October 26, 2009
Posted by: Sean M. at
08:42 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
October 22, 2009
(Oh, and this came from Excitable Andi's place linking to a lefty blog, so enjoy that, too.)
Posted by: Sean M. at
04:53 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
October 21, 2009
Posted by: eddiebear at
02:54 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
October 20, 2009
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
12:09 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
October 18, 2009
What's most distinctive about the American press is not its freedom but its century-old tradition of independence—that it serves the public interest rather than those of parties, persuasions, or pressure groups. Media independence is a 20th-century innovation that has never fully taken root in many other countries that do have a free press. The Australian-British-continental model of politicized media that Murdoch has applied at Fox is un-American, so much so that he has little choice but go on denying what he's doing as he does it. For Murdoch, Ailes, and company, "fair and balanced" is a necessary lie. To admit that their coverage is slanted by design would violate the American understanding of the media's role in democracy and our idea of what constitutes fair play. But it's a demonstrable deceit that no longer deserves equal time.There is a kind of willful blindness among these MSM jagoffs that is just incredible. Just marvel at that paragraph for a moment. It was written by a guy, who, we're told at the end of the piece, is the author of The Bush Tragedy. Which is a truly fair and balanced look at our last president, I'm sure.
Yeah.
I'll forgo the history lesson that Weisberg is obviously ignoring here in order to point out that his colleagues have been carrying water for the Democrat party for decades now. Oh, I'm sure he'd deny that, seeing as how he wouldn't dare to participate in a "politicized media" of the "Australian-British-continental" sort that he scorns, but here's the thing, Jacob...
Conduct an informal poll of your co-workers there at Newsweek. Ask them who they voted for last November. Or in November, 2004. Or in November, 2000. Or...you get the idea.
No, you don't? Why am I not the least bit surprised?
(h/t)
Posted by: Sean M. at
04:09 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 307 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:09 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
October 16, 2009
Mr. Breitbart claims victory, and in extravagant terms: "At every step of the way, we were correct. At every step of the way, the mainstream media took the lies of Acorn. At every step of the way, the mainstream media attempted to cover up for Acorn. . . . If they think that Acorn or the Democratic Party or the NEA or the Office of Public Engagement is the primary target, they couldn't be more wrong. It is the Democrat-media complex. It is the mainstream media. No jury would need more evidence at this point. The Clark Hoyts of the world should just put their pens down and retire right now and walk away. They lost."I'd tell you to read the whole thing, but I realize that I ain't the boss of you.
(Via Andy in the comments of today's yummy—if somewhat NSFW—BBF.)
Posted by: Sean M. at
08:34 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 151 words, total size 1 kb.
This is why I hate the media. They fucking think they are above the law and can retreat back to retractions and claims of "sloppying editing" when called out for their mendacity. So die from a snake bite to your cock, all of you. And spread the disease to your coworkers.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:09 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
October 04, 2009
When you are in a hole economically, you need to dig out. That's a time when you need government.
My response:
Other Meet the Press runners up for Quote of the Day below the fold, mostly Rachel Maddow getting a well-deserved slap-down...
more...
Posted by: JoeCollins at
12:57 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 928 words, total size 8 kb.
October 03, 2009
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
02:48 PM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
October 01, 2009
The New York Times reports today White House officials told congressional leaders they opposed the legislation pending in the Senate Judiciary Committee that would shield reporters from jail time for failing to reveal sources. The Times cites "several people involved with the negotiations."
It adds that the administration sent to Congress "sweeping revisions" to the bill that "would significantly weaken its protections against forcing reporters to testify."
The current form has provisions requiring prosecutors to "exhaust other methods for finding the source of the information before subpoenaing a reporter, and would balance investigators' interests with 'the public interest in gathering news and maintaining the free flow of information.'"
But under the administration's proposal, those procedures would not apply to leaks of a matter deemed to cause "significant" harm to national security, the Times reported.
Hah!
Posted by: eddiebear at
11:45 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.
60 queries taking 0.1486 seconds, 151 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.