The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in
Wisconsin shows Johnson with 48% support. Feingold, a member of the
Senate since 1993, again picks up 46% of the vote. Two percent (2%)
favor another candidate in the race, and five percent (5%) are
undecided.
While it would be great to talk about something that was right with Wisconsin, I'm not going to get too optimistic about this one. Feingold has been winning by double digits for quite a while and for the first time, I'm seeing him actually put on television commercials.
Sure, that means he's nervous but he's also good at this. If Reid can come back and take a lead, bet that Russy will do the same.
1
does that poll include the margin of fraud that will come from Madison and Milwaukee?
Posted by: eddiebear at July 30, 2010 09:24 AM (jx3S0)
2
Scientists so far have been unable to determine the level of fraud in advance of elections. It seems that the amount of fraud rises in direct proportion to the likelihood of a Republican victory.
Odd.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at July 30, 2010 09:26 AM (GC5S2)
Posted by: Dr Spank at July 30, 2010 03:06 PM (xO+6C)
6
People in Michigan have a chance to send President Obama a message August 3rd! http://mittromneycentral.com/2010/07/30/we-need-pete-hoekstra-as-michigans-next-governor-vote-august-3rd/
President Obama is trying to knock down Michigan’s best chance at finally having a conservative governor, but we can’t let Obama win! The stakes of this election are simply too high!
August 3rd is the most important day in Michigan politics in years! We need to do what we can to help make sure Michigan sends President Obama a message.
Posted by: Dan at July 30, 2010 08:29 PM (9L1z6)
7
I just feel like, if I get behind the Johnson and shove it and push it and press it, he'll be able to break in and really fill an important void.
Posted by: Moron Pundit at July 30, 2010 08:44 PM (GC5S2)
Posted by: mbt shoes at July 30, 2010 04:48 AM (u0P1W)
2
I wonder if this is meant to be a jab at Rush's money and the fact that he probably drives far more expensive vehicles. "He's not one of us, because he's rich," in other words. Ignoring the fact that if they had their way, NONE of us could drive an F-150.
Posted by: Laura Castellano at July 30, 2010 11:26 AM (fuw6p)
Yeah, i think it was meant to inspire class envy: Rush doesn't drive a pick up truck like the common working man. This makes me sad. On the other hand, seeing Gibbs give a press briefing while wearing a wedding dress would be funny, so thankyou mister Spam Monster.
Posted by: vermindust at July 30, 2010 02:21 PM (YW34P)
Gay dudes have new litmus test
Sorry Vinty & Gabe (and any gay lurkers), you got some movies to watch or they're (and by they, I mean some pretentious goof running a DC film festival) revoking your Gay Cards,
Thursdays this summer at the Atlas Performing Arts Center [in Washington, D.C.] will be Gay 101 – a series of films one must see to be a card-carrying gay man.
Sucks for you guys, I think I'd rather set myself on fire than watch some of that list...
Do i even have a Straight Card? Will they come and take it away if i don't watch Fight Club again this year?
Stupid assed attitude: you must conform to stereotype or you are not authenticaly gay. There is probably a word for an ordianry, average gay guy with no fashion sense, 10 pounds over weight who drinks wine with a screw-on cap. Uncle Tim? Aunti Tom? He Who Is Not Down Wit Da Struggle?
Going to go see if High Planes Drifter is on Hulu now.
Posted by: vermindust at July 30, 2010 02:29 PM (YW34P)
Karl Rove dodges cries of "WARMONGER," pies at Chicago campus
Mainly because they're cooking up bullshit reasons why he won't be allowed to speak there...
The university previously argued that the timing of Rove's appearance for the upcoming school year could imperil its 501(c)(3) tax status.
"The timing of this event is problematic given the campaign cycle," Kimberly A. Moore, director of student affairs and Greek affairs, told students in an e-mail. "Loyola has to maintain impartiality in order to protect our tax-exempt status."
The article notes that they're letting some no-name Obama appointee from "the White House interfaith council" (yawn) speak on campus, but that's really nothing major compared to this:
Conservative students point out that the school has hosted partisan speakers on election years before. In September 2004, the school hosted Howard Dean, who ran for president that year. A couple of weeks after his speech, political activist Ralph Nader, who also ran for president that year, spoke on campus -- a speech that was advertised as a campaign event in which donations were solicited.
But neither of those events were a threat to the school's tax status, whereas Rove (who the article notes isn't even working on any campaigns this year) appearing on campus would be a big problem. Yeah.
I honestly would have a lot more respect for these douchebags if they would come right out and just say that they didn't want someone like Rove delivering a speech on their campus because they disagreed with his political views. At least that would be honest, but I guess that's a little too much to ask for. Surprise, surprise.
Update: Now that I think of it, though they probably don't like Karl Rove, maybe they are worried about their tax status. This is Barry and Rahm's home turf, after all.
"Wouldn't want anything to happen to this nice university you've got here that would raise your taxes, would you?"
Jesuits. Fervent footsoldiers for the prevailing liberal culture. They claim to instill "critical thinking" in the young minds entrusted to them, but it is critical only of those who do not follow the Secular Liberal Agenda. We have the same problem with the Jebbie U in NOLA -- slathering all over pro abortion politicians and spokesidiots while holding Republicans and conservatives off with gutless excuses.
There was more than a grain of truth in the line about praying for the conversion of the Jesuits.
Posted by: Jaime at July 29, 2010 07:58 AM (jEcLg)
Posted by: tangonine at July 29, 2010 04:54 PM (C8Pcc)
3
I hate this shutting down of speech in the name of fairness, or the equality of speech in the name of free speech bullshit.
Oppression almost ALWAYS comes from the left, and it's disgusting.
I rarely ever comment or take part in this portion of the debate because it drives me into a rage, and I don't like being angry. Even I don't like myself when I'm angry.
BTW, Mesa said I should blogwhore this post if I'm gonna blogwhore AMA on the few places I'm not banned.
Not a lot of content, but I referenced eddie and was aggressive.
But more than that, I hate this hypacritical bullshit from the left, whenever I get called a liar by door knockers I have to fight the urge to punch them in the face. You will notice, most doorknockers are young, and female, and twice as offensive as the person pulling their strings.
Pathetic little puppets.
Posted by: Douglas at July 29, 2010 07:54 PM (uU+Ss)
So about the AZ SB 1070 ruling
I can't really say I'm surprised. This is pretty much what I was expecting when Judge Bolton didn't rule on Friday or Monday morning.
So here's the question for all the lawyerly types; have you read the ruling and what do you think of the reasoning? I have to admit I only read the first 18 pages, but here is what I gleaned from it; the injunction stems from the fact that congress didn't make it a crime to be in the US illegally. I'm not quite sure how she came to that conclusion but that's her basis. All the rest of it - The burden on federal authorities, the possibility of detaining lawful aliens, all that is just window dressing. What I really don't understand is how she can injoin (?) the part of the law requiring aliens to carry their paperwork when federal law already requires the same thing. She asserts that the AZ penalties somehow adversely impact the uniform alien registration requirement that Congress enacted. I just don't see how one necessarily follows the other.
Hopefully at some point Law and Order LA will do an episode based on this so I can broaden my legal education.
Make sure you have silver, copper, and whiskey in addition to gold. They're all more easily traded. Pre-1982 pennies are 95% copper, and are still widely circulated (at least going back to about 1970) ... their current melt value is about 2 cents (note that melting currency is illegal, this is merely for informational purposes).
On-topic ... the lawyers can slice this up any way they like ... I know when I'm being boned. The Federal Government is a disaster of epic proportions.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at July 28, 2010 11:58 PM (HSn53)
Oh, and once again, for catharsis and motivation in November, anybody who supported this fucking pile of fuckwaste can get fucked so hard with this chart, they will be twisted around and forced to fucking walk backwards so that they can see ahead of themselves. Fuck them for ruining the most innovative and life saving medical system around. And fuck them for making such fucking gawdawful charts.
It's just another piece of the overall legislative agenda -- the BFEA (Bureaucrat Full Employment Act). Soon, there's going to be one farm in Kansas somewhere, with about 100 employees (all illegals of course), attempting to support 300 million bureaucrats, accountants, lawyers, traders, and other rent-seekers. An interesting economic model to say the least.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at July 28, 2010 03:24 PM (HSn53)
2
You may be preaching to the choir here but keep it coming.
Posted by: Dr Spank at July 28, 2010 04:14 PM (jbVm4)
You see a twisted mass of regulations designed to channel medical resources to the chosen few and deny them to the regime's foes.
I see opportunity for the Medical Underground Surgical Empire. Trademark, man. MUSEtm. Knock on the door, speak the password: we have rabies vaccine on demand, coral snake anti-venom and five gallon toilet tanks. Saturated fat doughnuts in the waiting room, help yourself. You brought gold, right? Krugerands prefered, but what's grand mama's wedding ring when the government waiting time for an appendectomy is three days? It's either work with us or blow the whole staff of Community Organizers who run the hospital. Make up your mind fast, ma man, you're bleeding all over my carpets.
Posted by: vermindust at July 28, 2010 05:37 PM (YW34P)
4
Eddie, you gotta come out of your shell and start saying what you really mean!
Posted by: clintbird at July 28, 2010 11:38 PM (l/vuh)
One of the memes of those who advocate a rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan is that historically the Afghans have never been conquered; that Afghanistan is “the graveyard of empires”. I have argued against this view in the comments sections of other blogs as well as here, most recently last year when Ralph Peters once again called for us to withdraw. Once again I must be a trend setter because now almost a year later Foreign Policy magazine has published an article entitled, “Bury the Graveyard” which advances the idea that the graveyard of empires meme is hurting our progress in Afghanistan:
The Victorian British and the Soviet Union, the story goes, were part of a long historical continuum of arrogant conquerors that met their match in the country's xenophobic, fanatical, trigger-happy tribesmen. Given a record like that, it's obvious that the effort by the United States and its NATO allies to stabilize the shaky government in Kabul is doomed to fail.
Look, failure is always a possible outcome, especially judging by the way things have been going lately. But if the United States and its allies end up messing up their part of the equation, blame it on their bad policy decisions. Don't blame it on a super simplified version of Afghanistan's history -- especially if you prefer to overlook the details.
…
One of those myths, for example, is that Afghanistan is inherently unconquerable thanks to the fierceness of its inhabitants and the formidable nature of its terrain. But this isn't at all borne out by the history. "Until 1840 Afghanistan was better known as a 'highway of conquest' rather than the 'graveyard of empires,'" Barfield points out. "For 2,500 years it was always part of somebody's empire, beginning with the Persian Empire in the fifth century B.C."
…
Unfortunately, popular views of the place today are shaped by the past 30 years of seemingly unceasing warfare rather than substantive knowledge of the country's history.
So, what does this mean as far as the current war in Afghanistan go? Well in practical terms probably not much. The COIN strategy that GEN Petraeus is likely to pursue is inherently based on the idea that a stable government (or more accurately a stable enough government) can be established. All that an acceptance of this view of history can really accomplish in the current fight is to foster an acceptance, among the political class, that it actually can be won, and I stick by that assertion. From the article:
I made my first visit to Afghanistan that same year (ed. 2001). The Afghans I met were neither xenophobic nor bellicose. What they wanted most of all was peace, and they didn't trust their own leaders to bring it. "We're sick of fighting. We hate war. We want to have a free election," one grizzled -- and illiterate -- warrior told me. "And let's have the United Nations come in and make sure it's fair, so the warlords don't interfere." I heard similar views from many Afghans.
Really the fight is ours to lose, but given the attitudes currently in existence in D.C. I think that we are well on our way to that outcome.
The president is following the Weather Underground plan from '68, to weaken and overload the military with multiple long-term conflicts while preventing any actual victory. (A Cloward-Piven approach.) So long as Rolling Stone Magazine chooses our commanders and a commited communist sets our rules of engagement we cannot win in Afghanistan. But you are correct: it will not be the tribes and terrain that defeat us.
Posted by: vermindust at July 28, 2010 09:47 AM (YW34P)
1
Dear President McAwesome, Thanks for the socialism. It will take days to undo the damage you've done. And congratulations on those poll numbers! It's hard work becoming that unpopular so quick. Kisses!!
That was my message to the prez.
Posted by: Dr Spank at July 27, 2010 02:29 PM (jbVm4)
2
Looks like maybe a little love bite, you know, the kind you get from behind . . . .
Posted by: raincityjazz at July 27, 2010 06:11 PM (9NGSN)
Christina Hendricks fends off lesbian advances on The View
...even the Mad Men star could not hide her blushes when she got chatted up on live television by a female host.
The curvaceous beauty, who plays Joan Holloway on the hit TV show, was appearing on U.S. TV's The View when guest host Alexandra Wentworth told her she was her 'girl crush'.
...
At one point she placed her hand seductively on Christina's leg.
1
iirc (and I'm truly sorry if I do), Wentworth made the comment, on national TV, that she was headed for a lesbian relationship before she met lil Steph, so this is pretty much par for the course.
6
I love how if it were a man, being that sexually forward towards any of those women: SEXUAL HARRAAAAASSSSMENT!!! But no, it's cool, trendy, fun, lesbianism, so it's a-okay.
Wentworth fits in really well with that bunch.
Tangonine: Amish Yard Sale??
Posted by: ktgreat at July 29, 2010 04:01 PM (UT1k3)
Posted by: Dr Spank at July 27, 2010 09:41 PM (xO+6C)
17
Today's my wedding aniversery.....and you just burned an image of Dita into my brain. Hopefully my wife will be unknowing of the inspiration of my motives.
Posted by: olredtrk at July 27, 2010 10:59 PM (6qzMf)
Today? Not a good day.
Today I feel like the part where Meg says "You can't just die and leave me on this stinking Earth without you." But I'm trying to feel like this:
We forget, we all forget, how huge and amazing and miraculous the world is. I am grateful for my life, I truly am.
Keep your chin up. It will get a little easier, by fits and starts, as time goes by (my experience anyway).
You might also remember: The only way for the goodness and humanity of those that have died to succeed is for us left behind to carry in our hearts the precious memories of their loved ones. Also, it's OK to cry and cuss.
Posted by: olredtrk at July 27, 2010 09:17 AM (6qzMf)
2
In times like this I often think that the Moron Love and sympathy is a comparatively small and insignificant thing considering the circumstances but I also know that when I've grieved the smallest things could make a huge difference. I've been praying for you and your BFF's friends and family in this difficult time and my heart goes out to you. Loss is hard when we're in this world even though we know that Love is eternal and life itself is but a small and passing thing.
Posted by: Douglas at July 27, 2010 01:00 AM (uU+Ss)
2....with a jackhammer powered spiked dildo soaked in hot sauce.
Given this relatively gentle remonstrance, I take it you feel Chris Mathews could be salvaged - that there is yet hope for his eventual mental recovery?
You have a kind heart, eddiebear.
Posted by: Steamboat McGoo at July 28, 2010 05:08 PM (/cH23)
Uh-Oh, Climate Change and Illegal Immigration Have Teamed Up to Deal a One-Two Punch to the United States
(S)cientists are predicting another consequence of climate change: mass migration to the United States. Between 1.4 million and 6.7 million Mexicans could migrate to the U.S. by 2080 as climate change reduces crop yields and agricultural production in Mexico, according to a study published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The number could amount to 10% of the current population of Mexicans ages 15 to 65.
Oh Dear God, what can we do? Wait I know we can adopted the green house gas emissions targets set at Copenhagen. It’s the only way to preserve the American way of life.
Or we can look at this as what it is, scare tactics to try and drum up support for the Cap and Trade bill and comprehensive immigration reform, and probably any other languishing social program you care to name.
Nuthin' wrong with the border than mines and guns won't fix. And if the "Earth is going to be DESTROYED"tm then we can justify exactly that.
(Of course i can pay for it. $250 gets you a licence to shoot anyone within fifty meters of the border. We can raise a million dollars in a month and Da Boys will supply their own ammunition. Crude but effective.)
Posted by: vermindust at July 27, 2010 09:34 AM (YW34P)
5
As usual, the Libtards have cause and effect mixed up again...
Illegal Aliens cause Global Warming not the other way around. Look at SoCal, at AZ...It's fucking hot there right? I rest my case. So, yeah, what vermindust said...shoot an alien, save the planet.
Posted by: cbullitt at July 27, 2010 12:44 PM (M/WbE)
A question for the law talking guys
Does anyone besides me find it a little unsettling that the judge is taking so long to hand down a ruling on the SB 1070 injunction? It seems like if she was going to deny the injunction she would have had a decision on Friday or this morning. The fact that she hasn't released one makes me think she is really digging for precedent to justify the injunction.
Now some words of wisdom from Lionel Hutz (Your case won in 30 minutes or your pizza is free)
2
Well with my legal education gleaned from law and order I have no idea what that meant, but it seems she is cutting it a little fine when the law takes effect in 2.5 more days.
Posted by: chad98036 at July 26, 2010 11:20 PM (WNcvq)
3
No reason to rush yet. It doesn't matter if she finishes tonight, tomorrow, or Wednesday at 9pm. There'll be no difference in the legal effect of the ruling (though there may be some...interesting, shall we say, impacts on the appeals posture) so long as it comes before Thursday.
Moreover, she's going to want to get this right. Whichever way she decides is guaranteed to be appealed and guaranteed to be picked over by pretty much everyone in the country. So, it's not something she'll be eager to mess up.
She worked over the weekend, that's for sure, and her clerk did to. Probably polishing the thing now. Keep in mind that she has other things on her docket that can't just be shoved aside.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at July 26, 2010 11:46 PM (1TvCg)
4Keep in mind that she has other things on her docket that can't just be shoved aside.
Psshah, I say! I want answers now.
Well you guys are the lawyers so I'll defer to your expertise, I just get a little worried given the string of stupid reasoning in legal opinions that has been evident the past few years.
Posted by: chad98036 at July 27, 2010 12:15 AM (WNcvq)
5
I think she is desparate to find a reason for an injuction but has not found it yet. If she was ideologically disposed she would have issued it. Or it could be the issue is complex and she is being honest in dealing with it and trying to write a error proof order either way. Or she is delaying the injuction for maximum political effect.
Posted by: Federale at July 27, 2010 10:41 AM (PWWdd)