June 23, 2010
I completely, 100% agree with how Obama has handled the General McChrystal with the added bonus that he picked basically the most excellent possible general to replace him.
Bottom line is, as much as I love the military and those who serve in it, they work for the President. He is their boss. An honorable person makes every possible effort to discuss his concerns/disagreements with his boss before he goes around/over him and that's only when the disagreement is about something absolutely critical.
Instead, McChrystal spouted a bunch of shit-talk to a Communist rag and completely sucker-punched the administration. That's straight up bullshit and just like Bush shouldn't have tolerated this (to the degree he did) Obama has no reason to. Even if McChrystal is correct on the merits (and I can't think of a bigger dipshit than Biden) he went way outside the proper channels for dealing with whatever issues he had and essentially placed his boss in a position where his options were very limited. No organization can function effectively when its leadership (such as it is) is constantly undermined by its own members.
But, of course, there is a higher cause here than honor and politics and that is bringing the war in Afghanistan to as swift and successful a completion as possible. Were Obama asked to choose between firing him for the reasons I've listed above or winning the war, the choice would be clear (to most, anyway) but luckily Patraeus stepped up and broadened the options.
So, we have a solid result that I believe will enhance the chances of success in the war along with the appropriate response to an outrageous example of insubordination.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at
03:32 PM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 301 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: B.B. at June 23, 2010 04:07 PM (GxhuY)
Posted by: Douglas at June 23, 2010 04:20 PM (uU+Ss)
His merry band of fucknuts seriously needs to stay out of the man business.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at June 23, 2010 04:29 PM (GC5S2)
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at June 23, 2010 05:10 PM (G5qLy)
McChrystal didn't "spout a bunch of shit talk." His staff was drunk, at a bar in Paris, and said shit they shouldn't have said. McChrystal's 2 mistakes were in letting the staff talk with the Rolling Stone reporter and slamming Eikendouche. And from all accounts Eikendouche is a douche.
I disagree completely with your assessment of his conduct.
Posted by: tangonine at June 23, 2010 06:04 PM (C8Pcc)
Posted by: tangonine at June 23, 2010 07:34 PM (C8Pcc)
But what do you expect from someone’s conception of leadership comes from “The Apprentice”.
Posted by: spike at June 23, 2010 08:32 PM (oRmZx)
Posted by: Chaim at June 23, 2010 10:54 PM (aGvu6)
McChrystal is responsible for lives and success, the current president is responsible for bailing out this and that, "shovel ready" projects, and trying to hit par.
Meanwhile, the Norks and AAAHHHCKmadeedeenejihad do. not. give. a. fuck.
Weak guys like TOTUS are fodder for jakals.
Bad news for the good ol' USA
Posted by: the botnet at June 23, 2010 10:58 PM (3/GnL)
Secondly, and more importantly, McChrystal violated UCMJ with his comments. Pretty it up how you like, he spoke negatively of his civilian chain of command. That's a huge damned no no. Article 88 is pretty clear. And defend the truthfulness of the statements all you want (no seriously, please do so, I agree with them) but truth is no defense. Pluggy Joe might be a slack-jawed, mouth-breathing, pompous, self-righteous, all-singing, all-dancing, crap-of-the-world, Grade A Prime shitbird... but a Commissioned Officer cannot use contemptuous words in regards to the Vice President. And if he does, he speaks them into his beer where no one else may hear.
Sorry guys, you're used to the world where you can smack-talk about your boss, and he's got to put up with a certain amount as long as you do good work in the office. But when McChrystal did it, it was a violation of Federal law. He was right to offer his resignation, the President COULD have been a bigger man and refused to take it, but since when did anyone think ole paper-skinned Barack was capable of being the bigger man to anyone over 1 foot tall?
Posted by: MikeD at June 24, 2010 08:16 AM (FkL60)
Posted by: tangonine at June 24, 2010 02:04 PM (C8Pcc)
“Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”
Do you see "ambassador" in there? "National Security Council member?" Nope. In fact, the accepted interpretation of "congress" is congress as a whole, so you can even say bad stuff about an individual member and not be punished under this article.
Posted by: tangonine at June 24, 2010 02:10 PM (C8Pcc)
Posted by: tangonine at June 24, 2010 02:12 PM (C8Pcc)
And that goes back to point one... why would you give a "reporter" for Rolling Fucking Stone the time of day, much less permission to speak with anyone? You're under no obligation to do so. In fact, you CAN tell him to piss up a rope. I understand that the extended exposure was that let these guys see this shitbird as a human being was caused by the Iceland volcano (sorry, I can't spell Hjaklrrrghgfjord), but he shouldn't have been allowed to get within 50 feet of McChrystal or his staff.
Posted by: MikeD at June 25, 2010 09:21 AM (FkL60)
Everyone bitches about their boss. Hell, when my boss and I were discussing this at work I told him he wouldn't want to hear the shit I said about him to my wife and he said I wouldn't want to hear the shit he said about me to his.
It's human nature.
That rolling stoned reporter still needs a good, solid ass kicking. On principle.
Posted by: tangonine at June 26, 2010 12:01 PM (C8Pcc)
kanlı canlı bir platform porno izle keyfine bak
sikiselim diyenler burası sikiş en güzeli
dedik ne bir bakınz vipdilber kaliteliyer
Posted by: kacmak geldi at January 12, 2011 10:58 AM (i5Tel)
Posted by: fuirt at March 08, 2011 08:58 AM (CoKj6)
Posted by: redskins jerseys at July 27, 2011 09:11 PM (TYrXu)
cheap oakley sunglassesare sold here for all age groups and come in a complete array of shades, models and styles.At our oakley outlet, you can buy discount oakley sunglasses with high quality, save up to 70%, and these are some colorful oakley sunglasses cheap styles you can choose. Now get top quality fashion oakley sunglasses discountthat suit your mood.If you are searching for oakley sunglasses outletonline.
Posted by: the north face outlet at December 23, 2011 12:47 AM (Au+4C)
The blog article very surprised to me! Your writing is good. In this I learned a lot! Thank you!Victor Cruz JerseyEli Manning JerseyHakeem Nicks JerseyMichael Strahan JerseySteve Smith Jersey
Posted by: Plaxico Burress Jersey at March 05, 2012 05:07 AM (MzeRN)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








