February 01, 2010
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation
Which, of course, shocks the cocks off nanny-state law makers:
Might as well be scratching your asses, tardos because your world view disallows you from understanding why this is the case.
Simply put, the people that, when texting, were more likely to get into accidents are exactly the same people that are more likely to get into accidents while NOT texting. Sure, texting while driving is probably dangerous but the people that drive inattentively will tend to text more dangerously than people who, all things being equal, would be less likely to get into an accident anyway.
So, your stats don't show a decrease because those same sub-standard drivers found some other way to fuck up no matter how many baby gates you put between them and their own stupidity. Similarly, no matter how many weapons you make illegal or foods you ban, fucking fat people will still kill each other.
But, dillweeds, of course you can't understand that.because it is imperative that the risk of death and failure in general society be somehow revised to zero. No matter how much evidence exists pointing out that natural selection gets its fucking cut, you insist on tilting at the windmill of perfect safety at the expense of general freedom.
So, you know... get fucked. Die in a fire.
Laws banning cellphone use while driving apparently haven’t reduced crashes, according to a study released on Friday that compared the number of total crashes before the ban with the number after. The study found virtually no difference in the numbers, a finding that had the researchers scratching their heads.
Might as well be scratching your asses, tardos because your world view disallows you from understanding why this is the case.
Simply put, the people that, when texting, were more likely to get into accidents are exactly the same people that are more likely to get into accidents while NOT texting. Sure, texting while driving is probably dangerous but the people that drive inattentively will tend to text more dangerously than people who, all things being equal, would be less likely to get into an accident anyway.
So, your stats don't show a decrease because those same sub-standard drivers found some other way to fuck up no matter how many baby gates you put between them and their own stupidity. Similarly, no matter how many weapons you make illegal or foods you ban, fucking fat people will still kill each other.
But, dillweeds, of course you can't understand that.because it is imperative that the risk of death and failure in general society be somehow revised to zero. No matter how much evidence exists pointing out that natural selection gets its fucking cut, you insist on tilting at the windmill of perfect safety at the expense of general freedom.
So, you know... get fucked. Die in a fire.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at
03:59 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 271 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Thank you.
It's always seemed like the left's mission in life was to line the world in bubble wrap.
It's always seemed like the left's mission in life was to line the world in bubble wrap.
Posted by: TheUnrepentantGeek at February 01, 2010 04:07 PM (g1cNf)
2
You can't protect people from themselves.
These compassionate totalitarians couldn't care less anyway. Their goal is to feel better about themselves, actually doing good is secondary.
I will note one funny thing, they cause more problems than they believe.
What the two world view mean is that people who look at results think correlation does not equal causation while compassionate totalitarians think causation does not equal correlation.
Another irony of The Funniest End of Civilization Ever.
These compassionate totalitarians couldn't care less anyway. Their goal is to feel better about themselves, actually doing good is secondary.
I will note one funny thing, they cause more problems than they believe.
What the two world view mean is that people who look at results think correlation does not equal causation while compassionate totalitarians think causation does not equal correlation.
Another irony of The Funniest End of Civilization Ever.
Posted by: Veeshir at February 01, 2010 04:21 PM (EYmj5)
3
Not to mention, making a law does not stop people from engaging in the prohibited behavior.
Posted by: April at February 01, 2010 04:36 PM (b0THY)
4
Sure it didn't do what they said it would but there is a shit load of fine money coming into the government coiffures.
It is never about what the left says a law is. It is about taking freedom and money from the productive and giving it to the unproductive...it's only fairness.
It is never about what the left says a law is. It is about taking freedom and money from the productive and giving it to the unproductive...it's only fairness.
Posted by: jukin at February 01, 2010 04:38 PM (vkkNZ)
5
fucking fat people will still kill each other
Wait, I'm allowed to kill people now? GO TEAM ME! I will use my power for good. My good is still *a* good, people.
Wait, I'm allowed to kill people now? GO TEAM ME! I will use my power for good. My good is still *a* good, people.
Posted by: alexthechick at February 01, 2010 04:48 PM (8WZWv)
6
Sure it didn't do what they said it would but there is a shit load of fine money coming into the government coiffures.
Wait, coiffures? Are these government bank accounts especially hairy?
Wait, coiffures? Are these government bank accounts especially hairy?
Posted by: Jeff M at February 01, 2010 04:55 PM (8P3+x)
7
Heh, spell check strikes again!
Posted by: Veeshir at February 01, 2010 05:09 PM (EYmj5)
Posted by: カルティエネックレス at January 07, 2011 05:33 AM (VtmpG)
22kb generated in 0.0621 seconds; 67 queries returned 154 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








