October 09, 2010

This Lady Has More Balls Than The RNC Men's Room

Fuck yeah! This is how you take on the fucking O-bot thugs.

Once again, FUCK. THEM. ALL. Hurtfuck them with the dickstick of defeat so hard it becomes an internet meme even "Sad Keanu" would envy. Fuck these pussyass keelfuckers for being willing to beat up some guy at a political event, yet they run away from a housewife with a megaphone.

Weak, purple putrescine pegfuckers, your corruption and thuggery has only served to make us stronger, and WE WILL FUCK YOU SO HARD ON ELECTION DAY, you will need overnight with wings to stanch the flow of defeat the vaagmerian vicecock of victory will uncorck from your foul fuckbaskets.

So go ahead, union thugs. Run from a woman. We see what you are really like. Run from the people. And fucking run from your own defeat.

Fucking losers. 

Posted by: eddiebear at 12:32 AM | Comments (27) | Add Comment
Post contains 149 words, total size 1 kb.

October 04, 2010

Why Sean Bielat is important - Financial Attrition

Could he win?  Maybe.  From a national perspective, however, that's not as important as one might think.  It is just as important for Bielat to make Barney Frank spend all of his money trying to defend himself.

Way back in 2008 I wrote about my theory of Financial Attrition:

Entrenched incumbents almost never lose, barring the occasional "dead woman or live boy" scandal. Such Untouchables have large campaign war chests at their disposal, have first dibs at party and caucus money, and often represent safe districts. The unlikelihood of their defeat acts as a deterrent force against any potential challengers, or, if some fool does step in, the challenger's party lifts nary a finger in assistance.

What do these unchallenged incumbents do with their money? They give some of it away to help candidates elsewhere. By helping push their marginal fellow partisans over the finish line they accumulate favors for future battles.

Oppositely, what does an incumbent do when he as a challenger? He empties his coffers! Electoral history is littered with the corpses of challengers who were outspent 3-to-1 yet were only defeated by a few percentage points. 

When we find ourselves with uniquely qualified challengers such as Sean Bielat giving some old warhorse like Barney Frank a run for his money, we should understand that Bielat's use of funding will be extremely efficient at denying other Democrats around the country their precious funding.  One dollar given to Bielat destroys several Democrat dollars as they scramble to play defense.

(Originally posted at my own blog.)

Posted by: JoeCollins at 04:16 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 264 words, total size 2 kb.

<< Page 1 of 1 >>
15kb generated in CPU 0.01, elapsed 0.1091 seconds.
60 queries taking 0.1032 seconds, 130 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.