January 14, 2009

Hilarious request

The DNC protests - the gift that keeps on giving.

I shot some video with my point-and-shoot camera during the DNC protests (link for the three people who I haven't already pimped those pictures to) and posted it on YouTube. I got a message through YouTube today in response to this video:

I'm Kristofer Goldsmith
I'm Kris, a member of IVAW whom you've got a video of posted on your youtube channel. I'd like to request that you remove it from the internet, because I find it to be incomplete, out of context, and legally damaging to me the way that it is posted. Thank you.

-Kristofer Goldsmith
IVAW
Since I believe our shoe-dominatrix holds a law degree, and I know Gabriel pops over here from time to time too, would they care to offer a legal opinion?  Would anyone care to speculate as to how long it takes before YouTube pulls the video?  Or make any other observations regarding this video?  I don't really feel that it's incomplete or out of context, but it could just be me.  I'm thinking my answer is already decided, but if everyone here thinks I'm wrong to have posted that video it might just change my mind.

Posted by: Alice H at 04:11 PM | Comments (53) | Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 2 kb.

1

I posted the following comment on Alice's video:

 

I wonder if the same people who want to remove videos of somebody speaking in their own words are willing to demand jihadis and domestic terrorists/anarchists remove their videos and snuff pr0n. Just askin'

Posted by: eddiebear at January 14, 2009 04:27 PM (wnU1W)

2 I got notified when you put that up, eddie.  Oh, I needed a big smile and you brought one to my face.

Posted by: Alice H at January 14, 2009 04:28 PM (jRtPb)

3 "legally damaging to me" NO, his being stupid is pretty damaging.

Posted by: mare at January 14, 2009 04:38 PM (X1fsj)

4 Glad to help

Posted by: eddiebear at January 14, 2009 04:45 PM (wnU1W)

5 I'm no lawyer but he's got no case, legal or otherwise.

He was using a freaking BULLHORN. In public. There is zero expectation of privacy. He's got no right to demand 'context'.

What a joke.

Posted by: DrewM. at January 14, 2009 04:50 PM (hlYel)

6 Humm, in a public place on a bull horn acting to bring attention to himself.  I think he is free game.  His words are what is damaging to him.  Perhaps he should not have said such things in public if he did not want them noted.  Humm?

Posted by: bhenn at January 14, 2009 04:56 PM (5oEZZ)

7 I'm no lawyer, but my advice would be to tell him to take a long walk off a short pier.

Maybe you shouldn't shout things into a bullhorn if you don't want them disseminated..

Posted by: Techie at January 14, 2009 05:04 PM (906oR)

8

Actual words on tape=distortion and slander

Olbermann and Couric butchering uip a Palin quote=Truth to Power!

Posted by: eddiebear at January 14, 2009 05:05 PM (wnU1W)

9 The "legal" part may be that if this dumbass actually DID any of that, would this be tantamount to a confession for a military tribunal?

Posted by: Techie at January 14, 2009 05:06 PM (906oR)

10 Talking out of your ass in public and then later, wishing you didn't is hardly grounds for a legal case to restrict broadcasting said public statements.  I wouldn't be surprised if that shitwad never spent a day in Iraq.  Either that, or he's related to John Kerry.

Posted by: Syd B. at January 14, 2009 05:08 PM (Uo0OS)

11 I just found a longer video, shot at the same time, that includes about a minute before and a minute after what I shot.  This will provide whatever context anyone might feel is missing.  It's considerably MORE damning, in my opinion. 

Funny that at the end of the video he asks everyone to bear witness to what he's said.

Posted by: Alice H at January 14, 2009 05:15 PM (jRtPb)

12 Wait! A Lefty wanting the crowd to "bear Witness" and "Testify". Kinda church-y, no?

Posted by: eddiebear at January 14, 2009 05:17 PM (wnU1W)

13 Actions in the public domain. And now thanks to his attention bringing request, it will be viral in distribution and reach millions.

Techie is correct, the only damaging consequences are his alone to experience, but none of them likely of a legal nature. That is, unless Kristopher attempts to bring frivolous actions and is countered for fees and penalties.

LOL, sometimes this is the only way for the immature to learn reality.

Posted by: ray at January 14, 2009 05:17 PM (ix3FU)

14

Can we file a FOIA request to see if this guy even deployed?

 

I mean, if Joe the Plumber's files can leak to the media...

Posted by: eddiebear at January 14, 2009 05:21 PM (wnU1W)

15

What a joke! What kind of context would make that any different? Maybe a sign he held up to begin with that said, "This is what idiots say." Yeah, maybe in THAT context.

Don't you dare remove that video. People have to live with what they say.

 

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle at January 14, 2009 05:40 PM (unLXU)

16 Any bets this donut never served?

Posted by: Thomas Jackson at January 14, 2009 05:42 PM (0Qynq)

17

http://revver.com/video/1136764/winter-soldier-kristofer-goldsmith/

 

Dan Riehl just emailed this to me and a few others

Posted by: eddiebear at January 14, 2009 05:46 PM (wnU1W)

18

Oops. I think Alice and Ace already posted it

Posted by: eddiebear at January 14, 2009 05:49 PM (wnU1W)

19 That's the same vid I mentioned in post 11, different site - I'm glad it's getting out.

Posted by: Alice H at January 14, 2009 05:49 PM (jRtPb)

20 Goldsmith is a crank. At his Winter Soldier testimony to Congress he told the assembled Congresswomen that he'd joined the Army because he wanted to "kill ragheads", but we shouldn't be afraid of him because he's not that person anymore.

This is a new story for him, one that he left out of his testimony. Probably because his original drivel consisted of the horrors of backed up toilets that we'd inflicted on the Iraqi people.

But don't worry. Maxine Waters promised him his benefits (he was dishonorably discharged). The link to my live blogging the Congressional testimony is here.

Posted by: Jonn Lilyea at January 14, 2009 05:55 PM (dhtNf)

21 Correct Jonn's link. 

And it's a very good read.  Good background on this schmuck.

Posted by: Alice H at January 14, 2009 06:03 PM (jRtPb)

22

I don't see how he could have a claim.  But if you want to be safe, send him a message back saying something like:

"I don't see how a video of you speaking publicly with a bullhorn and asking others to bear witness for you could possibly be "legally damaging" to you.  However, if you think otherwise, I'm willing to keep an open mind to any arguments that this clip is "incomplete" or "out of context."  If you would like to make such arguments, email them to me and I'll listen.  If I agree, I will withdraw the clip.  I may even post your arguments or "context" alongside the video."

Posted by: The Comish (sic) at January 14, 2009 06:03 PM (WZWmk)

23 MANDATORY MASSIVE DISCLAIMER - I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER SRSLY IF YOU RELY ON THIS OMG THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING - ahem I may have paraphrased that a bit

He is in a public place.  You had every right to tape him.  It would be extremely difficult for him to make out a prima facie case for defamation unless you redacted portions in order to present him saying precisely the opposite of what he did - you know, like the Washington Post does about the CIA.

Again, not your lawyer and I don't really do a lot in the defamation/slander/etc field.  But this seem fair to me. 

Posted by: alexthechick at January 14, 2009 06:21 PM (xUOXi)

24

Jonn,

As I posted on your (great) blog post, Golberg was apparently dishonorably discharged for "malingering."  That means he faked a physical or mental illness to avoid duty.  Specifically, he apparently faked a suicide attempt.  He claims he did not dispute the charges.

http://www.realchangenews.org/
2008/2008_03_26/soldier_v15n14.html

Posted by: The Comish (sic) at January 14, 2009 06:24 PM (WZWmk)

25 Alex, what do fair and the law have to do with each other?

Posted by: mare at January 14, 2009 06:38 PM (X1fsj)

26 MANDATORY MASSIVE DISCLAIMER - I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER SRSLY IF YOU RELY ON THIS OMG THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING

HAHAHAHA! That cracked me up.

Posted by: pajama momma at January 14, 2009 06:46 PM (kWQTL)

27 Kristofer Goldsmith was dumb enough to stand out on the street with a bullhorn and tell his little sad story...and someone taped it, and now it's on the internet...WAAA...WAA....WAAAH.  Hopes his actions and words haunt him for quite some time...maybe he'll have nightmares over them....

Posted by: fmfnavydoc at January 14, 2009 06:52 PM (utes0)

28 Damnit, Alice, don't you know that there's a sacred right of privacy between a man and his bullhorn?

Posted by: Sean M. at January 14, 2009 07:40 PM (rLWHv)

29 He's got as much of a case as he can bring to bear with money and political influence. It comes down to that. You can win anything if you're powerful and rich enough. But 99.9% of the time, the threatening letter and ominous sounding warnings are all people send out.

Posted by: Christopher Taylor at January 14, 2009 07:44 PM (PQY7w)

30 Damnit, Alice, don't you know that there's a sacred right of privacy between a man and his bullhorn?

Really? Good. Me and my umm... bullhorn... have had a lot of fun ...together.

Posted by: Moron Pundit at January 14, 2009 07:48 PM (2uped)

31 As long as you were standing on public land you have a right to shoot whatever you want. That's how the paparazzi get away with what they do. Furthermore, you own the copyright to the video, so you are the only person who has a legitimate claim vis-a-vis whether it stays posted on the web. If YouTube takes direction from this clown it's not out of respect for copyright, but further proof that they're nothing but raging pinkos.

Posted by: Marty at January 14, 2009 08:00 PM (1jf5x)

32 It would be extremely difficult for him to make out a prima facie case for defamation

I was thinking more likely appropriation or false light. But even those would be extremely tenuous cases unless Colorado's laws are unlike everywhere else.

That said I echo the Lady of Darkness and Light: I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER SRSLY IF YOU RELY ON THIS OMG THE HELL.

Posted by: Gabriel Malor at January 14, 2009 09:42 PM (rWvvO)

33 I wonder if this guy also takes to wearing medals and ribbons he didn't earn

Posted by: eddiebear at January 14, 2009 11:39 PM (zvsy9)

34 No, not defamation to publish an unedited video of a public event.  Nor do you have an obligation to provide "context."

Posted by: Michael at January 15, 2009 12:14 AM (Pgb1M)

35 To be a little more technical, a defamatory "statement" must cause injury to reputation, which by definition cannot occur when the putative plaintiff is himself broadcasting this statement with a bullhorn.  Moreover, as the defendant, it must be shown that you knew, or should have known, that the statements were false before you committed the act of "publication."  That's impossible, when you were merely publishing a video of the plaintiff's own words.

In short, relax.

Posted by: Michael at January 15, 2009 12:22 AM (Pgb1M)

36 Tell him to suck the shit out of a pig's ass if he threatens you with legal action again.

Posted by: doubleplusundead at January 15, 2009 12:39 AM (D2cBI)

37 Gabriel is right -- a "false light" claim is not going to workl.  It requires proof of "actual malice."   Actual malice is very high standard and an interesting concept, but long story short, it can't be shown here when you were just taping the antics of a jerk at a public event.

Posted by: Michael at January 15, 2009 12:55 AM (Pgb1M)

38 Also, I am a crimefighter.

I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER SRSLY IF YOU RELY ON THIS OMG THE HELL.

Posted by: Michael at January 15, 2009 12:57 AM (Pgb1M)

39 I heart you guys

Posted by: Alice H at January 15, 2009 01:00 AM (jRtPb)

40

You've got to be kidding me...This guy's request confirms that he is as "Simple" as his rhetoric! (Too many Michael Moore flicks i'd say)

Personally...I am glad he is not defending my country anymore. In the words of "The Donald"...You're Fired!!!

Posted by: Ruggmeister at January 15, 2009 03:35 AM (RMvY2)

41

This guy is also, not surprisingly, a liar since the idea that Iraqis soldiers went out on patrol not noticing that the bolt was missing from their Ak's is baloney.

I call BS to his story.

Posted by: Pierre Legrand at January 15, 2009 06:35 AM (DLJPO)

42 You just handed him more air time. Good job. Looks like he won one over on you!

Posted by: army07 at January 15, 2009 11:12 AM (Hxbhy)

43 No, because now more people are (hopefully) going to look into his exploits, and expose him for the liar he is.

Posted by: eddiebear at January 15, 2009 11:20 AM (wnU1W)

44 ..."This is the guilt that I live with for the rest of my life... "
LOL - he needs a Mydol and a cup full of STFU.
This asshat disgraces the uniform he is wearing.

Posted by: Phil Lashio at January 15, 2009 12:35 PM (zrj3n)

45 Technically, he shouldn't be wearing it anymore.

Posted by: eddiebear at January 15, 2009 12:55 PM (wnU1W)

46

Its highly unlikely anyone is going to find anything on this guy, we keep playing the Mcbeth tune while ignoring that we keep playingteh tune of one guy because there aren't others to go on. In the meantime this guy get more airtime. And all we have done is disrespect a veteran because we disagree with his politics. That makes this site like people who spit on vets.

 

Just because you disagree with thier politics doesn't give you right to insult or discredit the man. Say what you will of his politics, actually grow up and talk about his politics and stop insulting him. It makes you disagraceful.

 

He served. How many of you did?

Posted by: army07 at January 16, 2009 05:33 PM (Hxbhy)

47 My brother and I served. Hell, my brother just returned from Iraq. XBradTC served as well. And so did MCPO Airdale, Wickedpinto, and Mesablue, just for starters.

As for "insulting" him, he started it by demanding Alice remove a video she shot of him speaking in his own voice on a public street. All while still wearing a uniform (which he shouldn't have, due to his discharge) and accusing other soldiers of doing horrible things. Does that not qualify as a legitimate discussion?

Posted by: eddiebear at January 17, 2009 01:49 AM (jwDMk)

48 You know, I've never served in the armed forces, but I don't think that disqualifies me from calling this guy an asshat for demanding that a video of himself shouting things into a bullhorn in a public place be taken down because he doesn't like the way it makes him look.

He had the right to speak his mind, and we all—whether we served or not—have the right to criticize what he said.

Posted by: Sean M. at January 17, 2009 04:27 AM (rLWHv)

49 Once, there should have existed magical smurfs that try to theleport over the places that can never exist again.possibly nijas could put the fires out and get away Once there is a structural engineer that can work a auto so that the agency would love to finish.My freedom isunrealistically proped up of shipbuilding and relating my way.multi scale guitars

Posted by: Joevanhalenhendrix at January 19, 2011 03:52 PM (nQi2u)

50 Reliable quality, reasonable price and satisfying service at our Coach Outlet Store. Welcome you to visit! We would be top Life Coach, to provide value in the world! Coach store, known as leading and affordable luxury brand from American, creates attractive designer Coach Bags and accessories. The famous brand is fashion items. It will be beneficial to your life and show your special life styles, we have reason to believe that it can bring you a new sense of your life. To thank the trust of our customers, we hereby launch a promotion activity, Coach Walletsand Coach Sunglassesare also included. So excellent products, so cheap price, why are you waiting for? The rare opportunity is not often, please catch it!

Posted by: xx at May 04, 2011 10:00 PM (4Vkpb)

51 Established in 1981, famous women’s designer clothing brand Karen Millen specializing in tailoring, coats and eveningwear. Brand Karen Millen Dress has been one of the most successful women brand and favoured by women worldwide. Perfectly show female body shapes with luxurious fabrics, Karen Millen Dresses are most internationally well known celebrities’ favorite, they wear Karen Millen Dresses to attend some important public occasions. Karen Millen UK online shop supply full collection of latest Karen Millen dresses, various kinds of Karen Millen Sale with high quality and best price, Karen Millen Shoulders Dresses, Karen Millen One Shoulder, Karen Millen Dresses 2011 Newest, Karen Millen 2011 SEP Style,etc. From our Karen Millen Dresses UK store, you will find fashion design Karen Millen discount offer to you, elegant and luxury Karen Millen Dresses are your perfect choice for work, wedding, party and evening wear.
Inexpensive Formal Karen Millen Dresses by Sally Fashions - In Karen Millen UK if you are looking for cheap Karen Millen dress for homecoming or prom, with Karen Millen Sale you're in the right Karen millen outlet! Cheap formal Karen millen 2011 dresses are hard to find Karen Millen, if you want quality and style Karen Millen Shoulders Dress, but the girl on Karen Millen One Shoulder dresses, we offer the highest quality Karen Millen Solid Colour at the best prices. Browse our Karen Millen Multicolour Dresses Fashion dress, cocktail dresses, Karen Millen Skirts available in 2011! The common Karen Millen Trench Coat that women love to shop Karen Millen Coats. Often they are required to key Karen Millen Shoulders Dress Mix Black Yellow Red in department stores, Karen Millen Leopard Print Trench Coat grocery stores and hundreds of Karen Millen Feminine Texture Tailoring Skirt Grey and Black boutiques that permeate the city average. However, some women prefer to buy White Karen Millen Broderie Dress only seasonal, reduce unnecessary purchases Karen Millen Tube Dress White-Black-Grey for special occasions.

Posted by: Karen Millen Dresses at November 01, 2011 01:18 AM (RaaPw)

52 Its highly unlikely anyone is going to find anything on this guy, we keep playing the Mcbeth tune while ignoring that we keep playingteh tune of one guy because there aren't others to go on. In the meantime this guy get more airtime. And all we have done is disrespect a veteran because we disagree with his politics. That makes this site like people who spit on vets.

Posted by: iPhone unlock at November 09, 2011 08:07 AM (bclxq)

53

It is really a great and useful piece of info. I am glad that you shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

Posted by: Cheap Logo Design at December 10, 2011 02:14 AM (pthdt)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






45kb generated in 0.2971 seconds; 68 queries returned 212 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.