October 30, 2008
I'm not speaking of the moral implications of using cowhide to make leather. Cows are both stupid and tasty, so I don't have any problem turning their hide into a wide variety of useful products, from thigh-high dominatrix boots to sexy bustiers.
But leather pants is just one step too far.
When you wear leather pants, you're making one of the following statements:
1) "I wanted to wear something which not only made my ass look bigger, but makes it look as if it's trying to escape." Leather pants do not flatter your figure, people. Oh, perhaps one in a thousand people can wear them, but nobody else can. But one in a thousand people can pick their nose with their feet, too, and I don't see anybody pretending that's acceptable.
2) "I'm too chickenshit to wear a short skirt like the rest of the tramps, but still just as much of a skank." I fully support a woman's right to decide to be a skank, but let's stop fooling ourselves that leather pants are some kind of acceptable way to tart yourself up. Just go for the too-short skirt and the fishnet stockings and stop pretending.
3) "I love the squeaking that my thighs make when I walk!" Because nothing says "hot" like audible reminders of balloon sex.
4) "I am a man with poor fashion sense." If you're a man, and you simply must wear leather on your legs, for heaven's sakes, wear chaps. They're fun, they're classic, and they're unique.
Posted by: plebian at
05:48 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 381 words, total size 2 kb.
OT: can someone point me in the direction of a site that has percentages of voters registered (by population) by state?
I ask because, apparently, NH has 90% of its eligible voters registered as of today (with more to come on Tuesday, I imagine) and I'm curious as to whether that's in line with the reality of past elections/states.
Thanks!
Posted by: ECM at October 30, 2008 06:04 PM (q3V+C)
The 2004 election data is here, if you tease the data enough. Nationally the average is 72%, so 90% sounds quite high.
I guesstimate that in 2004 NH probably had 81% registered based on their voter turnout (72%) and the usual percentage of likely voters who vote (88%).
YMMV.
Posted by: plebian at October 30, 2008 06:16 PM (sfcEj)
And ECM, no idea. I know NH has high voter registration, but 90% seems awful high.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at October 30, 2008 06:18 PM (1xqu1)
Posted by: ECM at October 30, 2008 06:22 PM (q3V+C)
(Do any of you guys know what I look like? I occasionally post pics, but always take them down within 24 hours so as to minimize creepy people hanging around my blog. Creepier than are already there, I mean.)
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at October 30, 2008 07:22 PM (8CGjC)
Posted by: ECM at October 30, 2008 07:56 PM (q3V+C)
I can put up a cheesecake shot (short skirt, high-heeled boots) by special request, but it'll be up only about 12 hours.
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at October 30, 2008 08:03 PM (8CGjC)
Posted by: ECM at October 30, 2008 08:23 PM (q3V+C)
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at October 30, 2008 08:33 PM (8CGjC)
Posted by: alexthechick at October 30, 2008 09:09 PM (zXJGz)
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at October 30, 2008 09:26 PM (8CGjC)
Ahhhh, to be 20 years younger, single, and classy. Not that I ever put those three all together in my life.
Someone will be lucky enough to land Mrs. Peel. It probably won't be a moron though
Posted by: Hermit Dave at October 31, 2008 03:22 AM (WhFvm)
Posted by: Men's Watch Shop at October 11, 2011 12:10 PM (KDIKy)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








