February 25, 2010
Hey, doesn't socialized medicine sound great? What say you, Brits?
The report, which follows reviews by the Care Quality Commission and the Department of Health, said that “unimaginable†suffering had been caused. Regulators said last year that between 400 and 1,200 more patients than expected may have died at the hospital from 2005 to 2008.
Andy Burnham, the Health Secretary, said there could be “no excuses†for the failures and added that the board that presided over the scandal had been replaced. An undisclosed number of doctors and at least one nurse are being investigated by the General Medical Council and Nursing and Midwifery Council.
Mr Burnham said it was a “longstanding anomaly†that the NHS did not have a robust way of regulating managers or banning them from working, as it does with doctors or nurses. “We must end the situation where a senior NHS manager who has failed in one job can simply move to another elsewhere,†he added. “This is not acceptable to the public and not conducive to promoting accountability and high professional standards.â€
A system of professional accreditation for senior managers would be considered and the Mid Staffordshire trust might lose its foundation status.
Some NHS chief executives have received six-figure redundancy packages or moved to other trusts despite poor performance. Martin Yeates, the former chief executive at Mid Staffordshire, received pay rises that took his annual salary to £180,000, while standards at the trust deteriorated.
The Liberal Democrats claimed that he had also received a payoff of more than £400,000 after stepping down last March, though Mr Burnham said he had received “no more than his contractual entitlementâ€.
Yeah, that sounds aweome. Sign me up.
Posted by: eddiebear at
12:51 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 286 words, total size 2 kb.
February 24, 2010
At which point, a security guard comes over and tells you that you can't do that and implies you're a pedophile. You leave in a huff only to be confronted by the cops who tell you to delete the picture and threaten to arrest you for disturbing the peace. Oh and btw the security guards reported you as a suspicious pedo.
Not to get us on another watch list, here's the shocking photo:
(Loser boy on the left is the guard) (Also that train is clown scary)
This is where we're at, ladies and gents. Take a picture of your own kid doing the most innocent thing possible and OMG PEDO. I'd say this is just Fail Brittania but I recall hearing mention of similar accusations being made here in the States. Of course, here in the States the security guard would probably have been popped one as serves him right.
I've said it before but it bears repeating: I will no longer have any interaction with a child in public and I will not be alone with a child at any point in time. If I were still a good church going girl, I would not teach Sunday School. I would not babysit during the services. I would not play with the kids at the church picnic. There's far far far too much risk with no reward.
The presumption that every adult, especially every male adult, is a budding pedophile is utterly chilling.
Posted by: alexthechick at
02:42 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 299 words, total size 2 kb.
February 14, 2010
David Fullard, 47, was prosecuted for attacking the two strangers who forced their way into his home and threatened to rape his partner and kill his two teenage children.
Geez, let me finish why don't ya?
Guy used a samurai sword he had on display.
The prosecution refused to accept that his actions amounted to lawful self-defence and argued it was 'over the top' to attack a man armed with a knuckleduster by using a 'battlefield weapon'.
The two thugs were both high on a cocktail of drink and drugs at the time, the court heard.
Ahhh, proportionality, he should have fought fair against the drunken thugs who wanted to murder and rape (possibly in that order) his family and burn down his house. Knuckle duster being brass knuckles. So since the thugs were willing to fight at arms' reach, it was rude and not very sportsmanlike for him to use a sword.
Wait for the Win!, it's coming.
But after a five-day trial at Hull Crown Court, Mr Fullard, a builder, broke down in tears as he was found not guilty of unlawful wounding.
Yay! Of course, it is still Britain so this is laced with Fail, you can't count on other juries to act sensibly.
Yesterday jobless Severs, 22, and Michael Smith, 19, escaped with a suspended prison sentence and 100 hours of community work after admitting affray at the court.
Mr Fullard was arrested and only later did police arrest Smith and Severs, who had his ear re-attached in hospital.
They arrested him on the spot for defending his house and family and only after on went after the known assailants. They were acquaintances of his son so they knew who they were.
This guy barely got off and you know he would have gone to jail, these career criminals get community service. It'll probably be something that allows them to case neighborhoods for future home-invasions.
I really wish they had a quote from an outraged prosecutor over the proles releasing this dangerous man who thinks it's okay to defend himself, but I have been trying to reduce my intake of schadenfreude so it's probably just as well.
Update: I forget who to H/T, I bookmarked it a couple days ago, so uhhhh. let's say, Wyatt Earp, even though his name should be "Latigo" if he's gonna call his blog "Support Your Local Gunfighter".
Posted by: Veeshir at
02:07 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 421 words, total size 4 kb.
Ah, the things we'd learn if only we went to prison. Like how to punish someone who should have gotten the death penalty, except that the UK doesn't have the death penalty. Except, wait, he shouldn't have been in a position to end up needing a good death-imposition, because the nanny state observation of children and making sure that each child has adequate medical care through socialized medicine should have made sure that this guy was never in a position to need the death penalty applied to him, but it didn't.
Posted by: Alice H at
10:48 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 109 words, total size 1 kb.
February 04, 2010
The more nanny the state, the stupider the government, I think.
In the U.K., apparently, there are nearly 90,000 alchohol related "glass attacks" a year. That's a nice way of saying that ninety thousand drunk Brits have someone smash a glass over their head every year. Instead of attacking the source - binge drinking, which is an issue that causes the NHS an estimated £3 billion a year - the nanny state put its mind to perfecting the technology for shatterproof pint glasses.
Yep. That's right. Now, when you get into a bar fight, you can get clubbed in the head with a glass that can't break, as opposed to having someone slash your skin open with ragged glass. I bet those Brits feel safer all ready.
The government is touting the prototypes as the first significant improvement in bar glassware in decades. The plan is to introduce the new glasses for use on a voluntary basis in pubs if tests show they are durable, cost-effective and safe.
Alcohol Concern, a charity working to lessen alcohol abuse in Britain, praised the new designs.
"We're very much in favor," chief executive Don Shanker said. "There has been good local research showing this could reduce the use of glass in violent incidents."
Half of all violent assaults in Britain are alcohol-related and it has become common for drinkers to smash glasses and use them as weapons, he added.
"You are five times more likely to be involved in a violent incident if you are in or around a licensed bar," he said. "There is a clear correlation."
The government estimates that "glassing" attacks cost the National Health Service roughly 2.7 billion pounds ($4.3 billion) per year.
Posted by: Ember at
09:05 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 289 words, total size 2 kb.
60 queries taking 0.1166 seconds, 137 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.