April 16, 2009

Now this is an interesting question

Forbes has their Billionaire list out and there's some controversy because one of the newcomers is a Mexican drug lord.  This raises an interesting point, if the list is to be a listing of the world's billionaires then why should the source of the funds matter at all?  If he is a billionaire, then he should be listed.  But still, there does seem something a bit odd about including him in that list.

Then again, there's a bunch of Russian tycoons on there and, frankly, I think the drug lord is being way more honest about how he's getting his money.

I do find it fascinating that there's no mention of the fact that there are multiple Waltons on that list yet there's no mention of Wal-Mart in the main article, at least not that I saw.  There's some discussion of it in the blurbs under the pictures, but I would think that some indication that Wal-Mart is doing fairly well would be in order.


Posted by: alexthechick at 03:37 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
13kb generated in CPU 0.02, elapsed 0.2604 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.2489 seconds, 133 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.