December 23, 2009

FAIL Is Now Spelled C-B-O.

I mean, is this shit a surprise?

The key point is that the savings to the HI trust fund under the PPACA would be received by the government only once, so they cannot be set aside to pay for future Medicare spending and, at the same time, pay for current spending on other parts of the legislation or on other programs. Trust fund accounting shows the magnitude of the savings within the trust fund, and those savings indeed improve the solvency of that fund; however, that accounting ignores the burden that would be faced by the rest of the government later in redeeming the bonds held by the trust fund. Unified budget accounting shows that the majority of the HI trust fund savings would be used to pay for other spending under the PPACA and would not enhance the ability of the government to redeem the bonds credited to the trust fund to pay for future Medicare benefits. To describe the full amount of HI trust fund savings as both improving the government’s ability to pay future Medicare benefits and financing new spending outside of Medicare would essentially double-count a large share of those savings and thus overstate the improvement in the government’s fiscal position.

Fuck this. Fuck this with the Sarbanes-Oxley Code Soaked In Government Grade "Fuck You". In my line of work, and with the numbers I have to deal with, this would be called fraud or criminal negligence. People in the "real world" would go to jail for this. But in Obamaland? You get a school named after you in Nebraska.

If this was intentional, then people need to fucking go to jail. If it was an accident, then people need to get fired and serve me my next pizza.

Fuck you, Congress. Fuck you forever.

Thanks to Alice

Posted by: eddiebear at 02:49 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 307 words, total size 2 kb.

1 A friend just explained how gov't agencies show a profit.

If you're say, a private business, you have income and outgo, but you also have future outgo like pensions you're promising your employees and whatnot, you have to include that in your accounting.
The gov't doesn't have to do that.

So that little trick is pretty much SOP.

So Enron's biggest problem was that they weren't congresscritters.

Posted by: Veeshir at December 23, 2009 03:56 PM (n3Uyz)

2 Uhm, govt pays retirement. I currently draw my .mil ret after my 20. Have for the last 15+ years.

Posted by: cmblake6 at December 24, 2009 01:26 AM (zSq+X)

3 Sure, the govt does. But they just budget it annually as an appropriation. Corporations can't do that. They have to set aside an amount greater than the annual outlays to cover the out-year liabilities. 

Posted by: XBradTC at December 24, 2009 01:57 AM (y0E9v)

4 the larger problem is that Congress (see: Reid (D-Lying Fuck)) makes purely cynical assumptions that will NEVER occur in the real world (see Medicare "savings") and the CBO has to score it utilizing those assumptions. They've been noting that by the way they issue their statements the way a hostage blinks repeatedly to show duress.

Posted by: Frank G at December 25, 2009 04:35 PM (I+To0)

5 Beneficial document helps make frequent advance, appreciate it write about, this pile-up connected with expertise is usually to hold finding out, focus is usually the beginning of money.

Posted by: oakley sunglasses at September 26, 2011 08:37 PM (WVgQ7)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






21kb generated in 0.0453 seconds; 68 queries returned 164 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.