1
Yeah, this will go about as far as the investigations into Rangel, Dodd, Conrad, etc. etc. etc.
Posted by: ECM at October 30, 2009 02:48 AM (q3V+C)
2
Yeah, these days they just open investigations so they can find nothing inappropriate and then they tell everyone to move on. The lack of effort they put into the cover ups these days is truly insulting.
Posted by: hudson at October 30, 2009 02:55 AM (n1uMU)
3
This is denounced as RAAAAACIST!!! and/or is swept under the rug in 3...2...1...
Posted by: Sean M. at October 30, 2009 03:55 AM (rLWHv)
4
Maybe we can hire those ambulance chasers who sued Louisville Slugger so politicians will be required to have "Danger: Bullshit" labels and disclaimers warning that election of said turd can result in : "Rampant Corruption & Theft."
Posted by: cbullitt at October 30, 2009 05:41 AM (BEQuG)
5
marginally O/T, but somebody (I forget who) mentioned that if Rangel were to be forced out, that would lead to Pete Stark running Ways & Means.
Posted by: eddiebear at October 30, 2009 07:34 AM (CMlvd)
6
Too bad we didn't have a competent media to follow these things up.
Foxnews, for all the attacks on it, is as lazy, stupid, ignorant and smugly superior as the rest.
In centuries to come people will tell stories about America that nobody will believe (How could anybody be that free?) and they'll always end with, "And then they fucked the whole thing up".
Oh well, we had a good run
Posted by: Veeshir at October 30, 2009 07:47 AM (pFu3Y)
7
Is there anyone in Congress who is not a complete crook? Seriously, anyone?
Posted by: alexthechick at October 30, 2009 07:54 AM (8WZWv)
8
alex, for a good documentary about it watch Eddie Murphy's documentary titled "The Distinguished Gentleman".
Ignore the last half-hour, the first hour or so is the real Congress. You'll be especially enlightened as you watch a con-man be absolutely surprised that congress-critters get away with stuff he couldn't even dream about.
Posted by: Veeshir at October 30, 2009 08:25 AM (pFu3Y)
9watch Eddie Murphy's documentary titled "The Distinguished Gentleman".
Actually, I have deep fondness for (most) of that movie. The initial part with the campaign ads is utter freaking genius.
Posted by: alexthechick at October 30, 2009 09:38 AM (8WZWv)
10tiffany jewelry hot sale now with discount. Tiffanyhotsale provides the best Tiffany & Co jewelry, including Necklaces, Bracelets, Earrings, Pendants and so on .
Posted by: lii at November 02, 2009 04:27 AM (90fqm)
So, what happens when leftists seize higher education?
I am both unsurprised that this is a kindergarten teacher, while simultaneously horrified,
Kolowith’s students learn about the explorer’s significance — though
they also come away with a more nuanced picture of Columbus than the
noble discoverer often portrayed in pop culture and legend.
“I
talk about the situation where he didn’t even realize where he was,”
Kolowith said. “And we talked about how he was very, very mean, very
bossy.”
Very, very mean and very bossy.
Nuance.
Moar,
Although lessons vary, many teachers are trying to present a more
balanced perspective of what happened after Columbus reached the
Caribbean and the suffering of indigenous populations.
By balanced they mean radical Marxist, Progressive or other vigorously anti-Western interpretations of the history of Columbus and the Western discovery of the Americas.
“The whole terminology has changed,” said James Kracht, executive
associate dean for academic affairs in the Texas A&M College of
Education and Human Development. “You don’t hear people using the world
’discovery’ anymore like they used to. ’Columbus discovers America.’
Because how could he discover America if there were already people
living here?”
Of course we don't, because most teachers are educated by professors who teach from a position of hostility toward traditional Western thought, interpretation and philosophy, and many teachers aren't educated well enough to recognize that and adjust. Then there are those that do recognize that, but agree with the underlying philosophies and play along. The public school system is mostly built around progressive philosophical concepts, so you have that as well. Then obviously most textbooks and workbooks are designed by people from a higher education background, who are for the most part leftists. Which is why we get the stupid, "How could he discover it if there were already people there?" nonsense.
In Texas, students start learning in the fifth grade about the
“Columbian Exchange” — which consisted not only of gold, crops and
goods shipped back and forth across the Atlantic Ocean, but diseases
carried by settlers that decimated native populations.
And Europeans picked up and brought back syphilis from the Americas, educators need to quit acting like Westerners waged biological war on Native Americans. They're bacteria, parasites and viruses, they spread with human contact, except in Madagascar, where they close their damned port every time someone sneezes, it's biology, it happens, especially in an era where people didn't really understand how the spread of disease worked. I'll also note that the dean I quote above parrots this bullshit on the second page.
They won't teach these kids that the Natives gave Westerners nasty diseases too, because they're taught to teach that America is the bad guy,
In McDonald, Pa., 30 miles southwest of Pittsburgh, fourth-grade
students at Fort Cherry Elementary put Columbus on trial this year —
charging him with misrepresenting the Spanish crown and thievery. They
found him guilty and sentenced him to life in prison.
“In their own verbiage, he was a bad guy,” teacher Laurie Crawford said.
See what I mean?
America, Marxism's bad guy,
And unfortunately, they'll keep getting away with this too, there's more of these jackass antics in the second page of the article. People focus on the leftist bullshit spouted about Columbus, but that's only because the material taught is so out of control. It's still the same leftist bullshit throughout the year, it's just slightly more subtle. People just don't realize it because most haven't been taught anything about historiography, and that includes people with history degrees. People are not taught anything about how to identify bias in historical works (and yes, that includes your gradeschooler's textbooks), how to recognize cultural styles and biases, sources and their validity, how to separate historical fact from historical interpretation, how to recognize what schools of thought those interpretations and biases came from, and I'm sure I'm missing others, but you get the point.
Parents need to gain a better understanding of what is going on in school classrooms. I don't expect grade schoolers to understand these things, but parents do need to learn about this stuff at least on a rudimentary level so that they can review their student's books and what they did in class, and push back as needed.
1
Hey, Its awesome that Europeans exported all of the diseases around the world that they did. How much did they want to dominate the world? They were basically willing to live in raw sewage for centuries to build up their immune systems, then infect the rest of the world with diseases that they themselves were immune to. Its badass.
Posted by: hudson at October 11, 2009 07:48 PM (n1uMU)
2
They didn't even talk about Christopher Columbus today at Teh Boy's school.
Posted by: Alice H at October 12, 2009 04:34 PM (qJHYy)
1"Obama's war," a locution one is now beginning to hear from other
conservatives, is an expression of discontent that has been smoldering
beneath the surface for several months.
Um, what "other conservatives" would those be? Got any names?
Posted by: Sean M. at September 05, 2009 01:04 AM (rLWHv)
That's why he's the Emperor
I used to spend most of my online time at the Emperor's site, that's where I spent my days commenting.
It got a little rough a few years ago and since I'd been surfing mostly at work, I've avoided it. Too many "rope, tree, politician, some assembly required" comments. I still think he has one of the best commands of invective and does a diatribe that makes me not want alexthechick to find his blog, I'm still hoping for pics.
In this post he unloads on Rinos, but that's not why I linked it. It's for this aside to Allah's love As an aside to Meghan: I went to biker rallies before you were even
born, yet it never once occurred to me that it made me more “hip.” What
I did observe was that starry-eyed young groupies showing up to
gain “street creds” were incredibly easy lays. Those were the days.
Apparently they haven’t changed. The supply of gullible, easy and
easily forgettable fucks hasn’t diminished. Good for you, girl.
Bwahahahahhaahahhahhahhahhahaahhahaha. Bulls-fucking-eye. Maybe Allah needs a bike. more...
1
If you're going to post about Meghan McCain, you should include the obligatory link to Megamus Macximus and her twitpic page. Including her latest tattoo.
Posted by: Alice H at August 13, 2009 10:25 PM (qJHYy)
2
Aw, Veeshir, thanks for the mad props, I appreciate it!
Coincidentally, if you're surfing from work, I don't blame you for not coming by as much anymore, even though, let there be no doubt: You are sorely missed.
On the other hand, you do great work here on one of my favorite blogs on the web (Daily Read List and all that, for quite some time), so it's all good!
Once again, thanks!
Posted by: Misha I at August 14, 2009 01:18 AM (xwZ1c)
3
Absolutely, no one lays down a better rant than the Emperor.
Okay, Everybody Just Shut Up!Now Obama want's the left to shut up too. He has big Change to bring and everybody just needs to shut up and listen to him. Quote President Obama told Senate Democrats he wished "left-wing groups" would back off.
"Okay, that's funny, but why is this in Bipartisan Fail?" you ask? Quote The President discussed how the current tone and culture in Washington
made it more difficult than it has been in the past to work in a
bipartisan fashion. In particular, he singled out Republican Senators who are trying to
work in a bipartisan fashion even in the context of a vocal minority in
their party who doubt that the President was born in the US
He loves the birther stuff because he can ignore issues (Just like the freaking 90s), and he has some GOP critters (gee, I wonder who.) to help him do it. They're just haggling over how much the gov't is going to take over right now.
The GOP seems to have no idea that people are angry that they taking over healthcare, not how much. I wonder if any townhall meetings they have will wake them up. Probably not, they'll just stop holding them or they'll be invite only.
One said: "You won an election, not the lottery. Stop spending my money." Another, held by an elderly woman, said: "Health care for seniors = Euthanasia."
The first-term congressman, stopping in Wicomico and Worcester counties on Tuesday for what he advertised as an agriculture roundtable, got an earful from constituents angry over health care reform bills proposed in Washington. Kratovil, a Democrat, represents Maryland's 1st District, a 12-county area encompassing the Eastern Shore.
"People are afraid of what's happening now," said Steve Lind of Ocean Pines. "They're afraid of big government; they're afraid of taxes. We're losing our freedoms. We're losing America."
The crowd of about 70 in the school cheered loudly following Lind's remarks. It was one of many times the crowd erupted into applause or gasped at with which statements they disagreed.
Posted by: eddiebear at August 05, 2009 11:33 AM (wnU1W)
2
Are there any elected Republicans who are Birfers? Seriously, are there? Because if not, then that statement makes no sense at all.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 05, 2009 11:44 AM (SHHaV)
3Because if not, then that statement makes no sense at all.
Oh it makes total sense. It helps if you think about the 90s. (I hated the 90s)
I would say something like, "Gee, the Clinton admin committed treason." when they had Gore make a deal that (quote) That deal appeared to undercut a 1992 law sponsored by Mr. Gore
and the response to me was, "Oh, so you think Clinton had Arkansas troopers kill his prostitutes?"
If you can get the person arguing irrelevancies or outright nitwiticities, the debate is a lot easier to win.
Obama is an internet troll is another way to think of it.
Posted by: Veeshir at August 05, 2009 11:54 AM (xZati)
4Obama is an internet troll is another way to think of it.
Omg, he's poon! I should have known.
Posted by: alexthechick at August 05, 2009 12:14 PM (SHHaV)
You remember the crew that got kicked out of Feinstein's office last week?
They are always called "activists" and they have a "spokesperson", however, none of the very few stories that carries the account say what group they represent.
They're activists and they have a spokestool, you'd think they'd have a name to go with their activism and their spokestooling.
Hmmm,
Minitru cover-up?
Minitru doing their normal, sparkling job of telling us the 6 Ws?
or they just don't have a name?
I tend to go with A and 2 an awful lot. They're stupid and they cover stuff up.
Since nobody's covering it except for one SF Gate article and one AP article, I'm leaning toward cover up.
No sense giving free publicity to people who disagree with their chosen political party after all.
Posted by: Veeshir at August 03, 2009 01:16 PM (ThMnZ)
3
I only wish the sound quality was a little better. It's almost bunk-worthy for a political nerd like myself.
Posted by: JoeCollins at August 03, 2009 01:32 PM (8JMx6)
4
This is the second big push for nationalized health care in my adult lifetime. It's clearly coming one of these days, as the parasitic freeloaders in America now outnumber the liberty loving producers.
So, is this BS?
Dunno, but the mere mention of David Brooks' thigh is a stronger vomit inducer than a bottle of Ipecac,
Part of me thinks it's BS, because the only thing more disgusting than the thought of David Brooks' thigh is David Brooks' desire to slob the knobs of every Beltway douchebag he can get his lips around, so I can see him coming up with a story like this to endear himself to them. On the flipside, I'm not sure he's creative enough to come up with a story like that, and I wouldn't be surprised if Brooks isn't bullshitting here.
Oh SNAP!
Among Democrats who are aware of both Benedict Arlen and Joe Sestak, 52% of them favor Sestak. On one hand, as much as I despise Specter, Sestak may be an even bigger scumbag, but on the other hand, HAHAHAHAAAAAAA!!!!! How'd that betrayal work out for you, Arlen?
Seriously folks, you need to chill with the handwringing
No, seriously, the reaction to the ad is ridiculous, man up, er, nancies. If you want to argue that it was an ineffective or stupid ad, fine, but why all the squirming and panicking about how the media is going to spin this? Why do we spend so much goddamned time wringing our hands about the fact that the media and the left are going to distort and twist what it is conservatives or GOPers say? The ad isn't sexist, man up and say it, and slap down any leftist who says otherwise.
But we won't, because we're way too willing to let the left set the terms of the battle, I can lay any money that tomorrow morning we'll watch the same Beltway douches squirming nervously and apologizing to Stephanopoulous or David Gregory or whoever, like we do every time we see something like this. Really folks, it's four simple words, and an understanding that we can't continue to let the left define the terms of battle and the battlespace and expect to win.
I keep going back to this, but I really think conservatives need to take a step back, and watch the NRA and gun nuts (and I say gun nuts in the most positive manner) to see how political fights are waged. If you've followed the Second Amendment debate, or have gone back and learned about the evolution of the debate, you'll come away with at least some sense of how to fight the fight and win. They don't back down, and on those occasions where they NRA doesn't step up, local activists step in and make things happen. And they're always on the attack now, gun control advocates can't seem to get any traction outside of a few Marxist havens like NY and CA. And you'll notice, when you see Wayne LaPierre or some other pro-2nd advocate arguing, they don't let the media or Bradys define the terms of the debate.
Even in what is theoretically a politically impossible place for pro-2nd activists to see victory, they're still racking up wins, such as the bill allowing concealed carry in national parks. The Bradys and VPC are completely demoralized, Josh Sugarmann and Paul Helmke have quit issuing press releases, they now issue lamentations. The media screeches impotently, gun nuts point and laugh.
Conservatives would be wise to step back and learn how to win political and culture wars from the NRA and gun nuts.
1
You know what's sexist? This assumption that female politicians can't freaking handle playing hard ball (so to speak ahem). Seriously, I'm not some wilting fucking flower that must have my delicate sensibilities all protected. Nancy wants to play at that level? Then Nancy better be prepared for what happens. She started it. We'll finish it. And that's totally fair.
Posted by: alexthechick at May 24, 2009 09:30 AM (kvgzh)
To paraphrase The Gipper's 1975 CPAC speech, we need to raise a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on a host of issues.
The fact that I can get a concealed carry permit in fucking deep blue Massachusetts is due to the constant, focused efforts of the NRA and the Massachusetts Gun Owners Action League.
Until we man up (lookin' at you, eeyorepundit) and take the fight to the libs across the board, we may win a few battles here and there, but we will lose the war.
Gonna be interesting to see where this goes. I've gotta think that this isn't going to happen, because there are 49 other states, and many counties, cities and towns (or townships if you're in PA) that are struggling to keep their debt under control. Other than those in CA or solidly Marxist districts, the congresscritters know that the next election cycle is going to be ugly for those that support something like this. They know the bailouts are unpopular, and porkulus is less so.
The other problem with bailing out California is obvious, the second we do it, every other state and local government has absolutely zero incentive to spend responsibly, and those people who do the right thing anyway are going to grow extremely resentful of those that don't control spending.
I think in this case, the traditional conservative response would be to march to Sac' equipped with tar and feathers. And a rail: mustn't forget the rail.
Posted by: davis,br at May 15, 2009 11:32 PM (0rRmD)
California is completely schizophrenic. Some areas are deeply conservative (or at least libertarian). Hell, the area I live in has one of the single best House members, Darrell Issa, as its rep.
The state is just too fucking big, and that's one of the main problems, in my opinion. You see this kind of thing with Texas as well. On the whole, Texas is highly conservative / libertarian, but you get city pockets (San Antonio) that are leftist and have outsized influence.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at May 15, 2009 11:46 PM (WhFvm)
4
Yeah, I'm just north of Orange County, and I've got solidly
conservative guys in Congress, the Assembly, and the State
Senate. But they're all offset by the whackjobs sent to Sacto and
DC by the idiots in places like L.A.
Posted by: Sean M. at May 15, 2009 11:53 PM (rLWHv)
Oh, look, the media finally notices anti-Jewish statements
It just took coming from some retarded backbench GOPer from Alabama, referring to Chuck Schumer as "that Jew." I'd note that a conservative blogger was the one who broke the story, according to the article. Before the left cranks the OUTRAGE!!! to eleven, they may want to consider the rank anti-semitism that is spewed daily on their own sites, and of course the DNC's own Jew-baiting shenanigans. There are countless reasons to despise Chuck Schumer, that he's Jewish isn't one of them.
Picture shamelessly stolen from sweasel.com. Stoaty has a very interesting analysis of TOTUS's signature, and a pic of how I'm certain Obama sees himself that I will no doubt be stealing for some future post.
1
Heh. It's like watching ripples on a pond, watching links move through my logs.
I'm pretty sure this is exactly what my parents had in mind when they sent me to art school.
Posted by: S. Weasel at May 03, 2009 05:32 PM (wh43V)
To begin
with, the legislation threatens the voluntary nature of Americorps by
calling for consideration of “a workable, fair, and reasonable
mandatory service requirement for all able young people.” It
anticipates the possibility of requiring “all individuals in the United
States” to perform such service – including elementary school students.
The bill also summons up unsettling memories of World War II-era
paramilitary groups by saying the new program should “combine the best
practices of civilian service with the best aspects of military
service,” while establishing “campuses” that serve as “operational
headquarters,” complete with “superintendents” and “uniforms” for all
participants. It allows for the elimination of all age restrictions in
order to involve Americans at all stages of life. And it calls for
creation of “a permanent cadre” in a “National Community Civilian
Corps.”
But
that’s not all. The bill also calls for “youth engagement zones” in
which “service learning” is “a mandatory part of the curriculum in all
of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency.” This
updated form of voluntary community service is also to be “integrated
into the science, technology, engineering and mathematics curricula” at
all levels of schooling.
1
Mandatory volunteerism is an oxymoron. This is just creepy as all hell. Like. Clown level of creepiness.
Posted by: alexthechick at March 26, 2009 11:14 AM (SHHaV)
2
This gets into one of the things I really dislike about financial liberalism - making it mandatory to do service work for a set period of time leads people to believe that once their obligation has been filled, there's no reason to continue to volunteer any more of your time. This is pretty obviously reflected in the difference in charitable giving between registered Democrats and registered Republicans - the Democrats figure they've paid their taxes (or likely not, as evidenced by how much trouble Obama has had filling his administrative posts) so the government should take care of all those pesky needy people.
Posted by: Alice H at March 26, 2009 11:59 AM (jRtPb)
3
How long before the first 13th Amendment suit is filed? If this isn't indentured service, what is? And I would also remind you the difference between this and a draft for military service- the Constitution specifically grants Congress the power to "raise an army" but I'm afraid I couldn't find any authority to compel civilian service.
Posted by: XBradTC at March 26, 2009 12:04 PM (nxLro)
BTW, you can probably kiss the missile defense program goodbye
Because if we're gonna hand out tens (hundreds?) of trillions in goodie bags to try and buy votes, we're gonna have to cut back on other things, and defense systems are probably going to be one of them.
1
In the early 2000's I bought in to the argument that missile defense would be too expensive and unlikely to work. (See MIRV) At this point, however, the technology is rapidly progressing while at the same time the world is getting more dangerous. It also has the benefit of being a strategic bargaining point a la SDI in the 80s, which BHO has decided to throw away for free. It is completely moronic to pull the plug now.
Posted by: Sockless Joe at March 03, 2009 10:19 AM (tzEdT)
2
I'm not surprised, but I am still wondering about this. Doesn't Russia sell Iran a lot of its technology? Do you think they will give up the revenue because Obama asks nicely? What happens if Russia declines?
More housing stuff
There's an interesting article in the Boston Globe about the stimulus bill and the rising anger by those who are not behind on their mortgages (ie the 93%) who are now going to be paying for those who are. Let's start with that, if you listened to the news, you'd think that it was 7% who are up to date and 93% who are not. Seeing the actual numbers is really interesting. There was also a study that showed that the default problem is pretty much concentrated in five states.
There's some fascinating discussions in the column, including a point blank admission by a supporter of the bailout that it's not fair but that something still needs to be done. That's a position that I don't think is the best, but, hey, bonus points for copping that it sucks for those who are stuck with the bill.
For further discussion, including my being the heartless bitch y'all know and don't actually hate, below. more...
1
I wrote about this back in September. I would bet there were a lot of representations made solely for the purpose of closing sales and assuring commissions.
Posted by: Old Grouch at February 24, 2009 02:03 PM (kzbvE)