January 31, 2010
There have been a couple of proposals, but they've thus far all languished in committee. The NRA has been opposed to the ban, because most of the bills have been written in ways that would probably make life difficult for birdhunters, particularly upland and waterfowlers who use dogs when they hunt. Naturally most of the PETA/HSUS set don't care, as they want hunting banned anyway. PA of course is pretty much in a perpetual contest with Texas to be the huntin'est state in the union, there's a strong hunting and gun culture here, so the bill is seeing some resistance.
So we now have Bob Barker dropping $1 million into a group that's been actively pushing for a ban. The good news is he didn't give it to HSUS, which is a proven capable organization. The bad news is politicians are whores and cowards, and a million dollars can still buy votes, and can buy ad space and be used to stir up a shitstorm, and pigeon shoots aren't exactly the most PC thing in the world.
I'm inclined to defend the PA pigeon shoots. For starters, the anti-Nanny instinct kicks in, I hate, hate being told by my "betters" what to do, I hate being told you can't do this. My first reaction is almost always fuck you, yes I can. Seriously, every time I see the PETA set screeching for a ban on the shoots my first instinct is to buy a nice double, break some clays and then sign up for the next pigeon shoot out of pure spite, just like my first thought is, why yes, a double bacon cheeseburger would be tasty right now, every time I hear the PETA set cry about eating meat.
I also don't like politicians getting into the habit of banning everyfuckingthing that comes down the pike that people don't care for, the last thing I want is a million little Nanny Mike Bloombergs running around banning every one of life's pleasures. There's also a good bit of cultural elitism involved in the push for a ban, most of the published pictures and video are of white trash types from poorly run venues doing these shoots, not the respectable looking hunters in the old days.
Are the pigeon shoots a blood sport? Yes, but properly run, there's no reason it can't be done with as much consideration for the pigeon's welfare as hunting, and most people aren't opposed to hunting. I know I'll probably take some flak for defending this activity, which I can live with.
That said, if the PETA set start spamming or screeching, I'm locking comments, I don't need to read the squealing and threats from PETArds.
H/T
Posted by: doubleplusundead at
02:19 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 554 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: alexthechick at January 31, 2010 02:48 PM (TtXKB)
I agree on the general principle (as dpud stated) that you can't go around banning everything someone finds unpleasant. Plus pigeons are basically rats with wings; filthy creatures that deserve to be gunned down mercilessly. New York City could do with a good pigeon shoot, as could Tokyo.
Posted by: Hermit Dave at January 31, 2010 03:29 PM (WhFvm)
Posted by: JoeCollins at January 31, 2010 04:04 PM (jtJig)
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at January 31, 2010 07:59 PM (k5nPY)
Posted by: Go_Fish at January 31, 2010 10:04 PM (+eYLq)
Posted by: eddiebear at February 01, 2010 01:39 PM (wnU1W)
Posted by: J.M Browing at February 01, 2010 09:11 PM (LBhpC)
Posted by: J.M Browing at February 01, 2010 09:33 PM (LBhpC)
Posted by: wifi extender at February 17, 2011 10:51 AM (k+H1o)
Posted by: zara at March 14, 2011 10:28 PM (ziZas)
Posted by: xx at May 04, 2011 10:45 PM (4Vkpb)
Wonderful and resourceful article on how to simplify````
<a href="wadsen'>http://www.wadsen.com/">wadsen led</a>
Posted by: wadsen lighting at October 14, 2011 03:10 AM (Z4c96)
Posted by: wadsen lighting at October 14, 2011 03:11 AM (0kYdc)
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.








