July 31, 2009
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
12:33 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Go_Fish at July 31, 2009 03:35 PM (CTpRY)
That's about the class I would expect.
OT (as if a zombie-related question is ever off topic), but I saw a zombie question and I couldn't figure out the answer.
In a thread about the tazer that shoots three times, we have a
Question from Rubeus
Are these effective against zombies?
Now, at first I dismissed it, but then I thought, they have muscles, they can spasm just as well as mine. Why wouldn't a tazer incapacitate a zombie for a period and allow me to reload or run like hell?
I'm not really sure how a zombie's central nervous system works nor how it might interact with a tazer. (assuming, of course, slow zombies as nature intended.)
So if a bro were a zombie, would tazing him do any good?
Posted by: Veeshir at July 31, 2009 04:02 PM (kQ+Os)
According to The Zombie Survival Guide by Max Brooks, an ordinary taser gun is ineffective against a zombie beacuse they require twice the energy to stun them (first edition paperback, page 57).
If you don't accept the Solanum theory advanced by Brooks, then you may be of the opinion that a taser gun would, in fact, work normally, and it seems likely that it should for the reasons you advanced. But bear in mind that they are undead flesh, so his general theory of requiring a souped-up voltage seems like it may be correct.
But why are you carrying something that is a temporary solution, when a .45 is a more permanent solution? And who's going to get close enough to taze a zombie anyways to check if it works or not?
Posted by: plebian at July 31, 2009 04:52 PM (Vlj+3)
A triple tazer might be enough then.
I hope I don't have to find out.
I'd feel like a stupid ass fucker if it didn't work.
Posted by: Veeshir at July 31, 2009 07:34 PM (VMm1a)
Posted by: zara at March 14, 2011 10:37 PM (ziZas)
Posted by: cheap lebron james at November 12, 2011 05:34 AM (RKwpX)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








