April 16, 2009
Now this is an interesting question
Forbes has their Billionaire list out and there's some controversy because one of the newcomers is a Mexican drug lord. This raises an interesting point, if the list is to be a listing of the world's billionaires then why should the source of the funds matter at all? If he is a billionaire, then he should be listed. But still, there does seem something a bit odd about including him in that list.
Then again, there's a bunch of Russian tycoons on there and, frankly, I think the drug lord is being way more honest about how he's getting his money.
I do find it fascinating that there's no mention of the fact that there are multiple Waltons on that list yet there's no mention of Wal-Mart in the main article, at least not that I saw. There's some discussion of it in the blurbs under the pictures, but I would think that some indication that Wal-Mart is doing fairly well would be in order.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Then again, there's a bunch of Russian tycoons on there and, frankly, I think the drug lord is being way more honest about how he's getting his money.
I do find it fascinating that there's no mention of the fact that there are multiple Waltons on that list yet there's no mention of Wal-Mart in the main article, at least not that I saw. There's some discussion of it in the blurbs under the pictures, but I would think that some indication that Wal-Mart is doing fairly well would be in order.
Posted by: alexthechick at
03:37 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 171 words, total size 1 kb.
13kb generated in CPU 0.0538, elapsed 0.142 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.1224 seconds, 133 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
61 queries taking 0.1224 seconds, 133 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.