April 20, 2010
Hey Marc Ambinder?
The Moral Urgency of Obesity? Really? Really? I still await the philosophical justification for the position that my body is the government's business.
Mr. Ambinder, I have the following modest propositions for you. All of these propositions flow from your apparent belief that it is, in fact, the government's business to tell me what to do with my body.
1. There is a fierce moral urgency to ensure that those who are lonely find surcease from their pain. Thus, the government has the right to tell me with whom I must engage in carnal relations.
2. There is a fierce moral urgency to ensure that the birth rate increases in order to maintain the needed levels of population for taxation purposes to fund government programs. Thus, the government has the right to force me to have a minimum of 3 children (one of the father, one for the mother, one for the state).
3. There is a fierce moral urgency to ensure that our nation's infrastructure is maintained. Thus, the government has the right to require me to work on a project repairing roads, cutting down forests, repairing dams and other such work.
Seriously, if the government has the right to regulate my body in one aspect, it has the right to regulate it in all other aspects. It's the dick/donut proposition. If you cannot tell me what to do with one, you cannot tell me what to do with another.
My body does not belong to the government. Funny, didn't we fight this incredibly bloody war to firmly establish that idea?
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Mr. Ambinder, I have the following modest propositions for you. All of these propositions flow from your apparent belief that it is, in fact, the government's business to tell me what to do with my body.
1. There is a fierce moral urgency to ensure that those who are lonely find surcease from their pain. Thus, the government has the right to tell me with whom I must engage in carnal relations.
2. There is a fierce moral urgency to ensure that the birth rate increases in order to maintain the needed levels of population for taxation purposes to fund government programs. Thus, the government has the right to force me to have a minimum of 3 children (one of the father, one for the mother, one for the state).
3. There is a fierce moral urgency to ensure that our nation's infrastructure is maintained. Thus, the government has the right to require me to work on a project repairing roads, cutting down forests, repairing dams and other such work.
Seriously, if the government has the right to regulate my body in one aspect, it has the right to regulate it in all other aspects. It's the dick/donut proposition. If you cannot tell me what to do with one, you cannot tell me what to do with another.
My body does not belong to the government. Funny, didn't we fight this incredibly bloody war to firmly establish that idea?
Posted by: alexthechick at
09:00 AM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 265 words, total size 2 kb.
13kb generated in CPU 0.0677, elapsed 0.1964 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.1897 seconds, 133 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
61 queries taking 0.1897 seconds, 133 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.