September 16, 2010

Please oh please oh please be true

I'll admit, I'm a bit skeptical about how accurate this is, considering it says all the things I want to hear, but if this is wishcasting, baby, I'm wishing on a star.

Posted by: alexthechick at 04:45 PM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Holy cow...all he needs is an "enemies list" and he is the socialist Nixon. Though he probably has a list by now

Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 16, 2010 04:59 PM (+bSoE)

2

It's worse than that LC, as Nixon was a hard worker.  Paranoid, certainly, and a mess on policy, but he did work his ass off.

The whole article reads as true because that's exactly what it looks like from the outside.  The guy has zero skills except being a BS artist.  Great for campaigning, but you have to keep moving up to keep the BS train rolling.  Once you've hit the peak, then you have to perform or you're finally gonna get called on your BS, which is what's happening now.   Being a completely empty suit, he's now totally lost.

The only thing I disagree with in that article is the chance for his reelection.  He simply can't run away from all his BS at this point -- there's nowhere left to run to.

Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 16, 2010 05:08 PM (sqGe2)

3 I agree, HD...Nixon did work his ass off. I just find it rather pathetic that this man-child is suffering from that kind of paranoia.

I remember watching him a few weeks after the inaguration, and I thought he looked spooked (heh!), like he had a "What now?" look on his face. And that was true...he was wondering what to do now. He has no concept of work, or job. And now that he is trusted with the most important job in the country (some would argue), he wants to shelve it for ESPN.

What a useless bag of hairclippings he is.

Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 16, 2010 05:29 PM (+bSoE)

4 all he needs is an "enemies list"

Fox News
Rush Limbaugh
John Boehner
...

Pretty good start

Posted by: Andy at September 16, 2010 07:11 PM (pRbtk)

5 Ohhhhhh...that felt...sinfully good.
 Who is newsflavor? Are they reputable?

Posted by: S. Weasel at September 16, 2010 07:22 PM (TAyEB)

6 My gut says Clinton loyalist looking to stir up shit, may all be true, who knows.  Sounds about right given his performance in office.

Posted by: doubleplusundead at September 16, 2010 07:22 PM (S1+SK)

7 I'm expecting a very public meltdown after the November elections.  He is an extremely mentally unstable man.  Narcissistic Personality Disorder is a diagnosable mental illness, plus the man is an extreme sociopath.  You can't hide that kind of thing forever when you're in the most high-profile job in the world.

Posted by: Laura Castellano at September 16, 2010 07:38 PM (fuw6p)

8  Who is newsflavor? Are they reputable?

I have no idea and I'm afraid to look in case I have to put my cigarette out. 

Posted by: alexthechick at September 16, 2010 07:46 PM (tOwRr)

9 This looks like some type of Clinton hit piece to me, too. Although I do agree with LC Aggie that Teh One did look rather flabbergasted and lost after the election, as if he did not know what to do next. The "Office of the President-Elect" thing was a huge clue. Unlike Clinton (who could at least appear to govern while still in campaign mode) Obama only knows how to campaign, how to sell bs and make people want to buy or vote for it. But his bs has been exposed as being just that; he is an empty suit who can project well and read from a teleprompter. As Lincoln said- "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me". As far as his re-election in 2012 goes, I do not think he is a shoo-in at all. Hell, I do not even think he is a shoo-in to be re-nominated. Given the popularity and growing influence of the Tea Party, I don't even think the media (with a few hard core liberal exceptions like MSNBC) are going to remain hitched to Obama's wagon much longer. I expect that after the November elections (even if the Democrats manage to hang on to a slim majority) he will have a public meltdown (as Laura said) and blame the MSM for his setbacks, and his supporters will abandon his ship like rats.  

Posted by: DaveK at September 17, 2010 09:50 AM (boNGU)

10

I have no idea and I'm afraid to look in case I have to put my cigarette out.

Coffee. Spit. Keyboard. U Owe Me Replacement.

...thread winnah!

Posted by: davis,br at September 17, 2010 11:03 AM (uCShA)

11 Perhaps just priming  for when he doesn't run in 2012?

Posted by: 2keyboards at September 17, 2010 12:18 PM (TYx+g)

12 2keyboards beat me to it! Rats!

I was just thinking that - if this is true (oh, god, please yes!) - then they may just be setting things up for an LBJ-like "I will not seek/accept a second term..." speech in a year or so.

That would clear the field in '12 for all Dems, including Hillary (who now has a sec-state feather in her hat along with the senator feather.)

I believe "any" decent Republican could beat O'Bugger in '12, but not so against "any" Dem'. That's a different can o' crap altogether.

Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at September 17, 2010 01:32 PM (/cH23)

13

It smells of truth.  Especially the dismisive distaste for Palin and Romney, that is a professional political hack's attitude.  (sniff...)  Actually the article reeks of Truth.

 

Posted by: toadbile at September 17, 2010 05:12 PM (r/lfO)

14 I always loved the irony of Joe Biden's foreign-policy "street cred" after so many on the left laughed at GWB's selection of Cheney as veep. Old and busted: Republican chooses an older running mate to beef up his foreign policy side. New hotness: Democrat chooses and older running mate to beef up his foreign policy side!

Posted by: Greg at September 17, 2010 09:53 PM (iZV52)

15 I see nothing in the source article worth believing.

But I agree, would be great if it were true, but can only be gauged if the person were named, and even then just one source is something we dislike on our side, and to praise as it happens on theirs is unseemly.

The author seems more than a little lacking in background and all too often snarky.

But Maybe Dan Rather can attach himself to it, to prove that it is fake but true.

Posted by: douglas at September 17, 2010 10:50 PM (uU+Ss)

16 Love your blog! Its nice to read reviews of true natural products from someone you can really trust! Also love vapour. I would love for you to review the new liquid foundation.

Posted by: website design perth at September 16, 2011 01:39 AM (BeP7C)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






26kb generated in 0.0503 seconds; 67 queries returned 163 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.