May 20, 2009

No, you don't fucking say!

I voted a straight "Oh, Hells Naw" ticket on today's California special election, which was basically meant to bounce responsibility for cleaning up the state's budget mess back to the voters.

Oh, and check out this Master (Mistress?) of the Obvious:

"Obviously, it's disappointing," said Democratic Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, chairwoman of the Assembly Budget Committee. "But I think the voters are sending a message that they believe the budget is the job of the governor and Legislature. We probably need to go back and do our job."
Probably? Probably? What the fuck? What the fuck have you assholes been doing over the last few years? Oh, right...raising taxes, spending more than you can take in, coddling illegal immigrants, and scaring away productive businesses through...well, those policies I just mentioned.

Why don't you get the fuck back to work and start cutting the hell out of every fucking non-essential program that the state has even a dollar invested in? Why don't you look at the drain on public services and education that illegal immigration has cost us? Why don't you tell the public sector unions that they're going to have to work on restructuring their contracts if they want California to be viable again? Why don't you take a look at the high taxes that are moving productive people into other states?

Oh, right. Because the idiots here in places like Los Angeles and San Francisco and other coastal areas will keep on electing Democrats who don't give a shit, as long as they get re-elected and their contributors get theirs in the process.

Silly me.

Posted by: Sean M. at 12:57 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 269 words, total size 2 kb.

1

Why don't you get the fuck back to work and start cutting the hell out of every fucking non-essential program that the state has even a dollar invested in? Why don't you look at the drain on public services and education that illegal immigration has cost us? Why don't you tell the public sector unions that they're going to have to work on restructuring their contracts if they want California to be viable again? Why don't you take a look at the high taxes that are moving productive people into other states?

Geez, fix some of that stuff and I might make another cross country trip back to the Golden State. (But you and I both know there is literally no hope for this.)

Posted by: ECM at May 20, 2009 01:05 AM (q3V+C)

2

I'm going to take a mildly contrarian view here, although this may just be wishful thinking due to the fact that I'm stuck in CA at the moment.

There is no doubt that the policies are currently disasterous and that the state is effectively bankrupt (effectively, as there is not an actual mechanism for a state to file bankruptcy, although they can repudiate debt).  However, as California is the biggest state leading this crisis (most in debt, one of the main housing foreclosure states, etc.), there is a chance, slim though it may be, that we may be one of the first states to bottom out in this crisis.

Obama may be the One, but his Administration has so many fingers in so many dikes at the moment, that he may find it impossible to support CA's debt on a federal level.  CA's hole in the fiscal dike is so big I don't even think Michelle's fat ass could plug it (whoops, cheap shot).

If CA doesn't get federal support, the state blows up ... huge cuts to government, unemployment blasting up to at least 30% (U-6, not the bogus U-3 that's used in the media), etc. etc.  Major pain in the short term, but major pain is the only way to wake people up to just how fucked up things are.

We're in for a world of hurt (you ain't seen nothin' yet) ... it's just a matter of when.  The areas that are the first to truly bottom will likely be the ones that are first to recover.  There's a chance CA could lead the way.

Posted by: Hermit Dave at May 20, 2009 01:59 AM (WhFvm)

3
that we may be one of the first states to bottom out in this crisis.

I doubt it. Budget crises are a CA tradition - they had them even when times were great. Now that times are this bad, they won't hit bottom unless they get bailed out.

Which, of course, they will, allowing them to join that august and growing group of people shielded from their own idiocies: auto manufacturers, bankers, house buyers, and now, credit card holders.

Posted by: geoff at May 20, 2009 10:15 AM (PV6Iv)

4
Looks like Megan McArdle agrees.

Posted by: geoff at May 20, 2009 10:29 AM (PV6Iv)

5 I'll be curious to see what happens, because I just have a hard time believing any congresscritter outside of CA and the deep Marxist territories are going to chance supporting a CA bailout.

Posted by: doubleplusundead at May 20, 2009 11:20 AM (pQ9UZ)

6 It's a helluva drastic solution to the illegal immigration problem.

On a different note, I moved a few years ago from Michigan out here to CA (Bay Area).  Talk about going from the frying pan into the fire.  Of course, being in the the Bay Area--Berkeley, to be specific--I hear some of the worst crap disguised as economic ideas at where I work, and also from some of my clients (most of whom are successful professionals--where do they think all of their economic freedom came from?).  It's really no surprise we are in this mess out here.  So much money gets wasted on ideas and good intentions:  light/hi-speed rail, social programs, environmental nuttiness that scares off business to Nevada and Utah, etc.  But I like the idea of CA bottoming out, especially if many of these excessive and superfluous programs get cut because of this budget crisis (man, I'm getting sick of that phrase--"budget crisis").  There's been talk of "overhauling the state budget" and building it back up.  We can only hope.

Posted by: Joel D. at May 20, 2009 11:35 AM (U0E8b)

7 Just watch- this budget crisis is going to open the door for the legalization of marijuna in California; it is already their biggest "cash crop", and would only grow bigger if legalized.

Posted by: David at May 20, 2009 04:03 PM (ttKrG)

8

I bet all you Californians are very happy about the $hundreds of millions spent on stem-cell research right about now. It's funny how often pandering and back-patting deals come back to bite somebody else on the ass.

I still think that bailing out the states could the final straw. Mostly Dem states really need to be bailed out, CA, NY, MA, MI for instance, (Athough, it appears we are in the middle of bailing out huge swathes of MI already).

I see a cascade effect as those 4 demand/ask for cash, then it spreads and I have a feeling the disbursement of "bailout funds" might be a little uneven between states depending on their voting records. And then... well, it won't be pretty.

As a side note, I've discovered a stimulus package I can appreciate. My Mauser should be here in a week or two.

Posted by: Veeshir at May 21, 2009 08:33 AM (ThMnZ)

Posted by: zara at March 14, 2011 10:22 PM (ziZas)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






25kb generated in 0.0575 seconds; 68 queries returned 168 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.