September 02, 2010

I gotta agree with Ace, Mike Castle for DE Senate

In addition to the things Ace lists, I believe that this interview with Christine O'Donnell completely destroys whatever lingering credibility she may have had.  Disaster.

I wonder if Michelle Malkin, who endorsed her, will weigh in on any of this?

Okay, how about Erick Erickson?  Hmmm...

Crickets.

Tumbleweeds. 

Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at 12:05 PM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I thought people would wake up a little and smell the coffee after getting Sharron Angle nominated.  I hope she beats Dingy Harry, but she's only in the game because Harry is so goshdarn awful.  If she wins --which she very well might-- it will be because her campaign will have managed to contain teh crayzee.

I'm totally on the same page as Ace on this.

Is there some kind of, ya know, strategically rational faction of the Tea Party I can root for?

Posted by: JoeCollins at September 02, 2010 12:17 PM (f3ldg)

2 Without downplaying the inherent crazy of Christine O'Donnell (which should have been evident from her hosting gigs on Hannity's show - I despise Hannity)...

Strategically rational has given us McCain, Guiliani, both Bushes, Specter, Murkowski, Delay, and Boehner.

If my choice is those versus crazy, I'm almost ready to side with crazy.

As in, on the Sharron Angle end. O'Donnell is a bridge too far - we have enough mean-spirited poseurs just in our strategically rational group. We don't need to import more.

Posted by: Ella at September 02, 2010 12:35 PM (DmnMk)

3 Also, I've never heard of not getting a degree for twelve years (or whatever) because of student debt.  They don't give you your sheepskin if you didn't make your regular payments.  It shouldn't have taken her so long to straighten herself out w/ the Bursar.

Posted by: JoeCollins at September 02, 2010 12:39 PM (f3ldg)

4 Ella, you're making a point about ideology, and I'm making a point about tact, sanity, and general qualification.  I'm with you on the ideology thing to a large degree.  I could point you to more than a few lengthy blog posts I've written on the matter, all basically arguing that we're capable of electing more conservative candidates than the self-styled GOP elite gives us credit for.

But you can't just put up any old person who yells something about "the Constitution" just because the inside-track candidate has RINO tendencies. 

Guiliani??  He was the most conservative Northeast big city mayor you're going to see in your lifetime.  And he didn't get to be the prez nominee, so not seeing the point there.

Posted by: JoeCollins at September 02, 2010 12:48 PM (f3ldg)

5 I would rather see voters screw it up our political betters. 

I'm looking at the tools who put Specter over Toomey last time.
They probably would have done it again if he had stayed in the GOP.

Elitist pricks piss me off.

Posted by: Veeshir at September 02, 2010 01:23 PM (QYriR)

6 I meant to address this
Is there some kind of, ya know, strategically rational faction of the Tea Party I can root for?

You're totally misunderstanding the main, fundamental fact about this deal.
There is no Tea Party.
There are only tea partiers.

 Go to a tea party event. Don't watch the speakers, check out the crowd. Most of them are ignoring the speakers too. They're just there to let their elected officials know they're unhappy about how they're doing their job.

Sarah Palin isn't a Tea Party Leader, she's saying stuff that tea partiers want to hear. If she tries to point tea partiers in a direction they don't want to go, they won't go.
If you understand that, it will make sense. What the tea partiers in Nevada do has little to do with what the ones in Delaware do.


There is no leadership, there are only a shitload of pissed off taxpayers who see elitist assholes calling them names, telling them to shut it, doing stuff against the interests of their voters all while spending their money and their children's money like the people who steal money from drunken sailors.

Posted by: Veeshir at September 02, 2010 01:54 PM (QYriR)

7 ok, "tea party" was imprecise, though I think it's fair to say there are factions amongst the tea partiers & TP sympathizers.  And with Ace's post, and the backlash to it, we're seeing that.

I mean something more like reform-oriented base voters.  Actually, quite a bit like Sarah Palin, who has shown a willingness to either embrace or buck the establishment when it is actually logical to do so.

Sometimes the party stumbles onto the truth.  Stopped clock, and all that.

Posted by: JoeCollins at September 02, 2010 02:08 PM (f3ldg)

8

If the incompetent fools at the NRSC stays out and lets things play their course, then I am OK with this one, since O'Donnell would get crushed in a general election.

....

But if Castle fucks up and goes full bore RINO and votes for cap&tax, against repeal of Obamacare, pro taxes, and pro Obama judges, then fuck them all. Many of us have been wounded too many times, and won't put up with the "leaders" in the not Obama crowd much longer to just take it anymore

 

Posted by: eddiebear at September 02, 2010 02:43 PM (v1cQf)

9
Sometimes the party stumbles onto the truth.  Stopped clock, and all that.

Why the antipathy for the tea partiers? Seriously.




Posted by: Veeshir at September 02, 2010 04:23 PM (1gIWC)

10 No antipathy.  But I can't say I consider myself one.  Sympathetic, most of the time, yes.  And sometimes I disagree, as with O'Donnell.

And it ain't like I don't criticize the party.  I've done way more of that.

Posted by: JoeCollins at September 02, 2010 06:44 PM (f3ldg)

11 Mark Levin has chunks bigger then you in his stool.

Posted by: AlphaBase1 at September 03, 2010 11:21 AM (E1H09)

12 Touché, AlphaBase1.  Touché.

Posted by: JoeCollins at September 03, 2010 02:31 PM (f3ldg)

13 Its great resource. i was finding that type inf and now i get it.thanks for this...

free sms

Posted by: flirt sms at October 20, 2010 02:38 AM (gp95y)

14 I am pleased would be a beautiful woman. They really pleasing to the eye, just the pleasure of reading your articles.

Posted by: roger waters san jose at November 12, 2010 12:31 AM (jh9l4)

15 this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing...

Posted by: Testking 350-030 at January 07, 2011 05:52 AM (tloPj)

16 Reliable quality, reasonable price and satisfying service at our Coach Outlet Store. Welcome you to visit! We would be top Life Coach, to provide value in the world! Coach store, known as leading and affordable luxury brand from American, creates attractive designer Coach Bags and accessories. The famous brand is fashion items. It will be beneficial to your life and show your special life styles, we have reason to believe that it can bring you a new sense of your life. To thank the trust of our customers, we hereby launch a promotion activity, Coach Walletsand Coach Sunglassesare also included. So excellent products, so cheap price, why are you waiting for? The rare opportunity is not often, please catch it!

Posted by: xx at May 04, 2011 10:56 PM (4Vkpb)

17 Today i go outside for trip with my friends,and i choose the birkenstock shoe on sale ;although i have worn it many times,i still like it.Due to the birkenstock sandals,i found that i love the music more nad more,the sound that it spread to me is really wonderful.From the day i got it,i keep satisfying with this birkenstock store,which present a perfect vision.

Posted by: birkenstock shoe on sale at June 19, 2011 09:40 PM (69rZJ)

18 Wewholesaleall kindscheap jerseys,youcan rest assured that order,there must besomething you want,wewill beat the lowestprice,highest qualityreturncustomer!!! cheap hats

Posted by: Buy cheap sunglasses at September 16, 2011 05:14 AM (6zpWb)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






30kb generated in 0.054 seconds; 68 queries returned 177 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.