February 23, 2010

Yesterday - hot dogs. Today - movies. Tomorrow - the world!

Yesterday, it was hot dogs.  Today, it's movies.

I don't go out of my way to find this kind of nonsense, I swear.  Somehow, it just keeps fucking finding me!

Film characters disappear into thin air, travel through time, and know how to fly. They're all scientific impossibilities, but since they take place on the silver screen, we suspend our disbelief and go along for the ride.

But one scientist has had enough and is calling on filmmakers to temper their creativity by obeying the rules of science.

At a recent meeting of American scientists, physicist Professor Sidney Perkowitz suggested a new rule: every film should be allowed just one major suspension of belief for the sake of the story.

In other words, films shouldn't repeatedly violate scientific laws. And they definitely should avoid internal inconsistencies - breaking scientific rules established in earlier scenes.

"If it's scene after scene, it becomes greater than I can stand," says Prof Perkowitz. "I understand the dramatic impulse behind it. The natural tendency is to hype things up."

Others in the scientific community agree.

In order to emphasise a sense of "impending doom", filmmakers often ignore realities like time, says Dr David Kirby, a lecturer in science communications at University of Manchester. After all, if the asteroid in Armageddon was spotted years before it threatened to hit Earth, the story would lack tension.

Okay, so it's just some jackass physicist who apparently has no concept of fun, but still, people, please.  The article goes on to mention the three "worst" movies for science - among them, one of my all-time favorite bad movies, The Core.  Frankly, if you think the American people are so fucking uneducated that they think the vast majority of a flick like The Core could actually fucking happen, then the issue isn't with science.

It's with the education system.

And if you can't put aside your disbelief long enough to enjoy a movie, then you really need to score some hookers and blow and have a night out on the town.  Maybe while we're at it, we should ban such literature as Azimov's Foundation Series - after all, it's obviously scientifically impossible to predict the fucking future.  Or Burroughs' Martian Tales - really, folks, active life on Mars? teleportation? atmosphere on Mars?  And, fuck, while we're at it, World War Z might convince the poor stupid American public that the zombie apocalypse is coming right now.  (Okay, strike World War Z.  We all know teh zombies are coming.)

Lighten the fuck up and enjoy a bad damn movie.

Posted by: Ember at 06:52 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 439 words, total size 3 kb.

1 You know how you can tell he's an idiot?
He specifically mentions Armageddon but he talks about seeing it late as the inconsistency.
Fool, that was the only part that was plausible. It is a big ass sky.
If you're going to go after that movie you should be mentioning how they got gravity and the lack thereof as wrong as they possibly could.

Posted by: Veeshir at February 24, 2010 08:25 AM (JOD88)

2 Seriously, someone just needs to slap this dude upside the head and give him a "Lighten up, Francis."

Posted by: MikeD at February 24, 2010 10:16 AM (FkL60)

3

Are these people for FUCKING REAL?  It's a MOVIE!!

Are we not allowed to dream or imagine? 

GET A LIFE YOU FUCKHEADS!!! 

They will try to control everything we eat, drink, do, EVERYTHING!  What a bunch of assholes!  

Motherfuckers!  

HEY GUESS WHAT....YOU CAN'T CONTROL WHAT I THINK...YET...AND GUESS WHAT IT IS!!!  ***snort*** 

 

 

Posted by: Charlotte at February 24, 2010 10:52 AM (iXIlj)

4 Just to make sure I'm reading this correctly...

They're expecting more truth from fictional fucking movies than they're expecting from global warming scientists?

Do I have that right?

Posted by: Alice H at February 24, 2010 11:33 AM (qJHYy)

5

They're expecting more truth from fictional fucking movies than they're expecting from global warming scientists?

Do I have that right?

Alice, I lol'd so hard when I read that that my daughter asked me why I was crying.

Posted by: Ember at February 24, 2010 07:47 PM (LdRAG)

6 But did I get it right?  Srsly, are we expecting more from fiction than we expected from An Inconvenient Truth?  Does my dictionary have the definition of 'documentary' wrong?

Posted by: Alice H at February 25, 2010 12:39 AM (qJHYy)

7 Yeah, sadly, you got it right.  Lie to me in documentaries, not in entertainment. 

Posted by: Ember at February 25, 2010 01:02 AM (LdRAG)

Posted by: pbl3717 at November 19, 2010 05:15 AM (Vz6cF)

9 New NFL Jerseys, Have aNFL Kid Jerseysis the perfect way to support your favorite players! Buy aNFL Kid Jerseysto cheering for them, After all of the jersey is the manager carefully checked to ensure customer satisfaction. Online shopping is convenience and fast, it is best way for people who like watching the games but have no time go shopping buy goods which there want . Don't hesitate, if you like the goods in our website:http://www.cheapjerseyclub.com/,we are thebest buy cheap jerseys, contact us, there can saving your time e-commerce, as long as you leave order, we will do the best service for you.

Posted by: wholesale nba jordan jerseys at November 24, 2011 12:51 AM (2+kNE)

10 That cheap jerseys from china doesn't make it right if you're claiming to be impa rtial, but it wholesale jerseys's worth noting that it's not just the liberals on this particular issue. cheap mlb jerseys

Posted by: cheap nhl jerseys at November 24, 2011 01:55 AM (6HhvH)

Hide Comments | Add Comment






25kb generated in 0.0503 seconds; 67 queries returned 156 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.