January 31, 2010
Can I get some of what he's smoking?
Because he's got to be really fucking high if he actually believes this:
The American people do not want the president to walk away from health care reform, White House senior adviser David Axelrod said Sunday."They want us to act," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "They would like us to work together to do it."
Keep fucking that chicken, Dave. All the way to November.
Posted by: Sean M. at
09:44 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jeff M at January 31, 2010 10:02 PM (8P3+x)
2
You're right, I don't want them to walk away, I've got money riding on Obama's approval rating getting into the 30's before June 1.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 31, 2010 11:44 PM (TtXKB)
3
Notice the comments on that page? Americans really seem eager for that health care reform. I really hope they don't walk away from this one, '10 and '12 will be epic.
Posted by: da_truth36 at February 01, 2010 09:49 AM (N2NHV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Presented without comment or context - David Shuster's online reading list
source
Posted by: chad98036 at
09:00 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Who's David Schuster?
Seriously, does anyone other than the 6 or 8 viewers of MSLSD give a rats ass what he reads?
Posted by: Go_Fish at January 31, 2010 09:50 PM (+eYLq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Old School Sunday Night Hotassery
Since this place could use a little class
Before anyone asks (I'm looking at you Gabe), this is Gene Tierney. She's best known for her work in Laura. Really, they don't make movies, or starlets, like they used to.


More below the fold
more...
Posted by: alexthechick at
08:29 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's a man man :-) just kidding
Posted by: chad98036 at January 31, 2010 08:57 PM (WNcvq)
2
She's no Veronica Lake.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 31, 2010 09:06 PM (k5nPY)
3
Veronica Lake was hot but I'm a Rita Hayworth fan myself
Posted by: chad98036 at January 31, 2010 09:12 PM (WNcvq)
4
Yow! I'd drink her bath water.
Posted by: Go_Fish at January 31, 2010 09:48 PM (+eYLq)
Posted by: MikeD at February 01, 2010 11:07 AM (FkL60)
6
^Eh, I've always thought the Seventh Seal was overrated.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 01, 2010 11:56 AM (9u9oT)
7
Sorry, I should clarify. Ingrid in Casablanca
Posted by: MikeD at February 01, 2010 04:19 PM (FkL60)
8
You got the joke right? Ingmar Bergman did the Seventh Seal.
You're absolutely correct about Ingrid.
Which makes me think of another of Bogie's squeezes, Lauren Bacall was bad to the bone in her day.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 01, 2010 04:29 PM (EYmj5)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Good Riddance?
At least some of the noisier Japanese
want us gone.
My question, do we need to stay in Okinawa?
We have bases in South Korea and Taiwan in that region. They need us, Japan doesn't.
Japan can defend themselves and nobody really wants to invade them anyway. The original reason we stayed was because we didn't trust the Japanese, but these days they are too into fucking robots, marrying cartoon characters and generally leading the world in "weird and creepy" to want to invade anybody else. They mostly want the world to leave them alone except to buy their stuff.
Their biggest threat is the poofy-haired maniac lobbing missiles, and we have cruisers and whatnot for that and they can field their missile defense. They're probably helping us and the Israelis build the systems anyway.
It seems to me there's no reason not to be out of western Europe and Japan. They don't need us and those bases cost us money. We can keep those soldiers in places where they're needed.
Posted by: Veeshir at
06:52 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My theory is when a country starts bitching the bases, we say "k" and leave and then watch the delicious tears fall at the realization of what that'll do to the economy there. Kinda like in Germany when we made noises about going at it was all "No, baby, I didn't mean, come back, baby, I love you, Ike just gets a little crazy sometimes".
Posted by: alexthechick at January 31, 2010 07:03 PM (TtXKB)
2
No bases in Taiwan. Okinowa is a very important basing system for the southeast Pacific area. There are no navy or marine bases in Korea. Guam is just too small to add much more there.
Posted by: Federale at January 31, 2010 07:12 PM (F2BPM)
3
Something you hear very little about is how much of the "Yankee Bases OUT!" jive is founded in the high price of real estate. We saw this very clearly when the Puerto Ricans demanded that we close the live-fire range in Vieques- and it turns out that the big reason was so that the land could be sold at a hideous profit to developers. The action is much the same in Japan, only more so: when you have a few square miles of American military bases sitting on land that might be worth four digits per square yard to a local developer, there's campaign donations a-plenty to the mayor or governor who can organize a street march or petition in "opposition to Yankee imperialism", or whatever.
IOW: Screw the Japanese.
Posted by: DaveP. at January 31, 2010 07:30 PM (DXTmU)
4
Huh, I assumed we had Marine, Navy and Army bases in Taiwan. We do have at least one airbase, Cha Shan Air Base.
I checked and according to this
wikipedia link, most of our Marine bases in that area of the Pacific are on Okinawa.
I did not know that. That changes things a little, but I wonder if we can move them somewhere else in the area, like Taiwan (wouldn't that cheese off China?) or South Korea. (Don't let Murtha get involved, he thinks Okinawa is just over the
horizon from Iraq)
It looks as if Okinawa is what we need. Oh well. I had hoped to have an idea for
making people love us telling some idjits to go screw.
I really wish we could just tell the world to screw off, but as we learned in 1917 and 1941, that just isn't possible.
Posted by: Veeshir at January 31, 2010 07:59 PM (1WYOx)
5
It's not about the Japanese Code Pinkers. We stay because of China and North Korea.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 31, 2010 08:01 PM (k5nPY)
6
We do have a Navy Base in Korea - Chin Hae.
Okinawa is important mainly because it is with-in 2000 miles of a number of potential trouble spots including North Korea. In fact when I was stationed there one of the primary missions was to respond if the NORKs attacked the ROK.
Third Marines could have troops airborne to Korea in 24 hours or less and the Entire MEF could probably be in country in less than a week or so if need be. It is only a couple hour flight to Pohang (ROK Marine Base or K-1) so that could be crucial.
Posted by: chad98036 at January 31, 2010 08:34 PM (WNcvq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Because no one saw that coming
Other than, say, every conservative around.
Bank bailouts created more risk.
Money quote (see what I did there?)
Barofsky wrote the $700 billion financial bailout has encouraged more
risk-taking because bank executives, who are still receiving massive
bonuses, figure the government will come to the rescue the next time
they steer their ships nearly aground.
No. Fucking. Shit. Once the whole "too big to fail" meme started, why the hell would risk taking be reduced? Hell, the gubmint will just come and save us the next time. Also note the slam on the bonuses as well.
Look, there is no way out that's not going to involve tons of pain. The question is how much pain and for how long. The same people who created the regs and whatnot that got us into this mess are the ones now claiming they can get us out. Yeah, that's going to end well.
Posted by: alexthechick at
03:26 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Other than, say, every conservative around.
Not true. Plenty of conservatives, blindly rooting on wall street, were for some form of bailout, lest the 'financial system collapse'. The head moron was particularly obtuse on the subject. Plenty still think that Hammering Hank Paulson did the best he could, when all he really did was spread misinformation and panic so that his cronies at GS and elsewhere could profit massively.
Is there a crisis? Yes, of course. Unfortunately everything done so far has papered over the problems, at huge expense to the taxpayer. Hell, many conservatives still think that forcing the banks to mark-to-market is a bad idea. As if all the bad loans on their books will magically become better if they're not forced to realize the loss when it occurs. I'd rather have a busted bank than a zombie bank any day.
The bottom line is that there is no consensus on either side of the political aisle on how to proceed, as most people (regardless of ideology) prefer putting off pain in the short term, even if it means more pain drawn out over the longer term. Combine that with those who still watch Tout TV (CNBC and the like) for their information, my railing against the current government/financial oligarchy is more likely to find a home at DKOS than on most conservative sites.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 31, 2010 03:54 PM (WhFvm)
2
In conservatives' defense, it was Bush and his coterie of "compassionate conservatives" trying to get McCain elected who started this crap, so it was "conservatives" much more than conservatives. And I'm pretty sure most real conservatives were pissed off when we found out that Bush' peeps forced some banks to take my money and lied about what was really going on.
I don't understand finance all that well but I do know that "too big to fail" is bad, bad, bad. If the gov't protects the biggies from failing but not the smallies, pretty soon there won't be any smallies, just biggies that are even too bigger to fail.
The first bailout I saw was Chrysler in the 70s and I thought it was a bad idea.
They needed more bailouts because they learned they were too big to fail instead of learning not to be stupid.
Posted by: Veeshir at January 31, 2010 06:26 PM (1WYOx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Evangelical Atheists Suck
Via Hot Air (where you saw it), we find this
article about some atheist group angry over Mother Theresa getting a stamp. As an atheist, I'll respond.
Go screw.
Idjits, you're making my life difficult.
They weren't upset about Martin Luther King because, so they claim, he just happened to be a minister while she was known primarily as a nun.
Methinks the Reverend Martin Luther King, in one of his sermons, might have disagreed.
Good people is good people. There are few enough who deserve our respect to restrict the pool because you have a problem with their particular religion.
Cool fact I didn't know until reading wikipedia about her for something I then deleted, she was born in the Ottoman Empire.
Weird.
Posted by: Veeshir at
03:12 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I felt the same way when I saw that story, V. It just pisses me the hell off, giving atheists everywhere a bad name. Atheists whine and whine about how no one ever has respect for their lack of beliefs, when they themselves more often than not have absolutely no respect for other's beliefs.
I've always said that most atheists I know (myself included) are some of the most faithful motherfuckers on the planet. After all, it's probably just as hard to prove that there is no God as it is to prove that there is God. Worse than the Bible-thumpers, atheists are.
Posted by: Ember at January 31, 2010 06:48 PM (LdRAG)
2
Fundamentalist Athiests are what drove me back to Christianity; I finally came to the realization that any group as miserable and as hateful as that couldn't be on the right track and certainly wasn't something I'd care to claim or be claimed by.
Posted by: DaveP. at January 31, 2010 07:42 PM (DXTmU)
3
Eh, they're just sore because Richard Dawkins won't be on a stamp anytime soon.
I left the militant side of atheism a long time ago over crap like this. Way to pick your battles guys. This one is dumb.
Posted by: Go_Fish at January 31, 2010 09:54 PM (+eYLq)
4
You know, for about an hour, as I was reading this blog, I almost forgot that Martin Luther King was black. His oratory was so transedent and his command of the languate was almost, kinda, well, you know, white.
Sorry to say, though, that I believe the reason MLk is acceptable to the leftards is because he was (really?) black. Mother Theresa was just a little old Italian kinda white woman with a bit of a moustache who didn't do anything special at all, except give her life in service to the poor.
Posted by: TimothyJ at February 01, 2010 01:43 AM (IKKIf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Don't forget the three laws
Via the Puppy Blender we see the Slashdot article linking to
this page that's an open access summary of an experiment into robot evolution and
this page that discusses the first page and has vids of the experiments.
Very cool. Read the whole thing, you'll enjoy it.
I don't really understand how the researchers recombine the robots' "genomes" to make "generations", but
they do so I'll let it slide.
What they did was let robots run around doing stuff, the ones who did what they wanted best "reproduced", they kept going until the populations were stable, in other words, didn't learn anymore (except once).
For instance, they told robots to run around longer than their batteries could handle with the instructions on how to recharge, so they had to go home periodically.
After 100 generations they all went back with 10% power left, that didn't change at 200 generations. They obviously developed a Murphy's law.
The exception was the predator/prey scenario.
The predator had to touch the prey, the prey had to run away. The prey was twice as fast but the predator could "see" the prey from 200 times the distance.
The prey figured out the best way to evade the predator and then the predator figured out how to overcome that stragety so the prey figured that out so the predator changed....
Quote (from the first link)
Overall, these experiments revealed that a large variety of
sophisticated behavioural strategies could evolve, but none of them
were stable over time because of the coevolutionary dynamics.It never stabilized.
Which makes them uniquely like people I think, these guys must be on the right track.
It seems to me that animals stabilize how they get their prey and how they avoid their predators, that's why new predators or prey can destroy an eco-system.
Man is the animal that best evolves its strategery in killing. It seems to stabilize, but then someone figures out a better way to do it an off we go. That's how empires are founded, like the Romans or the Greeks before them. Not many animals do that and none do it nearly as well.
Interesting and, I also think, important if they can evolve an intelligent robot.
We know lots of stuff, but not a lot of people know a lot about a lot of stuff and nobody can know everything we know all at once.
A brilliant physicist doesn't know all that a brilliant astronomer does and neither of them know what a brilliant mathematician knows.
Asimov, I think, wrote science-fictionally about how a lot of advances were made very quickly simply because a thinking machine could know lots of stuff and correlate it to do unexpected stuff.
That would be cool. If we could make reasoning computers they could figure out important stuff, like how to shut up a global warmmonger or make the perfect s'mores.
Related, excellent sci-fi books, Code of the Lifemaker and The Two Faces of Tomorrow, both by James Hogan, he's hit and miss, but those two are excellent about evolutionary robotics.
Related Video below the fold, because I'm supposed to.
more...
Posted by: Veeshir at
02:29 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 526 words, total size 4 kb.
1
So Skynet huh? Great. Just great. I for one welcome our new robot overlords.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 31, 2010 02:46 PM (TtXKB)
2
How is it remotely evolution if the robots were built and programmed by intelligent agents?? Basically what you have here is a cut and dry case of confirmation bias: they code the robots to 'evolve' and, lo and behold, they do so.
Basically, there is nothing at all to see here and they certainly aren't on the right track of anything except the leading edge of a tautology.
Posted by: ECM at January 31, 2010 02:48 PM (nYKDd)
3
It depends on how they "reproduced" I guess. As I wrote, I was taking them at their word.
In this process, genomes are paired (to allow recombination) and random
mutations (e.g., character substitution, insertion, deletion, or
duplication) are applied with a given probability to the new genomes.
This process of evolution can be repeated over many generations until a
stable behavioural strategy is established.But I also disagree on the tautology thing, why didn't the predator/prey stabilize like the rest? That's obviously what they wanted.
And what's the deal with the homing scenario and where it stabilized?
It looked like natural selection to me, selected ones reproduced, isn't that what evolution is?
Posted by: Veeshir at January 31, 2010 02:56 PM (CbYaR)
4
If you imagine a robot that can code new strategies for itself, it's pretty obvious how they could evolve. Those who coded better strategies would have their code combined and transferred to the next generation of robot, etc. etc. While these robots don't code their own strategies, the better strategies are still selected through trial and error.
It's been assumed for a while that AI would be best achieved through heuristics. This evolutionary strategy is more of a forced heuristic approach, as the robots don't have the ability to learn in and of themselves -- the learning occurs at the generational barrier. A combination of heuristics and evolution (essentially how humans improve) would be a powerful approach towards AI.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 31, 2010 03:22 PM (WhFvm)
5
In this sense, "evolution" refers to Genetic Algorithm programming, which is essentially a very peculiar way to do a blind search. Each individual in the population has a string of bits that are analogous to a genome, defining some number of character traits and behaviors. Populations are generated (usually randomly for generation 1), and some "fit" sub-population is selected and used to generate a subsequent generation.
There are varying methods for selection (shootouts, best X %, etc.) and generation (randomly changing a genome is called mutation, combining genomes is called crossover, and is roughly analogous to breeding. It's most accurate to say that this kind of programming looks like how we think evolution works. Specific individuals really have combinations of possible traits. The only thing the programmer defines ahead of time is what shape the traits might take. In this sense, it's like evolution, since biological organisms are ultimately limited in the forms they may take by the DNA that defines them, and in that all DNA gives is a rough guideline of "whatever DNA can build that can build more DNA".
I actually built one of these for grad class to do curve fitting. I guarantee you that there was no way I'd ever have come up with the same solution as the one that my code "evolved" for me.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at January 31, 2010 07:46 PM (JSO4h)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bob Barker donates $1 million to try and stop PA pigeon shoots, Haitians still starving in the streets
For those unaware, this has been something of an issue in PA, mostly with the PETA set, and of course some squishy suburbanites and liberals. PA is the last state to legally allow pigeon shoots. Some of you might remember the ending of the pigeon shoot in Hegins, PA in the 90's, which saw some publicity. Anyway, the PETA set and HSUS (who are really the people you need to watch out for) have been driving hard for a ban for a while in PA.
There have been a couple of proposals, but they've thus far all languished in committee. The NRA has been opposed to the ban, because most of the bills have been written in ways that would probably make life difficult for birdhunters, particularly upland and waterfowlers who use dogs when they hunt. Naturally most of the PETA/HSUS set don't care, as they want hunting banned anyway. PA of course is pretty much in a perpetual contest with Texas to be the huntin'est state in the union, there's a strong hunting and gun culture here, so the bill is seeing some resistance.
So we now have
Bob Barker dropping $1 million into a group that's been actively pushing for a ban. The good news is he didn't give it to HSUS, which is a proven capable organization. The bad news is politicians are whores and cowards, and a million dollars can still buy votes, and can buy ad space and be used to stir up a shitstorm, and pigeon shoots aren't exactly the most PC thing in the world.
I'm inclined to defend the PA pigeon shoots. For starters, the anti-Nanny instinct kicks in, I hate,
hate being told by my "betters" what to do, I hate being told
you can't do this. My first reaction is almost always
fuck you, yes I can. Seriously, every time I see the PETA set screeching for a ban on the
shoots my first instinct is to buy a nice double, break some clays and
then sign up for the next pigeon shoot out of pure spite, just like my first thought is,
why yes, a double bacon cheeseburger would be tasty right now, every time I hear the PETA set cry about eating meat.
I also don't like politicians getting into the habit of banning everyfuckingthing that comes down the pike that people don't care for, the last thing I want is a million little Nanny Mike Bloombergs running around banning every one of life's pleasures. There's also a good bit of cultural elitism involved in the push for a ban, most of the published pictures and video are of white trash types from poorly run venues doing these shoots, not the respectable looking hunters in the old days.
Are the pigeon shoots a blood sport? Yes, but properly run, there's no reason it can't be done with as much consideration for the pigeon's welfare as hunting, and most people aren't opposed to hunting. I know I'll probably take some flak for defending this activity, which I can live with.
That said, if the PETA set start spamming or screeching, I'm locking comments, I don't need to read the squealing and threats from PETArds.
H/T
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
02:19 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 554 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 31, 2010 02:48 PM (TtXKB)
2
I agree on the general principle (as dpud stated) that you can't go around banning everything someone finds unpleasant. Plus pigeons are basically rats with wings; filthy creatures that deserve to be gunned down mercilessly. New York City could do with a good pigeon shoot, as could Tokyo.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 31, 2010 03:29 PM (WhFvm)
3
This is a perpetual issue in PA, or at least it's a perpetual issue to a certain variety of lefty animal activist. I remember getting letters about this back in 1998 when I interned in my state rep's office.
Posted by: JoeCollins at January 31, 2010 04:04 PM (jtJig)
4
I'll be happy when they jump in front of my loaded shotgun. Fucking hippies and brain-dead douche nozzles.
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 31, 2010 07:59 PM (k5nPY)
5
Pigeon shooting ain't my cup of tea (I like to shoot other critters instead) but PETA and the creepy misanthropes at HSUS can go fuck themselves. I'd personally blast a bucket full of pigeons with my Desert Eagle just to piss them off.
Posted by: Go_Fish at January 31, 2010 10:04 PM (+eYLq)
Posted by: eddiebear at February 01, 2010 01:39 PM (wnU1W)
7
I've always wanted to see a pigeon shoot after the one that gained publicty for Petards. Because they should have another let PETAards come then when the pigeons are released don't shoot the pigeons shoot the PETArds and say they were in the way of my shotgun NOT. The only thing if they would have a pigeon shoot and some over zealous shooter would kill some PETArds, then get ready for another round of gun conrtol talk.
Posted by: J.M Browing at February 01, 2010 09:11 PM (LBhpC)
8
Because let's face it I mean PETA's is another liberal organization. I live in Western MD and I can tell how liberal MD is but we still hunt deer here in Western MD, But if you have a bear wonder on your property and cause damage for god sake don't shoot it Annapolis doesn't want you to hurt that 900lb bears little head no,and bears stick around where food is. So I going to always look over my shoulder when I leave my house NO WAY I'm waiting in my house and when smoky comes around I'm going to be havin bear stew or stake and a nice rug in front of my fireplace.
Posted by: J.M Browing at February 01, 2010 09:33 PM (LBhpC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Obama When He Leaves The Teleprompter At Home
The recent meeting between President Obama and the House GOP received a lot of attention, but The Hip Prez mentioned something
about his socialized medicine plans that I wonder if he wanted to have mentioned.“The last thing I will say, though — let me say this about health care
and the health care debate, because I think it also bears on a whole
lot of other issues. If you look at the package that we’ve presented —
and there’s some stray cats and dogs that got in there that we were
eliminating, we were in the process of eliminating. For example, we
said from the start that it was going to be important for us to be
consistent in saying to people if you can have your — if you want to
keep the health insurance you got, you can keep it, that you’re not
going to have anybody getting in between you and your doctor in your
decision making. And I think that some of the provisions that got snuck
in might have violated that pledge.”
Emphasis mine.
Heh.
Posted by: eddiebear at
10:54 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 189 words, total size 1 kb.
The Stupid Party
I'm not so much a Republican as an anti-Democrat. I don't like the GOP but I really, really, (insert another 50 or 60 "really"s) don't like the Dems.
So what's the deal with the
South Carolina GOP? The Governor wants to be with his soulmate but doesn't want to lose his wife or something and now the LT Gov shows his political acumen.
Quoth the LT Gov while
campaigning for governor.
that people receiving government assistance are like "stray animals" because "they breed" and "don't know any better."We've all done that. You want to say to the girl, "You can kiss better than that." but it comes out, "My dog can kiss better than that." in a really snotty voice and you're never getting another kiss from her (true story).
Obviously the SC LT Gov wanted to make a point but it came out "
I'm an idiot".
So what's an idiot who wants those "stray animals" to vote him to do?
Quote
Noting that he has raised money for a group that protects animals, Bauer also said he is "not against animals."Oh, well that makes it better I guess.
I do have to wonder if he's a Dem plant, doing for the GOP what Karl Rove plants are doing for the Dems.
I look forward to his explanation of his explanation.
Posted by: Veeshir at
09:14 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm torn. I want him to keep talking for the lulz but I'm also running way low on popcorn.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 31, 2010 01:40 PM (TtXKB)
2
You really have to start wondering how many politicians in each party are moles from another party.
Maybe the Libertarians and the Greens have joined forces to destroy the two major parties from the inside.
Posted by: Veeshir at January 31, 2010 02:36 PM (CbYaR)
3
You need to understand, the Lt. Gov. here in SC is a moron, has always BEEN a moron, and will always BE a moron. The ONLY reason the Republican Party hesitated to pitch Sandford out on his happy ass was that would leave the Lt. Gov. in charge. And no one wants that.
He'll lose in the primary, never fear.
Posted by: MikeD at February 01, 2010 11:26 AM (FkL60)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I Do My Research On Taxes, Polling, And Healthcare By Reading "Highlights" And Talking To Myself. So What's The Diff?
Seriously? Fucking seriously?!??
The UN can't be this fucking stupid, can they?
In its most recent report, it stated that observed reductions in mountain ice
in the Andes, Alps and Africa was being caused by global warming, citing two
papers as the source of the information.
However, it can be revealed that one of the sources quoted was a feature
article published in a popular magazine for climbers which was based on
anecdotal evidence from mountaineers about the changes they were witnessing
on the mountainsides around them {and I read Spank Magazine for my research into health care-ed}.
The other was a dissertation written by a geography student, studying for the
equivalent of a master's degree, at the University of Berne in Switzerland
that quoted interviews with mountain guides in the Alps.
The revelations, uncovered by The Sunday Telegraph, have raised fresh
questions about the {shitty-ed}quality of the information contained in the report,
which was published in 2007.
What. The. Fuck.? Yes, these fuckers are that stupid. And lazy. I really cannot believe what I just read. The UfuckingN basically went to Barnes & Noble, pulled a "Hiking" Magazine off the shelf, backed up their research by talking to the cleaning lady at the pizza parlor, and called this "settled science"?
Well, then fuck settled science. Fuck the UN. Fuck East Anglia. And fuck algore. Fuck all of them with a rancid meat javelin coated in hurty sauce. Those fuckjuggling fuckbags of fistfucking fraudulent fucking fuckity fuck fucking sold a shitfucking load of people on a fruitfucking scam, pushed fucking legislation, and fucking reaped their own fucking rewards, on a fucking piece of research that wouldn't make it out of a fourth grade history class? Fuck this! Fuck it forever with fire. And fuck all of them.
Fuck their research. Fuck their findings with the funny pages. And fuck anybody who still sides with them. This shit needs to be called out, and the hoaxers stripped of any work permit greater than being the backup elephant fluffer at the zoo.
Posted by: eddiebear at
02:00 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 360 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Pizza parlor cleaning lady at January 31, 2010 10:23 AM (DbybK)
2
Eddie - You forgot Lindsay Graham and MAVERICK. You know, those two stalwarts of the Republican party that support Crap & Tax?
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 31, 2010 11:26 AM (k5nPY)
3
point taken, Chief. Well played
Posted by: eddiebear at January 31, 2010 11:32 AM (rfBYM)
4
Klingon revenge. It couldn't be revealed until after the next IPCC report is published, but it would be epic. It's at the end of
this post.
Posted by: cbullitt at January 31, 2010 03:52 PM (0BEkJ)
5
And they mock us for disagreeing with them and their findings... aye yi yi...
Posted by: nick marschel at January 31, 2010 04:14 PM (rGOKZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Madame Speaker Loves The Military
Especially if it means babysitting and taxi service.Using Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, Judicial Watch uncovered thousands of pages of travel documents related to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s use of military aircraft.
What hasn’t been revealed so far is that military aircraft are being
used to shuttle Pelosi’s kids and grandkids between DC and San
Francisco without any Congressional representatives even onboard! Put
simply, the United States Air Force is serving as a multi-billion
dollar chauffeur- and baby-sitting service for Nancy Pelosi’s kids and
grandkids — presumably because commercial travel is beneath the
families of the autocrats.
Honestly, while I am not surprised to discover that the Party of the Little People treats our military in such a fashion, I am still amazed into silence at the impunity with which they do what they do.
Posted by: eddiebear at
01:46 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 142 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I am still amazed into silence at the impunity with which they do what they do.
Just go ahead, close your eyes, substitute House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's
name with that of Tom DeLay, and imagine ABCCBSNBCCNNNYTLATWAPO's
OUTRAGEOUSLY OUTRAGED OUTRAGE!!!11!one!!eleven!!!1!!
Yeah.
Posted by: Sean M. at January 31, 2010 01:58 AM (rLWHv)
2
If a Republican did this (I know, I know) they'd be sitting in front of a Congressional Committee in no time. It would be awesome, being as she is only capable of being mildly coherent for about 5-7 minutes, at most.
Posted by: ktgreat at January 31, 2010 11:38 AM (G6iSv)
3
You cannot possibly fathom the disgust I have for that woman and the media that props her up!
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 31, 2010 12:01 PM (k5nPY)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I can't decide if this is hot or disturbing
you decide
According to the latest rumors, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are finished. Expanding upon that rumor is another interesting claim: that Jolie had an affair with Lady Gaga.
...
Jolie is openly bisexual, and Lady Gaga is a rumored hermaphrodite who has insinuated in the past that she might be open to getting down with both girls and boys.
It's Angelina Jolie so by definition there is some hot involved, but it's also Lady Gaga so there is a little "ick" factor in there also. Throw in the way the Cleveland Leader makes her sound like a freak performing in the Cirque de 'Soleil and it comes off as a little disturbing to me.
Posted by: chad98036 at
01:11 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
January 30, 2010
Quote of the Day
"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock." - Will Rogers
Posted by: Moron Pundit at
11:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
It's funny because it's true
I found this while randomly surfing around and must say, this sums up my viewing habits nicely.
Posted by: alexthechick at
09:39 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
I say, chaps, do as we say, not as we, erm, do
I don't understand how the Brits were able to rule the largest empire in the world when they can't even manage to get shit like this right...
The Government’s controversial equality watchdog was last night accused of ‘rank hypocrisy’ for flouting its own policies on fair pay.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission has angered business leaders by ordering a crackdown on hard-pressed companies that fail to pay the same rates to employees doing similar work.
But official figures show that more than two years after it was set up to stamp out discrimination, the commission is paying its own ethnic minority workers almost ten per cent less than white staff – an embarrassment for its black chairman Trevor Phillips.
I don't care what color he is; that ought to be an embarrassment for anyone. When you're running the government agency that's supposed to "stamp out discrimination" and you're discriminating against your own fucking employees, that's some FAIL right there.
Posted by: Sean M. at
09:01 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I've got a rule of thumb that's never steered me wrong - whenever someone tells me how tolerant s/he is, whenever I read about an organization dedicated to "diversity" "equality" and "tolerance", I assume said person or organization is actually a bigoted, sexist, racist asshole.
I've yet to be proven wrong.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 30, 2010 09:36 PM (TtXKB)
2
I assume said person or organization is actually a bigoted, sexist, racist asshole.Shame on you Alex. You need to learn to be more tolerant, like me. :-P
Actually I apply much the same rule only I extend it to most facets of life. It's one of the reasons I dislike Glenn Beck so much. His constant preening about how committed he is to the original vision of the founders instantly triggers my "he's a fucking liar" reflex.
Shakespeare nailed it with "He doth protest too much"
Posted by: chad98036 at January 30, 2010 10:04 PM (WNcvq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Obviously I must buy this
I mean c'mon
it's clearly meant for me.And, yes, I would buy it just for the humor value.
Posted by: alexthechick at
08:22 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.
1
" Alex is giving birth to a new industry of multimedia publishing and delivering new opportunities..."
congratulations!! why didnt you tell us? was it painful?? (snicker)...
Posted by: mrfixit at January 30, 2010 09:25 PM (Bsm1s)
2
I doubt most morons will make it past the first five words in the description: "Alex give you easy access ..."
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 30, 2010 10:35 PM (WhFvm)
3
Read me, browse me, love me, TOUCH THE MONKEY!
Posted by: Moron Pundit at January 30, 2010 11:45 PM (GC5S2)
4
^2 I doubt most morons will make it past the first five words in the description: "Alex gives you easy access ..."
There were more words after that?
Posted by: davis,br at January 31, 2010 01:04 PM (uCShA)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Retro Cereal
I'm starting to see why Alex hates clowns.

Check out a bunch of defunct cereals like C3PO's, Ice Cream Cones, and Crazy Cow
here.
Posted by: JoeCollins at
06:01 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
83kb generated in 0.1378 seconds; 77 queries returned 238 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.2-pink.