS who vote for this....
Bill "fuckhead" Nelson in Florida...ARE YOU LISTENING? You will be defeated. Period.
HEY CONGRESS: WE HATE YOU AND YOU EARNED IT!!! FUCK YOU, THE HORSE AND THE DOG WHO FOLLOWED. YOU ARE NOT RULERS, FUCKHEADS.
Posted by: Charlotte at March 15, 2010 09:24 AM (iXIlj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Deem This!
When
Alex referenced the brazen attempts by the House Democrats, under the guise of Louise Slaughter's suggestion that the House may "deem" the Senate Healthcare Bill as passed without a vote, I thought it too ridiculous of an idea to become reality. Silly me. I thought a Bill, the exact same Bill in both houses, had to be voted upon before it could be presented for Presidential Signature. Oh well. How dare I think of
such a radical idea. How dare I think the House Democrats would respect the Constitution and at least vote for a procedure (reconciliation) that, while
politically toxic, is at least a vote on legislation. And how dare I think that the left in this country would step back from their bitterly
divisive push for a bill that has approval ratings between PMS and diarrhea and say,
"Yeah, we want this bill. But just not this way. Some things are too sacred."Well, I guess I was mistaken. I guess this is how the left wants to play. In that vein, please allow me to offer my opinion on the matter:
more...
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:25 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 597 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Please help support the Americans for Real Healthcare Reform by using Grasshopr.com.
http://www.grasshopr.com/GroupDetails.aspx?groupUniqueName=AFRHCR
Posted by: Chris Olson at March 14, 2010 12:33 AM (VueEY)
2
If the botnet wasn't so drunk, the botnet would have something to add; alas and alak, the botnet will get all wee-wee'd up tomorrow after bagels, omelets with sauerkraut and cheeses, a shower, and a good old fashioned dump.
Then there will be hell to pay.
By the way, Steve Kagen, ("Dr Moonbat") claimed to be wavering last week, as did David Obey (that contemptible piece of fucking shit). Fat fucking chance. Nancy (big tits for a Commie) Pelosi owns their peckers, land, and daughter's firstborn. Kagen and Obey are both pussies, whom the botnet would beat in either a drinking challenge or a streetbrawl. The botnet would prefer both, and in no particular order.
Yes, the botnet will say it out loud. Here... Now... Nancy Pelosi Has Big Tits. Nancy quit wearing those tight-fitting sport coats you Communist vixen.
In closing, Hate, hate, Hate, HATE!
Posted by: the botnet at March 14, 2010 01:27 AM (XW92X)
3
I cannot even wrap my head around the fact that this concept wasn't just laughed out of the room. I. It.
ALEXSMASH
Posted by: alexthechick at March 14, 2010 10:39 AM (aSDGn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 12, 2010
Has Pelosi Been Reading Marx Much?
I report, you decide.
Pelosi:
So, you can‘t—everybody has so much to gain from this, small businesses, as I said, seniors, young people, women, our economy. Think of an economy where people could be an artist or a photographer or a writer without worrying about keeping their day job in order to have health insurance or that people could start a business and be entrepreneurial and take risk, but not job loss because of a child with asthma or someone in the family is bipolar—you name it, any condition—is job locking.
Marx:
The German Ideology:
For as soon as the distribution of labour comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity, which is forced upon him and from which he cannot escape. He is a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman, or a critical critic, and must remain so if he does not want to lose his means of livelihood; while in communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. This fixation of social activity, this consolidation of what we ourselves produce into an objective power above us, growing out of our control, thwarting our expectations, bringing to naught our calculations, is one of the chief factors in historical development up till now.
Posted by: JoeCollins at
08:28 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 275 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Yes, who wants to worry about a pesky thing like a job or pulling your own weight when your neighbor can do it for you!
Hallelujah! I'm voting Democrat in November!
/facepalm
Posted by: ECM at March 12, 2010 11:35 PM (nYKDd)
Posted by: Dr. Spank at March 13, 2010 12:13 AM (I1/U/)
3
Outside of writing, Marx didn't really want to do shit.
Posted by: Car in at March 13, 2010 08:14 AM (/yC9R)
4
I woke up, this morning, with the thought that the US provides its citizen with more things than any communist country ever did.
It wasn't a good thought.
Posted by: Car in at March 13, 2010 08:16 AM (/yC9R)
Posted by: Grasshopper at March 13, 2010 09:43 AM (6AITe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 10, 2010
Sean Penn Supports A Murderous Thug And Anti Semitic Enabler
Fuck you, Spicoli. Fuck you and your bizzare obsession with anal diseases and arresting peoplewith whom you disagree. Fuck you and your fucking rump-fed addlepated fuckbacked puttockpuckingly Anti-Semitic peckerpicker enabling ass with the hell fucked leaden apes of fuckedupedness and towelfucking.
Who the fuck are you to tell me that I cannot criticize and mock a foreign thug on my home fucking soil? Who the fuck are you to wish a horrible disease on me because of a political disagreement? And who the fuck fuck fuckity fuckballoon of fuckfisting are you to condemn my views while you allow this shit to go on in the land of your hero?
The point is, Venezuela's Jewish community is facing an existential threat, all due to the policies and actions of that "great man" Hugo Chavez. Many have already fled the country for the USA, Israel, and other countries across the hemisphere. Those that remain face ongoing harassment and outright antisemitism from agents of the Chavez government. Until Chavez's ascent to power, Venezuela was one of the few countries where there was no real anti-semitic tradition or legacy. Jews were active in Venezuelan life, and achieved success in that society's highest levels, interacting with Catholics and Muslims in all facets of civil society. Now, the community has nothing to look forward other than a bleak future
Yeah, how the fuck can you stay silent there, fuckhead? How the fuck can you claim Chavez is a great man while he enables violence against a religious minority? And how the fuck can you dare fucking tell me to shut up when voices need to be raised in awareness of what Chavez is doing?
Fuck you, Sean Penn. Fuck you forever with the specter of the people your words condemn to a life of misery. And fucking catch rectal cnacer yourself, you fucking dickhead.
Posted by: eddiebear at
10:03 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 318 words, total size 2 kb.
1
All the cool hip kids in the USA were huge supporters of Hitler in the thirties.
Posted by: jukin at March 10, 2010 11:41 AM (vkkNZ)
2
and the UK.
Seriously, just because Chavez looks and acts like a fool doesn't cloud the fact he is dangerous, since he has oil and has been giving aid to shitheads like the Mullahs in Iran
Posted by: eddiebear at March 10, 2010 11:43 AM (wnU1W)
3
Apparently the scene where Spicoli hits his head with a shoe in Fast Times took 2 million takes.
Posted by: Spank at March 10, 2010 01:34 PM (muUqs)
4
"...just because Chavez looks and acts like a fool..."Lookit Chavez
with his pants on the ground!
Posted by: MikeD at March 11, 2010 11:36 AM (FkL60)
5
This Fucking asshole should have had a Father like my Father when he was growing up. My dad would have Kicked his fucking ass He is a fucking Jerk. He should be tried for treason the fucking fagot
Posted by: Terry Edgar at March 12, 2010 03:10 PM (gAf+9)
6
We could drop him off in his hero's socialist paradise and, unbeknownst to him, swap his Che hat to one that says, "Down with Chavez" and see exactly how his non-dictatorial buddy treats people who have a problem with his totally non-thuggish rule.
Posted by: Veeshir at March 12, 2010 03:37 PM (llWN4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 01, 2010
Notice She Didn't Say She Had The Votes
One thing I noticed (warning: NYT Link) in this article was that Madame Speaker declared her confidence that
she'll get the votes needed for Obamacare, not that she had the votes. Oh well. We'll see. We'll see if she can bribe, threaten, bully, or buy off wavering Democrats to go over the cliff. We'll see if Rahm Emmanuel really does have jobs lined up for politically dead people walking to secure their vote. And we'll see if any wavering politician will accept the collect call from "History" to vote themselves into a new line of work.
Grab your helmets. It's "Go" time.
Posted by: eddiebear at
01:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
February 23, 2010
Abortion clinic shut down after federal raid in Philly
Beyond the obvious ghoulish horrorshow of performing abortion after abortion, the clinic apparently
was about as sanitary as a Civil War field hospital,
Pennsylvania regulators say federal raids at a Philadelphia clinic
where abortions are performed found "deplorable and unsanitary"
conditions, including blood on the floor and parts of aborted fetuses
in jars.
This apparently was discovered after the not-so-good doctor had a
patient die during an abortion, and high painkiller levels were found in initial forensic testing of the patient. The feds are also looking into whether illegal late term abortions were performed in the clinic. The doctor's license is currently revoked.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
05:05 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 112 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey now. Even we have standards.
Posted by: Civil War field hospitals at February 23, 2010 05:10 PM (5Rurq)
2
Fetus parts in jars? Fuck! 80s Slasher Film Villains weren't this gruesome
Posted by: eddiebear at February 23, 2010 05:19 PM (wnU1W)
3
Eric Holder's Justice dept just said "nothing to see here, move along."
Posted by: mpfs at February 23, 2010 08:57 PM (QuP9W)
4
Links London Heart Necklace, it
is another classic Links of London Heart necklace with signature clasp, 18K
gold heart adds a suitable contrast against the sterling silver chain, all the
special designs are provided by Links London Store.
Posted by: links of london at February 23, 2010 09:26 PM (6BJGJ)
5
I'm still waiting on the outrage from the left.
Posted by: Alice H at February 24, 2010 10:51 AM (qJHYy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 22, 2010
Those dangerous Americans
This has nothing to do with implementing a civilian national security force to control those nasty teabaggers, I'm sure.
Americans who turn to terrorism and plot against the U.S. are now as big a concern as international terrorists, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Sunday.
I'm also certain this doesn't mean we're taking the focus off finding Osama bin Laden, or crushing the Taliban, or securing democracy in Iraq. Because our government would never turn against its own people rather than focusing on providing for the common defense, would it?
On a side note, can someone explain to me how the examples Napolitano gives of domestic terrorism
aren't making a case for locking down immigration from countries that are known sponsors of terrorism?
Posted by: Alice H at
10:36 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 126 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So, if that is the case that means that Americans who turn to terrorism and plot against the US are exactly NOT a concern to Homeland Security..since they have no concern for catching actual terrorists at all.....right?
Posted by: Robert Woolwine at February 22, 2010 10:54 AM (V+ylD)
2
Speaking of "Dangerous Americans", if any of you have a chance to get me involved in "Overhaulin'" where they take your care and Chip Foose it, don't.
I will kick your ass.
Chip's cars look cool, if you can afford $10 grand to fix all the custom-plastic 5 years later.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 22, 2010 11:03 AM (brd/I)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 11, 2010
So, That's How It's Going To Be, Eh?
Madame Speaker
thinks she can ram Obamacare through? Lemme see. After months of polling, special elections, legislative stalemates, massive and growing to massiver disapproval numbers, shady bribes and backroom deals, protests, and a general sentiment that this bill will be so unpopular, Charles Manson trying to give unwanted goatse giveaways will be more popular than this bill, Madame Speaker thinks this is a spiffy idea?
Really? I mean, fucking really?
Well, okay.
more...
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:50 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 351 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Angie at February 11, 2010 05:13 AM (5pHVo)
2
To Pelosi and company, it's no longer about approval- it's about survival. They know that they'll lose a lot of the "Moderate Republicans" and independants if they ram the bill through, but they KNOW that if they fail, their own party base will see them as incapable of producing results. Pelosi- and in fact the majority of Democrats in the House, and about a quarter of the Seantors- are in "Safe" districts. They read the odds of losing their seats to a Republican as somewhere lower than the odds of a Donny Osmond comeback going platinum... and, mostly, they're right (Brown was the product of a 'perfect storm'; the conditions that produced his victory may apply to one or two other Democrats in Blue states, but I couldn't tell you which ones). They DO understand that they can lose their jobs to another DEMOCRAT in the primaries... especially if their voters and donors start viewing them the same way a rancher views a stud bull who can't get it up anymore.
Right now they've got to pass SOMETHING. Anything.
And they will.
Posted by: DaveP. at February 11, 2010 05:53 AM (DXTmU)
3
Prof. Reynolds commented that if they do this the opposition will be justified in viewing the law as illegitimate. That's my view on it as well.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 11, 2010 08:57 AM (8WZWv)
4
And Dave:
The lefty pundits like Ezra Klein are begging Pelosi to pass *anything* and promising to spin for them to the nutroots, because they also feel that the Indies are gone and that 2010 is a lost cause
Posted by: eddiebear at February 11, 2010 09:00 AM (wnU1W)
5
BWA-HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
-breathe-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
An absolute classic Eddie.
Posted by: Old Iron at February 11, 2010 09:04 AM (tD0Cq)
6
Absolutly FUCKING ON TARGET!!! BULLSEYE!!!
The healthcare bill will not be dead until a stake is driven through its heart and a silver bullet as well.
I'm getting out my garlic, and sharpening up the stake. Already have ammo. BRING IT ON, DIMS!!! BRING IT ON!!!
Tar and feathers is gonna look good to you!!!
Motherfucking assholes.
Posted by: Charlotte at February 11, 2010 09:36 AM (iXIlj)
Posted by: eddiebear at February 11, 2010 10:46 AM (wnU1W)
8
The funniest part?
If they ram this through the Dems' campaign ads for November will be, "
Don't elect Republicans, they'll repeal our health care bill!"
And the GOP won't have to spend a penny to win every election in a landslide. (Which might not be so funny if the GOP doesn't learn anything)
And Minitru will freak out, dust off their 1994 playbook, and call us all "stupid and petulant, really just children on a temper tantrum"
Posted by: Veeshir at February 11, 2010 10:46 AM (G93du)
9
2010 will make 1994 look like 2008 to the dems, if they do this.
An example, hard core liberals in Iowa saying they will vote for Terry Branstad for governor, just to clean up the mess left by Chet Culver. Branstad is the retired governor before Tom Vilsack and Culver. We had a surplus at that time. Now we don't. It took 1 year for Vilsack to take care of that one. Culver has just continued down the path of epic fail since his election.
Branstad by 15 points in blue state Iowa. Bet on it.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at February 11, 2010 11:30 AM (UEEex)
10
Hey, didn't I ban you?
Geez, I get no respect even on the intertubes.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 11, 2010 11:56 AM (G93du)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 05, 2010
You know who can eat a dick?
California state Sen.
Alan Lowenthal (D-Ickeater), that's who:
State lawmakers are taking aim at what some of them see as a menace to California's environment: free parking.
There
is too much of it, the legislators say, and it encourages people to
drive instead of taking the bus, walking or riding a bike. All that
motoring is contributing to traffic jams and pollution, according to
state Sen. Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach), and on Thursday he won Senate
approval of a proposal he hopes will prompt cities and businesses to
reduce the availability of free parking.
"Free parking has
significant social, economic and environmental costs," Lowenthal said.
"It increases congestion and greenhouse gas emissions."
Hey,
eater of dicks, you might not have noticed, but we've pretty much got
the shittiest economy since the Joad family rolled into the state. That
has some rather significant social and economic costs, too. Oh, silly
me, you're too busy gobbling cocks up in Sacramento to notice trivial
shit like that. Or, for that matter, to realize how deeply unpopular
raising more fucking fees on the backs of working people is going to
be. Silly me again...I'm assuming people who would have to shoulder the
burden of these increased fees still have, you know, fucking jobs.
In short, please die in a fire, you cock-smoking piece of shit.
(
h/t)
Posted by: Sean M. at
03:35 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 228 words, total size 2 kb.
1
(D-Ickeater)I see what you did there.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 05, 2010 03:41 PM (TtXKB)
2
Suggestion: move out of the state like I did! It's not going to get anything but worse in the near-to-mid term and you can always go back when they get their in gear sometimes around mid-century.
Posted by: ECM at February 05, 2010 03:57 PM (nYKDd)
3
I've seen this article elsewhere and am still waiting for somebody in Cali to find out if their State Senators get free parking at work. If nobody pushes back against these elitists, then you get whats coming to you.
Posted by: plep at February 05, 2010 07:11 PM (o/Kdp)
4
"Let's tax it! Monetarily punishing free choice is the quickest way to modify behavior."
Gawd, I'm really starting to hate these people!
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at February 05, 2010 08:41 PM (k5nPY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 01, 2010
Mmm...mmm...mmm...
Say,
this isn't at all creepy.
Posted by: Sean M. at
02:04 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 7 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You do realize I just assumed that was a link to a spider clown.
Not that that's any less creepy.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 01, 2010 09:53 AM (8WZWv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 31, 2010
Madame Speaker Loves The Military
Especially if it means babysitting and taxi service.Using Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, Judicial Watch uncovered thousands of pages of travel documents related to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s use of military aircraft.
What hasn’t been revealed so far is that military aircraft are being
used to shuttle Pelosi’s kids and grandkids between DC and San
Francisco without any Congressional representatives even onboard! Put
simply, the United States Air Force is serving as a multi-billion
dollar chauffeur- and baby-sitting service for Nancy Pelosi’s kids and
grandkids — presumably because commercial travel is beneath the
families of the autocrats.
Honestly, while I am not surprised to discover that the Party of the Little People treats our military in such a fashion, I am still amazed into silence at the impunity with which they do what they do.
Posted by: eddiebear at
01:46 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am still amazed into silence at the impunity with which they do what they do.
Just go ahead, close your eyes, substitute House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's
name with that of Tom DeLay, and imagine ABCCBSNBCCNNNYTLATWAPO's
OUTRAGEOUSLY OUTRAGED OUTRAGE!!!11!one!!eleven!!!1!!
Yeah.
Posted by: Sean M. at January 31, 2010 01:58 AM (rLWHv)
2
If a Republican did this (I know, I know) they'd be sitting in front of a Congressional Committee in no time. It would be awesome, being as she is only capable of being mildly coherent for about 5-7 minutes, at most.
Posted by: ktgreat at January 31, 2010 11:38 AM (G6iSv)
3
You cannot possibly fathom the disgust I have for that woman and the media that props her up!
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 31, 2010 12:01 PM (k5nPY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 30, 2010
Reason Eleventy Bazillion And Twenty Eight Why The Government Should Not Be Allowed To Run A Car Company
Seems the concerns many people had about the Federal Government owning car companies because of an
unfair advantage may have been correct.However, as Caruso-Cabrera pointed out, it was the Obama
administration's Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood who determined
that Toyota had to recall these vehicles over reports of sticky acceleration pedals. "Ray
LaHood is on the record saying that he told them they had to do this,"
Caruso-Cabrera said. "They had to stop selling. Are you looking into
whether or not that was absolutely necessary? Are you convinced this
was necessary?"
Sessions expressed his concern over that
possibility and noted the amount of money the federal government had
recently pumped into GMAC, the auto financing arm of General Motors.
"Well,
you know - we were in until late last night and I hadn't heard that,"
Sessions said. "I worry about those kind of things. I worry about Ford
working hard and having to compete against the federal government. With
an unlimited - they just gave $3 billion more to GMAC. The President's
got to be careful here. He can not be playing politics and union
politics or regional politics with the economy of this country."
Since Toyota (NYSE:TM) announced the recall, the shares of the auto manufacturer have dropped more than 15 percent in the last seven trading sessions, down $2.10 on Jan. 28 after a $7.01 slide the day before.
Not to be a conspiracy nut, but when the Government owns anything, they can do anything to the competition. Take heed, anybody involved in healthcare or insurance.
*****CRITICAL UPDATE FOR TEH KITTIES!1!1!!******
Here is some information on the issue. And here is the website of the supplier.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:59 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 297 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Question - is the parts supplier that made the faulty gas pedals a union shop by any chance?
Short-term future headline:
Ford Slapped With "Excess Profits" Tax, Money to Go to TARP Repayment
GM, Chrysler Continue to Not Be Required to Pay Back $80B TARP "Loans"
Posted by: steveegg at January 30, 2010 01:21 PM (UGOcx)
Posted by: eddiebear at January 30, 2010 01:25 PM (EoOAf)
Posted by: eddiebear at January 30, 2010 01:28 PM (EoOAf)
4
From what I heard, the problem is not with the accelerator pedal at all, but is caused by the floor mat slipping and getting lodged under the pedal. If they could hold the floor mat in place, the problem wouldn't have happened.
Posted by: Jeff M at January 30, 2010 03:34 PM (8P3+x)
5
If it's the floor mat, then why are only the models with gas pedals supplied by CTS (which is a UAW union shop) the problem? Why wouldn't the Camry Hybrid (built in Japan without a CTS gas pedal) be affected?
Posted by: steveegg at January 30, 2010 03:59 PM (UGOcx)
6
I should say CAW (the problem plant is Canadian).
Posted by: steveegg at January 30, 2010 04:05 PM (UGOcx)
7
Update - Fox News is reporting a fix has reportedly been approved by the Feds. Short version - a shim in the spring area is the fix (which means it's not the floormat, or the shape of the gas pedal itself).
Posted by: steveegg at January 30, 2010 04:31 PM (UGOcx)
8
Maybe we're thinking of unrelated incidents. I was referring to
this specifically (warning: car accident photos, no bodies, but it is pretty nasty), where it appeared that there was not enough clearance between the floormat and the bottom of the pedal. The floormat slipped and got stuck under the accelerator, which made it so the car couldn't stop.
A shim could theoretically fix that problem, holding the pedal a few centimeters higher, out of the way of the floormat. Or it could be the accelerator itself, I don't know.
Posted by: Jeff M at January 30, 2010 06:02 PM (8P3+x)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 28, 2010
Get out your secret racist decoder ring
Apparently, if you've used a word to describe Barack Obama that some
Stormfront douchebag also happened to use within the last year or so,
you're...wait for it...wait for it...
A RAAAAACIST!!!!!
By that standard,
this must be the most racist website on the innertubes.
(
h/t)
Posted by: Sean M. at
10:57 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The comments at SFGate are freaking great.
Posted by: Pat at January 29, 2010 01:38 AM (R0lVr)
2
Threadwinner over there: In Zennie's article I see the words: Obama, slammed, his, white, girlfriend, with, his, black, cocky. (Fact check it yourself!)
I think Zennie owes us an apology for his racist and sexist hate speech.
They've got a comment rating system that doesn't require registration, just sayin.
Posted by: Alice H at January 29, 2010 09:58 AM (qJHYy)
3
Oops, forgot to close the blockquote. I'm sure you can figure out what I was trying to say.
Posted by: Alice H at January 29, 2010 09:58 AM (qJHYy)
4
Alice, I have to admit I liked the one right before that.
In the language of my people, the word "zennie" means "retard".
Posted by: Veeshir at January 29, 2010 02:33 PM (CNMEV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 26, 2010
Be Careful For Which You Ask, Since You Just May Get It
For years, I have half jokingly told people in the media that their work on the air or in print should be registered and regulated by the FEC as an "in kind" contribution to the Democrats. I never really meant it, but it was fun to insult and annoy the arrogant assholes in the Fourth Estate.
Well, I am intrigued to see that the left has decided to weigh in on the matter. And, not surprisingly, they want to regulate and harass Fox News via amorphous (at best) election laws (warning: MediaMatters link) and force it to register as a campaign donor. Needless to say, this is part and parcel of the Soros crowd whining and lashing out after the Brown Victory last week, with Eric Boehlert leading the charge. And what is most disturbing is how many media hacks and other lefties read MediaMatters and look to it for advice and agenda setting :
The FEC made the correct, sensible decision in 2006 when it extended its media exemption to include bloggers, even though many of them broadcast a proud partisan voice online. There's nothing wrong with a strong editorial voice. What Fox News is doing today, however, goes so far beyond broadcasting an editorial voice, skating so close to GOP campaign management, that it should no longer enjoy the distinction of a media exemption.
Indeed, with its radical transformation into a purely political entity, Fox News has changed the rules governing politics and the press. It's time for the FEC to recognize that, look at Fox News with a fresh set of eyes, and act accordingly.
Heh. So that's how it's going to be, eh? Just be careful, asshole. Be careful, because if you do get your wish, and Fox News is muzzled and regulated, then don't fucking piss and moan if the next Republican President goes after MSNBC, PBS, or the New York Times. Don't fucking whine, because we can probably find an FEC expert who could make the case that the MSM as constituted today is a campaign tool for the Democrats and subject to future FEC regulations as well.
Sadly, the Republicans won't really do it. But I would love to see Katie Couric, Adam Nagourney, or Gwen Ifill forced to register their work with The Man and see how they like it then.
Posted by: eddiebear at
01:29 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 401 words, total size 2 kb.
1
A dream come true, that would truly be. Bring it on. I think Fox and Rush would probably double their numbers, if this happened.
Posted by: Jay in Ames at January 26, 2010 02:25 PM (UEEex)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 24, 2010
Gay V Teh Ghey
Holy Return Volley
Batman!
The other day
a blog I don't really read too much had a link to a
Hillbuzz post about being attacked for not being all Hopey Changey.
Turned out, they're 2 gay guys, but they're obviously not teh ghey. As you will soon see.
Coupla high points, but then you have to go read the whole thing.
Seriously, you might as well just click and not read what I'm about to quote.
But I'll quote anyway.
Many thanks to everyone who has been helping to track down the
identities of the Leftist thugs who have been defaming, threatening,
harassing, and libeling us. It feels like we’re making real progress,
and are close to zeroing in on the IDs of these people. Expect a full
update soon, once we have time to pull everything together, and piece
together all the clues you’ve been uncovering....Uh-oh.
More
Someone told us to be very careful with digging too deep into this,
because if our hunch is right and this does lead back to the DNC and
Organizing for America themselves, there are many people who will do us
physical harm to keep us from exposing them.And that's not just rhetorical. Another reason this needs to be highly publicized. Cockroaches don't like the light.
And my favorite part.
Listen, we grew up gay in the Midwest, where we were abused,
threatened, maligned, harassed, and blackmailed before…by people much
more creative than the Hope and Change Gang…people who covered their
tracks better. What these Obama-supporting thugs don’t realize is that
when you launch Alinsky attacks against people who have been subjected
to Alinksy attacks their whole lives, like us, we aren’t going to just
turn tail and run.Bring it on.
I can't believe I'm giving money to Hillbuzz.
Seriously, it's kind of long and you'll feel a little gay dipping your balls into gay pudding, but just dip,
Like a Viking!
Posted by: Veeshir at
02:22 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 326 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm sure y'all can imagine what I think of outing.
The vile motherfuckers doing this can DIAF now.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 24, 2010 03:23 PM (TtXKB)
2
Those fellers over at Hillbuzz are good people, and the vile thugs from the left want to hurt them. It seems to me that the thugs made a key mistake here, and that is interpreting goodness (and probably gayness, because lets face it, your typical leftist is the most hateful bigoted piece of trash around - just look at the projection if you want proof!) as weakness.
Cowards always make this mistake. They've made it with me before, too.* Kindness, patience, and goodness is not the same thing as weakness. I'm very interested to see how the Hillbuzz boys handle this, and also to see the leftists that get exposed to start whining about how scared they are of the big, bad righties and their threats (there's that projection again).
*I am a big man. 6'-4" tall, pushing 300 pounds, and can bench press way over my body weight. All of this adds up to me being a very nice, very gentle person, which gets interpeted as weakness all the time. Everybody seems to want to fight the "big guy" to prove their mettle, and so they choose me because I seem pretty harmless. Heh. I know where the Hillbuzz boys sit right now, and I know how they feel. I hope they win. i think they will.
Posted by: Goober at January 26, 2010 08:53 PM (Pzz/u)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 20, 2010
Bastids, farging bastids
Via
cbulllitt we find a link to
Nicky Goomba where we find that they're not done trying to shackle us.
As Goomba said, google hr-45, the first link is to
Thomas.loc.gov, they post bills online.
This fine little bill is all about gun registration.
Quote
The term `qualifying firearm'-(A) means-`(i) any handgun; or
`(ii) any semiautomatic firearm that can accept any detachable ammunition feeding device;All handguns and it will turn out to be all semi-autos, somehow I figure they'll include clips in that "detachable ammunition feeding device" so a Garand is included.
And what do they do with these firearms?
It shall be unlawful for any person other than a licensed importer,
licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector to
possess a qualifying firearm on or after the applicable date, unless
that person has been issued a firearm license--These bastards are just relentless, every fucking day there's another fucking outrage.
They get your fingerprints and all your personal info and they give you a license.
They record what guns you own (for when they go to confiscation) and you have to renew every 5 years (every 5 year anniversary of your birthdate), you have to pay to buy a gun.
But wait, there's still more! Remember Probable Cause and Illegal Search and Seizure?
Unnecessary
In order to ascertain compliance with this Act, the amendments made by
this Act, and the regulations and orders issued under this Act, the
Attorney General may, during regular business hours, enter any place in
which firearms or firearm products are manufactured, stored, or held,
for distribution in commerce, and inspect those areas where the
products are so manufactured, stored, or held.Words don't fail me, but they're all full of threats and whatnot so I'll won't say them
I will comment on this
`(ff) Failure To Provide Notice of Change of Address- It shall be
unlawful for any individual to whom a firearm license has been issued
under title I of Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act
of 2009 to fail to report to the Attorney General a change in the
address of that individual within 60 days of that change of address.'.Fuck you very much.
Posted by: Veeshir at
09:29 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 370 words, total size 3 kb.
1
yeah, this bill sucks ass
Posted by: eddiebear at January 20, 2010 10:05 AM (wnU1W)
Posted by: Alice H at January 20, 2010 10:12 AM (qJHYy)
3
Before y'all get all psycho about this...
Go here: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-45
And read this: SPONSOR: No cosponsors.
Nobody- not Pelosi, not Boxer, not Schumer has signed onto this bill.
Bobby Rush could submit a bill to square the circle or bring back sexy if he wants- unless someone other than himself votes for it, it's just waste paper.
If memory serves, he's submitted some kind of asinine gun-registration bill every session he's been wasting the taxpayer's air in Congress. I personally remember this particular rumor running around a few years ago.
Democrats don't have the balls or the stupidity to put a gun-registration bill up for a vote. They know what would happen if they did (can you say, "Permanent Republican Majority", folks? Sure you can) because they saw what happened last time. I don't deny that the current administration and Congress would LOVE to attack gun ownership, but I expect it to happen either incrementally through bueraucratic fiat (e.g. the ATF completely stops issuing FFL's and starts revoking the ones still out there, or makes getting an FFL too onerous to manage) or through "unintended consequences" (e.g. as part of the Obamacare bill, where ownership of firearms is listed as 'voluntary risky behavior' and means you get a much higher premium and have to go to the back of the line for care).
It's not that there's no threat; it's just that this almost certainly isn't it.
Jeez, I wish people do a little thought before they hit the hysterics buton.
Posted by: DaveP. at January 20, 2010 10:19 AM (DXTmU)
4
According
to this, it's in committee as of 1/6/10.
These are just trial balloons, they need to be smacked upside the head each and every time they try this shit so they know to stop fucking trying it.
Healthcare is a right to these people and yet guns, which are specifically mentioned, are not. You see, the Constitution is designed to restrict what gov't can do, except for the 2nd amendment, that's to empower the gov't at the expense of the People.
That bill has so many anti-Constitutional things in it that it's fucking ridiculous, they need to be smacked in the head of even thinking about it.
Posted by: Veeshir at January 20, 2010 10:21 AM (k50Q0)
5
Notice it was referred to the House Judiciary subcommittee on "Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security".
Fucking bastards just lumped me in with criminals and terrorists.
Fuck them.
I know I'm paranoid about guns, but that's the most important amendment.
As FrnakJ said once (I can't find the link so paraphrase), "
Of the 1st and 2nd amendment, I'll take the 2nd because then I can say what I want because I'll have a gun."
Posted by: Veeshir at January 20, 2010 10:28 AM (k50Q0)
6
Means nothing, Vee.
Part of a good self-defense posture is situational awareness, but part of situational awareness is the ability to analyze threats and to judge the difference between (say) a barking dog and one who's about to bite. Rush is antigun, we got that a long time ago; but we can't pry him out of his safe seat and we can't stop him from submitting crap like this. We CAN focus our attentions on the serious problems (the Chicago 2nd Amendment suits, say, or the efforts to treat ammunition makers as either explosives manufacturers or as biohazardous industries) and not distract ourselves worrying about threats that- while offensive- can't be taken seriously.
Hell, the best thing to do might be to do what the Republicans did to Charles Rangel when he proposed resurrecting The Draft: force the bill to a vote, and make the bastards either stand with it or disavow it...
Posted by: DaveP. at January 20, 2010 10:53 AM (DXTmU)
7
Thanks for the explanation DaveP. Otherwise I'd be apoplectic arrest. Or something.
Posted by: davis,br at January 20, 2010 11:50 AM (uCShA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
102kb generated in 2.4839 seconds; 80 queries returned 250 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.2-pink.