July 09, 2008
Writes Schmich:
Reason, a libertarian journal, surveyed the 35 most populous American cities to determine how they "balance individual freedom and government paternalism."She goes on to list several other things, like barbecue lighter fluid and air conditioning, which she wishes the city would take away from her neighbors.
Concluding that Chicago was the strictest of all, the article mocked our bans on handguns and public smoking and—as easy as shooting geese in a barrel—the recently rescinded ban on foie gras.
The complaints went on. The article stomped its foot over our limits on serving trans fats in restaurants and blathering on cell phones while driving.
It whimpered about our police cameras, our tax on bottled water, our high cigarette and alcohol taxes, and, in the way of many a 10-year-old, seemed to equate the fact that we can't have whatever fun we want whenever we want it with an assault on our basic freedom. But where some people see paternalism, we weirdos believe that most of Chicago's rules help turn unruly city dwellers into civilized citizens. Big cities are like big families—put a lot of people into a small space and somebody has to be charged with the power to say "Stop it."
That's a fine idea. Next, how's about we come up with a few other things Big Daddy could take away from Mary. You know, for her own good. Might I suggest:
-Hybrid cars. The smug is a terrible problem.
-Hair and nail salons. The chemicals can't be good for the environment.
-Coffee shops. All those paper cups and the little paper things that keep you from burning your hand. Shudder.
-Newspapers. More paper. They probably still cut down trees to make it.
Got any more ideas? We've got to save Mary from herself, people!
(h/t)
Posted by: Sean M. at
07:48 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 351 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: XBradTC at July 09, 2008 07:58 PM (Sp2fz)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at July 09, 2008 07:59 PM (YTk4M)
I can't disagree with the results of Reason. There are so many bans and restrictions on this city it's ridiculous. The best part of this whole thing is that the majority of the people who are voting for and wanting these restrictions in place, are the same people that call Bush a fascist and convinced he wants to be a king.
Posted by: conservativeinthecity at July 09, 2008 09:02 PM (vqbP7)
I stand by my position, if the government cannot tell me whether or not I can put a dick in my mouth, it cannot tell me whether or not I can put a donut in my mouth.
Posted by: alexthechick at July 09, 2008 09:53 PM (GknYa)
.
.
.
No?
.
.
.
.
Call me, I've got some donuts for you.....
Posted by: XBradTC at July 09, 2008 11:26 PM (Sp2fz)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at July 09, 2008 11:35 PM (YTk4M)
Posted by: alexthechick at July 09, 2008 11:48 PM (GknYa)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at July 10, 2008 12:01 AM (YTk4M)
Posted by: Dave in Texas at July 10, 2008 07:58 AM (pzen5)
Posted by: Moron Pundit at July 10, 2008 09:04 AM (83gRI)
My suggestion is that since the woman makes her living killing trees, they ought to take away that avenue so she can better offset her carbon footprint.
note: I think the term "carbon footprint" is one of the biggest crocks of shite I've ever heard, so don't flame me...
Posted by: Lemur King at July 10, 2008 09:42 AM (bOVmC)
But I also thought it was funny.
It is interesting how much further local governments can go in restricting our freedoms than the feds. Why is that? Is it because of the limited geographical scope of the bans? "You can still do that, you just can't do it here..." Dunno, but I tend to think the greatest threat to our freedoms is this growth of the intrusion of municipalities into our lives, which sets the stage for wider spread of these impositions. Next thing you know, it is a state wide ban... and then the Supremes find an evolving standard...
Posted by: XBradTC at July 10, 2008 10:53 AM (yjBRt)
Posted by: alexthechick at July 10, 2008 11:36 AM (SHHaV)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at July 10, 2008 11:46 AM (YTk4M)
Posted by: website design perth at September 16, 2011 02:02 AM (BeP7C)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.









