June 23, 2009

And what exactly is wrong with Rubio's statement?

Via Ed at Hotair, we've got this, some twat named Josh Kraushaar on Politico whining about this statement from Marco Rubio, (and of course using the worst picture of Rubio he could find, like some hack putting together a pamphlet for election season)

I have a feeling the situation in Iran would be a little different if they had a 2nd amendment like ours.


...and acting like this is some shocking, bizarre statement.  Uh, no jackass, it isn't, and if the Iranians had a concept in their society equivalent to a Second Amendment, and were able to keep and bear arms as we are, my guess is that the current regime wouldn't be nearly so bold about engaging in egregious human rights abuses and brutal to dissenters...assuming the leadership of the Iranian regime hadn't been overthrown already.  I'd also guess the Basij and the rest of the regime's enforcers would be a hell of a lot less bold about randomly shooting into crowds, too. 

There are usually a few reasons guys like this twat freak out when someone notes what the Second is for, particularly a politician.  They don't like hearing what the Second is for.  They're liberal statists, they don't want you to be able to reject state power.  Because of that, they've been trying to redefine the Second Amendment as the Hunting Amendment for years now, and have failed miserably. 

Unlike the GOP, gun nuts and the NRA don't cave to bullshit like this, and as a result gun nuts are winning the debate and the culture, and even now to an extent defining the terms of the debate, which is why the media and certain Democrats are screeching so loud about guns lately, they're losing, badly.  Gun nuts don't roll over, and liberals don't like that.

They don't want to admit that sometimes force is needed to preserve human rights (not that they particularly care about human rights to begin with).  Liberals can't or won't differentiate between protective violence and malicious or oppressive violence.  This is why you'll hear some liberals whine, "Oh, great, more violence, yaaay!" when stories of people defending themselves with lethal force in the news are published.  Ace's post here catches this mindset perfectly.

Posted by: doubleplusundead at 10:11 AM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 379 words, total size 3 kb.

1

...and acting like this is some shocking, bizarre statement. 

Nothing enrages people more than speaking the truth.

Posted by: John at June 23, 2009 10:14 AM (wtEx8)

2 They don't want to admit that sometimes force is needed to preserve human rights (not that they particularly care about human rights to begin with).

Bingo.  It's Mark Steyn's point about the people with the Free Tibet bumper stickers.  If actions to actually, you know, free Tibet were undertaken, those same people would slap an Arms Are For Hugging or other similar bullshit on top of the Free Tibet bumper sticker.


Posted by: alexthechick at June 23, 2009 10:20 AM (SHHaV)

3

What was that line Orwell had about we sleep soundly..?

Posted by: eddiebear at June 23, 2009 10:36 AM (wnU1W)

4 Why is it when I see the word 'twat', I immediately know that DPUD wrote the post?

Posted by: Alice H at June 23, 2009 10:37 AM (qJHYy)

5

^ we each seem to have our own "voice", so to speak. And certain words just flow easier from some of us.

Posted by: eddiebear at June 23, 2009 10:44 AM (wnU1W)

6

My in-laws are sanctimoniously pacifist (and draft dodging, but that's another matter), and were horrified beyond words when I "came out" and conceded that, yes, I am armed. And proud.

But, on the larger point, the NRA should serve as an example for the testosterone challenged "leaders" in the GOP: The NRA never backs down, never gives an inch, and look at what they can accomplish, against sometimes Herculean odds.

Posted by: eddiebear at June 23, 2009 10:48 AM (wnU1W)

7

Posted by: doubleplusundead at June 23, 2009 10:52 AM (lCjXq)

8

The NRA never backs down, never gives an inch, and look at what they can accomplish, against sometimes Herculean odds.

Eddiebear for president.

Posted by: davis,br at June 23, 2009 11:48 AM (uCShA)

9

ghetto quote: 

"Peeps got guns, the gub'mnet better watch out!  Peeps don't got no guns, peeps is in deep shizzle!"

Thomas Jefferson (a.k.a. TJ hoopie)

Posted by: tangonine at June 23, 2009 09:29 PM (C8Pcc)

10

BTW my new Nitehawg from ParaOrdnance is due in next week!! http://www.paraord.com/product/product.html?id=6 

Oh. Yeah.

Posted by: tangonine at June 23, 2009 09:34 PM (C8Pcc)

11 Eddiebear - I know what you mean, my sister and I were parked near a base during a concert and she was really shocked and horrified to see men carrying guns nearby.  I think they were the Queen's York Rangers.  She was just offended that these uniformed soldiers were openly carrying weapons.  Weird.

Posted by: fozzy at June 23, 2009 10:21 PM (ccEuN)

12 davis:

While I appreciate the suggestion, I'm too short and too foulmouthed to be the Hip Prez.

Tango:
Suhweet

Fozzy:
Heh.

Posted by: eddiebear at June 23, 2009 11:42 PM (3eV4U)

Posted by: mp495 at February 17, 2011 10:33 AM (k+H1o)

14 Hi buddy, your blog's design is simple, clean, and I like it. I really enjoy reading your blog popular distributed: a good article waiting for you!

Posted by: fake louis vuitton belt at September 16, 2011 09:19 PM (Ei0Nv)

15 Pair of sunglasses is tight! I have in the past and we offer a lower price, published a customer more in that theme, and now reviewed. Thank upstairs information.

Posted by: fake oakleys at September 18, 2011 06:27 PM (UsyiC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






26kb generated in 0.0486 seconds; 68 queries returned 174 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.