January 31, 2009
Money well spent
Behold
Stimulus Watch, which gives you an idea of what we'll be getting for our billions. I particularly liked this one:
Forks
of the Road Heritage Trail. This project would greatly enhance one of
the primary gateways to our city by creating an African American/Ethnic
Heritage Trail along a stretch of St. Catherine Street between the
Forks of the Road Slave Market Site
All for a cool $600,000,000. Which the site estimates will create a whopping 65 jobs in the Natchez, MS area. Yay!
(Via
Moron Central.)
Posted by: Sean M. at
10:48 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm going to propose a 'White Man's Burden" trail. I'll mark out a path between home, school, work, the tax office, and the place where you got mugged because the government is wasting money on stupid shit instead of actual infrastructure.
I can deliver this for approx. $100,000 ($1,000 for signage, $4,000 for labor and my very modest $95,000 management fee). Talk about value!
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 31, 2009 11:00 PM (WhFvm)
2
Did you see the item for "Patrol rifles"? It's almost $400K for rifles for a Florida PD.
That makes me wonder if the website isn't full of crap. I mean, what Dem would put that in there?
Posted by: Veeshir at February 01, 2009 11:34 AM (ThMnZ)
3
That makes me wonder if the website isn't full of crap. I mean, what Dem would put that in there?Democrat elites have nothing wrong with enhancing state power through police, though they occasionally throw crumbs to their anti-cop wing.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at February 01, 2009 12:35 PM (fDw+c)
4
Thank you for good post.
Posted by: Misyon5ice at January 03, 2011 04:07 PM (UHkQR)
Posted by: カルティエ ジュエリー at January 13, 2011 01:43 AM (cOLKv)
6
There could be
shanghai escort typically two reasons for which a car owner buys keyless remotes and keys.
Posted by: shanghai massage at June 29, 2011 07:18 AM (6BrkU)
7
So fun article is! I agree the idea
Posted by: Red Bottom Shoes at August 27, 2011 04:52 PM (J7EjZ)
8
Good article,this is really useful for me
Posted by: Reebok Shoes at August 27, 2011 04:52 PM (J7EjZ)
Posted by: harrie at February 17, 2012 01:22 AM (xiQiE)
Posted by: GraceBlood at March 21, 2012 02:34 AM (0I5Up)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I think we just found one way Obama will preserve jobs
Mandate itOn Friday, Obama issued an executive order that requires all new contractors who win a service contract to include a clause that requires them to give the right of first refusal to the workers under the prior contract. The new contractor cannot hire anyone new until the right of first refusal has been been provided. Why the hell would anyone bid on a new contract if the new company isn't allowed to bring in its own employees?
And of course there's an exemption provision, of course there is. I see no situations in which the director of an agency would possibly decide that, nope, this won't apply to this contract. None at all!
Worst. End of Civilization. Ever.
Posted by: alexthechick at
12:44 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So when does Dear Leader, whom henceforth I will only refer to as "44", issue the Anti Dog Eat Dog Act??? John Galt, call your office....
Posted by: mr fixit at January 31, 2009 03:59 PM (Ir2QL)
Posted by: smithover at November 09, 2011 03:28 AM (x6pn+)
Posted by: samjenny at December 19, 2011 05:49 AM (blhxK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 30, 2009
Fun with Identity Politics
I would try to make some jokes
about this, but, well, the jokes write themselves.
Um, not so much
jokes, if you will, as, well, death threats. I'm sure some Reichwing RethugliKKKans were responsible. Yeah.
Posted by: Sean M. at
05:29 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't have enough white folks making my clothing. I should be more careful where I shop.
Posted by: Alice H at January 30, 2009 09:39 AM (jRtPb)
2
Michelle's reaction: "I'm so rich and powerful I am white."
Posted by: snaggletoothie at January 30, 2009 02:18 PM (9m+gW)
3
Hello,
Today surfing the web I found a site selling original windows 7 key and windows DVDs, http://www.onlinekey.org
the key is priced at $20, . It also has other licenses at discounted prices. You may also request a copy of the installation DVD and the dvd will be sent to you through USPS.
wholesale windows 7 product key
free windows 7 download
cheap windows 7 product key
cheap office 2007 product key
cheap office 2010 plus product key
cheap windows xp product key
Norton 360 product key
Windows 7 Ultimate key (32/64 bits dvds) 30$
Windows 7 Professional key (32/64 bits dvds) 20$
Windows 7 Home Premium key (32/64 bits dvds) 20$
Office 2010 Professional plus key (32/64 bits dvds) 30$
Office 2007 Ultimate key (dvd)20$
Office 2007 Professional key (dvd) 20$
xbox 4000
xbox 12 + 1
The key only works with the final retail versions of Windows 7 and office The page URL is: http://www.onlinekey.org
According to users who have bought works perfectly , and the complete Windows passes validation Windows Genuine Advantage.
Posted by: tjacky at July 26, 2010 03:15 AM (qwMAN)
4
The first could be that
shanghai massage he/she owns an older car model that was manufactured without the keyless functions incorporated in it and
shanghai escort wants one installed. Another is
Posted by: shanghai massage at June 29, 2011 08:01 AM (6BrkU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 29, 2009
Marion Barry Is In Trouble Again
This is not a recording.
Note to Marion Barry: Tax Day 2009 is Wednesday, April 15.
While we're at it, Tax Day 2010 is Thursday, April 15.
You may want to circle those dates on your calendar right about ... now.
Why the reminder? It seems the Mayor For Life didn't file his tax returns (yet again) for 2007, according to the Washington Post.
This news comes after Barry pleaded guilty in 2005 to two misdemeanor tax charges and admitted to not filing his taxes from 1999 to 2004. So he didn't pay most of the taxes he owed on more than $500,000 in income. Big whoop, right? If the nation's treasury secretary can't figure out this whole taxes thing, who can?
Barry, who now makes more than $92,000 per year as a council member, had no comment for the Post and didn't let on to when he might file his taxes.
Posted by: eddiebear at
05:28 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 158 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Marion Barry at January 29, 2009 08:38 PM (6/6mo)
Posted by: Don Carne at January 29, 2009 08:56 PM (wSNS7)
3
Is he still a crack ho?
Posted by: mare at January 29, 2009 10:49 PM (X1fsj)
4
File this under 'Funniest End of Civilization EVAR!" ... for which you need a category, btw.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 29, 2009 11:00 PM (WhFvm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 28, 2009
What he said
Treacher gets what's going on with the lame celebrity "I Pledge" video that I mentioned
here (and again,
here) several days ago:
Have
you ever spent time around children? I did, before the court order.
When a little kid doesn't get what he wants, the adult who has thwarted
his will is, to borrow a phrase, the Worst Person in the World. But the
second that kid gets what he wants, everything is suddenly wonderful.
It's like for the last 8 years, Bush was the mean babysitter who didn't
let Ashton Kutcher and Ashley Judd eat ice cream for dinner and stay up
past their bedtime. But now they've got a new babysitter and he's so cool and he's promising all sorts of amazing things and oh isn't everything just totally super awesome?
Bullseye.
Anyway,
read the whole thing, and watch about the first half of the video he
has up there, before it segues into a rant about libertarians (unless
you like that sort of thing).
Posted by: Sean M. at
11:36 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, that's about the point where I clicked away too. I don't know whether or not I agree with libertarianism, because I've never stayed awake long enough to think about it.
Posted by: Jim Treacher at January 29, 2009 04:02 PM (cvmgB)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Who could have possibly seen this coming?
It turns out that
a bunch of the money in the Obama stimulus package isn't really meant to stimulate the economy, but is, instead, going to inject cash into a bunch of liberal pet projects.
No,
really?
(
h/t)
Posted by: Sean M. at
11:37 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The best part is that pretty much nobody I know is even remotely aware of this painfully obvious fact (mainly because the media isn't exactly pointing it out...at all).
Posted by: ECM at January 28, 2009 11:47 AM (q3V+C)
2
You have to be willfully ignorant not to know just how bad our government is. Sadly, as ECM notes, many prefer to just bury their heads in the sand and whine about the bad economy.
MSM bias is no longer an excuse as far as I'm concerned. People who ignore the obvious and allow themselves to be spoon-fed by the deciders are the problem. Hell, that's why I'm a hermit. I hate people.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 28, 2009 11:54 AM (WhFvm)
3
Heh, I accused a friend of pretty much that the other day (being "willfully ignorant") after explaining to him the exact details of what's going on--he told me I was just bitter at McCain's loss, completely ignoring the facts of the situation.
The best part is this is only the begining: we're only a week into a Dem-controlled fed government and this is merely a down payment on the madness that is to come and, with a complicit media, there is literally no chance of an effective opposition forming that is characterized as anything other than "obstructionist" and standing in the way of a government-fueled recovery (as if a government, in the history of mankind, has ever led the way out of an economic downturn without massive tax cuts as the spearhead).
We are so fucked! (And I don't say that lightly or to play the role of looney alarmist #373,459.)
Posted by: ECM at January 28, 2009 12:28 PM (q3V+C)
4
Shut UP! Really? I'm shocked! Shocked! Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go collect my winnings.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 28, 2009 01:20 PM (SHHaV)
5
I'm wondering how many millions of it will be spent to reelect Obama.
Posted by: snaggletoothie at January 28, 2009 02:32 PM (9m+gW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
As God As My Witness, I Thought Turkeys Wouldn't Form Gangs
Apparently, some postal route in Kennedy Land is under attack from gangs of wild turkeys.
Nearly every day over the last five months, an average of 10 turkeys — led by a pair of male "ring leaders" — have been chasing and attempting to peck a postal worker on his route along Marmion Way and South Street.
Rockport Post Office Delivery Manager Tim Russell said slippery sidewalks and territorial dogs are common challenges for his carriers, but over the 22 years he's worked for the U.S. Postal Service, he's never seen anything quite like this.
"Some of the neighbors said their dogs have been attacked, but mostly it's just been our postal truck," Russell said. "They chase the truck down the street — two males in particular — it's just unbelievable."
The local post office stopped delivering mail to several South Street homes after an incident Jan. 15 when a number of passers-by stopped to help the postal worker as he was being chased by the quick-trotting turkeys.
"Last week, people had to intervene so (the mail carrier) could get back to his truck," Russell said yesterday. "He was trying to wave a bag full of mail at the turkeys as he ran when some folks pulled over to shoo the turkeys away."
For weeks prior to the incident, Russell said the mail carrier had tried to park the truck out of sight or change the time of day he was delivering the mail to that area, but nothing worked.
Posted by: eddiebear at
10:02 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Funniest End of Civilization Ever.
Turkeys are attacking federal gov't officials....and winning.
I would remind these geniuses that turkeys taste good and that they're far more afraid of shotguns than umbrellas.
My favorite quote? Glad you asked
Russell said if the umbrella doesn't work, postal workers will have to come up with a "plan B."
50$ says that, unlike every Plan B that's ever worked since the 1400s, this one will not include firearms.
If this was happening in a non-Democrat run state, they would have been deep fried weeks ago.
Posted by: Veeshir at January 28, 2009 10:55 AM (zXUuJ)
2
I like the synergy between Kennedy and Wild Turkey.
Posted by: Sockless Joe at January 28, 2009 11:03 AM (tzEdT)
3
In PA, we have this thing called "hunting" that takes care of wild turkeys.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at January 28, 2009 04:24 PM (D2cBI)
4
I respect your work , good information with good examples. I appreciate your work and expect more post from your end.
Posted by: Website Design at May 03, 2012 12:01 AM (hJUD9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 27, 2009
I'm sure this will be effective
A
petition to tell big bad Rush Limbaugh how much he hurt your widdle feewings.
Stand strong against Rush Limbaugh’s Attacks — sign our petition, telling Rush what you think of his attacks on President Obama. We’ll send Limbaugh your comments.
I'm guessing talking to Rush about your bruised feelings will be about as effective as talking to Iran about their nuclear program. And I'm still stymied by why the libtards are so threatened by conservative radio that they're up in arms over every little thing that's said.
If any of you send a coded message to Rush, please post it in the comments so we can all laugh at it too.
Posted by: Alice H at
10:59 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The funniest thing about all of this is that the Democrats are basically legitimizing Limbaugh and his opinions. They find what he says to be so powerful that they now have a letter-drive to tell Limbaugh what people think?
I'll bet you anything that Limbaugh takes this and then reads some of the comments on the air.
Democrats were bragging about how the last 8 years Rush has fallen off because Republicans were in power (which is quite the opposite), but now they are only ensuring his voice becomes louder than ever.
Posted by: conservativeinthecity at January 27, 2009 11:04 PM (AxoS/)
2
*eyeroll*
Like people have been saying in various blog comments, funniest end of civilization ever. I wonder if the ancient Romans, observing the fall of their empire, got as many laughs out of it as we are getting.
(I will read Gibbon one of these days. I will, I will!)
Posted by: Mrs. Peel at January 27, 2009 11:23 PM (nSsz2)
3
CiC:
This is part of the reason Rush, O'Reilly, et al. refused to mention Olbermann or Franken at all. They never wanted to legitimize them as rivals.
Posted by: eddiebear at January 27, 2009 11:26 PM (wD72y)
4
Dear Mr. Limbaugh,
Really, we need to get beyond this nonsense.
Obama is trying to bring us together.
Please take that into account before trashing him again.
Democrats and Republicans,
Every one of us,
All proud Americans,
Depend on his success.
Partisan sniping is not the answer.
I know we can all get along.
Now is the time for unity.
Keep that in mind.
Our country depends on it.
Shame on you if you can't accept that Change has come.
Posted by: Sean M. at January 28, 2009 02:48 AM (rLWHv)
5
That's BEAUTIFUL, Sean. I'm sure Rush will appreciate it.
Posted by: Alice H at January 28, 2009 11:06 AM (jRtPb)
Posted by: Alice H at January 28, 2009 01:37 PM (jRtPb)
7
Dear Mr. Limbaugh,
During this historic time, pointing out the socialistic agenda of our new President, does nothing to help him achieve the changes he hopes to bring. The President clearly pointed out to the Republicans that they should not listen to you. Sadly given the vote this evening in the house, too many of them are not following the guidance of the President. If you continue to speak such truthful things about our President, the minority party will only strengthen their resolve to stand firm against the President's wishes. Please remember this every day you are on the radio.
Posted by: crashland at January 28, 2009 08:44 PM (4ox4M)
Posted by: george bil at January 10, 2011 06:48 AM (h26Hw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The forgotten victims
The new Age of Obama has been tough on a lot of us, but there's one group of poor, downtrodden souls who haven't received much attention—
liberal political cartoonists who are having trouble ridiculing The One:
After poking fun at George W. Bush for eight years — often drawing him with big ears and a severe overbite, or as a gung-ho Joe College type, or simply as a clueless doofus — political cartoonists are finding Barack Obama a more elusive target.
Bush's emotive facial expressions, easy-to-caricature physical features and, most of, all his deeply unpopular political decisions were fodder for liberal-leaning cartoonists. But the cool and detached Obama enters the White House at a time of considerable economic anxiety, bolstered by wishes of goodwill even from some political opponents.
"I had all my villains in place for eight years and they've been taken away," lamented Pulitzer Prize winner Pat Oliphant, one of the most widely syndicated cartoonists. "I don't know that I've ever had this experience before, of a president I maybe like. This is an antagonistic art. We're supposed to concentrate on finding things wrong. There's no point in drawing a cartoon that's favorable."
Awwwww. Doesn't your heart just bleed for the poor dears? No? Well, frankly, mine doesn't either. Fuck 'em.
Posted by: Sean M. at
09:33 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 214 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Gee. *taps chin* I can think of no possible physical characteristic that President
Dumbo Obama has that could possibly be caricatured. Not a one!
Posted by: alexthechick at January 27, 2009 10:39 PM (DMkhn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Well, if Al Franken can do it...
It seems that a friend of Blago's had an interesting idea about who he ought to offer Obama's Senate seat to...
"She seemed to be someone who had helped Barack Obama in a significant way become president," Blagojevich said. "She was obviously someone with a much broader bully pulpit than other senators."
Click here to find out who he was talking about, and check under your seat for a surpriiiiiise!
Posted by: Sean M. at
03:13 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
This Much Common Sense Must Not Be Allowed!
Undoubtedly, attempts by the state of New Jersey to require High School Seniors to take basic finance courses is too good to survive the stupidity that is The Government.The Senate Education Committee approved a pilot program in personal financial education despite concerns about overloading the high school curriculum.
Sen.
Jim Whelan, D-Absecon, expressed concerns about adding requirements to
the high school curriculum without extending the length of the school
day.
The New Jersey Education Association says financial
lessons can be incorporated into existing coursework in business,
economics, math or home economics.
Overloading the curriculum? I didn't know "Flag Burning 101" took up that much time. I guess Big Brother can't allow the precious snowflakes to learn a thing or two about handling money. That might *gasp* make them think for themselves and not rely upon the Magic Unicorns for everything.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:49 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Don't worry. I'm sure they will teach "liberal" finance. You know, how to apply for food stamps, welfare, section 8, WIC, etc. Oh, and how to run up your credit cards and declare bankruptcy.
Posted by: PDot at January 27, 2009 01:35 AM (5DhtJ)
2
It's gonna be hard to teach basic personal finance (like balancing a checkbook) if you can't teach students how to do basic math first.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 27, 2009 01:44 AM (WhFvm)
3
Yeah, this makes actual sense which means that it must not occur.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 27, 2009 09:08 AM (SHHaV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 26, 2009
The pot just called the kettle delusional
While grousing about his inclusion on a Forbes' list of the
25 Most Influential Liberals In The U.S. Media, Andi Sullivan writes the following (link goes to Forbes.com, not St. Andrew of the Blessed Heart-Ache, by the way):
Sure,
I opposed the McCain-Palin ticket, although I made McCain a close
second as my favorite in the primaries [after Ron Paul—ed]. No sane
person, in my judgment, could have supported the farcical inclusion of
an absurdly under-qualified and delusional crackpot like Palin as a
potential president of the United States.
This, from a
demented, vag-o-phobic Trig Truther who has spent endless hours
smearing Sarah Palin and her innocent children in a quixotic quest to
"ask questions" about whether or not she had actually given birth to
her own infant son. Not to mention the fact that he once
Questioned the Timing™ of the announcement that a terror plot had been
broken up
because of Ned Lamont's Connecticut Senate primary win. What the fuck business does this douche have contemplating anything about the choices "sane" people might make?
I'd say I hope he dies in a fire, but that's too good for him.
Posted by: Sean M. at
03:57 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 195 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Well, Andi is kind of the Platonic Ideal of delusional crackpottery so he would know. Also, what was she delusional about? That she actually gave birth to her own son?
Posted by: alexthechick at January 26, 2009 09:14 AM (SHHaV)
2
Andrew Sullivan makes me so irritated/angry I lose the ability to form sentences.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at January 26, 2009 09:17 AM (83gRI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 25, 2009
Leonard Pitts, dishonest, sanctimonious twat
He asks this about
Rush's hope that Obama fails to enact his agenda,
``I hope he fails.''
Do you ever say that about your president
if you are an American who loves your country? Would you say it about
George W. Bush, who was disastrous; about Bill Clinton, who was slimy;
about Jimmy Carter, who was inept; about Richard Nixon, who was
crooked? You may think he's going to fail, yes. You may warn he's going
to fail, yes.
But do you ever hope he fails? Knowing his failure is the country's failure? Isn't that, well . . . disloyal?
Hey Lenny, your pipe?
Put this in, start smoking. That collection of quotes isn't even the tip of the iceberg, it's a few molecules that make up a microscopic sliver of the iceberg. I'm done listening to dishonest twats like you who want to pretend the endless stream of
treasonous and
vile shit spewed endlessly from the liberal elite and nutroots these past eight years never happened.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
01:18 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Also, there's a world of difference between hoping someone fails in their agenda, and hoping that some disaster happens simply because the prez is of the opposite party.
I too hope Obama fails in his agenda, but I'm not going to go around frothing at the mouth about it. I hate politics of personal destruction, but that's got nothing to do with opposing policies I believe are bad for the country.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 25, 2009 01:33 PM (WhFvm)
2
I seem to recall quite a few of us wishing for failure on Bush's part a couple of summers ago during Shamnesty...
Posted by: Alice H at January 25, 2009 03:16 PM (jRtPb)
Posted by: doubleplusundead at January 25, 2009 03:27 PM (D2cBI)
4
"Knowing his failure is the country's failure?"
In other words "Only liberalism can save us".
Posted by: blackrockmarauder at January 25, 2009 06:03 PM (GvgvT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 23, 2009
President Obama
Fuck. You.Update: Obama's immediate hubris, arrogance and lack of
nuance in the first week of his presidency confirms my greatest fear.
This is the end game for the left. They believe the 2008 election was the G.O.P.'s Waterloo.
They aren't just going to lead from the center in an attempt to maintain slim electoral majorities. They intend this to be the end. Obama believes they have enough momentum and majority to finish it and they will act with all the entitlement and lack of diplomacy that such a mentality implies.
Some predictions. They will, before the end of this term, remove the Senate rule that requires 60 votes to close debate; the so-called Nuclear Option. They will also attempt to bring back the Fairness Doctrine (as a commenter points out).
In their mind, this is
the last 8 years of two-party Democracy in America. And why not? A bare majority of the population which will only grow with increased entitlements and (il)legal immigration. Soon, a majority of American's will take more from the government than they put in, ensuring that those that pay for government will be too few to change anything. They have a media so supportive that they come with an underwire.
They have every advantage and this time there will be no pussy-footing around. This is for keeps.
Don't say you weren't warned.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at
11:11 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 229 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Here comes the Fairness Doctrine. Who can sense the chilling wind?
Posted by: blackrockmarauder at January 23, 2009 11:14 PM (GvgvT)
2
Hubris hampered Clinton's first two years. If they try to kill off the Right once and for all, they'll reap the whirlwind.
The GOP rose from the ashes of the Whigs. The idiocracy of the Left might be able to stamp down the party, but they can't kill conservatism.
Posted by: sulla at January 23, 2009 11:57 PM (tlFbX)
3
I only brought up the Fairness Doctrine because if I were inclined to get it through, I would do so under the aegis of being the best way to get things done for the country.
I don't want to sound unhinged. That is what I think.
He may very well just like using the bully-pulpit steer people to his preferred communication channels.
I am confident that even liberals (the ones who don't work in D.C.) would be appalled by the Fairness Doctrine, so it probably isn't that likely. However, seeing Chuckie Schumer salivate while comparing political censorship to "decency" censorship is not very encouraging.
Posted by: blackrockmarauder at January 24, 2009 12:50 AM (GvgvT)
4
Never thought we would need Radio Free America in America.
Posted by: turtle at January 24, 2009 09:04 AM (sZPLX)
5
Well that's not depressing.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 24, 2009 09:14 AM (6ecGF)
6
So doe this fall under stupid or evil, MP? You're slacking off on the running total...
Posted by: Alice H at January 24, 2009 09:29 AM (jRtPb)
7
I bet Rush is loving the free publicity.
Posted by: snaggletoothie at January 24, 2009 10:52 AM (9m+gW)
8
May I suggest that if such a think happens (and I think you very well could be right), we are headed toward war on our own country fought by those who wish to take up arms and save our republic!?
Good post. Was suggested to me on twitter. :-)
Oh, and p.s. with Obama, anything is likely, so don't be so sure he won't somehow get that fairness doctrine passed after his latest slam at Limbaugh.
Posted by: Tami at January 24, 2009 11:38 AM (yTr9O)
9
http://www.mises.org/books/TRTS/
Perfect link for us morons: "The Road to Serfdom" in comic (oops, I mean graphic novel) form .
Posted by: mamma b at January 25, 2009 01:21 PM (jvbMh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I Have A Great Idea To Cut Spending
Let's release prisoners early.
"It's the length of stay that is driving our high incarceration rate in this state," Department of Corrections Director Patricia Caruso told reporters. "People just do a lot more time."
About 12,000, or one-fourth, of Michigan's 48,000 prisoners are beyond their earliest release date. That's down from 17,000 when Granholm took office in 2003.
Policymakers want to pass laws limiting the parole board's discretion to hold inmates beyond their minimum sentence. The requirement would start with prisoners sentenced after April 1 of this year, so those in prison now wouldn't be affected -- though the board already has taken steps on its own to reduce the number of inmates being held beyond their earliest release date.
Outside experts analyzed the prison system during a yearlong review requested by the Democratic governor and legislative leaders. The bipartisan report released Thursday by the Council of State Governments was backed by legislators and administration officials who worked on the project.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:58 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 169 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Same stuff going on in CA. Rather than make prisons more efficient, the Dems just want to let the inmates go. And the next step is getting them the right to vote.
Posted by: PDizzle at January 23, 2009 01:52 PM (5DhtJ)
2
Well, there's only so much they can do to make prisons efficient, given what the courts have mandated that prisons must provide. But this would certainly be a case of penny-wise and pound-foolish.
Posted by: XBradTC at January 23, 2009 02:23 PM (1eLHw)
Posted by: chad at January 23, 2009 02:33 PM (Fdmhw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 22, 2009
More class acts from the left during the Ball for wounded vets
After most of the acts bailed on performing at the last minute, and of course Our Lord and Savior too, George Clinton and P. Funk agreed to perform...
great, until they decided to roll out a huge FUCK GEORGE banner. They're claiming the banner was for George Clinton, but a bunch of the vets bailed on the ball as a result.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
02:41 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 72 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Clinton, Bootsy, and P-funk are one of the great live bands of all time. It's not stated why the other 'celebs' pulled out, but it's rather obvious it's because Obama wasn't going to show up. To their credit, P-funk showed up instead, and I'd trade the group of assholes listed over at Gateway for P-funk any day.
Because they're all about giving a great show, and because "One fellow band member seemed to notice people walking out and quickly ripped the sign down," I'm tempted to give the band the benefit of the doubt on their explanation. And I'm normally the last person to give celebs any slack.
My verdit ... stupid, but without malice.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 22, 2009 03:23 PM (WhFvm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Question to all those blue collar guys who voted for Obama
You feeling stupid this morning? You should be. Of course, if you're like Western PA, no matter how shitty the Democrats treat you, no matter how often they spit on you and degrade you, you'll just turn around and say "please sir, may I have another?"
Oh, and there's this line from Rangel,
RANGEL: And one thing you can depend on, you don’t have to be worried
about what the middle-class is gonna do. Things are so bad. They have
to put food on their tables. Clothes for their kids. Get them in
school. I think this is a tremendous opportunity for a stronger America.
No words can describe how disturbing it is to read that.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
11:38 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 127 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There's a reason why a lot of the long-term unemployed are that way -- they don't want to work. So yeah, let's give money to the laziest people who will stand around leaning on shovels all day.
Hell, I'm lazy and can lean on a shovel. Unfortunately I'm also a white male, so I guess I'm SOL.
On the other hand, if the government is hell-bent on spending the money, the one thing I'd like to see it spent on is training. My idea of training is vastly different from the Government's, however. Means tested, up or out (weed out the bums), training in practical fields would help those who are willing to work and in real need of a job.
Give a man a fish ... etc.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 22, 2009 12:19 PM (WhFvm)
2
Every day I'm stunned and amazed at the hate, stupidity and racism that comes out of our tolerant, caring, oh-so-intelligent Left.
I'm also stunned that nobody seems to care. Bush frees millions and he's evil. Carter condemns millions to slavery and worse (for instance, in "certifying" Chavez's election before even getting to the country, or helping the Arafish or not helping the Shah or... well, he's not History's Greatest Monster for nothing) and yet on the one hand we have Chimpy McBusHitler while on the other we have St. Jimmeh.
On the third hand, I'm sure we're in the Funniest End of Civilization Ever so watching St. Jimmeh mess with St. Jimmeh Jr's* foreign policy will be darn funny. Right until cities around the world start disappearing in nukular fireballs. And having Hillary trying to torpedo him from the inside to clear the way for her run in 2012 (before she needs too much botox and starts to look like Pelosi) will be the icing on the cake. Radioactive, glowing icing, but icing nonetheless.
I'm thinking it's going to be similar to Constantinople's fall where the leaders were more worried about their domestic opponents than their foreign enemies.
But much funnier.
( *Or is Obama 'St. Jimmeh Sr.' since he's so close to being a demi-god?)
Posted by: Veeshir at January 22, 2009 12:28 PM (zXUuJ)
3
There's still a middle class?
News to us bitter, clinging gun-owners here in Western Pa. who can't
wait for John "somebody shoot that fat bastard" Murtha to import all
the detainees from Gitmo to his district--so he can get more pork to
release them humanely into the wild.
When the former US Steel building comes crashing to the streets of
Pittsburgh, I'll have a good view from across the Mon, and I'll know
who to thank.
Posted by: cbullitt at January 22, 2009 02:34 PM (M/WbE)
4
Murtha's not my fault, damnit. I'm not in his gerrymandered district, but I did contribute to his opponent. If he brings the Gitmo detainees here, I hope they thank him properly by making him the first fatality when they escape.
Posted by: mr fixit at January 22, 2009 04:29 PM (Ir2QL)
5
All day I've been coming back and re-reading that, trying to comprehend what Rangel's saying there. I honestly am not understanding the coded message. Can someone please clarify this for me?
This is not sarcasm, either he's not speaking any English I speak or what he's suggesting is so foreign to my poor little brain that I can't comprehend it...
Posted by: Alice H at January 22, 2009 06:04 PM (jRtPb)
6
I wonder when Thomas Franks will be coming out with
What's The Matter With Pennsylvania? Or
What's The Matter With Michigan?I won't be holding my breath.
Posted by: Sean M. at January 22, 2009 08:13 PM (rLWHv)
7
So I guess with our new treasury sec getting a pass on his little tax problem, that we can assume Rangel isn't going to get his come-uppance, either?
It's good to be in the ruling class, innit?
Posted by: ECM at January 22, 2009 08:48 PM (q3V+C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A name that says "Please have a gay affair with me"
Apparently Portland mayor Sam Adams, the first openly gay mayor of a major city, has been in office less than a month and already has a sex scandal. He slept with a legislative intern who was 17 years old at the time (he's now 21).
The kid's name? Beau Breedlove. Seriously. Gayest name ever in the history of ever.
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at
01:03 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is that real? Gotta be a gay porn name.
Posted by: PDizzle at January 22, 2009 01:12 AM (5DhtJ)
2
It is certainly a real name, but I think the gayest name ever is Matt Leinart.
Just say that name, say it out loud.
Posted by: Two Dogs at January 22, 2009 01:43 AM (VKaVC)
3
It's Portland, no one will care.
(Full disclosure, I'm an Oregonian, born and raised.)
Posted by: A. Weasel at January 22, 2009 02:17 AM (6sfXW)
4
When I saw that on one of my news feeds I thought somehow that and my Bel Ami updates got mixed up.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 22, 2009 09:10 AM (SHHaV)
5
Haha. Love the inside baseball from alexthechick.
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at January 22, 2009 01:12 PM (tWwDt)
6
the phenomenon,
not in time to take emergency measures targeted maintenance.
Over the years,
frequent <a href="http://www.northerfacecoats.com/">north face
winter coats</a> overloading of vehicles through Bridge of the phenomenon
has not been effectively curbed,
Posted by: north face winter coats at November 07, 2011 10:45 PM (5+/bg)
Posted by: B.J. Raji Jersey at November 10, 2011 01:28 AM (xNMOt)
Posted by: Aaron Kampman Jersey at November 10, 2011 01:29 AM (y/peg)
Posted by: James Starks Jersey at November 10, 2011 01:29 AM (1yUs+)
Posted by: Paul Hornung Jersey at November 10, 2011 01:30 AM (TtNyq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 21, 2009
HuffPo Hack: "Hey, let's impeach John Roberts!"; Update
There is no excuse for ruining the Messiah's Ascension. I'm quoting the whole thing* :
There is simply no excuse for United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts bungling the presidential oath of office to such an extent that Barack Obama might need to do it again, at least in private, to ensure the legality of his inauguration.
Roberts should be impeached and removed from office for this unforgivable error. The Constitution requires certain language for a presidential oath of office. Roberts blew it. And if he doesn't understand such things he should be fired for misfeasance of the first order.
I guess this tool missed the fact that two other inauguration oaths have had to be retaken, apparently without requiring the impeachment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. I suppose this new impeachment requirement is what "Changetm" meant. Oh, by the way, you'll never guess which station has hired this genius as a media analyst.
*Good luck suing me, Craigy, I have no money or savings or anything. Certainly no unicorn farm yet.
(h/t)
Update: Even President Obama says that Chief Justice Roberts isn't to blame:
“We’re up there, we’ve got a lot of stuff on our mind, and he actually helped me out on a couple of stanzas there,” Obama told ABC News backstage at the “Neighborhood Ball.”
“So overall, I think it went relatively smoothly and I’m very grateful to him.”
Good on you, Mr. President.
Posted by: It's Vintage, Duh at
11:52 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 249 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Given that there is no constitutional requirement that the Chief Justice administer the oath (indeed, the Constitution doesn't say it needs to be administered at all, just that the incoming President shall take the oath), can we impeach Obama for malfeasance for choosing Roberts to administer the oath?
Posted by: XBradTC at January 22, 2009 12:05 AM (Y/Fc0)
2
I must say, I'm very very glad my New Year's resolution was to drink more. I'm definitely going to need it.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 22, 2009 12:09 AM (GY1/+)
3
I'll bet he would confirm Geithner though, the hypocrite.
Posted by: dfbaskwill at January 22, 2009 09:05 AM (4L5Tl)
4
This guy sounds like a tool. Oh yeah, he works for MSNBC. That's a requirement.
Posted by: conservativebelle at January 22, 2009 04:26 PM (tgneZ)
5
Not surprisingly, he is one of Olbermann's favorite contributors
Posted by: eddiebear at January 22, 2009 04:46 PM (wnU1W)
6
Color me stunned, Eddiebear.
Posted by: conservativebelle at January 22, 2009 05:33 PM (tgneZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
95kb generated in 0.1871 seconds; 82 queries returned 269 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.