doubleplusundead

September 01, 2010

How Many More Examples Does The RNC Need?

Seriously, RNC/NRSC/GOP Insiders, after yet another defeat of one of your RINO, deal making, get along fucksticks, will you ever get the message? Will you ever fucking realize that the base of your party and those who oppose Obamanomics will not support you if you keep supporting and forcing upon us people such as the latest soon to be ex-Senator (along with ex-Senators Specter and Bennett and -thankfully- never became Senator Crist and never became Governor KBH).

Just keep it up, you fucking arrogant jerks. Just fucking keep telling us we are stupid for standing up for ourselves and saying "No more". Just fucking keep trying to meddle in primaries and nominating processes. Just fucking keep telling us that you know better than us. And just fucking keep trying to stab us in the face with one hand and have the other hand out for money. Just keep it up, because my answer will be:

Fuck you. That's right. Vanfuck you so hard on a dirty mattress in the alley with Freedomlover K. Fuckabout's fuckmuscle that you'll wish you were a $2 whore needing to get her nightly take back to her pimp instead of the shit you'll have to endure from us.

You really think that in these times we are going to put up with deal makers and backstabbers? Do you really think that we are going to put up with you lecturing us? Do youy really think that we are going to fall for that whole "electability" bullshit, especially in deep red states such as Utah and Alaska? And do you really, really fucking think that we are going to put aside old wounds just because you think we'll fall for your "I can change" bullfuck once again?

No. No. Doublemegafuckno. You hurt us one too many times. You treated us worse than your bedsheets after a night of playing "pass the basket" with a lobbyist's wife. And we have had enough. We will not fucking take it anymore. We will not allow you to fuck us over anymore.We will not allow you to play handmaiden to the demise of our children's future because you think supporting people who will work with, rather than against, creeping statism (and the destruction it unleashes) is better than having some "rubes" in office who *gasp* actually care about the future more than their own lobbying circlejerk. And we will take over who we elect to lead us, for it is our fucking right to do so.

You have been warned, Beltway GOP. Listen to us, or be replaced. The Train is coming around the bend. The Fucktrain for our Future. And either get onboard, or get flattened worse than a pack of goatses.

Posted by: eddiebear at 09:31 AM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 461 words, total size 3 kb.

Eddie Bear... you've really got to man up and quit sugar coating it every time. I mean, come on! The soft sell isn't working.

You're right on. Fuck them, Fuck their idiocy, Fuck their moderation, Fuck their arrogance, Fuck their "we've got to be bipartisan" dildo-from-hell-in-my-rectum, Fuck their inane platitudes about civility.

I T I S F U C K I N G W A R!! And, the sooner these douchenozzle felchers of boyscouts get the message, the sooner we can take back our country.

Posted by: joe at September 01, 2010 09:53 AM (c2riB)

How many examples?

I'm thinking they might need one involving tar and feathers since they haven't learned from losing two elections, a bunch of tea party events, losing primaries and people not sending in money.

But then, I'm kind of a jerk.

Posted by: Veeshir at September 01, 2010 12:32 PM (aFnZ8)

true. But listening to some of the RNC shills, it's our fault for being too demanding. We should know our place, and calling out our "betters" is bad.

/sarc

Posted by: eddiebear at September 01, 2010 12:58 PM (v1cQf)

4 The GOP establishment is not about anything but perpetuation of their own power. They're part of the problem and not the solution. Thus, these 'lessons' are lost on them and they will continue to fight the grass roots conservative movement until they're forcibly removed.

Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 01, 2010 01:00 PM (sqGe2)

Can we still use the tar and feathers HD?

Posted by: Veeshir at September 01, 2010 01:48 PM (aFnZ8)

6 I believe tarring and feathering qualifies as forcible removal (especially combined with being run out of town on a rail). I was thinking more along the lines of the ballot box, but whatever gets the job done.

Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 01, 2010 01:57 PM (sqGe2)

7 I can't wait to see the lost puppy dog look on Mitch McConnell's face when all his inner sanctum buddies are gone. He'll probably turn to Cornyn for comfort.

Posted by: Jay in Ames at September 01, 2010 02:58 PM (UEEex)

8 I also have to wonder if their upcoming lobbying careers are going to be as lucrative.
In the past you had all the "my good friend" stuff when the critters retired.

Now? They're being replaced by people who ran pretty much calling them corrupt, insider, money-ticks.

So those ticks are going to have to try convince their replacements to let them get a little more of that sweet, sweet taxpayer money.

Hmmm, that's funny and non-endy.
Now I'm scared.

Posted by: Veeshir at September 01, 2010 03:18 PM (ZhLgQ)

I'm thinking they might need one involving tar and feathers ...

You need to move on, Veesh'.

...I'm already to solutions ecompassing solitudinous aging gnarly oak trees with strong limbs, 3/8 inch sisal rope, simple (but effective) slip knots, and a smack to the rump of a tall horse with an urge to bolt.

...frontier justice.

Posted by: davis,br at September 01, 2010 05:56 PM (uCShA)

10 Well folks, you got what you voted for. Don't blame the fuckwads if they are fuckwads. Somebody elected these slime bags, and somebody keeps electing them. Quit complaining and find somebody conservative to run against them when they come up for election again. And no more of this crap about these RINO's being as conservative as we can get in New England. Screw New England.

Posted by: TimothyJ at September 01, 2010 05:57 PM (b+pBW)

11 You missed the memo TimothyJ.

Now we're bitching because the GOP establishment keeps trying to screw the new conservative candidates in Red states.
You know, like Miller for instance.
And torpedoing Toomey in PA.
Twice!
The Dede Scozzofava debacle in NY.

Posted by: Veeshir at September 01, 2010 06:08 PM (HH2U8)

12 the NRSC meddling (again) in a primary was bad enough. But when they sent lawyers up to help Murky, that became my Rubicon with them.

Davis: please no violence. Just electoral defeat and humiliation.

Posted by: eddiebear at September 01, 2010 06:18 PM (6SQhi)

13 As a member of the senate Murkowski is entitled to that help. That's part of what the NRSC exists for. Assume Miller wins and during the next election cycle he is challenged by someone like Arlen Spector and it is as close an election as this one. Would you want the NRSC to sit on the sidelines or send the lawyer that Miller would be entitled to?

Posted by: chad98036 at September 01, 2010 06:45 PM (WNcvq)

14 Sit on the sidelines.
That's the whole point. They promised not to get involved in contested primaries.
Let Teh Peepul figure it out without bringing in Caveman Lawyer.

I don't know about anybody else, but I'm pissed off at the system, not just who's in charge of it.

Posted by: Veeshir at September 01, 2010 06:49 PM (HH2U8)

15 I don't remember them promising not to get involved in contested primaries but if you say they did I'll take your word for it. I'm sorry I just refuse to get upset about someone availing themselves of a service that they contracted / paid for.

Posted by: chad98036 at September 02, 2010 02:09 AM (WNcvq)

16 I know this is from last year, and from Politico, but this is what Cornyn said, especially as it reflected upon Florida:

"As far as what's happening in specifically Florida -- we made a decision to endorse Gov. Crist at his request{what's that tell you on both sides?-ed}. But we'e really not involved in the primary," {ahem-ed}Cornyn told Manu. "That's up to the voters in Florida."

And this:

"Our job is to elect Republicans so voters in Florida will have a chance to sort that out {and they did by rejecting your guy-ed}."

And this:

"We will not spend money in a contested primary... There's no incentive for us to weigh in... We have to look at our resources. . . . We're not going to throw money into a (primary) race leading up to the election {ahem again-ed}."

Look, that last bit could be parsed, especially as it relates/related to other races, but sending lawyers/consultants up to AK to help the Murkowski recount effort (lawyers and consultants who I am sure do not work for free, hence requiring money to be thrown at them) , along with their earlier campaign advice on going negative against Miller, in a primary comes as close as can get to the NRSC/GOP Machine meddling in a primary.

Posted by: eddiebear at September 02, 2010 06:58 AM (bX2fk)

17 I’ve been around for rather a long time, but at long last decided to exhibit my appreciation of your mind!Well done, and keep it up!Cheers. bathroom storage

Posted by: Abraham Herena at November 09, 2010 02:37 PM (CSfl2)

18 Wewholesaleall kindscheap jerseys,youcan rest assured that order,there must besomething you want,wewill beat the lowestprice,highest qualityreturncustomer!!! cheap hats

Posted by: Buy cheap sunglasses at September 16, 2011 05:14 AM (6zpWb)

Hide Comments | Add Comment