April 23, 2009
The head of the Republican Party called on President Obama to withdraw Kathleen Sebelius' nomination as health secretary unless she answers more questions on abortion.Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele's comments come on the same day Sebelius, the Democratic governor of Kansas, vetoed a bill that would rewrite a state law restricting late-term abortions. The measure would have required doctors performing such abortions to report additional information to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
Steele says Sebelius has not been forthcoming about her stance on late-term abortions and her ties to a Kansas abortion doctor, George Tiller.
George
Tiller has been the subject of some of the most, um, demonstrative
anti-abortion protests, and not without good reason. Tiller's practice
has been long-known to provide very late-term abortions, and O'Reilly
did a report a few years back claiming to have proof that Tiller did late-term abortions to alleviate temporary depression in the mother.
Catholics for Sebelius
claims that Gov. Sebelius never accepted campaign money from Tiller,
only that he won a reception at a charity auction. Is anyone really
fooling themselves that Sebelius could have declined the reception on
moral grounds? Would Obama be obliged to hold a reception for a KKK
Grand Wizard? Tiller is not an unknown figure in Kansas; he's been
making headlines since at least the mid-80s, when his clinic was
bombed.
I'm sincerely starting to think Obama's going to
yell "LOL! Punkd!", as I'm struggling to understand how so many Obama
appointments can be so wrong.
We have a Treasury Secretary with tax problems;
we have a Secretary of State who wants to overcharge our relations with Russia;
we have a head of the CIA whose intelligence experience consists of how to sneak the bimbos in and out of Clinton's White House;
we have a Director of National Intelligence who has a history of human rights violations;
we have a judge-shopping Attorney General;
we have a Secretary of Education who's planning on 'fixing' No Child Left Behind because his former school district was unable to meet its standards;
we have a Secretary of Labor who was on the board of directors of a pro-labor lobbying group;
we have a Homeland Security Secretary who thinks Canada and veterans are our nation's greatest threats;
we have...well...

and now we have a possible director of Health and Human Services who has accepted campaign and PAC money from what might be the nation's most notorious abortionist.
Did I miss any?
Funniest end of civilization ever.
Posted by: Alice H at
09:26 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 448 words, total size 4 kb.
But according to the left, loving abortion is a feature, not a bug.
I mean, they say they're pro-choice but they're really pro-abortion and anti-humanity (these seem to go together).
Posted by: Moron Pundit at April 24, 2009 08:19 AM (83gRI)
More Obama antics In case you haven't heard, Obama appointed Aneesh Chopra to be the nation's Chief Technology Officer (CTO). Now we have two Indian-Americans in two positions that will make decisions about which government jobs are outsourced to India, and which ones are displaced by H-1Bs...
Posted by: whuptdue at April 24, 2009 08:59 AM (jzgah)
Funny, just yesterday FrnakJ had an article about how he's figured it out.
If you've never seen FrnakJ at his funniest, this is a pretty good example.
In fact, no one seemed to catch on at all during the campaign, and now he’s gotten elected president and keeps trying even wackier stunts. Bowing to the Saudi king, giving a DVD set he bought at Costco to a foreign leader, giving an iPod to the queen of England — they’re all obvious comedy bits. And then there’s his budget. Like every month he throws another trillion on it to see how far he can go before we figure out it’s all a gag.
His logic is impeccable.
Posted by: Veeshir at April 24, 2009 09:06 AM (zXUuJ)
Posted by: alexthechick at April 24, 2009 09:15 AM (SHHaV)
Posted by: twolaneflash at April 24, 2009 09:20 AM (6ZNDC)
Posted by: J David at April 24, 2009 10:01 AM (nhIMs)
My theory all along is that Obama is an empty suited, shit for brains and a heck of lot more people know it than the Democrat Party and MSM want to admit.
I think the reason his cabinet and administration are full of Clinton-era dregs and rank incompetents is because the truly qualified and politically ambitious don't want being part of the worst government in a century on their resume.
Posted by: Go_Fish at April 24, 2009 10:56 AM (CTpRY)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 24, 2009 10:56 AM (ztNrs)
Posted by: eddiebear at April 24, 2009 10:58 AM (wnU1W)
Posted by: J David at April 24, 2009 11:08 AM (nhIMs)
Posted by: Moron Pundit at April 24, 2009 11:12 AM (83gRI)
10:
and look what you and the rest of the "sit out to send a message" crowd have wrought*
*yes, I know I wrote my #9 comment about not feeding trolls, but this requires attention.
Posted by: eddiebear at April 24, 2009 11:22 AM (wnU1W)
I was more wondering why he's commenting here since he left the site long ago.
I too was a little disappointed in the content of the comment.
I mean, he should have accused this site of being AllahPundit-lovers.
That would have rounded out the crazy nicely.
Posted by: Veeshir at April 24, 2009 11:33 AM (ThMnZ)
Posted by: Cigarette Man at April 24, 2009 11:49 AM (NhqJg)
Posted by: ed at April 24, 2009 11:53 AM (vozo7)
At the risk of setting Gabe off on one of his famous rants, I confess I still wonder sometimes if the HA certicates of live birth list "religion" on them. What do you suppose it would have said?
Also, I suppose I am sort of an "Education Troofer" in that I wonder if The Won was The Token Black at Harvard. Since He won't release His grades, I guess we will never know.
So sorry if the Token Black reference pisses all you guys off.
Posted by: TimothyJ at April 24, 2009 02:33 PM (IKKIf)
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at April 24, 2009 05:20 PM (/FiKn)
Since the "approval" rating is based on your improvement in test scores, the extra special ed and ELL students bring down the average enough that we cannot improve by the required amount. We've actually made it a year longer than expected before losing the rating.
Posted by: Eschaton at April 24, 2009 06:09 PM (xdSWw)
But if your programs are so good, why can't the kids make the grades?
I would say you have more sped/ell students because your district is engaged in illegal grouping policy. If you were compliant with LEA, this wouldn't matter. Furthermore, what does your union have to say about this? Nothing as long as all employees are union, right?
Thank the fact that test and IQ scores are so easy to manipulate for keeping your school just above "Fail" status for another year. Yipee! Get ready to reevaluate your ability to put others before yourself in your chosen profession during your school's restructuring as NCLB will never die as long as Ted Kennedy is still on parade.
Posted by: FeFe at April 26, 2009 03:38 PM (NUmos)
Do you mean Fat Ted's no child left behind program is a failure? It appears to me that those who complain about it are from districts that can't measure up while 99% of the others have no problem measuring up.
Posted by: Scrapiron at May 03, 2009 09:34 PM (w7YpG)
Posted by: Kishi at September 01, 2009 12:12 AM (L5phN)
Powered by Minx 1.1.2-pink.








