January 29, 2010

Silky Pony's mistress demanding tapes back from Silky's aide

Wrong, so, so wrong.

Posted by: doubleplusundead at 01:22 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.

January 22, 2010

Caption Contest!


I'm gonna go with: "Dude, Bill...Altoids."

Posted by: Sean M. at 02:59 AM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.

January 21, 2010

Arlen Specter: Chivalrous Gentleman

Look, I agree that politics is a rough and tumble deal, but could you imagine what would have happened had a Republican Man had said this to a Democrat Woman?

Posted by: eddiebear at 10:25 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.

January 20, 2010

I wasn't aware lies were protected speech

I'm surprised the ACLU isn't behind this.

Rick Strandlof may have lied about being a decorated Iraq War veteran, but those lies are protected by the First Amendment, according to his attorney and a civil liberties organization.


He is accused of posing as "Rick Duncan," a wounded Marine captain who received a Purple Heart and a Silver Star. Strandlof used that persona to found the Colorado Veterans Alliance and solicit funds for the organization.


Rutherford Institute attorney Douglas McKusick argues that Strandlof's lies did not "inflict harm" upon the medals he lied about or debase the meaning of the medals for the veterans who actually earned them.

I suppose it's true, lawyers don't have to actually make any sense.

Posted by: Alice H at 12:29 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 128 words, total size 1 kb.

January 18, 2010

In which I piss off everyone

Disclosure: I think the conception of separation of church and state that gets bandied about by most of those attempting to use it to force what is, in effect, pure secularism in the public sphere is absolutely wrong and ignores both the language and intent of the Constitution. Also, if I ever have to hear or talk about the Lemon test again I'm going to curl up in a ball and cry. Also, I think the group that is bringing all this to attention is full of crap.

Having said all that, what the hell is this company thinking?

If you want the military's business, then you play by the miltary's rules.  There are specific rules in place about proselytizing in the Middle East to try to keep that whole pesky Crusade/Holy War thing from gaining credence.  It should also be obvious to anyone with an above room temperature IQ that doing this will open huge huge problems with church and state issues.  We're not talking about a soldier choosing on his own to put these there.  We're talking about a company shipping out the parts with Bible references already on them.  From looking at the pictures, you couldn't get this off absent some major filing work.

Look, if the company doesn't like the rules or doesn't like the idea that it can't ship it's product without some Biblical reference, then try to change the rules.  You'd have my support on that.  Hell, the Scientologists would have my support on that.  But don't go doing this and then whine about help help you're being oppressed.  It infuriates me that organizations that are trying to keep any reference to God out of the public sphere entirely turn around and get support for their claim that there are those who are specifically trying to make there be state support for religion.

It's not okay for the manufacturer of a weapon being sold to the military to put a Biblical reference on that weapon.  Note I'm limiting this to that situation, if a solider wants to write whatever on it, that's different.  But, yeah, this is not that situation.  The company should have known better.  And if the company wanted to do this anyway, then the company bears the costs of doing that.  I'm sorry, but I can't get worked up about this the way I can about kids praying in school.  This is a company who is getting directly paid by the US government to provide a good.  Accepting that contract means accepting all kinds of limitations.

Btw, I really don't believe the guy about the whole Jesus rifles thing.   But still. 

Posted by: alexthechick at 12:52 PM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 446 words, total size 3 kb.

January 15, 2010

Gee, guess who's upset that Palin has a new Fox News gig?

His name rhymes with "Brandrew Grullivan," he's not getting a link, and he seems to think that this is proof of Roger Ailes setting up a "New Political-Media Party" and orchestrating some kind of "FNC-RNC Hostile Take-Over," all the while failing to recognize that he's writing about himself, in part (with my emphasis):

Ailes' new political-media party is fueled by Beck's integration into the paranoid far right, aided by O'Reilly's fading but still significant grip on ageing Reagan-Democrats, and galvanized by Hannity's nightly unvarnished propaganda and endless demonization of all things not-Republican. But until Ailes found Palin - a figure who instantly short-circuits rational thinking in those who support and oppose her, he had not yet found the sub-rational rallying point.
Um, do we know anybody who fits that description? Bueller? Bueller?
This FNC/RNC merger is another threat to reasoned discourse in public life, because it is a showman's concoction of very powerful emotional elements: resentment, sex, religion, anger.
Aaaaaand...is it just me, or does that sound strikingly similar to the blog of a certain somebody? Emotion, resentment, sex, religion, and anger? The only thing that's missing is amateur gynecology.

He then goes on to describe several positions that Fox News has supposedly taken, including that "Obama wants to ignore the war in order to effect a radical transformation of America into some kind of scary version of France and Waziristan" (um, okay, that must have been during their morning show, which I don't really watch, or from the voices in Andrew's head, which only he can hear) before saying...
I'm not exaggerating. Listen to these maniacs.
Those are Andrew Sullivan's italics. And while it kind of sucks to have to descend to the schoolyard level, I don't think it's inappropriate to say, hey, it takes one to know one, you fucking maniac.

Posted by: Sean M. at 01:22 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 312 words, total size 2 kb.

January 11, 2010

Does this make my ass look big?

Why, of course it does! That's why you bought it, right, dear? Oh, shit. Did I say something wrong?

Posted by: Sean M. at 03:49 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.

<< Page 1 of 1 >>
24kb generated in CPU 0.0357, elapsed 0.1342 seconds.
60 queries taking 0.127 seconds, 143 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.