1 Not to go all Allah here, but what really is there to nail Obama on that the Deciders would cover?

2 Interestingly, the video has gone bye-bye.  Hmmmmm...

3

This is a potentially huge story ... with pretty far-reaching implications.  Definitely enough substance there to make it worth paying attention to.  We'll see if the MSM can spike it or not.  

4

Yeah, too many cut-outs.

Though the financing thing is interesting.

5 Hey, 'pinto.  Still hate me?

6 Yeah, I think how far this goes is gonna rely on how far the media will go to embargo it, which means the talk radio people and talking heads are going to have to carry the ball on this.

7

You know, if the Bush Administration would grow some balls and actually go after Obama for all the illegal shit he's doing (undercutting negotiations with Iraq, anyone) we wouldn't have to rely on a hostile media to publisize this. 

Just order the FEC to look into it.  Period.  That would get huge attention and possibly destroy the Obama campaign for good.

8

Realistically, there's little Bush can do without it getting real nasty real quick.  We don't want this to become a country where whenever one party loses power its leaders go to jail, which is where some people wish it was heading (Joe Biden, I'm looking at you here). 

Or a country where running against a leader means you'll be prosecuted for byzantine infractions of elections law (and face it, there are plenty of byzantine laws out there, thank you John McCain).  The sword cuts both ways on this one.

The best thing is to prosecute those surrogates who cross the line (ie ACORN), issue a few private warnings to Obama if necessary, and then hope that nothing egregious happens between now and election day.

Because if it becomes a scenario where the promise is that the election's losers are going to jail, voilence and rigged elections will surely follow.

This ends my serious pontifications for the month.