Chupacabra?
Hardly, says I. This lady thinks she has chupacabra, I think she has feral Mexican Hairless Dogs, or a mutt with that breed, or a close relative. Look at the skin tone of the dog in the article, and the one in the Wiki page, note the shape of the ears. Its similar, and keep in mind, the 'chupacabra' has been dead awhile, plus it could be older, which may explain the wrinkles and ears sitting down on the head.
1
Hmm, I think that's the same type of creature that accounted for the Elmendorf Creature sightings. We've been seeing these things in Texas for a couple years now. All we know about them is that they're canines.
(PS, saying that this is a chupacabra isn't the same thing as saying that mysterious goat-sucking beasts with four fangs actually exist. What she's most likely saying, and what the vet is definitely saying, is that this is the creature that spawned the legends of chupacabras, sort of like how narwhals spawned the legends of unicorns.)
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 31, 2007 11:20 PM (dwsxB)
Armorers Soon To Face Severe Shortage of GauntletsYikes! In China, a woman cut off her internet addicted husband's hand after promising to stop spending all his time online. He swore he would stop going online and spend more time with his child, but he was soon sneaking off to internet cafes to do video chats with girls(I'm assuming chats of the adult variety). On his last visit, he was online, and felt a numbness in his hand, and realized the mouse cursor wasn't moving, he looked down and his hand was severed and blood was spurting out.
The man pleaded with the court to show his wife mercy and drop the charges, saying it was his fault for breaking his promise. So if you're significant other says to spend less time online...you may wanna take them seriously.
***Welcome again, Hotair Readers! Feel free to look around and comment to your heart's content.
***Welcome again, Hotair Readers! Feel free to look around and comment to your heart's content.***
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You gave us the big welcome, did your best to make us all feel comfortable and cozy. All you politely asked for was a few comments. And what did you get?
One measly comment. Pathetic.
I've been keeping an eye on you... You've been getting linked by ace and Hotair quite a few times lately. And this is how they treat you. Disgraceful.
In the future, the next time you get an ace-o-lanche or Hotair-storm, don't bother with the sweetness and light. You gotta give 'em a good pimp slap right off the bat, to get their attention and respect. You go arround trying to placate these fickle, worthless moron-blog and allah-head commenters, and they'll piss in your face and tell you it's raining.
Honestly, if you don't ride herd on these shirtless bastards, they'll just root arround the place for a while and leave the place worse off then it was before, stinking of farts and B.O.
You gotta blog hard, or go home. Wimp.
Posted by: Hotair reader at August 31, 2007 06:33 PM (zGHW/)
4
Looks like the cat dragged in something really smelly. Just look at all the stink and mess commenter #3 left!
Posted by: Tushar D at August 31, 2007 06:40 PM (9ULFg)
Rossetta: Yeah, you may be "down with the brown", but I'm not. In fact, they terrify me. When I saw Tushar here, I promptly shat myself in fear. Fortunately, I was able to calm myself and type out my screed of hate.
As far as what "double plus undead" means, it is a reference to George Orwells "1984." In it, to control the population, the state controlled and restricted the number of words the people could use.
In normal conversation, we use all sorts of words of varying meaning or intensity to convey subtlties of meanin. For example: House vs. Home. Technically, these are synonyms. But house has a more impersonal, commercial feel to it. Home has a more warm, intimate feel.
So to help mentally lobotomize the people, the state in 1984 banned as many words as possible. If you liked the food you were eating, you could call it "good". But if it was delicious, or tasty, you would just call it "plus-good" or "double-plus good".
The "un" was used the same way, to help reduce the vocabulary. If you were tired, you were called "tired". But if you were feeling alert or focused, you would instread use the term "un-tired" to describe your mental state.
So in this case, I'd say that the blog host is calling himself or the blog a zombie, or a member of the un-dead. As indicated by the picture of the shambling zombies. But the double-plus means he is a super powerful, or supercool zombie.
Don't bother thanking me for this, I'm happy to help, as I'm sure you aren't a terrrifying shade of brown.
Uh, right....?
Posted by: Hotair reader at August 31, 2007 09:04 PM (zGHW/)
8
Rosetta, the name came doubleplusundead from the fact that I had read World War Z, The Zombie Survival Guide, and 1984 in close proximity. So I had a random mashing together in my mind of the Newspeak phrase doubleplusungood, and of course thinking of zombies, and it hit me, doubleplusundead, coincidentally I had been considering creating a blog, and I thought, hey! This could be a good blog name, and so it was.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 31, 2007 09:27 PM (qCp9p)
9
Thanks for the explanations. Very interesting. And I'm only brown after long exposure to the sun.
Posted by: Rosetta at September 01, 2007 10:40 AM (omkIU)
Michael Jackson Has Died
No, not the creepy pop singer. Michael Jackson was a writer who has played a major role in evolving beer culture in the US and abroad. He wrote extensively about the history of beer, development of brewing and styles of beer. He was a big influence on the revived microbrew culture in the US.
He had been suffering the effects of Parkinson's disease for over a decade, Jackson's health problem was only made public in 2006.
I've always found brewing fascinating, and I have to say, if I could get a job as a brewer, I would absolutely take it. There's something about the craft that draws you. I think Jackson understood that, and helped bring that to the masses in his writing and passion for beer.
The really sad part is the guy doesn't realize how dumb he is because of the audience.
That's almost as bad as having 2+2 = ? and going to the audience and it's 40% say 5 and 60% say 4.
"That's pretty even...I'm gonna phone a friend."
Was this France or Quebec?
Posted by: Rosetta at August 30, 2007 09:27 PM (Jf5b4)
5
I almost wonder if the audience was just fucking around and purposely hit the wrong thing...if they speak french, its not out of character to be that obnoxious.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 30, 2007 09:44 PM (ObdTA)
6
C'est magnifique! It's the idiot frog du jour. And what about the host? He tried so hard to not make the guy feel more rotten. It was so funny I watched it twice.
Posted by: ConservativeBelle at August 30, 2007 10:01 PM (/v6Id)
7
Yeah, I mean, what else are you going to do if you're the host. Obviously you can't point and laugh like we're doing, I give the host credit for his professionalism. I'd be laughing uncontrollably.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 30, 2007 10:15 PM (ObdTA)
8
There was a Family Feud in which one couple got down to the last question. The husband got sent backstage while the wife answered (they have to get the same answer to win). The question was, "In what month is morning sickness worst?" It was supposed to be something like "third month" or "sixth month," but the woman answered, "September," and Richard Dawson started laughing so hard they had to cut to commercial. When they came back, he was still laughing, and they cut to commercial again. Finally, he managed to get himself under control, and they called the husband out to answer. The husband gave a normal answer, but they showed the video of his wife answering, and he turned to her and said, "September?!?" and it set Richard Dawson off again.
Also, there's a famous incident in which someone...I think it was Tom Selleck...was on one of those shows where you get your partner to guess the word by saying a related word, and he had "buck," so he looked at the (black) woman and said, "Doe." She responded, "Knob," and he laughed so hard he fell to the floor. She actually sued him over it, iirc. Public humiliation or some such.
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 31, 2007 06:47 AM (dwsxB)
Apparently that Tom Selleck story is an urban legend, but it was still funny as hell.
Here is one that is true: Bob Eubanks from The Newlywed Show asked the female contestants "Where is the strangest place you and your husband have made whoopie?" One female replied, "In the ass."
Posted by: ConservativeBelle at August 31, 2007 10:14 AM (01WZ2)
10
Heh, they've actually shown that clip from the Newlywed Game on TV. Its funny as hell.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 31, 2007 11:27 AM (qCp9p)
11
Dammit. My parents told me that they actually watched that happen live. This isn't the first time they've told me an urban legend and swore it actually happened to them (not the "friend of a friend" thing). I'm just not going to believe anything they say from now on.
I'm pretty sure the September one is true, though.
You know, my mom bought this cactus once, and it started to shake, and...wait a minute...*checks snopes* Dammit!
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 31, 2007 07:56 PM (dwsxB)
Some People Love the Open Road A Little Too Much
***Hello fellow AoS morons, thanks for visiting doubleplusundead! Feel free to look around and comment!
This guy, specifically. He was found by cops driving completely naked and flogging the bishop, his hands were covered in Vaseline. When asked why he was driving naked, he said he felt comfortable that way, so he drove naked.
Children Banned From Playing Tag, Story Of Increased Child Obesity Surely To Follow
Via Drudge. Its so damn predictable, a handful of kids complained, and now they're banning tag. They still allow running, I'm amazed some soulless lawyer hasn't made them ban that yet, but the kids can't chase each other, which of course sucks some of the fun out of children's lives. Sadly, this sort of schoolyard issue is a microcosm of what we see in the adult world in the Nanny State.
Its a self fulfilling prophesy, a small group of dumb people, kids in this case, can't behave themselves, so they ban everyone from engaging in the behavior. Then as a result, further down the road, because you've sucked the joy out of the rest of the kids lives, they don't play anymore or engage in sedentary activities until those get banned, and then a number of them get lazy and overweight. From there, the cycle continues, and people start calling for bans on fatty foods.
This is the poisonous nature of the Nanny State Ban Brigades. Rather than either help or discipline those who are abusing rights and privileges, they impose a blanket ban on said right or privilege, whether they are motivated by laziness or a twisted sense of 'fairness', seeking to punish someone without actually punishing them.
The problem is, once you ban one thing, the consequences related to that ban, combined with a culture that accepts banning as a standard practice to address an issue make it much more likely that more bans will be used to address societal problems. Societies refusal to confront problems directly is largely what is driving the Nanny State. In the longterm, this sort of action will begin to eat away at liberties that do matter.
It sounds like the administrators are standing up and saying "we are not capable of making judgements" or dealing with occasional games of tag gone wrong.
So who wants their kids to be around people who can't or won't make judgements? They may learn to panic and appeal to authority to help them, but there's a lot they won't learn.
Posted by: MamaAJ at August 30, 2007 12:25 PM (X6Zdh)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 30, 2007 12:32 PM (gLf8f)
3
Well, Mr. doubleplusundead, if that is your real name, guess what? We need you to be unhealthy, so that we can blame "society" for your ills, then get you sucking on our teat and depending on us for every single aspect of your life.
Then we will have what we really want. Power. Absolute, total, complete and un-deniable power.
So, if you know what's good for you, you will just sit the fuck down and
shut the fuck up and let us deal with this, 'k?
Thank you.
Posted by: Nanny State at August 30, 2007 01:21 PM (IHbof)
4
HAHAHAHAHA!! I'm glad I have you morons to make me laugh.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 30, 2007 01:27 PM (gLf8f)
5
Hey! What did we say! No laughter! No smiling! No healthy release of stress or depression!
NO FUN OF ANY KIND!
Posted by: Nanny State at August 30, 2007 01:51 PM (IHbof)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 30, 2007 02:22 PM (gLf8f)
9
The article says only two parents complained about the ban. Their kids must have been the horrible bullies, terrorizing all those poor little angels.
Posted by: bmac at August 30, 2007 03:55 PM (lwGnE)
Richard Jewell DeadHe was only 44. It was a result of problems with diabetes. You can't help but feel awful for the guy, getting wrongly accused like he was while the whole world was watching.
Wow. This is terrible. And you're right, I always felt bad for him after he was tried, convicted and sodomized by the press and then not so much as an "oh....sorry".
What a shame. I hate the fucking press.
I think he was the first person I heard described as a "person of interest". That phrase has made me nervous since.
R.I.P.
Posted by: Rosetta at August 29, 2007 03:42 PM (omkIU)
2
I hope he finds solace in the next life. Jewell was just a guy who did his job, and the media made him pay dearly for it.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 29, 2007 04:07 PM (gLf8f)
"Person of interest." I suspect we caught that phrase off the Brits. They're forever seeking out so-and-so "to aid in the inquiries." Probably has to do with their hair-trigger libel laws and pre-trial publicity laws.
Jewell. Poor bastard.
Posted by: S. Weasel at August 30, 2007 06:53 AM (rasT+)
F*ck Huck
You know what, he seems like a nice guy, but fuck you Mike. You're even worse than Hillary... He wants to impose Prohibition on cigarettes. Yeah, that's right. Go ahead Mike, go for it. I can't wait to open my first speakeasy. Goddamn, we're going from crawling to a Nanny State to a sprint.
Y'know, I hate to frag my own side, but when you do shit this stupid, you're asking for it. You let the gov't make one arbitrary ban, thousands will surely follow.
I should also note, I rarely smoke, just a cigar on occasion, but I still respect people's personal liberties, because that's how I fucking roll.
1
I can't stand the smell of cigarette smoke, but I totally agree that smoking shouldn't be banned. I don't even think it should be banned in restaurants/bars. The way I see it is, if I don't want to smell smoke, then I won't go to a restaurant or bar that allows smoking. Some restaurant/bar owners will have smoking, some will do the smoking & nonsmoking sections thing, and some will ban smoking. Nothing wrong with any of those choices.
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 28, 2007 06:38 PM (dwsxB)
2
(to clarify, I obviously meant that smoking shouldn't be banned by the government in restaurants/bars. Owners should be able to make their own choices.)
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 28, 2007 07:02 PM (dwsxB)
Restaraunts and bars should be ALLOWED to selectively issolate their own clientelle, it happens all the time, so no smoking restaraunts and bars is fine by me, as long as it's the proprietors who make the decision, and the clientelle is informed of the situation. I think all denny's are smoke free. You wanna grandslam and smoke after? fuck you go to schecky's corner store restaurant, thats fine by me.
non owners, who don't care about clientelle making the decision is bullshit.
Some people don't like jews. how about a no jew policy?
Posted by: Wickedpinto at August 28, 2007 09:09 PM (QTv8u)
Posted by: Rosetta at August 28, 2007 09:17 PM (1tfre)
6
And that's all I ask Mrs. Peel, to let businesses determine their own policy. Huck doesn't honor that. I actually hate the smell of cigarette smoke too (it smells cheap and nasty) quality cigar smoke however, is sublime.
Posted by: sinistar at August 28, 2007 09:21 PM (gLf8f)
Anyway, a comparison: Bars and restaurants also frequently play loud music. The noise level at your local Pappasito's (and if you don't have a local Pappasito's, git yer heinie down to Texas for some kickass fajitas and chile con queso!) is actually above the maximum levels OSHA sets for factories and such. (I don't know how the employees are not required to wear hearing protection. Must be an exemption. Good work, lobbyists.) And bars can be even worse; the one and only time I went to a bar, I had to turn my hearing aids off before we even got close to the door, and I have only 15% of normal hearing, and I could still hear that "music" (I hesitate to use that term for such cacophany). So people who go to those places a lot are suffering severe damage to the hair cells in their inner ears, which means they will eventually suffer hearing loss. (It's not an increased risk, like secondhand smoke supposedly increases the risk of lung disease. It's a guarantee.) Should the government then ban loud music?
Huckabee's problem is that he went on a big health kick a few years ago and lost about fifty pounds, so he's decided that everyone else should lose weight and get healthy too. Possibly true, but he's lost track of the fact that it's none of the government's damn business what health choices I make.
ok, time for bed. I have to be offsite almost all day tomorrow, bleh. At least that means I don't have to dress up. Not that anyone else in this group dresses up for work anyway. Typical scientists. I bet they don't even know how to tuck their shirts in.
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 28, 2007 09:58 PM (dwsxB)
Oh well, hope your day tomorrow is better than its sounds like it'll be.
Posted by: sinistar at August 28, 2007 10:03 PM (gLf8f)
9
Thanks. It won't be bad, just long. My current job involves coordinating several groups from several different institutions, so I have to go offsite tomorrow to do some of that, and then I have class in the evening. We're planning for some preliminary testing next month, and then we have our big test in October. That test will be sixteen hours straight starting on a Friday morning at 8 am. Gack! But on the bright side, the testing facility is at my alma mater, so I will already be in town Saturday, so I'll get to go to a football game. Yay!
ok, bedtime for real now.
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 28, 2007 10:31 PM (dwsxB)
I smoked cigars for about 3 years, they taste fantastic, I must admit, and the environment of cigar smokers is, as you said, sublime, however, WATCH a cigar smoker.
They are no different from Chaw chewers, and as you listen to them talk, as they talk around a cigar, sounds like they are sucking air through a dirty diaper.
I am working at quiting smoking, not cuz of cigarette smokers, but because cigar smokers are friggen disgusting, in their habits.
example, Listen to Rush Limbaugh during a phone call. You hear him weaze, and you hear his spit bubble under his inhalation.
I have a weak stomach, and I fucking GAG! when rush with his def ass ignores how DISGUSTING his habbit is.
"slurp slurp weaze" "yes?" "slurp slurp weaze" and you HEAR the SPIT riddled "point" bubbling under his inhalation.
FUCKING DISGUSTING.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at August 29, 2007 12:37 AM (QTv8u)
Random bit of info. I sucked the eyeballs out of a freshly killed rabit, I ate, RAW dear, and god knows how many of raw fish while I lived in japan. the only beef I ate, while living with my girlfriend was tongue, barely cooked.
I can eat a lot of shit without gagging, but listening to rushes cigar sword sucking background disgusts me.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at August 29, 2007 12:39 AM (QTv8u)
14
That's why I don't smoke them often. I know some people get hooked and can't do that, but I can, so that's what I do.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 29, 2007 08:23 AM (gLf8f)
Very seldom do I find a restaurant that allows smoking. I recently went to an Applebee's on the MS Gulf Coast and took the first available seat with my co-worker. The smoke was awful and I decided I didn't want to go back there again when they are so busy that I choose "first available." A non-smoking restaurant will get my business the next time. That's how commerce works and how people make decisions for themselves. Doesn't seem so complicated that I need the government to interfere.
Here is some information about the legislation Huckabee passed in AR regarding the public places smoking ban. I have to say while I disagree in theory with the government interference in business, they make a salient point about the health care savings. It is an interesting trade off.
Posted by: ConservativeBelle at August 29, 2007 01:08 PM (1Q+46)
16
I always hear that health care argument, and I understand it, but to me, its an issue of fixing the health care system, not controlling behavior. Beyond that is the longterm risk, if the government can force you to do things that can prolong your life, the gov't can likewise force you to reduce your life span, things like euthanasia, waiting lines, refusing treatment, that sort of thing. I saw recently that the Brits are talking about refusing care to certain overweight patients. That's what scares me.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 29, 2007 01:55 PM (gLf8f)
Those are all great points and I agree. Watching two family members suffer with cancer-related illnesses, I have seen the burden of health care costs, even with medicaid and supplemental plans. There is a huge problem with the costs associated with health care in our country. Let me say for the record that I'm opposed to socialized health care. However, that said, I do think there are very simple measures that can be taken to make improvements that are not harmful and don't restrict freedoms. I believe Governor Huckabee's point is primarily for the non-smoking majority upon whom others impose their harmful habits when we share the public realm.
I want a say-so in how my tax dollars are spent, including health care plans for government employees, medicaid and medicare programs. For example, I don't think plans should cover sex change operations but local governments are starting to include coverage in health care plans for such things. My taxes pay for that privilege. But on the flip side, if someone suffers from a birth defect that disfigures their appearance, that is seen as cosmetic and often denied coverage. It's insanity.
Posted by: ConservativeBelle at August 29, 2007 03:51 PM (1Q+46)
18
Which is why I'm so opposed to private health care. I believe there are plenty of measures we can take that don't involve hostile gov't takeover. Beyond that, we get situations that are arbitrarily decided as you describe, which is often how gov't decides things.
Beyond that, I think a donor trust system to help the uninsured could be a useful thing to offset the costs a hospital picks up. Liberals could just give their money to those charities, since they feel so strongly about insurance for all...yes I realise that the reason that hasn't been done already is because liberals are socialists and often too undisciplined to give away their money without coercion.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 29, 2007 04:13 PM (gLf8f)
19
Well, it's pretty much a done deal. Anytime these bans get on ballots, they pass. Every single time. Now, the push will be smoking in cars, and at home. It's an easy sell, because people hate smokers so much, they'll gladly begin to sacrifice personal freedoms, to stick it to those dirty disgusting stinky smokers. This is a big deal that's really kind of getting ignored, because smokers are a minority. These bans are going over so easily, and without a fight, that people are watching to prepare for the next bans, which will be red meat, and ultimately, guns.
Posted by: bmac at August 29, 2007 05:29 PM (lwGnE)
20
the reason I'm so passionate about the Nanny State Problem is that liberty works on a synergy, the more you have, it is much stronger it is as an institution, the less you have, you see a dramatic weakening of the institution of liberty. If you burn one person and take their liberty, they feel no obligation to defend yours when the authoritarians put their sights on you, and soon enough, liberty starts being eaten away quickly, as no one has any reason to defend anyone elses.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 29, 2007 09:11 PM (gLf8f)
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 29, 2007 09:33 PM (dwsxB)
22
guess I should have posted my smoking ban story in a more recent thread.
Posted by: wiserbud at August 29, 2007 09:51 PM (56ssE)
23
Its cool, things are slow enough here right now that people can keep up, I haven't had a good link to send to Ace or Allah in a few days, so traffic is slow...
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 29, 2007 09:57 PM (gLf8f)
24
Well, I linked you the other day, so you should be seeing a huge jump in traffic any minute now.
Annnnnnnny minute now...
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 30, 2007 06:02 AM (dwsxB)
Sony Putting Rootkits in Products Again
According to a Finnish computer security firm. This isn't the first time the numbskulls at Sony have done this either as you can see in the link. I have to admit, I'd have a hard time buying anything from Sony right now. Sony has become an utter crapfest.
For me, the split with Sony came from hardware issues with my PS2. The early models tended to suck in dust and cloud the laser, causing Disc Read Errors. People who bought theirs later didn't have this problem as much, but early PS2 owners can tell you about the horrors of seeing Disc Read Error over, and over, and over again.
After looking at sites that said the PS2 was having issues and you could send it back, I called tech support, they asked me if I used any third party stuff...I should have lied and said no, so they told me ninety bucks for a service charge, and I thought, screw that. Later, my sister and I found out what the issue was, and that you could make a temporary fix by gutting the stupid thing and cleaning the disc reader lens...we might have seen it on TechTV before Comcast ruined it.
Anyway, that provided temporary fixes, but it required ripping apart our console regularly.
Beyond that, the spectacular failure of the PSP, the rootkits, Lik Sang, and the overheating issues of the PS3. Sony sucks the barbed cock of Satan. Oh, and here's the obligatory Maddox link.
World's Largest Diamond?
An unnamed mine in South Africa claims to have found a green diamond that is the world's largest, about 7000 carats. De Beers is questioning the finding, as green stones are an unusual color for that region, and the area isn't known for strong diamond production. They do say if it is legitimate, it'll be the find of the century. It'll be interesting to see if it is real and what they'll do with it, whether they'll make a traditional cut, or keep it closer to its natural shape to preserve its size as much as possible.
Nanny Knows Best: Hillary Applauds Tobacco Banning Nanny Staters
She supports any local or state ban, and applauded NYC's various ban plans. I'm amazed she showed enough restraint to refrain from calling for a national ban. This kind of mentality is so incredibly poisonous to our nation and the ideals it was founded on.
For those who support these sorts of things...you may wanna think twice, because it'll be your ox that gets gored next time, and beyond that, you could see essential rights begin to decay with the erosion of personal liberties(which I recognize as seperate from basic human rights, as defined by the constitution).
1
Leftards have some of the most brilliantly flawed logic, evah. To them, "freedom" means letting splodeydope Isamofascists free rein, allowing gays to parade down city boulevards with their tools swinging, letting teachers skew instruction towards the "progressive" version of history, &c. Very rarely do libtards mean "freedom" when they invoke the word. What they really mean is "We want to control every aspect of your life and tell you what to do and when to do it." These fuckwidgets are disgusting.
Posted by: skh.pcola at August 28, 2007 02:44 PM (jFpwo)
2
The problem is, its catching on, and the idiot disease is infecting the GOP elite and local elected numbskulls too.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 28, 2007 02:48 PM (gLf8f)
3
I smoke and I have a friend who doesn't. He isn't an obnoxious anti-smoker and I am very considerate about my smoking when we hang out together. When they instituted a ban on smoking in bars and restaurants in CT, I sent around an e-mail asking that people write their reps and ask them to block it, using the slippery slope argument you reference above.
My buddy told me I was crazy and that he totally supported the ban, simply because he hated going to bars and smelling the smoke.. However, now that they are banning smoking outdoors in places and even attempting to ban it in people's own cars and homes, he has come to me and apologized. He now understands what I was trying to tell him.
Posted by: wiserbud at August 29, 2007 09:48 PM (56ssE)
4
Yeah, people don't realize where these things go. I'm glad he gets it now, but we absolutely need to have people understand beforehand, because as you know, you give the Nanny Staters an inch they'll take a mile.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 29, 2007 09:55 PM (gLf8f)
Denver Area Hospitals Ready Themselves For Baby Boom **Hello again Hotair readers, feel free to comment and look around, though we are having a technical problem, my comments are blocking Wordpress URLs. Sorry for the inconvenience, I hope it'll be fixed soon.**
Why? Because we're approaching about nine months since last winter. Last year, Denver area had multiple heavy blizzards and heavy snowfall during the winter, and local hospitals believe that locals found a way to keep themselves entertained and warm during the cold, snowy months.
The hospital has a number of beds for babies in case they have more than what they normally handle. Local shops that sell baby clothes and items are already experiencing a spike in sales.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 28, 2007 04:31 PM (gLf8f)
3
Shop creations of timeless beauty from cheap tiffany jewelry that will be treasured always. You can buy cheap tiffany jewelry but high quality from us
Posted by: 09mrei2 at November 02, 2009 10:02 AM (rfgQs)
Orphaned Baby Hedgehogs Make Scrub Brush Their Adoptive MotherAwww....
The poor little guys lost their mother when she was run over, and they were taken to a zoo to be raised by the staff. The little critters roll around and rub up on the brush, and will be released back into the wild when they're old enough.
Harpwn3d!
A group of vacationing whale-watchers off the coast of Hokkaido were horrified by the sight of a Japanese whaling boat harpooning and reeling in a whale. The Baird's Beaked Whale was spouting water from its blowhole before getting harpooned, then dragged to the boat 20 minutes later.
The whale watching crews are concerned, and want to try and find a way to let the whalers do their job, while not harpooning whales in front of their tours. The whalers say the whale watching boats shouldn't be approaching when they're harpooning, and want a warning issued.
1
This is a new tourist economy in the making. They could let the tourists each harpoon their own baby whale. Which they will then chop up into bite sized Blubber Bits that can be taken home for later snacking. After the obligatory picture with the bleeding baby whale carcass, of course.
Posted by: mesablue at August 28, 2007 03:52 PM (KCOdQ)
2
Heh. And the reaction from PETA is worth it alone!
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 28, 2007 03:55 PM (gLf8f)
Adding Your Wordpress URL to Comments Is Okay Again
Sorry guys, it was a problem on Pixy's end, but its fixed for now, so feel free to put them in the URL box again when you comment.
Next, I am going to ban the letter E from my comments.
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 27, 2007 08:42 PM (dwsxB)
2
By the way, what do you prefer to be called? I know of 3 or 4 different nicks you have used or are using. I tend to use Sinistar because that's the one I'm most familiar with. Do you prefer a different one?
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at August 27, 2007 08:52 PM (dwsxB)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 27, 2007 09:19 PM (5/pL6)
4
Nice to reference the hostages, as insane we are.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at August 28, 2007 12:02 AM (QTv8u)
5
Well PattyAnn drops by regularly, and she wasn't able to post The Hostages URL to her name, so I felt it was appropriate to give a free plug...which might pull you two or three people.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 28, 2007 09:10 AM (gLf8f)
...and Speaking of the FrenchSarkozy calls on Europe to start pulling its own weight in security. He's gonna get a lot of resistance, and probably a lot of abuse from the press, both domestic and abroad, and that's before all the surrender jokes.
This is a good thing and a baby step in the right direction, the Europeans have assumed we'll take care of things for far too long. This is partially a consequence of Cold War politics, where Europeans that had the luxury of not being under the thumb of the Soviets also had the luxury of not needing to have an actual military, because we were covering their asses, the Cold War is over, and we are less obliged to defend Europe.
The other side of this is the obvious ideological conflict in European thinking in regards to military force. As we've seen in fighting the Jihadists and facing other issues, the Europeans as a whole revel in talking shit and sliming our Armed Forces and how they get the job done.
Meanwhile we see tragedies like the one unfolding in Darfur, and a good portion of the left in the US and Europe are clamoring for intervention, and it just isn't happening, I say, let the Europeans build a force all on their own, and be the driving force to end the genocide there, they can find out what taking on the responsibility a military action in the modern era is.
Perhaps with a more capable military system in Europe, the Europeans can finally start understanding the difficulty of real military actions that have real consequences (beyond standing around aimlessly on a UN tour with no clear objective), and get an understanding that war and military affairs aren't easy, and aren't clean. Its easy to sit on the sidelines and bitch about how the US does things, but there comes a point where you have to either put up an alternative or your criticism runs hollow, and Sarkozy I think recognizes that.
Funny Frogman!The Dissident Frogman has an excellent pwnage of the AFP for its photo of the Iraqi woman with the unfired rounds claiming the US armed forces shot them at her house. Click over there and watch it!
On the same topic (maybe this has popped up elsewhere but I haven't seen it) I was slumming at "Think Progress" this morning and saw an article about young Iraqis taking up arms in the militias. Here's the link.
If that is a picture of kids with real guns really threatening the kid in the car with real violence, I would be shocked. It looks, at least from the smile on the driver, like they're playing around.
I would be interested if anyone else has noticed that.
Posted by: Rosetta at August 27, 2007 12:54 PM (omkIU)
2
Arg...I copied the picture to the last comment but it didn't stick. The link works though and the picture is still there.
Posted by: Rosetta at August 27, 2007 01:16 PM (omkIU)
3
Yeah, I think they're just training, as disturbing as it is to say a bunch of little kids are training for kidnapping and murder...
Posted by: doubleplusundead at August 27, 2007 01:31 PM (5/pL6)