Odd considering the lack of any indication that chemical, biological or nuclear weapons were present in any form.  Now, it may be the case that they were and we just haven't heard about them yet but if they weren't, we now have proof that Iraq was chock full of WMD's since apparently the term has been toned down to include any device intended for the mass harm.

Anyone have any information on what they mean by WMD in this charge?

Posted by: Moron Pundit at 08:56 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.