An in-depth response
First, everyone go look at the post below this. I'll wait. I know it's going to take awhile. Back? Good.
Here is my in-depth response to this article at the Village Voice.
Fuck. And. You. Listen, you utterly ignorant piece of shit motherfuckers, it is not insane to hold conservative views. It's not. Also? Fuck you for being utterly fucking racist jackwipes. There is no such thing as "white" brain or a "black" brain or any other fucking color (other than, you know, gray) to describe a mind. Fuck you for perpetuating the vile and loathsome concept of racial group think.
Fuck you. I hope that bedbugs infest your offices for the rest of time.
1
I'm sorry. I'm still ...er...um...pondering the last post.
Posted by: Rich at September 29, 2010 12:59 PM (Qrjpn)
2
We've lost our mind because we don't have enough black babies for alligator bait.
And how fucking pathetic is it that I feel the need to add a </sarc> to that, before someone comes and accuses us of actually using black babies for alligator bait? I think sharks really prefer the taste of black babies anyway. Oh, </sarc> again, just in case it wasn't perfectly fucking clear.
Posted by: Alice H at September 29, 2010 04:15 PM (qJHYy)
3
Well, figures the guy can get away with this shit. He's black.
I did read the comments, and I'm heartened to see that some liberals didn't take kindly to it. Only some, though....
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 29, 2010 06:03 PM (+bSoE)
4
Two words equal the sum total of this "author": Dick Head.
Lovely to see racism alive and well in America.... coming predominantly from the left.
Posted by: Angie at September 29, 2010 09:42 PM (m6qM/)
9
Resources much like the one anyone reveal here are going to be very cooperative in my opinion! I will certainly post one of the links to this page on our blog. More than likely my guests will quickly realize that quite significant. http://www.hermeshandbagoutlet.com
Posted by: hermes birkin at October 24, 2011 10:07 PM (me19U)
10
Khaki fits convey the impression that you just Karen Millen
dresses undoubtedly are a sensible minded individual and much more
of the workaholic. Please remember there's a extremely broad variety of khaki
coloring - from Karen
Millen sale the brightness beige hue to some darker brown shade.?
Charcoal gray fits would be Karen Millen dresses
UK the chosen selection of various since it assignments an picture
of authority, and professionalism. It can be an great selection for males of all
age groups and might be put on for the two semi-official and standard functions.
Possibly one of the most versatile color, it appears beneficial with nearly any
colored shirt or tie imaginable.? There may be a broad variety of brown coloring
fits from the brightness brown to some deep chocolate brown. Brown coloring fits
are much more put on on much less formal and casual events. For long, brown was
not regarded an suitable coloring for company meets.
11
But considering that then, the tendency has Karen Millen
dresses transformed and nowadays you see gentlemen putting on brown
fits with assurance on nearly all occasions. if you ever reside in the chilly Karen Millen
UK climate city, a tan match is perfect for spring and summer.?
brightness Gray is regarded by various since the perfect coloring for spring and
summer time Karen
Millen dresses online months. The a single unique element of
brightness gray coloring match is it will go nicely with any complexion color.
The brightness gray match together with white, brightness blue and nearly any
pale colored shirt make an great combination.? various folks fail to recognize
the grandeur of light suits. if you ever can disregard the community thoughts
and opinions and go dressed in the light coloring suit, you will undoubtedly be
appreciated for the boldness.
CHRIS
MATTHEWS, HOST: You know, a great question, Charles, that wasn't on my
list to ask but I'm going to ask you because you seem like a
sophisticated guy of many parts. You think business can sit on those
billions and trillions of dollars for two more years after they screw
Obama this time? Are they going to keep sitting on their money so they
don't invest and help the economy for two long years to get Mr.
Excitement Mitt Romney elected president? Will they do that to the
country?
1
To paraphrase Denis Leary - we can't smoke them, Chris, you've already smoked them all!
Posted by: alexthechick at September 27, 2010 10:42 PM (bQ5xy)
2
You what would make a "great question?" something that didn't require 6 sentences and 9 phrases to qualify before offering an interrogative prior to giving a leading answer.
He engages in political interrogation the way a vaccuum cleaner salesman describes his product. "Look at all of that filth, noone wants that in their house, do you have children? Do you want those kids crawling around in this stuff? I mean, this is a great machine! am I right?, I know you care about your kids, so what do you think?"
It's not a question, it's a projective statement.
Should not exist in "journalism" but it's the standard.
Posted by: douglas at September 28, 2010 03:38 AM (uU+Ss)
3
I plan to uncork MY billions just as soon as that bastard is out of office.
:rolleyes:
Posted by: kermit at September 28, 2010 03:47 AM (t4Dyt)
4
To answer the question in the headline, I'm paranoid.
But I'm not stupid and I try to avoid willful ignorance. That makes my paranoia much more constructive.
Personally I don't think Matthews believes that, I think that he thinks that people who watch him believe that
When you're fighting for an audience with Rachel Maddow, well, you need to bring out Teh Crazy.
It's about affirmation not information.
Posted by: Veeshir at September 28, 2010 04:47 PM (u5xHx)
5
I enjoyed your entries on Toxic Words - such great thoughts and a wonderful reminder to watch the words I use - to be positive and kind and use words to build up rather than tear down.
6
Resources much like the one anyone reveal here are going to be very cooperative in my opinion! I will certainly post one of the links to this page on our blog. More than likely my guests will quickly realize that quite significant. http://www.hermeshandbagoutlet.com
Posted by: hermes birkin at October 24, 2011 10:08 PM (me19U)
7
Thanks for sharing excellent informations. Your site is so cool. I'm impressed by the details that you've on this web site. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this website page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found just the info I already searched all over the place and just couldn't come across. What an ideal web-site.
we've got many new users here who recently got an Apple iPod touch or an www.itunes.com/download. To use it you must first download and www.itunes.com. The instructions to download it and install it are below. itunes.com is needed in order to sync your device, and also to download or sync applications or music from the App Store.
Posted by: jaskca at December 31, 2011 12:42 AM (AuXUx)
Those stupid hippies
There's an additional fire insurance policy that can be purchased to have a company come in and spray your house down with fire-retardant chemicals and take some other fire-preventive measures if your house is in danger of being consumed by a wildfire. The company (Chubb Wildfire Defense) that provides this service has a written understanding with local firefighting services regarding what they will and won't do. Chubb's work possibly was responsible for saving ten houses that were within the burn zone and were covered by their policies.
So what's the reaction from a local Boulderite?
"When you don't have that policy and someone else
does, it sets up a have and have-nots kind of feeling," she said.
I'm not going to provide links here, but this poor have-not's two-bedroom, one-bath house was valued at over $400,000 prior to the fire, and prior to the housing crash is was valued at almost $600,000. So I'm going to make a wild-assed guess that she might have been financially able to purchase a policy that included this protection. She had Allstate insurance, there's no reason she couldn't have purchased from Chubb instead.
So I'm curious...Is it better to have ALL your neighbors' houses burn down than to allow a few of them to buy extra protection for their houses to protect their investments? Or would it be better to just raise everyone's rates so they can all have this sort of protection?
It's this same sort of stupidity that's creating a lot of the health care debate. People buy low-end policies and then are surprised when they don't get high-end treatment. And there's no way we can give low rates to everyone and expect everyone to get high-end treatment; math just doesn't work like that.
And they both have a shitload of stupid people in them.
Posted by: Veeshir at September 21, 2010 04:32 PM (7nqEV)
4
This twit probably couldn't afford a better policy. A hell of a lot of people have way more house than they can actually afford, and are so leveraged through debt that they're paupers in their McMansion.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 21, 2010 05:49 PM (sqGe2)
It set up a "thinks and thinks-not" kind of feeling in me.
Posted by: geoff at September 21, 2010 10:41 PM (QrzlF)
6
Considering the smartest president ever doesn't understand the difference between comprehensive and liability insurance for his car, and thinks he should get the former when he pays for the latter, it's not entirely surprising that his even less intelligent followers feel this way.
Posted by: AndyN at September 22, 2010 08:59 AM (ukfUE)
Need Any More Motivation To Vote Come November?
Avenge this shit!
The Florida Democratic Party sent out a mailer last week detailing
Republican congressional challenger Allen West’s 2005 tax lien and
court orders to pay delinquent credit card bills. West is challenging
Democratic U.S. Rep. Ron Klein.
The mailer includes a reproduction of the $11,081 tax lien filed
against West in Marion County, Indiana, and paid off four months later.
The document, pulled from public records, includes a column titled
“Identifying Number” that shows West’s nine-digit Social Security
number. Although the number isn’t specifically identified as a Social
Security number, West campaign manager Josh Grodin said there is no
mistaking what the number is.
West called the mailer “an unprecedented new low in American politics.”
Agreed, Sir. And fuck the left for how they are acting over this. If they want to act like this, then seeing them get kebabfucked with a side of fucksauce by the electorate will only be sweeter.
So get prepared, lefties. Get prepared to be kecklefucked by the fuckrope of fury until you learn to like it in revenge for this shit. And then be prepared for me to piss all over your supine carcasses after we glorypound you.
It is interesting, though, how they think it's just A-OK that so many of King Barry's appointees have been tax-dodging little pricks - who don't bother to pay until they're actually caught and not in a reasonable period of time - yet they want to come after Col. West.
They're just raaaaacists.
Posted by: Angie at September 20, 2010 10:50 PM (m6qM/)
Hell, if tax problems aren't an issue for the Secretary of the Treasury, they're not an issue for a candidate for the House. The SS# thing is a new low for sure, though.
Besides, $11k is small potatoes. My accountant laughs at that lien.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 20, 2010 11:12 PM (sqGe2)
4
They released his SS#, but won't even bother to have Prez Obama's vetted?? Bunch of twatmoldy fucktards...
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 21, 2010 06:49 AM (+bSoE)
5
Glorypound them with fuckkebabs, perhaps? Outstanding, eddie.
Fucking with West is probably not wise. I can see him channeling Al Pacino in Scent of a Woman and "taking a flamethrower to this place!"
Posted by: C Monster at September 21, 2010 09:06 AM (M/WbE)
Yes, The Contrast Is Telling
This article describing the difference between how leftists and conservatives view the voters.
This is yet another confirmation that the right and left look at
America – and Americans – quite differently. The leftists view their
countrymen as in dire need of supervision — by elites like them, of
course. Americans are not competent to make decisions on their own, and
left to their own devices, will run amok. Wall Streeters are greedy,
New Yorkers are xenophobes, and the rest of us are Bible- and
gun-huggers. And here we go again — acting out and acting up. Obama,
the poor dear, just can’t talk sense to us.
When things go wrong for the left, it blames the people; when things
go wrong for the right, it blames the governing elites. It is not in
the nature of conservatives to demean and attack fellow citizens. To
the contrary, conservatives’ vision is grounded in the belief that
Americans are competent, decent, and hardworking, and it is the heavy
hand of government that threatens to squelch American virtues.
Yes, and that is why I fucking hate the left. Fuck them for thinking they know better when every fucking program they start only makes things worse for the people they purport to help. Fuck them for telling us we are the bad guys for trying to stop their destruction of this country. And fuck them so hard that the earth's rotation gets knocked out of whack as a result for ignoring that the American people, not a buck of fistfuckingly fistfucked fuckwobblers are the ones who make things work.
And that is why the left hates us. They hate us because we refuse to give in to them and their ways. They hate us because they know, deep down, that their ways have failed and will fail again, and we are the only ones in the way of that disaster befalling us. They hate us because we put our faith in the Constitution, not the cult of personality that is the state. And they hate us because we are unwilling to be led like sheep and drones.
Well, jigglefuck them like a whore who thinks she is being charged an overdraft fee. I will not stand idly by and let the future be one giant shitpile topped with fuckspray. I will not allow my daughter to grow up in a day worse than today. And I will not allow the Last Great Hope for Man become a fucking weakened fuckvictim to the rest of the world because we did it to ourselves.
Take heart, though. Take heart, because the hate the left heaps upon the electorate reveals their fear. It reveals them to be afraid of what will happen to them this November for their disregard for us. And it reveals that they fear us and what our votes will do to them when we send them to the goatseheap of electoral history for their insults and arrogance.
They hate us because they know, deep down, that their ways have failed and will fail again, and we are the only ones in the way of that disaster befalling.
I disagree with this particular part of the rant analysis. They don't consider their ways to be a failure -- for them. As far as they're concerned, millions dead is a small price to pay to gain and maintain power. They hate us because we are between them and power, and for no other reason.
To them, the only possible failure is loss of power. Collateral damage is not a consideration at all.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 19, 2010 02:17 PM (sqGe2)
The Million Hipster March
What do you want to bet that when a few hundred Trustafarian assholes show up for this that it gets much more MFM coverage than Glenn Beck's rally did?
Also, "overwhelmingly white"? We'll see.
Update: I'm sure they'll be looking out for racist and/or inflammatory signs at their rallies. Because, you know, neither of them would want that sort of thing showing up at their events.
Posted by: Sean M. at September 19, 2010 12:12 AM (ZMtjd)
8
one last thought: while I am not surprised that Stewart and Colbert have turned from "truth to power" to "truth for power", the fact they are targeting the voters for mockery is a bit disturbing.
Posted by: eddiebear at September 19, 2010 09:20 AM (1PtVy)
9
I'm not surprised, eddiebear. They believe the American people are stupid, just as Bill Maher has stated, though to give them credit they never stooped down to Maher's level of hatred.
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 19, 2010 06:06 PM (+bSoE)
10
It's good to see
this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any
proper resource, thanx now i have the link which i was looking for my
research. . . . . .
Turkish restaurant in
Brooklyn
In a statement, President Barack Obama called 2009 a tough year for working families but said it could have been worse.
"Because of the Recovery Act and many other programs providing tax relief and income support to a majority of working families — and especially those most in need — millions of Americans were kept out of poverty last year," Obama said.
Click here to find out the context behind that quote, and once you've got it, file it away in the "If Bush Had Said It" archives. Yeah.
It's worse than that LC, as Nixon was a hard worker. Paranoid, certainly, and a mess on policy, but he did work his ass off.
The whole article reads as true because that's exactly what it looks like from the outside. The guy has zero skills except being a BS artist. Great for campaigning, but you have to keep moving up to keep the BS train rolling. Once you've hit the peak, then you have to perform or you're finally gonna get called on your BS, which is what's happening now. Being a completely empty suit, he's now totally lost.
The only thing I disagree with in that article is the chance for his reelection. He simply can't run away from all his BS at this point -- there's nowhere left to run to.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 16, 2010 05:08 PM (sqGe2)
3
I agree, HD...Nixon did work his ass off. I just find it rather pathetic that this man-child is suffering from that kind of paranoia.
I remember watching him a few weeks after the inaguration, and I thought he looked spooked (heh!), like he had a "What now?" look on his face. And that was true...he was wondering what to do now. He has no concept of work, or job. And now that he is trusted with the most important job in the country (some would argue), he wants to shelve it for ESPN.
What a useless bag of hairclippings he is.
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 16, 2010 05:29 PM (+bSoE)
Posted by: Andy at September 16, 2010 07:11 PM (pRbtk)
5
Ohhhhhh...that felt...sinfully good. Who is newsflavor? Are they reputable?
Posted by: S. Weasel at September 16, 2010 07:22 PM (TAyEB)
6
My gut says Clinton loyalist looking to stir up shit, may all be true, who knows. Sounds about right given his performance in office.
Posted by: doubleplusundead at September 16, 2010 07:22 PM (S1+SK)
7
I'm expecting a very public meltdown after the November elections. He is an extremely mentally unstable man. Narcissistic Personality Disorder is a diagnosable mental illness, plus the man is an extreme sociopath. You can't hide that kind of thing forever when you're in the most high-profile job in the world.
Posted by: Laura Castellano at September 16, 2010 07:38 PM (fuw6p)
I have no idea and I'm afraid to look in case I have to put my cigarette out.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 16, 2010 07:46 PM (tOwRr)
9
This looks like some type of Clinton hit piece to me, too. Although I do agree with LC Aggie that Teh One did look rather flabbergasted and lost after the election, as if he did not know what to do next. The "Office of the President-Elect" thing was a huge clue. Unlike Clinton (who could at least appear to govern while still in campaign mode) Obama only knows how to campaign, how to sell bs and make people want to buy or vote for it. But his bs has been exposed as being just that; he is an empty suit who can project well and read from a teleprompter. As Lincoln said- "Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me". As far as his re-election in 2012 goes, I do not think he is a shoo-in at all. Hell, I do not even think he is a shoo-in to be re-nominated. Given the popularity and growing influence of the Tea Party, I don't even think the media (with a few hard core liberal exceptions like MSNBC) are going to remain hitched to Obama's wagon much longer. I expect that after the November elections (even if the Democrats manage to hang on to a slim majority) he will have a public meltdown (as Laura said) and blame the MSM for his setbacks, and his supporters will abandon his ship like rats.
Posted by: DaveK at September 17, 2010 09:50 AM (boNGU)
I was just thinking that - if this is true (oh, god, please yes!) - then they may just be setting things up for an LBJ-like "I will not seek/accept a second term..." speech in a year or so.
That would clear the field in '12 for all Dems, including Hillary (who now has a sec-state feather in her hat along with the senator feather.)
I believe "any" decent Republican could beat O'Bugger in '12, but not so against "any" Dem'. That's a different can o' crap altogether.
Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at September 17, 2010 01:32 PM (/cH23)
It smells of truth. Especially the dismisive distaste for Palin and Romney, that is a professional political hack's attitude. (sniff...) Actually the article reeks of Truth.
Posted by: toadbile at September 17, 2010 05:12 PM (r/lfO)
14
I always loved the irony of Joe Biden's foreign-policy "street cred" after so many on the left laughed at GWB's selection of Cheney as veep. Old and busted: Republican chooses an older running mate to beef up his foreign policy side. New hotness: Democrat chooses and older running mate to beef up his foreign policy side!
Posted by: Greg at September 17, 2010 09:53 PM (iZV52)
15
I see nothing in the source article worth believing.
But I agree, would be great if it were true, but can only be gauged if the person were named, and even then just one source is something we dislike on our side, and to praise as it happens on theirs is unseemly.
The author seems more than a little lacking in background and all too often snarky.
But Maybe Dan Rather can attach himself to it, to prove that it is fake but true.
Posted by: douglas at September 17, 2010 10:50 PM (uU+Ss)
16
Love your blog! Its nice to read reviews of true natural products from someone you can really trust! Also love vapour. I would love for you to review the new liquid foundation.
Microsoft, just stay evil. You were so much better at it.
Hey Microsoft...
If I say, "I'm gay" or "He's gay," actually referring to someone's sexual orientation, that's not a slur. If I say "I'm from the town of Fort Gay," that's not a slur. Implying that Fort Gay is gay, because of the name, that's a slur.
I was workin' for Babs Boxer, but then I got high!
I was pullin' six figures too, but then I got high, Now I'm gettin' hauled off by Capitol Cops, and I know why, (Why's that, man?) Because I got high, because I got high, because I got hiiiiigh!
That's insultingly stupid, not to mention smugly corrupt. This is the kind of stuff that's fueling the rage in the public. It's so openly wrong, so blatantly droit de seigneur, that it's infuriating.
1
I'd be more than happy if we could manage to limit government corruption to basic nepotism.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 08, 2010 02:33 PM (sqGe2)
2
her spin will be, and if the idiots in her district will wake up?
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 08, 2010 05:24 PM (+bSoE)
3
Meant to type: I wonder what her spin will be....
Sheesh....
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 08, 2010 08:41 PM (+bSoE)
4
I live near her district, and I'd be totally stunned if her idiot constituents didn't send her back to Washington. Would love to see it happen, but...it won't.
Posted by: Laura Castellano at September 08, 2010 10:29 PM (fuw6p)
Al Gore has had some tough breaks — like losing the presidency after getting more votes than the other guy — but the noted environmentalist achieved a singular honor last week, becoming the first vice president to have a Los Angeles school named after him.
And, fittingly, the school will be devoted to environmental themes. {as opposed to education}
But as in the 2000 election, there's a catch. {a catch? since when is the U.S. Constitution a catch?} Critics say the campus' location poses a long-term health risk to students and staff.
...
"Renaming this terribly contaminated school after famous environmental advocates {I thought Gore was a famous advocate of his own pocketbook} is an affront to the great work that these individuals have done to protect the public's health from harm," an environmental coalition wrote in a letter to the Los Angeles Unified School District. Making sure the school is safe "would be an even better way to honor their contribution to society." {making sure the school is safe should be a basic fucking requirement, and should have nothing to do with honoring ManBearPig.}
...
Lowry said the school's environmental emphasis will do Gore proud, including recycling projects and research and beach cleanups {but will he make money off carbon offsets from this? I don't think he's going to be proud if he doesn't.}. Cross-curriculum efforts will include environmental speeches and presentations in English {at least they're teaching some English in this school}, topsoil measurements in math and climate study in science.
The principal also envisions an organic garden that could produce a student-led farmer's market.
Suwol said Lowry sounds "incredibly wonderful," but added that she'd feel better if the vegetables were grown in planters above the ground. {I feel bad cackling over kids getting poisoned, so I won't shout "BWAHAHAHAHAAA!". But at least, thanks to the 20 million child deaths from the DDT ban, the school won't be overcrowded.}
1
I did a post on this.... SEX POODLE HIGH!!! I'm just wondering what the mascot will be
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 08, 2010 05:26 PM (+bSoE)
2
That article has one of those lines that, when said by different people mean exactly the opposite Quote "...Rachel Carson, the late author credited with helping launch the modern environmental movement."
Yup. I absolutely agree. The modern enviro movement that is anti-science and whose "solutions" do nothing good except make enviros feel smugly happy.
Posted by: Veeshir at September 09, 2010 07:17 AM (ubwe+)
3
What is this face, OMG. I wish I could punch him.
4
; font-family: arial, helvetica, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px; ">This is really my very first time here, great looking blog. I discovered so many interesting things inside your blog especially its discussion.
; font-family: arial, helvetica, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px; ">
; font-family: arial, helvetica, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 19px; ">From all the remarks in your articles, it appears such as this is often a very popular website. Keep up the truly amazing work.
Posted by: dave at November 06, 2011 06:16 PM (sdjg+)
With the smug incomprehension in which it takes so much pride (can’t understand – won’t understand!), the BBC sets about the American Tea Party Movement as if it were a cross between the Klu Klux Klan and the German neo-fascist brigade. Not once in all the demonic depictions I have seen and heard (last week’s Newsnight package was particularly outrageous) have I heard a mention of what the TPM is actually about: taxation. (Note to BBC editors: the movement is named after the Boston Tea Party because it is protesting about the imposition of higher federal taxes and over-weening controls on citizens who believe their voices have been ignored.)
The British generally and the BBC in particular have a real problem understanding the obsessive suspicion in which the power of central government is held in the US. This is not some funny redneck eccentricity: it is fundamental to the Constitution which gives individual states much greater sovereignty than the countries of the European Union enjoy. The states have independent judicial systems (some states have capital punishment, others do not) and separate taxation systems (some have sales taxes, others do not). Only a Supreme Court ruling can over-turn state law by, for example, declaring something (such as abortion) to be a legal right which a state legislature may not deny.
Yeah. How dare we care for our future? How dare we cherish the freedoms brave men and women have died in order to protect? How dare we cherish the system set up that enables the United States to become the last best hope for man in the face of tyranny and despair? Yeah. How fucking dare we?
That's right. How fucking dare we care? What the fuck is wrong with us? Why can't we just take what the bureaucracy throws at us and ask for more? Why can't we just accept a lower standard of living and be happy, just so we don't get called racist?
You know why? Because we are fucking Americans. That's why. Freedom and opportunity were our birthrights, forged over 230 ago with people standing up, demanding that their leaders be held accountable, and refusing to accept limits on our futures. Liberty is our divinely entitled right, and fuck anybody who sees otherwise. Fuck them seriously and with the vigor that doesn't need boner pills to get ready. And fuck anybody on any side who wishes to endanger or limit those freedoms through deal making and then tell us they know better than us.
And how can we stand in front of our children and grandchildren and tell them that we sat silently by as the Leviathan sought to enevlop us? How? Through moderation? Fuck that. Fuck that with the forecock of future freedoms. Fuck anything close to surrender or compromise. I owe it to my daughter to refuse to let her future be threatened, and I must do what I can through the electoral process to preserve it. I must stand up and tell "our betters" that they are not special, and that they listen to us. I must exercise my rights, so that she will be able to have the same ones as she grows up. And I must not yield, for the other side never quits.
And while not easy, it can be accomplished. How do I know? Because I fucking lived through it. And I know we can do it again.
So fuck you, statist critics of freedoms. Fuck you, go to hell, and let us save the future.
News outlets have enough trouble getting local news right, never mind international opinion. The farther you get from home, the more worthless the MSM becomes, as they can distort their reportage with more impunity. I'm sure everyone across Euroweenieland believes the tea party is run by Beelzebub and staffed by his demonic minions.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at September 08, 2010 02:24 PM (sqGe2)
3
As if the BBC is considered a balanced media entity. Even one of its ministers of propaganda came out and admitted to the leftist bias.
Besides, them Brits are just jealous...always have been!
Posted by: LC Aggie Sith at September 08, 2010 05:30 PM (+bSoE)
The Brit media isn't allowed to remember the Boston Tea Party, eddie, because they are the same fuckwitted fops of fail we fuckbombed back across the Atlantic 200 years ago. Fuck them with the fuckfife of flame.
Posted by: C Monster at September 08, 2010 11:48 PM (mm4Hr)
5
Very easy for them to be critical of those who wish to fight for their freedom when they have already abdicated any claim on their own.
Think "ultima ratio regum" and extend it to the common American citizen (and I don't mean literally - at least we haven't risen to that level yet). THAT is America is supposed to be about, willingness to sacrifice for continued freedom.
Freedom is a lot like balancing a bowling ball on the tip of a pin. Yes, it's going to try to fall a lot but you keep guiding it and putting the fucking thing right back up there and you don't give up because it's difficult. If it weren't difficult, fucking everybody would do it.
Good posting EB.
Posted by: Lemur King at September 08, 2010 11:48 PM (JowOv)
6
Watch out for whatever alterations in visual aspect as well as color.
Posted by: acompanhantes at March 21, 2011 03:06 AM (Mri4Y)
7
Not so many acompanhantes are well prepared as we know malta and above all malta nightlife. Other than that, we have no doubt about the real value of malta escorts mostly same things as kind of girls you can meet in putas madrid. At the end of the reflexion, the only thing we can say is thanks a lot for your good knowledge as a roma escort roma... by the way nothing to say if we are studying in cursos ccoo
Posted by: bylli at March 21, 2011 03:12 AM (Mri4Y)
Oops!
A lot has been made about Obama's "They talk about me like a dog" remark today, but check out what he just barely avoids saying at around 0:48...
He's still running for president. He has no idea how to actually be president.
Whodathunk that electing a marxist, Chicago-machine politician with little or no experience would be a bad thing.
Posted by: Veeshir at September 07, 2010 07:35 AM (HwSlV)
4
I'm telling you, the snark about him wanting the office of President Elect is so true.
Posted by: alexthechick at September 07, 2010 09:17 AM (eRjGt)
5
Well in his "home country" and where he grew up, rather than being Man's Best Friend", Dogs are considered unclean.
He has shown more true emotion about the Dog reference than anything else recently since it deeply insults him according to the religion in which he was raised.
Posted by: Mark E at September 07, 2010 09:26 AM (w5RwR)
6
Wait -- what happened to the "cerebral", "Spock-like" PrezBO the media's been telling us about?
Posted by: JoeCollins at September 07, 2010 01:04 PM (f3ldg)
Seriously, fuck the left and their race hustling. Fuck them for trying to tell people of any color and/or faith what to do, think or believe. Fuck them for thinking they are more enlightened than those who wish to help free people from a perpetual cycle of dependancy. And androidfuck them with Mechagodzilla's robotic fucklever wrapped with a hard earned ticket off of their plantation for thinking they can keep people down with their legislatively enforced slavery to statism and "knowing one's place".
So fuck off, race hustling lefties. Fuck you for failing the people you purport to lead, and then continuing to try to keep them down so that they depend on you for help. Fuck you for crying racism at every turn instead of truing to fix the structural problems that have caused minorities to remain poor. And fuck you because your "help" has made things worse for ALL Americans.