September 30, 2008
Mark Levin, who is quickly becoming my favorite conservative, has signed on to The Corner today to respectfully disagree:
Count me among those few here who want to thank the House Republicans for taking a bold stand against what had been a stampede on a scale I have never before witnessed on matters of huge consequence. Conservatism is more than a quaint belief-system to be embraced and debated over donuts at Starbucks. It is more than a list of talking points. It is the foundation of the civil society. The liberal uses crises, real or manufactured, to expand the power of government at the expense of the individual and private property. He has spent, in earnest, 70 years evading the Constitution's limits on governmental power. If conservatives don't stand up to this, who will? If they don't offer serious alternatives that address the current circumstances AND defend the founding principles, who will? The House Republicans have done both. And I, for one, thank them.I realize the markets are bad, but I would rather have years of economic turmoil than have a bill passed that gives the Treasury Secretary the right to "ensure the economic well-being of Americans." That's a bridge too far.
Update: As I was writing this I saw that another Cornerite, John Hood, also opposed the National Review editorial. Good for him.
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at
01:08 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 286 words, total size 2 kb.
So few people are writing sensibly on this, and to me one of the reasons seems clear:
Many of the writers live in NY or DC, both of which are, although larger, as insular as any small town in Appalachia. The current crisis, although good for America in the long run (and for some, such as conservative local banks, the short run), is terrible for both NY and DC. When their little insular world gets shaken, the writers at NRO are mostly going to throw principle right out the window and cry like little girls.
Hell, as an independant trader, I should be for the bailout on a strictly self-interested basis. It would make things much more predictable for the way I like to trade, as I'm personally terrible at trading short-term political uncertainty, to the point where I just close everything out and watch from the sidelines. I have a bit more self-respect than that, however, and would rather stand on principle for an issue that I consider this important.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 30, 2008 01:19 PM (WhFvm)
Many of the writers live in NY or DC, both of which are, although larger, as insular as any small town in Appalachia.I grew up in one of those insular Appalachian towns, and when I moved to DC I was surprised how similar it was.
Full of Democrats.
Everyone knew everyone else's business.
Excellent metro system....errr....
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at September 30, 2008 01:23 PM (mv8F7)
We can build a fireline with this bill or we can watch the American economy be destroyed through rampant regulation.
Posted by: chad at September 30, 2008 01:24 PM (lNQg8)
chad --
First of all, the government can't really do jack shit about the economy. All they can do is shuffle piles of money from one place to another or print money. We're going to have years of economic distruption with or without the current POS bailout. The time to pay the piper for the excesses and irrespnsibility of the last 10 years (or so) seems to be now. So be it.
Second, the current bailout proposal is a "vast increase in government control of the economy". One which, with the government involved, is bound to be terribly inefficient. I'd rather shoot this down, and take my chances fighting the next "solution" that comes down the pipe.
Finally, the situation isn't completely analagous to the Great Depression, as we're already so heavily indebted as a nation that we simply can't afford more government programs. Sure, the pols will try to pass what they can, but the public is already furious and sick of both parties. I think the pols are going to find it increasingly difficult to borrow from the future or steal from Peter to pay Paul.
So, I'm not going to sweat the 'fireline'. Certain institutions need to burn. Let 'em.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 30, 2008 01:36 PM (WhFvm)
The problem with your approach is that not only will it lead to years of economic disruption, it will most likely lead to a vast increase in government control of the economy.So why not cut out the middle man, pass the Paulson plan, and go straight to the government control, right?
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at September 30, 2008 01:39 PM (mv8F7)
Posted by: chad at September 30, 2008 02:17 PM (lNQg8)
Whatever dude. I get it. The sky is falling. We have to destroy conservatism to save it. Yadda yadda yadda. I'll make sure to wear my hardhat when I'm outside so I don't get hit by any of those sky chunks.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 30, 2008 02:20 PM (WhFvm)
Posted by: chad at September 30, 2008 03:24 PM (lNQg8)
Assuming that you are a conservative, buck up and start acting like one. It is easy to be a conservative when things are going well. Things are not going well now. This isn't the moment to turn our backs on everything. This is the time to stand firm.
This is the moment we separate the real conservatives from the fake ones.
Posted by: Blarg the Destroyer at September 30, 2008 05:44 PM (PcJ/l)
I will say in a general sense that we do have to make stands somewhere, some conservatives and "conservatives" are ready to compromise with the Democrats until they've compromised us to the edge of the cliff, where we'll promptly be shoved over the edge. I'm not about that, we saw what happened when the squish Tories pushed out the Thatcherites, Labour has taken over there and is becoming rather viciously authoritarian, and it'll happen here too if we don't make a stand somewhere. Is this the issue to make the stand? Dunno.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at September 30, 2008 05:59 PM (W4Uy5)
Posted by: gga at November 18, 2010 01:58 AM (FR/42)
Posted by: dişleri at December 15, 2010 05:12 PM (P1r/Y)
Posted by: xx at May 04, 2011 10:01 PM (4Vkpb)
Posted by: xx at May 04, 2011 10:45 PM (4Vkpb)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








