doubleplusundead

January 07, 2009

A Thought On "Vetting" Candidates

Back during the election, the media declared it their duty to "vet" Sarah Palin and Joe The Plumber (an ordinary citizen, by the way) by digging into every detail of their personal lives, going so far as to mock McCain for not digging himself.

Well, given Bill Richardson's departure from the Obama Cabinet, I have noticed a lack of curiosity on the part of The Deciders to dig into Richardon's dealings, and their unwillingness to ask the President-Elect about HIS vetting process.

Just a thought.

Posted by: eddiebear at 01:09 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.

1 RRRRRAAAAAACISTTTT!!!!

Posted by: conservativeinthecity at January 07, 2009 02:01 PM (i3tSP)

2 Damn! You got me!

Posted by: eddiebear at January 07, 2009 02:04 PM (wnU1W)

3 This all leads to the main question. What does Prince Bandar’s successor know about Obama’s past life that will give him power that no American could have over him? What does Putin know that the New York Times was too lazy and/or biased to find and report? What does Ahmadinejad know that the Washington Post was too biased and insular to find? Was there some nugget that the AP turned its back on while worshiping Obama that will be used by a foreign power to endanger our national security? We’re not even a month from the inauguration and already media incompetence has fed into the weakness of the Obama administration. What weakness? The weakness that comes from lying and covering up and being allowed to get away with it. Democracy only works in the light of day. And there was an unhealthily small amount of it in the recent election.

Posted by: snaggletoothie at January 07, 2009 02:45 PM (9m+gW)

Hide Comments | Add Comment